We've given weight the wrong readout    • Article by: PAUL
CAMPOS   • Updated: January 4, 2013 - 5:06 AM  Our current
definition of "normal weight" makes absolutely no sense.    • 27
• Comments    • Results per page: merkinJan. 4, 13 7:55 AM
Let's have a burger and talk about it.  You can pork out all you
want, but I'll stick with eating sensibly and exercising
regularly. Sitting on the couch eating chips may lower my
mortality rate, but it also lowers the amount of fun I can have
dancing, running around our many parks, and raises the amount of
time I would spend in a hospital.  Thanks, but I'll stick with
my current lifestyle.  luzhishenJan. 4, 13 8:23 AM  "Sitting on
the couch eating chips may lower my mortality rate," The article
doesn't say that - better check it again. As for the main topic
of the article, if within a species - take dogs for example -
there is a wide range of healthy weights for given breeds with
the same basic length or height measurements - why shouldn't the
same hold true for human