Fujifilm X100 versus Sony Nex-5?  Started Jun 18, 2011 |
Discussions thread Senior MemberPosts: 2,771 It is a point and
shoot because its not a true rangefinder, point being ? In reply
to fad, Jun 20, 2011  Who are these "serious photographers" for
one thing ?  Two, given the X100 is not a true rangefinder, nor
is it a true SLR, what could it be other than a p&s ?  Given the
MF isn't ideally implemented yet I certainly use mine like a
P&S, ie; auto focus, point then shoot.  Also like a p&s, it
doesn't have interchangeable lenses, so again, unlike a RF like
the M9, its more akin to a p&s  Its an awesome p&s though and
works just perfectly for a casual wear around your neck camera
fad wrote:  Serious photographers are saying that it is a p&s in
its soul with a dslr sensor.  Both will deliver stunning
pictures in the right hands  The X100 apparantly has some
amazing JPG OOC possibilities with brilliant skintone colors, no
PP needed...  Serious photographers on the Fuji forum have a
thread where they excoriate u