Reply to a comment  Reply to this comment  dardena writes:  in
response to MmmBop:  Actually, police unions are the primary
reason that ongoing physical testing is not part of LE
employment. Jhaz is on the money with that statement, and the
absence of a union in Suquamish is the primary reason their PD
gets away with this.  Are you saying it is the unions that
prevent the public safety agencies from requiring officers meet
minimum physical/mental job requirements?  Would that not make
the union causal to endangering the officers they represent?  Is
that a *good* thing?