  Re: issues with the AGPL  Greg Harris <glharris@panix.com>
wrote: [...] > Here's what I think needs to be addressed if
anyone wants to make > actual progress on this subject: >  -
What exactly is it that someone wants to do that they are
prevented >    from doing by the terms of the AGPL?  Use it on
their website without being liable for the cost of download for
code that they have not written or modified.  This is the flip-
side of the freedom to distribute when you wish and the AGPL
problem is a consequence of the confusion over whether you are
compelled to distribute the whole thing or only your changes.
Also, whether that distribution must be to everyone who has any
sort of access to it, only to users who are allowed to log in
(or similar), or only "when you wish" (which is a phrase RMS
used to use when explaining the four freedoms - I wonder if he
still does).  >  - What other license would be required to allow
them to implement a >    derived work, offer it to public users,
and refuse to share their >