How can we make reputation a reflection of trust rather than how
many ambiguous, argumentative, and general questions you can
answer/ask before the mods notice?  Look at any high reputation
person, yes they certainly answer a lot of questions very well,
but if you look at the things that actually generate their
badges and reputation I can guarantee that they're almost all
questions that are generic, argumentative, or horribly
subjective.  I realize that this is in itself probably in the
category that I speak of. But I posted a question that I was
actually passionate about but it was closed for being
argumentative. People even continued to favorite it after it was
closed but that doesn't matter really.  So what are the common
thoughts about this? Does anyone even agree with me about this
or is this just the rant of every newbie to the site?
share|improve this question What was the question? (link) – 
cletus Dec 4 '09 at 2:59 @cletus:… –  Jared Harley Dec 4 '09 at
3:25 Your question was closed because it wasn'