  Regarding "Draft Policy 2011-1: Inter-RIR Transfers"  and the
proviso that:     the transfer and which otherwise meet both
RIR's policies. Transferred    resources will become part of the
resource holdings of the recipient RIR    unless otherwise
agreed by both RIRs."  I am opposed to inter-RIR transfer
policies, including this one. Let me mention just a few reasons
why.  I. Resource Firebreak Issues.  In thinking about this and
similar policies, consider where addresses would  likely come
from and where addresses would probably go given current
circumstances (and assuming that all RIRs agreed to participate
in the   RIRs with remaining IPv4 address resources ("supplier
RIRs")   RIRs with a likely immediate-term demand for additional
IPv4 addresses ("consumer RIRs"):   Thus the flow of address
space would thus likely be *from* the developing nations of the
southern hemisphere (except Australasia) *to* the developed
nations of the northern hemisphere.  Countries in the southern
hemisphere (which have histo