In response to:  The Mob Presses on John Roberts  Panda Wrote:
Jul 05, 2012 2:30 AM The "it's a tax" ruling is indefensible: 1.
A penalty (designed to affect behavior) is not a tax (designed
to raise revenue). A speeding ticket is a penalty, not a
"speeding tax." Roberts knows that not everything resulting in
money going to government is a tax. 2. Roberts provided no
SCOTUS precedent for equating penalties with taxes! None! 3. By
Roberts' "reasoning," government can make us buy anything, as
long as we are charged a fee if we refuse. Wow. 4. Finally,
Roberts admitted bias against the Court undoing legislation, as
this would "do the voters' work for them." DUDE, IF YOU CAN'T
UNDO ANYTHING COMING FROM CONGRESS, THEN WHY IS THE COURT EVEN
THERE? YOU'RE JUST A RUBBER STAMP! Roberts is an activist judge.
Face it.  Is anyone surprised that the ink wasn't dry on Chief
Justice John Roberts' incoherent switcheroo before team Obama
was again denying Obamacare is a tax? Why did he do it?  There
is no doubt that the left