system
A chat on 4chan
human
I'm not advocating for vegetarianism, I just need to put this out there, it's something I am deeply disturbed by. 

The way this world / dimension/ universe is set up. To survive, you must kill. You must make something else suffer. Just forget vegetarianism, it's not biologically viable, and even if it is, I am more so talking about the system rather than the individual act. If you really think the counter argument for this is just eat plants bro! Then instead of thinking about humans think about an animal you accept as carnivorous. I eat meat every day. But it disturbs me somewhat. I don't think the individual action of eating meat is immoral, but the way the whole system is set up is 'immoral' and vile to me. I think about this a lot, and I have literally 0 people to talk to so I wanted to put this out there to try to put what I feel into words. Life is savage and extremely brutal and fucked up. Nature is evil. Animals have feelings, and are not just objects. They get scared and suffer. I say this as I am eating meat, because I recognize that eating meat is the order of this world. The law of this world is that to survive you must kill. To not suffer the experience of hunger and death, you must make something else suffer, even if you do not do it directly, you must contribute to it. And that is in our biology. Perhaps plants themselves are sentient. Again, I do not think it is necessarily immoral or evil on the individual level to take part in the activity of killing. Is a wolf evil? It feels hunger, and so to not suffer it must make something else suffer in an act of desperation. The world is evil. And I think about this all the time. I am somewhat disturbed every time I eat meat and do not view it as a simple object like a cartoon ham, yet I partake in it anyways. What I think about is the dualistic nature of myself. If this is the law of nature, dominance, killing, then how do I feel something wrong about it? There must be something else, some other god. ..
gpt
Nature is not immoral. It has no philosophical thinking, so it can't conceive ethics. And since moral comes from humankind, and nature was before us, it's actions, the way living things behave can't be analysed in therms of good and evil. Morals are related to human actions. Ironically, it's in your nature as human being to question about the ethics of everything you see. Your nature. But it's a mistake to anthrophormize forces that are beyond mankind, like nature. Thomas Hobbes thought that it was absurd to give God human atributes like wrath or will. I know we are not talking about God but about nature, but acording to Baruch Spinoza they are the same XD