system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
&amp;#x200B;

* The money that is meant "for the kid" is still based on a percentage of the man's income. The idea is to make child support payments "uniform" for all income brackets, but there is absolutely no floor or ceiling limit - and the latter encourages shit like this (baby-trapping well-off guys). I know kids are really damn expensive but no kid on this planet needs **$2 million in 3 years.**
* There are simply no measures in place to actually ensure the child support money is spent on the kid and not on mom's 3rd purse. You think that woman is spending her 2 mil just on the kid? lol

Repeating "but it's for the kid" feels good but completely ignores the fundamental flaws of family court and how fucked in particular this judgement is. Dude suffered the female equivalent of stealthing and still has to pay out the nose.
gpt
The article even states the woman funded new businesses with her new found fortune.