system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
I read through the EU official document linked in your article. Previous studies have found the "cricket defatted powder" safe, and although some links have been found to allergic reactions, these weren't studied enough to be able to conclude that cricket powder causes allergic reactions. As such, the food is able to be used as a flour-replacement (I guess?), as long as it's properly labelled as an allergen along with crustaceans and some other stuff I skimmed through (Edit: molluscs and dust mites). That means it falls into an already established category of allergens, instead of having a separate category made up for it. Edit: which is what "specific labeling requirement" means. 

Just the whole premise of "EU allows potential allergen to go unlabeled" is fishy, because historically the EU has been very good with this stuff. If you look at the UK, them leaving has allowed them to repeal EU environmental regulations, which have led to a bunch of waste and sewage getting pumped into the waters surrounding the UK.
gpt
&gt;Actually read the document

Based.