post #121 of 121 Originally Posted by lfmorrison View Post  (but
some would disagree with the enforcability of this) dynamic run-
time linking.).  The FSF might claim this but they'll likely
never sue over it. Even static linking is iffy. They might lose
and suddenly GPL turns into LGPL. The key is what constitutes a
derivative work. No derivative work and it doesn't matter. Now
linking (static or dynamic) probably implies that one is a
derivative work of the other but it's not always so. If I had
developed a proprietary library/subcomponent/plugin prior to
writing a GPL'd project and used it in other systems you going
to have an impossible time selling the idea to the court that
this is a derivative work and is governed by the GPL license
just because I reused it with other GPL code. The argument would
be that this is aggregation and not derivation. I would have to
release all project code that was a derivative of other GPL
code.  I would find that pretty funny but freetards wouldn't and
RMS isn't stupid. Eve