already a subscriber? Register me Subscribe now See my options
• We reserve the right to close commenting on specific stories.
Discussion guidelines | Privacy policy | Terms of use  Limit of
2000 characters, 2000 characters remaining  Sort by Comment
threads per page: 10 | 20 | 50   1. here we go again with public
officials not understanding what art is.   2. How is it that
know-nothings can stop a perfectly charming and engaging
proposal like this? How can we teach them that "ridiculous" is
not an intelligent comment here? How can we enlighten them to
see that an "old school technology" is a wry and pointed comment
in this work? (I'll bet they wouldn't object to a carved stone
statue because of its very old technology) How can we, well,
just get the old farts out of the way?   3. I Love what Zweig
did with the NY Subway. My smile would be painfully huge with
pride if I could walk down the Milwaukee streets and see her
art. It is absolutely ridiculous that Aldermen are ultimately
responsible in deciding