Atheism is just thinking there aren’t any gods  Andyman writes:
Also, if there is one criticism of atheism I see too often its
that naturalism is, apparently incoherent. It would be great if
you could explore this a little bit more, as I’ve seen far more
theists attack naturalism than actually defend their own
arguments.  I’m probably only going to do one post on this,
because I don’t find this topic very interesting, but it’s worth
one post. Basically, I’m a naturalist in the sense that I think
there aren’t any gods, the miracles claimed by the world’s
various religions didn’t happen, there isn’t an afterlife, magic
spells don’t work, and so on. But I’ve never heard anyone say
naturalism in that sense is incoherent, and I can’t imagine how
you’d argue that it is.  When people say naturalism is
incoherent, they’re generally talking about some very broad
philosophical thesis that’s supposed to have lots of
implications for lots of other philosophical issues. I don’t
find those debates very interesting, since