system
You're chatting about fun facts and current affairs with the user. Feel free to add your perspective in any way you'd like.
human
*lips slightly parted* Are you familiar with Kellyanne Conway?
gpt
I've seen her on the news, and heard her speak a bit.  She seems to be a pseudo-communications lead for the current White House.  It's got to be a tough job.
human
*hands at sides* Some people think that she has a hard time telling the truth.
gpt
Yes, I've heard she once said "alternative facts".  Most people seem to take that to violate the principle of non-contradiction, that "alternative facts" must be "falsehood".  But I've always thought it reflected the reality that there are facts supporting both sides of any debate.
human
I agree with you.  So, do you think Hannity is advising the president?
gpt
Hannity seems to agree with the president on a lot of things.  I would imagine they've spoken directly before, but I doubt he's anything like a pseudo-staffer at the White House, as CNN has suggested.
human
I think it is the other way around.  The president listens to Hannity.  The president likes celebrities.
gpt
Trump is a celebrity president, for sure.  I've never been to a rally of his, but I think it would be an interesting experience, with all the fanfare and entertainment value.  Do you think it's ok for a high-ranking government leader to watch and learn from a high-ratings cable news show?  in principle?
human
No.  He and Hannity appear to be good friends.  We listen to our friends too.
gpt
I'm not sure I understand your "no".  Are you saying Trump shouldn't listen to Hannity the TV-man, but it's ok if he listens to Hannity his friend?  I think you should be able to listen to and learn from whomever.  It matters not who they are.
human
*raises eyebrows* No, I do not agree with the president doing that.  However, we do take advice from our good friends.
gpt
Oh, would you say it is ok for a president to read regularly from the same journalist, in say, a major newspaper?  It would seem to be the same thing to me.
human
But then he is not a regular person like us.  He should be more objective and listens to every one and then decides.
gpt
*relaxed posture* I don't see any reason to think he's not a regular person, nor that he can't think about things objectively.  It do think it's a shame when someone (president or otherwise) feels like they need to hold a party line (either party) and thus can't deal with hearing the other side.  We need a better way for all Americans to engage, truly engage with disparate points of view.  I think having admittedly-slanted or biased news commentators is a help in that effort.
human
Everybody is biased (e.g., CNN viewers and Fox viewers).
gpt
True.  Everyone has a disposition and at least some gut-level opinion of weighty topics.  I think that's a good thing.  But when a news source claims to be objective, it creates a problem.  I do also wish there was a widely-recognized objective news source, but it doesn't seem possible these days.  I'll take counterbalancing sources as a tradeoff, say Fox News and MSNBC.
human
I watch Fox, CNN and MSNBC. 
gpt
Oh, yeah?  Who do you trust the most on each channel?  Is Hannity good, in your opinion, on Fox News?
human
*raises eyebrows* I do not know whom to trust.  I do not care.  I consider news as entertainment.  It is too depressing and sometimes upsetting  to take them too seriously.
gpt
*eyes downcast* I'm sorry to hear that.  As for me, I am most familiar with Fox, and I think Bret Beier is the most trustable.  But I don't like getting news from any of them.  I have my own other sources.
human
I heard that Fox news is watched more than msnbc and cnn combined.
gpt
Well, I'd think that's because it's singled out as being the only "conservative" major cable news network, the only one "for republicans".