Reply to a comment  Reply to this comment  Model19 writes:  in
response to EJohn71:  Why would we want to re-elect an old judge
who hasn’t helped our courts improve since his “appointment” to
the bench. It’s about time that we start electing judges who are
willing and able to make positive changes and bring our courts
and government into modern times. This judge will be well into
his late seventies assuming he gets elected and serves out his
term (which he most likely will not do). Electing this dinosaur
just continues the disgusting practice of appointing judges
without public approval.  Why would we want to elect a new judge
who has never tried a case, who has never assisted the court by
serving even one day as a judge pro tem, who has never served on
a county bar committee, and who has never even helped out with
the county schools' moot court program? The Star urges Bjelke to
"stay involved" but the problem with his campaign from the first
day was that he was never involved to begin with.   Featured
Promot