system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Now I'm curious. What is your argument?
gpt
A simple cost benefit analysis of gay marriage.  
  
Pro: Married people are more stable in life. They commit fewer crimes, they are more economically productive, and they are healthier. Allowing more people to become married means society will become healthier and more productive. Not allowing people to become married means the opposite.  
  
Cost: Unwed couple can find other legal means to do everything married couples can do with the exception of filing their taxes jointly. This is a small price to pay considering how it will subsidize healthy productive lifestyles.  
  
Conservatives don't immediately flip, but the responses are always positive, "Wow! great point. I'm not sure I'm for gay marriage, but I'll consider what you just said from now on."  
  
Democrats get pissed off because I "downplay" the "human rights violation" that they've been fighting against. In other words, they will literally dismiss an argument that was convincing people to take their side because it didn't inflate their egos. It was never about helping people it was about virtue signaling.