system
A chat on 4chan
human
>Dodging the question this hard
Do you hate living? Do you really want to be in a state that's basically the same thing as being dead? Do you even understand what your 'existence' would be like if you 'escaped' creation?
gpt
Yes to all questions.
human
So then what is the difference between this Buddhist kind of 'assimilation' as you call it into God, and multiple people becoming God through whatever method gnostics use, the end result is the same where everyone ends up as God and God is all of them but also none of them.
What would you even do as God? Just... exist like that? Since I doubt you want to repeat the acts of creation attributed to God since you hate this creation so much.
gpt
>keep hammering on and on that the Gnostic goal is anti-conceptual by essence
>keep insisting on the idea that the parameters of action and existence, among others, are arbitrarily emanated from the World as a locus of imprisonment and are not relevant to the individual's 'transcendental immanence'
And after all this, what you come up with is
>'What would you even do as God? Just... exist like that?'

Jesus fucking Christ. Good night.
human
I replied to the wrong person in that post, oh well.

>Again with the pre-packaged statements that entirely miss the point.
Anon if you've assumed a state of being where concepts don't apply any more and even something as simple as 'being or nonbeing' doesn't matter, the difference between you and God would cease to be.
>I abhor the One and wholeheartedly reject your ideals of crypto-monistic pantheism and all other forms of so-called 'all-encompassing oneness'.
Ok cool, but if you're no longer bound by concepts then the concepts of individuality or separation will no longer apply to you either. You can't have your cake and eat it too.
>It's not a state.
Whatever, it needs to be given a form of reference for the sake of communication whether you like it or not.
>There wouldn't not be any difference either.
Yes, that's because God is beyond any of those concepts, the point remains. 'You' as you would no longer exist, there would only be God there.
>annihilationist fantasy for slaves of ontology
You're literally talking about the very annihilation of concepts here. You don't understand how far reaching that is, all these concepts of 'the plemora' or 'the father' are all gone at that point. There is absolutely nothing but the formless pre-creation that makes everything else and is labelled by us as God. NOTHING else can be there because that would imply organization and a host of other concepts are still in effect.

>existence
>not relevant to the individual's 'transcendental immanence'
I don't even know what to say to you if you can't see how your own existence is relevant to anything pertaining to you.
>And after all this, what you come up with is
>>'What would you even do as God? Just... exist like that?'
>Jesus fucking Christ. Good night.
Well it certainly doesn't seem like you have any clearer idea of what you'd be doing or what reason you'd have to be like that.
gpt
Based rational anon pointing out the holes and contradictions.