Take the 2-minute tour ×  I bet the automatic response to my
question would be "Bell's theorem" and of course I am not
disputing Bell's proof. I am however uncertain of one of his
assumptions.  The so called "no conspiracy" assumption states
that we somehow posses this magical thing called free will which
makes us able to break free from the causal chain of events that
make us measure the $y$-axis instead of the $x$-axis and so on
in experiments. Obviously this makes little sense once reviewed
under the light of logic. What this naturally implies is that,
if a theory is fully deterministic, it is instantly super-
deterministic.  Simon Kochen and John Conway published a theorem
in 2009, "The Strong Free Will Theorem", which simply-put
states: either everything is deterministic (super-deterministic)
or every particle has free will.  Among the few who accept this
to the fullest extent is Gerard 't Hooft. He has proposed that
what we call sub-atomic particles are really just templates and
that there is a realm ben