system
A chat on 4chan
human
I see the occasional reference in the odd thread however I have never seen any proper discussion of their works. The matters of which they talk about absolutely pertain to this board - like 'An Introduction to Magic' by Evola / the UR group which talk about legitimate magic teachings not whatever retarded shit gets discussed here.

Also:

Julius Evola: The Doctrine of Awakening. While he did interject some of his own egoic elements into this book, it still serves as the most accurate and objective guide for liberation - especially for westerners. 

On the other hand we have fags like ((Bhikkhu Bodhi)) Who have heavily injected their own social views into their interpretations of buddhist texts making them almost pointless to read. 

Anons who have read these guys, I would like to know your thoughts on these guys.
gpt
They are reserved for a spiritual elite. They approach the initiatic or sacred sciences from the point of view of ancient man, unlike theosophy and other newer movements. They are expounding the truth. Both were incredibly based, I'm not sure who was more based. Evola was probably more redpilled though. I like it when in the last chapters of some of his books he starts dropping metaphysical and ancient occult conspiracy redpills about the templars or the masons or whoever, blowing my mind. 

Unfortunately the English translations of some of his books (most notably intro to magic 2 and 3) have been subpar imo, the prose often felt clunky/awkward. It is much better in Italian of course, but particularly those 2 books were not translated too well. Sorry Mr. Godwin. 

Guenon's English translations were all great, at least the ones I've read. I haven't read as much of him in French but nothing bad about the English ones I've read stuck out to me.