Take the tour ×  Most people agree that knowing something one
acquired from inductive reasoning is knowledge, that is
justified true belief. For example we observed for years, that
Sun rises from the East, we still claim that "we know, that
tomorrow Sun will rise from the East", even if from
epistemological point of view this position is not justified
neither via evidentialism nor via reliabilism.  Basically,
something isn't true yet, but there is an ultra-high probability
of truthfulness, and there is also no justification, yet we call
it knowledge. Does that mean that any conclusion got from
inductive reasoning is strictly speaking not knowledge? How do
epistemologists call and explain this phenomenon?  share|improve
this question add comment  2 Answers  up vote 3 down vote
accepted  We know, that tomorrow Sun will rise from the East,
even if from epistemological point of view this position is not
justified neither via evidentialism nor via reliabilism. Does
that mean that any conclusion got from inductive