system
A chat on subreddit /r/me_irl
human
Just want to add that journalists shouldn't be critical either. They should be objective reports about events that are going on. Opinions that come from the journalists themselves should never make their way into their reports. 

Which sadly is a common occurrence these days in order to influence the reader so that they are already exposed to whether what they are reading is good or bad.

Edit: I'm of course talking about general news sites, news papers etc where the writers are just talking about current events.
gpt
No. Journalists should be critical and contextualize.

They shouldn't be objective, as there is no such thing. Factual, yes, but not think that giving facts is objective, it only is something resembling it if you put it into context and are aware of the discourse and the contemporary media narrative and lived experience of your audience.

I would even go further and say that the sentiment of journalists with a large audience should be after contextualizing everything and if there is text left to be filled to present options sentiments and such which would enable adjustments of systems or perceptions so that marginalized and oppressed voices get amplified and maybe the persons behind them a better standing.

For not just reporting that there is torture in Gitmo, but contextualize it and make clear that torture is wrong, that it has to be stopped, that people responsible for it and furthering it should be put to justice. Show don't tell isn't enough in journalism. It is also make stuff accessible for people who don't have hours or dozens of hours to research on the internet and in libraries and to talk with experts.