system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
its based on a framework of freudian-marxist logic that goes something like this:

&gt;We have found the institutions in which the economic and the sexual interests of the authoritarian system meet. We have to ask ourselves how this comes about. This question is also answered by character-analysis, provided one does not exclude such questions from character-analytic investigation. Suppression of the \[25\] natural sexuality in the child, particularly of its genital sexuality, makes the child apprehensive, shy, obedient, afraid of authority, "good" and "adjusted" in the authoritarian sense; it paralyzes the rebellious forces because any rebellion is laden with anxiety; it produces, by inhibiting sexual curiosity and sexual thinking in the child, a general inhibition of thinking and of critical faculties. In brief, the goal of sexual suppression is thin of producing ai individual who is adjusted to tthoritarian order and who will submit to it in spite of all misery and degradation. At first, the child has to adjust to the structure of the authoritarian miniature state, the family; this makes it capable of later subordination to the general authoritarian system. The formation of the authoritarian structure takes place through the anchoring of sexual inhibition and sexual anxiety. The result of this process is fear of freedom, and a conservative, reactionary mentality. IMMEMth aids -6te mass inclividuarpaan but also structure an intereilIMM supporting the authoritarian order. The suppression of natural sexual gratification leads to various kinds of substitute gratifications. Natural aggression, for example, becomes brutal sadism which then is an essential mass-psychological factor in imperialistic wars.

And as the other guy says its all power dynamics as parts of marxist's interpretation of hegelian dialectics. Marx even said the family structure was opressive, as the father opresses the son, which sounds like the most teenage angsty thing ive ever read.
gpt
&gt;It's based in some nonsense with no connection to reality written by two debunked German edgelords who never got past the 'angry 13 year old' stage of development, and who should only be studied in a historical context.

Fixed that for you, and thanks - that actually makes a lot of sense.