Branko Čibej wrote: > > Really, Bill, this is going too far.
This is *not* how you solve ABI > compatibility issues. [an
aside] Having a trademark/API discussion isn't being
unreasonable, but we agree entirely that it's not an entire
solution. A multi-pronged approach to API compatibility is
goodness, along the lines of other discussions about .0-dev
./buildconf and ./configure warnings and other helpful cautions
to our users.