  Re: Negotiation in draft 01  From: Daniel DuBois
<ddubois@spyglass.com> Date: Wed, 9 Aug 95 08:11:55 -0500
Message-Id: <9508091311.AA12435@hook.spyglass.com> To: http-
wg%cuckoo.hpl.hp.com@hplb.hpl.hp.com >All current browsers do
accept all formats, in the form of the Save As.. >dialog.  The
WG decided that it was better to assume the best than to
>require all clients to be compliant before the feature could be
used.  Because I have Save As and an old browser I like sanskrit
as much as I like us-ascii?  I can see the point of a change
from 0 encoding and/or charset quality (on lack of the header)
to a positive encoding and/or charset quality, but all the way
to 1?  .001 seems infinitely more appropriate.  >Any server that
breaks on an empty field value is already broken, >regardless of
what the spec requires.  I can restore the 1#( if that  I'm sure
our server is immune, but I can sympathize with the idea that
others might break given this previously unexistant construct
(valid headers that have no body) bei