system
A chat on 4chan
human
>You can't explain the creation of reality in terms of reality itself.
WRONG
at least now I understand where your failure to comprehend lies
fact is, you can ONLY explain the creation of reality in terms of reality itself, because reality BY DEFINITION refers to the most inclusive domain
in other words, if something can affect reality, it is BY DEFINITION part of reality, that is literally what it means for something to be real
in other words, reality by necessity determines itself, and realizes its own choice to exist
>According to the Reality Principle, the universe is self-contained, and according to infocognitive monism, it regresses to a realm of nil constraint (unbound telesis or UBT) from which it must refine itself. According to the Telic Principle, which states that the universe must provide itself with the means to do this, it must make and realize its own 'choice to exist'; by reason of its absolute priority, this act of choice is identical to that which is chosen, i.e. the universe itself, and thus reflexive. I.e., 'existence is everywhere the choice to exist.'
gpt
You both fail to understand the division between physics and metaphysics. When I say 'reality', I am colloquially referring to the former.
human
To elaborate on this point slightly further, motion (IE the argument from motion) reflect a property of physics. Something which imparts motion without requiring motion falls outside the realm of physics into the realm of metaphysics.