[Top] [All Lists]   From: Lachlan McIlroy <lachlan@xxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2008 11:32:43 +1000 In-reply-to:
<20080926003401.GG27997@disturbed> References:
<48D9C1DD.6030607@xxxxxxx> <48D9EB8F.1070104@xxxxxxx>
<48D9EF6E.8010505@xxxxxxx> <20080924074604.GK5448@disturbed>
<48D9F718.4010905@xxxxxxx> <20080925010318.GB27997@disturbed>
<48DB4F3F.8040307@xxxxxxx> <20080926003401.GG27997@disturbed>
Reply-to: lachlan@xxxxxxx User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20080707)
Dave Chinner wrote: On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 06:43:43PM +1000,
Peter Leckie wrote: Still, don't check it in until we understand
whether sv_t's are completely broken or not... Well I added some
tracing code to the __wake_up_common, however it never tripped
which made me think "are we even being woken up from the wait
queue", or is someone directly waking us up from the task
struct. So I had a look and found the following.
xfs_mount_t             *mp,       xfs_lsn_t
threshold_lsn)       mp->m_ail.xa_target = threshold_lsn;  Which
is indi