   From: Alex Danilo <alex@abbra.com> Date: Tue, 01 Jun 2010
22:47:29 +1000 Message-Id: <576C3L.95FNQ90LIAEF@abbra.com> To:
Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi> Cc: robert@ocallahan.org, www-
svg@w3.org, Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, abarth@webkit.org,
eric@webkit.org You miss the point.  The comment about
vapourware was about HTML5 as a whole, not individual aspects of
HTML5+SVG integration.  If you can't understand the explanation
about the comment was about the whole spec. then there's no
point trying to justify a pointless argument.  HTML5:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vaporware   --Original Message--:
>On Jun 1, 2010, at 12:58, Alex Danilo wrote: >> So IMHO it fits
the description of vapourware until someone actually implements
>> all of the parts of a very comprehensive and complex spec. >I
disagree, but the status of the whole spec is beside the point.
>What matters in the context of the SVG WG is that the parts
relevant to SVG integration have been specced and implemented
(in a browser and in a validator). T