  Re: New work on fonts at W3C  From: Mikko Rantalainen
<mikko.rantalainen@peda.net> Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2009 13:29:59
+0300 Message-ID: <4A3F5D27.2080407@peda.net> To: www-
style@w3.org Adam Twardoch wrote: > This may sound trivial, but
the only situation when font users and font > is being made.  As
Brad Kemper already said, font users and font vendors never "got
in touch". There was never a real contract. Only an End User
License Agreement (legal status of which is highly questionable
under various countries laws).  > (unlike most software
applications), are sold through many distributors, > ways. No
single feasible way exist for the vendor to verify if the user >
of that would be really high.  So you're basically saying that
Monotype does not know who it has licensed fonts to. However, in
the same time Monotype (and other font foundries) are shouting
on the roof tops that fonts are pirated all over the place. How
can they know? The cannot even know if those fonts have been
legally licensed. (They may truthfu