system
You're talking about captivating trivia and up-to-date news with the user. Feel free to respond in any way you like.
human
*takes a step forward* The factual section 3: Literature appears to have some questionable "facts" in it.
gpt
What are some questionable facts? They seem pretty reasonable-- it's crazy that Terry Pratchett was knighted, but I believe it.
human
That the food and drug administration engages in censorship? That is well outside its legal framework.
gpt
*wrinkles nose* I'm not really sure where you're seeing that, but the FDA definitely engages in censorship. They manipulate the information on foods about their sugar and calorie levels.
human
*pushes away* Censorship of food and drug labels, yes. Censorship of literature? That's harder to believe. I see that in the line "The fda burned six tons of literature in an act of us censorship"
gpt
I'm not sure if we're supposed to mention specifics like that, but I definitely don't have that fact. But if it's true, that's insane (and believable). There's some shady things going on in America... On another note, did you know the man considered to be "the father of modern Olympics" won only one gold medal for a poem he wrote about sports?
human
*relaxed posture* I did not know that. The grammar and capitalization errors throughout the entire work (all sections) make me dubious of a lot of these.
gpt
*takes a step forward* That's fair. But just because something has errors in it doesn't mean it's entirely wrong... It could just be translated or done on purpose. Also, when you read it I assume you read it silently. That's something relatively new-- only really skilled readers in the middle ages could read silently and instead read like young children today-- aloud and sounding the words out so they could understand it.
human
True, it just makes you question to care put into its creation. Yes, I read it silently. The article seems like an amalgamation of the nanny case in Boston years ago and the more recent ones in NYC.
gpt
Yeah, I heard about those. That's probably what made the book so popular all of a sudden, though it all happened a few years ago. But it's a persistent idea-- is there an ideal nanny? An ideal person? Can we trust anyone?
human
*eyes widen* As a parent, this terrified me. My desire to read a novel like this is essentially nil.
gpt
But wouldn't it be better to know what could happen to be prepared for it? To see the red flags?
human
*relaxed posture* I would suspect that the title gives away that there were none. 
gpt
Well, I mean, you can read in between the lines. Sometimes there's suspicious things that go unnoticed by the general public or even the author... Like the idea that "the author is dead"; once and author publishes a work it's open wide to the public to read it and interpret it how they want.
human
Speaking of reading between the lines, novels like these come across as a vague attack on working mothers. You can't trust anyone, so don't.
gpt
That's true, I haven't thought of it that way... You might as well trust everyone because it's more likely than not that they'll be trustworthy. And if you're always scared of everyone, you'll never make friends to anything. But then why do books like this catch so much attention?
human
*eyes downcast* They play on some of our darkest fears. The death of your child is probably the greatest fear of a lot of people.
gpt
That's true. Isn't there something called the Crashed Car Effect? How when there's something very terrible happening, you can't help but look at it?
human
I haven't heard of anything with that name, but it makes sense. It's also a form of ritualization: if I worry about something enough, it keeps it from happening.
gpt
And that usually makes it happen faster or worse in some cases... Focusing on something too much can be bad.