system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Iceland is 100% run on geothermal and hydropower, Austria is 57% hydropower, Costa Rica is 72% hydroelectric and 15% geothermal and those the first couple countries I looked up thinking about it - France’s excellent adoption of nuclear power does show it to be an excellent power source, but other emissions-free power is possible and hydroelectric power as a renewable energy quite viable.
gpt
The exemple of Iceland is quite specific as it is on a zone with a lot of geological activity and therefore can be applied only to similar zones. But I get where you're going. And I'm not saying renewable energy is not a viable source. (Just reread myself, and yes I did, which is a bit exaggerated but still close from the truth)

I'm saying renewable energy as a cost of production/creating waste, is not as efficient as nuclear. And right now if we want to power tomorrow's world we need nuclear. Renewable energy is still to this day asking for a lot of ressources to be made, taken care of, replaced. 

But yeah I'd be all for something less hazardous, but right now, we need nuclear. I think America just achieved fusion for the first time, and the European Kadarach project is on the same way. Which might make our future a bit brighter.