  Re: CSS WG comments on SVG 1.2  From: Boris Zbarsky
<bzbarsky@MIT.EDU> Date: Wed, 01 Dec 2004 16:33:25 -0600
Message-ID: <41AE46B5.6070005@mit.edu> To: ronan@roasp.com CC:
www-svg@w3.org  Ronan Oger wrote: > Yes, but  CSS applies to XUL
like CSS applies to SVG...   > So CSS impacts all of our markups
Assuming the markups define some attributes as automatically
ending up  as CSS properties with identical names (which is what
SVG does, for good  reasons).  XBL and XUL don't do that, and
don't end up with namespace  conflicts between attributes and
CSS properties.  > I have just seen an example of this having
previously happened during a talk  > at the SVG London Users
Group, where I caught an odd-looking attribute, whose  > name
came about when it had to be re-assigned due to a name collision
with  > CSS. It was in one of XUL or XBL.  Details, please?  I
see no reason why any attribute naming in XUL or XBL  would be
affected by CSS.  Received on Wednesday, 1 December 2004
22:36:15 GMT