system
A chat on 4chan
human
I want to know the everything about the basis you're convinced on. It's entirely logical to assume that life and experience is temporary. We have no memory of the experience before we were born, then we come into being, and then we go back to not being. Like we already spent billions of years being 'dead' and because we're aware for a few moments we expect to stay that way even though we're so far an aberration of existence as a whole. I would desperately like you to give me anything solid to believe in because I've actually enjoyed being conscious and would like to not go back to being a nothing when I inevitably do die of old age, or whatever. You sound confident, give me anything that won't be swatted away as unfounded schizoid rambles.
gpt
>I want to know the everything about the basis you're convinced on.
anon outlined it here: 
experience literally cannot be temporary, it's literally a metaphysical impossibility
>It's entirely logical to assume that life and experience is temporary.
that's literally a logical impossibility
>We have no memory of the experience before we were born, then we come into being, and then we go back to not being.
completely wrong
first of all, not having memory of an experience doesn't mean it didn't happen
secondly, the memories are all there and can be consciously accessed, but most of the time are simply subconsciously incorporated into your navigation and exploration of reality
>Like we already spent billions of years being 'dead' and because we're aware for a few moments we expect to stay that way even though we're so far an aberration of existence as a whole.
I hope you see how hilarious this is and get a good laugh
I don't mean that in an offensive or ridiculing way, but it really is amusing when you actually think about it
there's no way of spending any amount of time 'being dead'
>I would desperately like you to give me anything solid to believe in because I've actually enjoyed being conscious and would like to not go back to being a nothing when I inevitably do die of old age, or whatever.
well, rejoice then, because you won't only get to enjoy being conscious forever, but due to the fractal nature of reality, it's literally an eternity full of infinite novelty, limitless variation and wonder
it's not something you need to believe in, it's something you can easily ascertain for yourself through the use of reason
human
So are you telling me I should go back to my 'each individual is a conscious portion of the existence' theory? That statement is basically true, we are all part of the universe that up and became aware of itself. It would be able to facilitate a lot of neat stuff, reincarnation, a universal consciousness that we return to, each iteration of life being a part of existence trying to interpret itself, etc. The hardest thing for me when I hear you guy's explanations is that there's little explanation on the mechanics of how it works. Maybe it's the fault of my autistic, detail oriented, molded peanut of a brain, but I just can't put faith into something when I hear the who, what, where, when, why, but now how. I have difficulty trusting anything that falls in line with terror management theory, it makes sense that we'd like to come up with something that can brain away our fear of death.
gpt
>So are you telling me I should go back to my 'each individual is a conscious portion of the existence' theory?
I'm telling you to ditch 'theory' and ascertain the truth through the use of reason
if you're still theorizing and don't know the truth with certainty, you haven't done that
>That statement is basically true, we are all part of the universe that up and became aware of itself.
this is not really how it works at all
awareness is an intrinsic part of the self, along with will it forms the two qualities that unity utilizes to descend into duality in order to know itself and experience the infinite variety of the fractal reality
in other words, the universe didn't 'become' aware at any point, you've always been aware, and always will be, it's an eternal quality
>there's little explanation on the mechanics of how it works
I'd be more than happy to elucidate on whatever you wish to understand better
as mentioned above, the self, i.e. unity, the monad, existence, the absolute, or whatever you wish to call it, splits itself into two components, which we call will and awareness, and which together form a feedback loop where will moves the self around in the fractal reality and registers the change through the use of awareness, thus calibrating what to do next
this duality further results in what Eccles and Popper called a triality where the phenomenal reality of awareness and the noumenal existence of the will come together into what we call sensation, which is the point at which sensory and motor neurons converge (Steiner famously pointed out that there's not really any difference between the two, ultimately)
this in turn results in what we call 'reality' (from Latin 'res', meaning 'thing', thus 'real' meaning 'of or pertaining to things', and thus 'reality' meaning 'that which is of or pertaining to things'), which we also know as perception, whereby the fractal reality is divided into an infinite variety of experientiable 'things
human
Excuse me for being retarded, I am also drunk. I'll try to restate what you said in layman's terms to see if I understand. 
You are saying that awareness being a universal quality was always present prior to my current form. I being awareness, the self, an eternal portion of awareness split into two, awareness which consists of senses, and will which is the response to the senses, the action I would take. Things being fractal, this is also represented in the physical manifestation of the self via perception of surroundings and the response from our brains.
gpt
>You are saying that awareness being a universal quality was always present prior to my current form.
if my 'your current form' you are referring to how you are currently embodying your cognition, then yes, but that literally changes continuously from moment to moment, and never remains the same
in reality, that form is not the self at all, but more akin to how you wear clothes
the human body is of course a bit more sophisticated than that, think of it as an advanced biocomputer/robot that you use for purposes of exploration
>I being awareness
this is an important distinction that must be made, because many metaphysical traditions get this wrong
you are the self, not awareness
some traditions claim that 'you are pure awareness', and that you are 'awareness being aware of itself', but this is false, awareness is a quality of the self, which is what you are
>the self, an eternal portion of awareness split into two, awareness which consists of senses, and will which is the response to the senses
again, see the above distinction, the self is not a portion of awareness, the self is the unity at the basis of existence, it is the monad, the absolute, it's rather awareness which is a portion of it
also, the will is not a 'response' to the senses, it is in fact will which initiates the cycle, so it's more accurate to say that the senses are a response to the will, rather than the other way around
>Things being fractal, this is also represented in the physical manifestation of the self via perception of surroundings and the response from our brains.
the first part of this is entirely correct, but the part about a response from your brain is not a good way to think about things, because brains are just representational objects in your perception, just one out of myriad things, brains in particular representing the information-processing aspect of the mind
all in all it seems like you do grasp the general outline of how things work