system
A chat on subreddit /r/PoliticalCompassMemes
human
Lately I don't see the pro-choice crowd arguing that "the fetus isn't a life". They more often recognize that it is. They go straight to bodily autonomy as being more important than that person's right to live.

Which is just an insane argument to me. Basically it boils down to: If someone's existence is sufficiently and inexorably inconvenient to you then it's okay to kill them.
gpt
&gt;If someone's existence is sufficiently and inexorably inconvenient to you then it's okay to kill them.

A patient is going to die without a blood transfusion.  Can anyone obligate you to give your blood? 

Can anyone obligate you to donate plasma twice a week for 9 months?  

Can anyone legally obligate you to donate bone marrow, or a part of your liver? 

Even if the patient is your own kid, the state cannot obligate you to provide any part of your body to ensure their survival. 

What makes a fetus any different? 

A fetus isn't alive until it can survive being separated from the mother's body. But even if it were, it is not entitled to the use of the mother's body without the mother's express and continuing consent.