Sunday, March 07, 2010  Evidence of adverse editorial selection
by the CRU Email theives    and what was not      Ben said...
But it's not as much fun when the context is there!  So few
e-mails released, so much context obscured...  Marco said...
"Climero"? I like the dyslexia in this case.  carrot eater
said...  You might be giving them too much credit here.  Deech56
said...  Instructions to reviewers. Oh the conspiracy.  OK, I
have been involved in reviews of R&D contracts, and instructions
are always given to reviewers. If there are weaknesses, you
cannot give a perfect score, strengths/weaknesses have to
support the score given. That kind of thing.  This is an
interesting submission from Osborn. Worth reading the whole
thing; everything he writes is familiar to anyone in science.
Tim Curtin said...  Eli, you repeat the canard about "theft" of
emails from CRU. You of all people should know that when one
works for a public-funded institution, all staff communications
are the property of the institution.