  Re: lprng license  Richard Braakman <dark@xs4all.nl> writes:
David Starner wrote:    > > LPRng  is  distributed  under the
GNU software license for    > > non-commercial use, the Artistic
License for limited  com=AD    > > mercial  use.   Commerical
support and licensing is avail=AD    > > able through Patrick
Powell <papowell@sdsu.edu>.    > What's so strange? How I
understand it is that you can use it under the    > GPL or
Artistic License. If you need support or want to include it in a
> program without following the Artistic or GPL, then email him
and he'll    > hook you up - probably for a hefty fee. Still,
completely DFSG-free.     No, it's strange.  "under the GNU
software license for non-commercial use".    No such license
exists.  I think you're obfuscating the meaning of that phrase.
To me, it is clear that he means that you can use the GNU GPL if
you don't need to incorporate LPRng into a commercial product.
In any case, the text makes clear that commercial use is
limited.    This is