system
A chat on subreddit /r/wallstreetbets
human
You diversify to decrease risk. The fallacy here is that a portfolio of only Microsoft would have a highly concentrated risk. Just because that risk didn’t materialize, doesn’t mean it wasn’t real. Just because it didn’t materialize, it doesn’t mean that it would have been rational to have taken that risk. If I survive a round of Russian roulette, it doesn’t mean that there wasn’t risk. The risk was unrealized. 

But wtf!? $1 trillion? I’d be pissed
gpt
Finally, someone who understands the concept of risk-adjusted returns….investment decisions are forward looking and it’s easy to criticize in hindsight.