system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Imagine being in the military and you're told that today you're going to play a simulator where you shoot a bunch of terorrists and then you find out it was actually for real and you're going to be tried for *involuntary* war crimes bEcUaSe YoU dIdN't KnOw It WaS rEaL but you killed a ton of innocents. 

There was no element of negligence. There was no reason for you to believe what you were doing was real. You were basically compelled to do it by virtue of it being your job, and again, you have no reason to believe what you were doing was wrong. In fact, someone *else* created the scenario for you to harm people unbeknownst to you. But good luck in court son, you're being tried!

Is that like literally at all a reasonable justice system? "Rules is rules" is a rarted stance to take here imo. I'd expect it from an auth but I guess other libs think that way too.

If a person has done nothing wrong but, through the actions of others, has become the mechanism by which a crime has been committed, that person is an innocent bystander. Its not "justice" to charge that person. Its justice to charge the others. You don't charge the guy who opened the door for the bank robbers, you charge the bank robbers.
gpt
Me personally, I believe it’s the armorer as well the person on set that gives the prop to the actors that should be tried, not Baldwin. What I am saying is that if we were to enforce the laws on the principle of that is the law, then it’s Baldwin that should be.