   From: Arun Ranganathan <arun@mozilla.com> Date: Fri, 13 May
2011 15:01:41 -0400 Message-ID: <4DCD8015.1040309@mozilla.com>
To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net> CC: ietf-http-wg@w3.org
Firstly, thanks for your response :-)  On 5/12/11 11:55 PM,
Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > * Arun Ranganathan wrote: >> We'd
welcome your feedback, including suggestions about embarking
upon >> an IETF standardization track for this protocol. > Well
there are all sorts of problems with your proposal (bulleted
lists > with half a dozen of items do not belong in an Abstract,
This appears to be a subjective stylistic nit (others in the
WebApps WG  actually like the rapid jump to IDLs), but for what
it's worth, there's  always room for improvement, and the
Abstract can certainly be tightened.  > you list RFC > 1738 as
normative reference but the document does not seem to be refer-
> enced at all,  RFC1738 is normative for URLs and for
"file://", and in the File API  those were important
considerations while we coined a scheme fo