Hillary And American Sexism…Really Guys? Still?  On Sunday,
George Will wrote a column arguing that Hillary's loss is its
own proof that sexism wasn't the reason she lost. Hmmm,
illogical-sounding! And yet compelling nonetheless. Because
thanks to TNR I had just read a collection of thirty-something
thoughts culled from more than a dozen anonymous emails from
Clinton campaign staffers and fundraisers and high-level
supporters, and I don't remember "sexism" coming up once. So I
hit Ctrl-F, just to make sure. Nope! None for "sexist" or
"misogyny-" either! Women are still ticked off about how she was
treated, about Sweetiegate and Whoregate, but at the end of the
day, whatever, it is not why she lost. And Ahmadinejad is bad,
but he is neither Hitler nor Krushchev, and energy independence
would be nice, but the $370 billion farm bill that enriches
agribusiness only by starving some billions of the world's poor
only sounds like a good way to achieve it relative to a trillion
dollar war. And so I find myself in the