DragonFly BSD DragonFly kernel List (threaded) for 2006-01  Re:
a take at cache coherency  From: Csaba Henk <csaba.henk@xxxxxxx>
Date: 23 Jan 2006 17:21:54 GMT  On 2006-01-23, Simon 'corecode'
Schubert <corecode@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > i'm sorry but i don't
like the patch for those reasons.  general vfs  > code gets
cluttered with namecache interal going-ons (the shadow groups)
> and makes it super-easy to introduce a mistake.  Yeah, that's
what's now. Though I didn't mean the shadow group interface used
directly as is now... the namecache interface could easily be
sanitized; yet trying to do that would have been a premature
optimization at this  Abstracting the namecache interface might
be necessary/beneficial for other reasons too; if that were the
case, you can't say my patch is too much off the path. I can
also imagine that the current way of using the namecache is
decreed a sacred cow; in that case I admit that my approach is
not viable in this form.  > I think if we already carry the
fields around in th