Thread history  From Talk:Policies/Licensing Policy Viewing a
history listing Jump to: navigation, search Time User
ascActivity Comment 12:25, 25 January 2012Yecril71pl (Talk |
contribs)New thread created  19:26, 27 January 2012Yecril71pl
(Talk | contribs)Comment text edited (they differ only in KDE
approval) 16:43, 30 January 2012AnneW (Talk | contribs)New reply
created (Reply to GFDL 1.2 is listed twice)  There are two
identical bullets in §8 describing GFDL 1.2, they differ only in
KDE approval. Why is that? Is it a way of legally saying that
unapproved licenses are allowed?  Should it be assumed that
documentation that bears no licensing metadata is GFDL?
Yecril71pl12:25, 25 January 2012    Annew16:43, 30 January 2012