Quote Originally Posted by StoneNYC View Post I know I keep
busting your butt about this, but mostly I just kid about it,
however it demonstrates a good point here.  You took a street
image that was crooked, very obvious, and didn't straighten it,
it looked amateurish to me, and I asked about it and you said it
was a street shot and you didn't have time to frame it or you
wouldn't get the shot.  So how do you feel about the integrity
of that image? You like it, I know you do,,and wouldn't have
gotten it if you had taken more time, does this give you less
integrity as a photographer?  Sent w/ iPhone using Tapatalk  It
hasn't got dick anything to do with "integrity" of the image, or
the photographer. A photographer was there, irrespective of the
lens he used, he shot the scene. What's the hue and cry here
that the shot should be technically perfect, compositionally
pleasing, in-focus and "straight"? God, blah, blah, blah about
silly peripheral subjects. Why should on-the-spot street/docu
photography have to mee