system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
I'd actually argue against this: if right to life begins, once life begins, than all plants, animals and microbes would have a right to life. I'd say it makes more sense to give the right to life once personhood begins and to then define personhood to begin once consciousness begins.
This would also allow a certain right to life be granted to more intelligent/conscious animals, such as dogs, elephants, dolphins, pigs (or maybe even octopuses), or at least some form of legal protection from harm, which is already the case for animal abuse.
gpt
Life is the wrong word to use here. Even cancerous tumors are "alive".

A better way to think about it is "personhood". Essentially, the question is when does a fetus become a "person"(an organism with rights). Plants and microbes never become a person. A human embryo however will eventually otherwise we couldn't have a conversation about a woman's right to choose.

This of course naturally leads into another series of debates about what personhood even means, but that's a can of worms I won't get into. All we need to know for this debate is that a human becomes a "person" at some point, and a decision needs to be made about when that is.