  Re: Validators that don't validate  From: Masayasu Ishikawa
<mimasa@w3.org> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 1998 00:58:37 +0900 To:
w3c-wai-ig@w3.org Message-Id: <19981112005837F.mimasa@w3.org>
Liam Quinn <liam@htmlhelp.com> wrote:  > >When in doubt, I refer
to the W3C for the correct answer. > >It is a matter of knowing
where to look when an error occurs.  In my mind, > >W3C is
always the definitive source. > FWIW, the W3C Validator is not
infallible.  That's true, and as Daniel said, some folks are
trying to fix it.  > http://www.w3.org/Press/1998/DOM-
REC.html.ja  I'm sure this is valid, because I wrote it and
validated it ;-)  > http://www.htmlhelp.com/ja/reference/html40/
BTW, though WDG HTML Validator found no errors in the following
document:   but actually it's not valid.  It's syntactically
correct, but its character encoding doesn't match declared
charset.  HTTP response header says it's encoded in ISO-2022-JP,
but actually it's encoded in Shift_JIS.  The result is
devastating; it makes the document totally unr