Oliver North Recommend this article WASHINGTON -- For better
than a month, the Obama administration has been dodging and
weaving over what actually transpired in Benghazi, Libya, on the
night of Sept. 11-12. Questions have been posed about why
Ambassador Christopher Stevens was there and not at his embassy
post in Tripoli. Congressional investigators have asked why he
had no security detail, why the State Department decided not to
send in U.S. Marine embassy security guards when they were
offered months before, why contingency plans were not in place
on the anniversary of 9/11 and why the O-Team insisted for so
long that the attack on our U.S. diplomatic post was a
"spontaneous event" and not an act of terrorism.  By now, all
should realize that truthful answers to these inquiries will not
be furnished by the White House or State Department until after
the presidential election on Nov. 6. But there is an even more
important question that should be asked and answered now: Once
the White House knew about the at