Reply to a comment  Reply to this comment  BanFoodStamps writes:
in response to TOP_OfTheMorning:  What one sees as a 'gigantic,
idiotic leap' is seen by others as a display of 'what is good
for the goose, is good for the gander'.  I tell you what, you
quit assuming that all the recipients of TANF are drug-addled
child-abusing leaches, and quit demanding the surrender of their
fourth amendment rights, and I'll try real hard not to assume
you are some cold-hearted, prejudging right-wing fascist gun-
crazy uneducated nincompoop.  I figure I am still coming out way
ahead, since you continue to prove yourself to be such without
anything from me.  Love Pete! I bet the real Pete is getting a
kick out of proving your classic paranoia on almost a daily
basis...  I didn't see where speedislife said that all TANF
recipients were drug addicted, child abusing leaches, any more
than an employer thinks every potential employee is a drug
addict.  Funny how you are so adamant about defending the fourth
amendment rights of so