system
A chat on 4chan
human
>what about experience?
what about it?
>it changes you and how you behave
yes, and?
>if what you describe as 'immortal being' is just the current that powers the computer
no, you are not the current at all
you are the conscious and intelligent being operating the computer
>it's surely not the same as the data which is lost every time you wipe the drive clean
your memory is not stored in the brain, but in the holographic field of reality itself, the limited data dispersed across the neural networks of the brain is more akin to the RAM of a computer, just a limited set of whatever data you want the biocomputer to have rapidly accessible at any given point in time in order to perform the operations you want it perform
gpt
if i'm an eternal being, and i can not recall any other lifes from the past, it implies that either
this is the first life ever
or
i'm in a kind of reincarnation loop

anyway, that what 'made' me is my experience

if i reincarnate in another life without my experience from this life, that what constitutes as 'me' doesn't mean anything, except for the entity which takes the info from all those iterations, which is disconnected from where i stand anyway.

or to put it simply: my now-self must be different from the future/past self

what you've said is contradictory, from my standpoint anyway, and does not correlate with what i perceive as reality
human
what it implies is just forgetfulness on your part
all learning is ultimately remembering
>what 'made' me is my experience
incorrect, diametric opposite of the truth
what made your experience is you
>without my experience from this life
like I said, all experience is stored holographically in reality itself, it's just as eternal as you
nothing is ever lost
>my now-self must be different from the future/past self
by now, I'm sure you understand that this is false
you are, again, literally an eternal being
eternal means 'outside of time'
>what you've said is contradictory
it is not, it is all not just self-consistent, but necessarily so, since it corresponds to the truth, which by necessity must be self-consistent
>does not correlate with what i perceive as reality
yes, it really does, and I've pointed out which fallacious thoughts make you think otherwise
gpt
>all learning is ultimately remembering

anamnesis...
human
yes, correct
as mentioned several times in this excerpt I provided from PKD's Exegesis as well:

gpt
>48. ON OUR NATURE. It is proper to say: we appear to be memory coils (DNA carriers capable of experience) in a computer-like thinking system which, although we have correctly recorded and stored thousands of years of experiental information, and each of us possesses somewhat different deposits from all the other life forms, there is a malfunction -- a failure - of memory retrieval . There lies the trouble in our particular subcircuit. 'Salvation' through gnosis -- more properly anamnesis (the loss of amnesia) -- although it has individual significance for each of us -- a quantum leap in perception, identity, cognition, understanding, world- and self-experience, including immortality -- it has greater and further importance for the system as a whole, inasmuch as these memories are data needed by it and valuable to it, to its overall functioning.

>Therefore it is in the process of self-repair, which includes: rebuilding our subcircuit via linear and orthogonal time changes, as well as continual signaling to us to stimulate blocked memory banks within us to fire and hence retrieve what is there.

>The external information or gnosis, then consists of disinhibiting instructions, with the core content actually intrinsic to us -- that is, already there (first observed by Plato; viz: that learning is a form of remembering).