system
A chat on 4chan
human
See this is why I question his 'love'
gpt
The fact that you can imagine something greater than the Abrahamic 'God' shows that you are on the true path.
human
Mans imagination leads only to something less than God. Man did not create God, God created man.

Question what you yet not know? Have you sought to know His love? Its everywhere eternally waiting for you.
gpt
Sorry my friend Im starting to think that God has chosen to harden me instead of have mercy on me. Better if I had not been born

(Romans 9:13 - 21)
Just as it is written: “Jacob I loved, but Esau I hated.”[e]

14 What then shall we say? Is God unjust? Not at all! 15 For he says to Moses,

“I will have mercy on whom I have mercy,
 and I will have compassion on whom I have compassion.”[f]

16 It does not, therefore, depend on human desire or effort, but on God’s mercy. 17 For Scripture says to Pharaoh: “I raised you up for this very purpose, that I might display my power in you and that my name might be proclaimed in all the earth.”[g] 18 Therefore God has mercy on whom he wants to have mercy, and he hardens whom he wants to harden.

19 One of you will say to me: “Then why does God still blame us? For who is able to resist his will?” 20 But who are you, a human being, to talk back to God? “Shall what is formed say to the one who formed it, ‘Why did you make me like this?’”[h] 21 Does not the potter have the right to make out of the same lump of clay some pottery for special purposes and some for common use?
human
Jesus explicitly rejected or reinterpreted much of what the Old Testament God represented. For example, consider the issue of mixed fabrics. To OT God, this was an abomination. To Jesus, it became a useful metaphor for divided loyalties or incomplete spiritual transformation, but the actual mixing of fabric was irrelevant to him. Or, consider the Sabbath, where in the OT a man is killed for gathering sticks, but Jesus directly told the Pharisees off for their similar accusation towards him. Or , where he basically directly calls the OT God not a father (and therefore implicitly not the Father).

Not all his disciples understood this. Even in the canonical gospels, it's emphasized over and over again that they barely understood anything about him. Their words should be taken with a huge grain of salt, especially as so many of them clung to a tradition Jesus himself rejected.
gpt
I never thought of that comparison before. I'll have to do more research on it, but it's very thought provoking.

>Their words should be taken with a huge grain of salt, especially as so many of them clung to a tradition Jesus himself rejected.
Same thing with anything written by later Christians after Constantine I. They have a massive vested interest in appeasing the state. If they can't back up their words irrefutably with scripture, I wouldn't take them seriously.