  Re: Are CSS animations a done deal?  From: Lars Gunther
<gunther@keryx.se> Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2010 20:26:45 +0200
Message-ID: <4BB24265.4020707@keryx.se> 2010-03-30 19:19, Chris
Marrin skrev:  > Right. I've been reading files with CSS
Animations, Transitions and > Transforms in them for a long
time. And it's not only  > much easier to read such
descriptions, it's easier to write them > in a clear and easy to
understand way.  This is my question:  Can we do animations in a
declarative style that are equally clear and  understandable,
but is not CSS?  This thread has gotten replies defending the
concept of declarative  animation as such. Nobody is questioning
that. At least I am not.  This thread has got replies about the
intended usage of CSS animation,  but NOT A SINGLE REPLY about
user expectations in the event the  technology gets abused.  A
user that runs NoScript will still see CSS animations, is that
an  expected result? How long will it take until we see multiple
bugs in  Webkits's and Mozilla's bugzil