The GOP Finding Its Voice on Foreign Policy.  Greg Sargent
argues that with the controversy over the Cordoba House, "the
Cheney-ites are winning the battle over the future direction of
GOP foreign policy." If it's true, it shouldn't be too
surprising. Within a complex party, particular issues are often
ceded to the group that cares about them the most. And apart
from a Likudnik approach to the Middle East, which is now
practically universal on the right, lots of Republicans don't
have much to say about foreign policy. If you had to describe
the prevailing GOP approach to foreign affairs, what would you
say? It's hard to know, even with regard to some places where
we're rather heavily engaged. What's the Republican position on
Afghanistan? On the future of our relationship with China?  The
easiest thing to fall back on is the division of the world into
good guys and bad guys, which may get you to a Palinesque level
of understanding, but it doesn't give much guidance as to what
the country should do. For instan