  Re: Update protocol and dataset description  From: Lee
Feigenbaum <lee@thefigtrees.net> Date: Sun, 07 Aug 2011 13:47:08
-0400 Message-ID: <4E3ECF9C.3080500@thefigtrees.net> To: Andy
Seaborne <andy.seaborne@epimorphics.com> I went and tried to
find the last time we discussed this. I believe it  was here:
In which you asked:   > I'm not sure what &default-graph-uri=
and &named-graph-uri= mean for   > an SPARQL Update request.
> I can see this applying to the pattern part only (c.f. USING)
for  > Anzo/Glitter -- is that the intent?  and I replied:  On
the protocol teleconference, we discussed that they would define
the RDF dataset against which graph patterns are evaluated -- a
la USING and  USING NAMED, as you say below.  In response to
that, you suggested:   My other reading was a protocol argument
for WITH.  Would better names be:  -- same as WITH  -- same as
USING  -- same as USING NAMED  Something to make it clear it is
not the graph store being affected for the "using" ones.  For
what semantics, in