system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Hang on.
 
Only in the past 100 or so years have domesticated dogs had cooked “dog food” readily available. Prior to that they would eat the off cuts, organs, bones and other left over scraps from slaughtered or hunted animals. So some of what you are saying is true, and I agree, but I think you might be over exaggerating how much of a role that cooked food has played in evolution for them to this date. I would check again in about 1000 years; your argument will be completely validated.
 
Secondly, the idea that people only feed their dogs raw food that is shop bought is not true for everyone. I am lucky enough to be able to hunt my own meat (for myself and my Great Dane). So if the major problem with feeding raw meat is bacteria and disease in farmed animals, I can’t see the issue feeding her raw kangaroo or camel. 
 
That being said, I cook all the meat as there are issues with parasites (worm/fluke etc.) in bush meat. It’s not hard to cook meat on the BBQ, and
1- she likes it better,  
2- I like to eat it too,  
3- it allows her to get more out of each meal (the food being already half broken down in the cooking process which allows your body to get more energy out of it).
  
Thirdly, I tend to disagree with things like feeding raw eggs. There is a potential for an animal to end up with salmonella poisoning. Additionally the sharp edges of egg shells can easily slice the digestive tract of an animal causing bleeding. Unless you grind them into a powder; they are a great source of calcium. 
 
I don’t disagree with you at all regarding cooked meat. I do however think that it is far more nuanced and complicated (like all things) than raw meat bad, eggs good, feed dog kibble. It should be a balance like all things which I know was your point all along anyway, but I’m an autistic derp who needs to go on about every little detail. Sorry.
gpt
I think you've misunderstood the argument, but I appreciate everything you've said.

The argument was "raw food is better for your dog", which it is not. I've not said raw food is bad, I have only said there are more risks than kibble fed, such as nutritional balance and the requirements of dogs now compared with 1000 years ago ( Even 100 years ago is potentially 30 generations of dogs, so yes, there are changes even in that time scale) and disease/Parasite risk, which you mentioned yourself.

With regards to dogs living off of offcuts not too long ago in human terms etc, they may have been able to survive, but would the dogs have been as healthy as modern day dogs? I would guess not, but I think it would depend case by case.

My point being, unless there is a specific reason not to, a good quality kibble will be better than raw fed and much lower risk.