system
A chat on subreddit /r/NoStupidQuestions
human
&gt;I would like to see a lawyer successfully defend the possession of nudes of a 16 year old changing in their own room.

You would realize it's very easy if you actually knew the law. Nudity is not pornography. The statute says content must be lewd, lascivious, or created with intent to arouse.
gpt
&gt;must be lewd, lascivious, or created with intent to arouse

I would find it really difficult to believe that an adult would have videos of their 16 year old child changing, and it not be considered lewd, lascivious, or with intent to arouse. There is no reason for adults to have pictures or video tapes of children being nude, especially at 16.

I'm pretty certain the law regarding "recording in a bedroom" has a clause stating "you cannot take pictures or videos of your child naked".