Reply to a comment  Reply to this comment  Spike writes:  in
response to ElwoodBlues:  Oh, you're one of those who believes
no endorsement is the same thing as an implied
endorsement,too,eh? What part of "we don't think you need us to
tell you who to vote for for POTUS because we believe you're
smart enough to figure that out for yourselves" means "pssstt!
for Obama" to you? I don't recall the EB ever endorsing liver
and onions,either..does that mean they want you to eat it 5
times a week? And apparently you're one of those who believes
that unless the CT incessantly bashes everything you don't agree
with,it's "extremely liberal" by default.Just because a dog
doesn't bark at every passing car doesn't mean it's not a
watchdog.Newspapers are like every other information can either
read them or don't,take them as trustworthy or don't,but just
because they may not always tell you what you want to hear..or
in your case,incessantly bash somebody you want to see bashed
doesn't necessarily mean they ascribe to some "