  RE: Javascript alternatives not necessary?  From: Fentress,
Robert <rfentres@vt.edu> Date: Mon, 26 Jul 2004 11:16:42 -0400
Message-ID:
<E7BD4EDD62660F44922C0B11258FBE8F401234@fangorn.cc.vt.edu>  My
responses surrounded by <RAF> --Robert Alexander Fentress
[quote - M Cooper] -----Original Message----- From:   Michael
Cooper [mailto:michaelc@watchfire.com]  should be required if
that content itself is accessible.  [quote - Fentress, Robert]
Yes.  Well-phrased.  GV: How could content be accessible if not
in text?   How do you render it into braille for example for
someone who is blind but does not hear well?  <RAF>You don't.
If JavaScript-based functionality cannot be replicated with a
text alternative, you simply require the user access the
resource with a JavaScript-enabled browser.  The content
produced by the JavaScript-enabled browser must be accessible to
those using assistive technologies.  It might be wise to require
the inclusion of a <noscript> indicating that this resource
requires Javascript, but