[ previous ] [ next ] [ threads ]  To:  <m0n0wall at lists dot
m0n0 dot ch>  Date:  Wed, 30 Aug 2006 08:59:32 -0600 > Or just
perhaps, the traffic level is higher with these enabled and  >
because of the traffic volume, things work differently?  I would
tend to  > think that in order to definitively tag P2P as the
culprit there would  > need to be a replacement by something
else to represent the appropriate  > level of traffic in order
to truly demonstrate that something else isn't  > failing.  That
isn't to say that P2P isn't in fact the culprit, only that  >
the anecdotal evidence so far doesn't seem to prove or disprove
that.  If  > your normal traffic with P2P is 20 units, then
killing P2P and letting  > traffic drop to 5 units doesn't prove
anything. > By way of example take the case of the car which had
a tendency to just  > die at speeds over 75 mph.  Very
repeatable, and absolutely no failure  > cases below that speed.
The problem turned out to be a fuel supply issue.  > The problem
with using the sp