Comment: I disagree  (See in situ)  In reply to comment: Ron
Paul's discrediting (see in situ)  I disagree  I don't know that
RP wouldn't be willing to pay them for the domain, though it
seems apparent that he doesn't want to pay $250,000. I don't see
how RP is discrediting himself or harming the current domain
name owners by not giving them a quarter of a million dollars.
RP has always promoted contract law as libertarian and the
current domain owners are now smearing him as "unlibertarian"
for utilizing the dispute arbitration option in the contract
they agreed to when they obtained the domain name. Don't you
think that's just a little bit hypocritical and nasty of them?