Account of Hillary Clinton's Senate appearance was one-sided  on
January 30, 2013 at 12:53 AM       In reference to Hillary
Clinton’s testimony at the Benghazi hearings, I read with
interest Advance columnist Matthew Lee’s article January 24.  
 I ask: Is his article a news report, or is it an opinion
column?      Having watched the testimony, Mr. Lee’s commentary
seems one-sided, extolling Mrs. Clinton’s testimony by “taking
on lawmakers.”      Missing are the questions and commentary
posed by Sens. Mark Rubio, John McCain, Ron Johnson, Rand Paul,
etc.      Her responses and contrived excuses regarding the
Libyan attack defy credulity. As for her statement “What
difference at this point does it make?” — yes, the difference is
that four Americans are dead, and her “apology” and the
administration’s malfeasance won’t bring justice to them and
their families.      The perpetrators, including Mrs. Clinton
and the White House, go unpunished, and thanks to one-sided news
commentary such as evidenced by Mr. Lee,