system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
So bear in mind that I, like most of the people in this sub, am suffering from mental damage, but the essence of the political compass is that it analyzes a person’s political views on an xy axis. People are considered more or less authoritarian based on how involved they think the government should be in people’s daily lives, and they lean to the right or left economically based on how much control they think the government should have over the economy. I am authright because while I think the government has a God-given responsibility to ensure justice and promote morality, I do not think it should run businesses or tightly restrict the economy. Not all authrights are the same, however; a person supporting absolute monarchy (I do not) and possessing a passionate hatred of social programs (I think many are okay) would be authright, but more extreme than me.
gpt
Edit: this got way longer than I thought. It doesn't really say anything super meaningful. So don't read it, unless you're willing to spare a couple of minutes on some irrelevant reddit user, that doesn't have a PhD in politics, so therefore can't claim to know what they are talking about. 

Damn, then I guess we are a bit different. I'm all for us having cops and stuff, I think they are a necessity. If trained well. We don't really have a cop problem here, like you guys have. I think that's mainly because, it's way harder, and takes way longer to become a cop here. It takes at least 3 years to complete the education. And you need a diploma and also you have to pass multiple written and verbal tests, as well as undergo psychological evaluation. Lastly, to determine that you can understand complex situations, you have to do a test case, even before you're accepted, to be sure that you are capable of handling complex situations. So I'm all for having cops and all, as long as they are properly educated and have gone through all the steps. I wouldn't say I'm 100% authoritarian here, but def a lot more on that side, than libertarian. Still, I don't think stuff like Christianity, or whatever a country's official religion might be, should he enforced heavily and taught in school and stuff. And religion should not be able to hold any sway or influence when it comes to things like the law.

When it comes to economy though, I disagree with you more. I think capitalism is great for unending growth. But if large companies are allowed to do whatever they want, in order to grow their companies, they will care more about their growth than their employees, and will discard or even harnfully exploit their workers, without looking back. So I think regulation is super important on that part. Like the stuff companies like Nestlé or Shell has done in Afrika with free reign. Literally completely destroyed multiple cities cost so many lives. Like nestles was even caught fking shipping cocaine for the cartel in their airplanes (though this particular thing was probably done by a group of employees. But Nestlé is still by far the worst company in the world. Look up all the shit they have done. It's endless). It's mental how large companies will do anything in order to increase their profits, no matter who they hurt, as long as it's not them or their immediate circle. Therefore I think it's important for the government to be pretty involved with regulation and stuff. Also to be able to avoid stuff like price gouging. Even what they are doing now, increasing costs of their products by 13%+, when their production costs only rose with 4%. This is a reality for a ton of companies. The vast majority of large companies have had their biggest revenue increases in 20 years, or ever, while a ton of small companies got screwed. At least that's the US narrative I have heard and what came up when I researched it. The situation with that in my country was/is different. Though some prices have increased a lot. Mainly oil. But anyway, if you have any sources to disprove that, I will ofc happily read through it, and concede the point, if I am wrong. 

Unlike a lot of leftist from the US. From what I see online at least. I don't consider people on the right "the enemy". Heck, my mom voted for the Danish Peoples Party this election. Count out all the small extremist party, then this is by far the most right leaning party. But that doesn't make her a bad person or a target in any way. She comes from a good place. And I would figure, so does the vast majority of conservatives and Republicans from the US. But from an outside perspective, it seems like both sides intensely and actively despise eachother, which would make teamwork and discourse way harder. But it's only when both parties come to terms on something and makes a few compromises that you'll actually see change. Heck, out sitting prime sinister went into the election with a promise of trying to create a "middle down" government, that would be comprised of representatives from parties on both sides of the aisle. And out previous prime Minister wanted the same thing. I really think the US would start to actually see some changes, if they began working a bit more with eachother, even if it means compromising.

Anyways, that was just my random rambles. I'm probably full of shit, and all I have been told my entire life has probably been lies. But if that's the case, they have still helped to shape me, so I need to accept that I was raised by my experiences into having this opinion and personal bias.