system
A chat on 4chan
human
what science terms 'evolution' is merely the adaptation of organisms to their environment. There is no 'progress' going on, that is just an idiosyncrasy of our times (and implies the environment somehow progresses linearly in danger to survival)

Moreover, the mechanism through which this adaptation happens is not random mutation and subsequent natural selection. The lie is the 'random' mutation. Recently tests were performed on fruitflies where random parts of the genes were mutated. The scientists did countless mutations and none of them resulted in a viable fruitfly, all of them were crippled in some way. From this they calculated that if mutation was truly random, the whole lifespan of life on earth wouldn't be enough to even reach a few succesful mutations, let alone the functional diversity of life we see today.

In truth the mutation is a directed process driven by consciousness, in the sense of (yes) Lamarckism. Science is beginning to catch up to this by discovering epigenetics but really it is a conscious driven process which they are nowhere close to uncovering (in fact they probably never will get to the bigger picture, science in its modern form is reductive and degenerative).
gpt
>There is no 'progress' going on, that is just an idiosyncrasy of our times
The only people that see evolution as progressing toward something are pepe with no understanding of the theory or science in general.
human
and the idea of progress is intrinsically linked with science as well since science thinks it is advancing human knowledge

when in reality it is permeating existing knowledge in a distorted form onto the general public, which was better off without this imperfect, flawed knowledge

'the theory of evolution' is a prime example of this, it has wrought atheism, misplaced ideas of eugenics, and social darwinism and all sorts of nonsense
gpt
The scientific understanding of evolution very explicitly states that there is no end goal, no 'progress' being made. It is change. It is not advancement.
Again you show you have no understanding of what you are trying to criticize.
human
not an argument. But this was agreed in by my friend who has a phd in biology and studied the epigenetics of kilifish so I'm bound to think it's you who has the simplified view


>Thus, from the war of nature, from famine and death, the most exalted object which we are capable of conceiving, namely, the production of the higher animals, directly follows. There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been originally breathed into a few forms or into one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed law of gravity, from so simple a beginning endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.

>One general law, leading to the advancement of all organic beings, namely, multiply, vary, let the strongest live and the weakest die.

guess who said these things, friendo


These particles are assembled by conscious driven force, yes, be it by a creator or spirit or on their own. The temporal picture of bow this happened as put forward by science is of course blatantly wrong. Actually it is hard to even call it wrong as there is so much gaps and omission in the picture they have. I say this as a physics phd