LISTSERV at the University of Georgia Menubar Imagemap Home
Browse Manage Request Manuals Register Previous messageNext
messagePrevious in topicNext in topicPrevious by same authorNext
by same authorPrevious page (July 2010)Back to main SPSSX-L
pageJoin or leave SPSSX-L (or change settings)ReplyPost a new
messageSearchProportional fontNon-proportional font Date:
Tue, 20 Jul 2010 13:36:02 -0400 Reply-To:     Gene Maguin <>
From:         Gene Maguin <> Subject:      Re: three way
interaction vs separate analysis with 2 way In-Reply-To:  <>
>>the dichot. moderator is gender, so i just split the sample
and calculated the 2 way interactions for men and women
seperately.  >>my assumption was that if i for example get a
sign. interaction for men but not for women, that i can claim
that there is a gender difference.  Gene: You can claim it but
as a reviewer I don't think I'd accept it. For instance, suppose
the two-way interaction coefficient was -.03 (se=.06) for men
and +.03 (se=.07) for women. Neither is