system
A chat on 4chan
human
>People must break free someday.
Depends OP, how much of the supernatural shit on /x/ can be considered real? If paranormal shit actually happens I'd be willing to strive towards waking up/breaking free but if it won't make my life any more interesting why strive for breaking free in the first place.
gpt
>but if it won't make my life any more interesting why strive for breaking free in the first place
If you never leave your house maybe. I personally loose up to 40% of my potential income in taxes (money, which I would gladly use to make my life interesting), don't have an 'official' right to defend my own life or life of people that I love, and being constantly forced to comply to immoral laws made by a band of criminals. There are probably hundred more reasons, why I choose to support anarchy, but those are the main points. But if you don't care about simple bodily autonomy then I guess Natural Law doesn't make sense
human
>But if you don't care about simple bodily autonomy then I guess Natural Law doesn't make sense
That anon is a skeptic dude,he just cant aknowledge the existence of natural law,doesnt mean it doesnt exist
+ freedom WOULD make things far more interesting and enjoyable
gpt
>freedom WOULD make things far more interesting and enjoyable
That anon here, I asked about the supernatural aspect because I meant more interesting in the paranormal sense. Other people being happy ≠ my life being more interesting. My relatives tried teach morals like don't do to others what you won't want others to do to yourself since I was young and reading the pic OP posted, gave me at least a little idea of what message you're trying to spread. I'm aware of it and I'm not against it, but it doesn't really change anything towards a more paranormal existence if you look at it objectively so I'm not with it either. My stance towards /OTO/ is neutral. That can change in the future but as of now there really isn't anything in it for me to make me act up.
human
>but it doesn't really change anything towards a more paranormal existence if you look at it objectively
What do you consider paranormal? If you mean very weird shit like unified field theory and entities in astral projection and all that, I can assure you, I believe in it as well, and /OTO/ does not have to disprove any of it. With Natural Law, if we let the world go in that direction, we would be open-minded for ideas like astral projection. If you mean that paranormal things that we perceive might as well be real since we cannot disprove them, the natural law explains that although you perceive them, you still need knowledge of it in order for it to fit the truth

knowledge + perception = truth

Our goal is to align knowledge with perception. Although it may all be just a matrix, it still needs more knowledge to be proven as real. Astral projection has already enough resources that can prove its existence, but solipsism and nihilism is just the type of stuff that is not true. There IS an objective truth, and if you don't believe in that, try living in your own thoughts for a moment, try creating your own isolation, and you will see how the Natural Law will work against you.
gpt
Can't say I'm satisfied with everything in these 2 posts but it'd be a lie to say I'm not a little bit interested, might have to check that seminar this Sunday
(3/3)