One more consolidated O'Reilly Discussion Post (if you can
stomach it)  So I've argued the O'Reilly stuff to death, and
read what others (DiD, doc, Marachi etc) have said on the
subject, and was thinking about it last night. I think I'm a
pretty smart person, who thinks about things logically most of
the time. I think there are others who do as well, so I've been
a bit perplexed as to why we are so far apart (mainly because I
agree with a lot of what you guys have written).  I think one of
the misunderstandings here is that I'm arguing for RORs demands.
I am not, for the most part. I agree with everything about the
Avs making fair offers, they are in the position of strength (in
comparison to O'Reilly). O'Reilly has been a huuge baby about
this stuff, it seems, and that he is more at fault for the
situation getting to this point. O'Reilly has done f'ed up. He
should have taken the $3.5M offer when it was clear the Avs
weren't going to cave, and I think he's going to end up costing
himself more by this holdout