Take the 2-minute tour ×  In the following minimal document  $1
< 2$  the output is missing the < symbol.  On the other hand, if
I load the two font packages in the opposite order  $1 < 2$  the
output is as it should. Why?  I could not find this documented
anywhere.   A less minimal example would also show that whereas
in the latter case the < does appear, the math fonts being used
are not the Euler fonts. Hence I do think that the two are
incompatible. I'm starting to think that perhaps incompatibility
between different font packages is the norm and not the
exception?  share|improve this question +1 for minimal example.
–  vanden Jul 28 '10 at 22:13 My log says: Missing character:
There is no \202 in font zeusm10!, but I have no idea what is
wrong here. –  qbi Jul 28 '10 at 22:56 I didn't find anything
strange in my log file, though. This is why I asked. –  José
Figueroa-O'Farrill Jul 28 '10 at 23:08  1 Answer 1  up vote 1
down vote accepted  Both packages mess around with the maths
font loading, so you'd ge