system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
It’s absolutely about maintaining a population that can repel tyranny. 

The context is that the country JUST WENT THROUGH THAT PROCESS. Should be obvious.
gpt
Right? How can anyone argue otherwise? If people want to argue that weapons have advanced to the degree where it's just not feasible to let any random asshole own shit like nukes, then I'm willing to listen. But when people try to look at the words of the second amendment and argue that the founding fathers wouldn't want us to have weapons capable of competing with the government's weapons? How the fuck can someone even say that shit when the context of the time was "we just made ourselves independent by successfully fighting against an oppressive government, so we want to ensure our country always has that same ability".

It's so blindingly obvious that the intent behind the amendment was that we retain the right to have weaponry on par with the government in case it becomes tyrannical. There's no disputing that in good faith.