Karma reasons for concrete message        Posts: 7525   •
Darwins +1095/-6  Oh, and the sandstone thing. Gee, why do you
think there isn't any of that same sandstone in South Dakota,
Ohio or Mississippi? Or Alaska or California, or Maine, let
alone Brazil or England or Japan.  Why would it be localized? 
Why is there no sandstone whatsoever around where I live in
Montana?  A big flood would be, you know, big. Geologists have
an explanation, but you find it inconvenient so you prefer
making up stuff. That is your prerogative. Just don't expect to
be impressive too.  Did you expect the sandstone to cover the
earth? How big exactly is big enough for you? Edit: Obviously
many other places have sedimentary rock too, what I used is an
example, not a thorough discourse  And yes, there are also good
reasons to doubt other dating methods, mostly with similar
reasoning as c-14.  You don't get to have it both ways. You
can't point out that something points to proof for you, and then
dismiss it as irrelevant. In one part