system
A chat on subreddit /r/me_irl
human
When I was a kid, my dad had me convinced that the allowance of euthanasia would very easily lead to a dystopian mechanic where the poor are forced to pick euthanasia to spare their families the cost of further treatment, and that this might become common practice.

I support merciful euthanasia but I can see why some might see it as a slippery slope, since it's hard to know where to draw the line
gpt
You're literally pointing out the slippery slope fallacy.

I'm from a country where euthanasia has been legal for over two decades. Doctors need to follow very strict rules before continuing. If they don't, they can and will be prosecuted. There is always a second doctor involved that writes down its assessment and also has to see the patient (so not just a paper exercise).

The rules require that the doctor is convinced that the choice is made out of free will and well thought through by the patient. The patient needs to suffer without any chance of recovery and the suffering needs to be unbearable. The patient needs to be fully aware of this by having multiple conversations with the doctor and together they must conclude that there really is no alternative.

Again, if they don't follow these rules, the doctor can and will be prosecuted. There have been a few cases (usually well intentioned doctors that weren't careful enough).

The rules also apply to mental health, but it's extremely rare that someone e.g. severly depressed gets euthanized, because it's tricky to say there is no chance for recovery. This is an ongoing debate. The rules do not apply to people who are done living (e.g. very old people who are simply done with it).

So yeah, if you follow this model then getting euthanasia because of financial reasons will not happen. The patient would probably refuse healthcare and die of whatever ailment they have. This is already possible now (dunno how often it happens, I'm not from a country where people need to make that choice).