MAIL: Clean Energy Bias?  Dams can have a negative impact on
fish Dams can have a negative impact on fish Wind Turbines can
have a negative effect on birds Wind Turbines can have a
negative effect on birds Dams can have a negative impact on fish
Wind Turbines can have a negative effect on birds  In “How Clean
Is Your Electricity?” (HP152), Andy Kerr gives several sources
of electrical generation negative nicknames. He uses the terms
“miner-killing and mountaintop-removing coal; aquifer-polluting
and fracked ‘natural’ gas; radiation-producing nuclear; war-
causing oil; or fish-killing dams,” but he describes wind power
as “wind power.” He does state that wind power “can be bad for
birds if poorly sited.” I suppose it can be bad for birds, since
it can kill them. Most people consider death very bad. Why the
bias? Why not describe wind power as bird-killing wind power or
describe dams as merely dams that can be bad for fish if poorly
sited?  This appears to be just another example of promoting
your political agen