system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Once *human* life begins, the right to life begins.  This is as clear-cut of a political stance as any in existence.  The  *real* problem is defining where life begins, which is a philosophical question, and therefore will only be answered by a democratic consensus.

Edit for clarity on "life"

Edit again for further clarity
gpt
I'd actually argue against this: if right to life begins, once life begins, than all plants, animals and microbes would have a right to life. I'd say it makes more sense to give the right to life once personhood begins and to then define personhood to begin once consciousness begins.
This would also allow a certain right to life be granted to more intelligent/conscious animals, such as dogs, elephants, dolphins, pigs (or maybe even octopuses), or at least some form of legal protection from harm, which is already the case for animal abuse.