Re. brain sizes: Einstein's and women's  Jd JDay123 at Sun Oct
20 22:35:58 EST 2002  Dave Wilson <testaccount2002 at> wrote:
>Jd wrote: >> Why they keep on insisting that men sprang from
mud via apes and >> simultaneously reject the notion that human
evolution isn't subject >> to gene dominance rules as are other
critters (which would lead >> eventually to a new and improved
species) is puzzeling.  To them >> there simply can never be a
higher human form other than the one >> which currently occupies
the earth.   >> The logical conclusion to that argument is that
evolution is static >> when it comes to humans, which means that
the argument of "one race, >> forever" contridicts the science
of "liberals" themselves.   >I'm a bit unsure what you mean by
'gene dominance rules' -  >dominance/recessiveness is entirely
unrelated to how 'desirable' the  >effect of a particular gene
is reckoned to be. It's a matter of  >biochemistry, rather than
moral judgement. Also, 'improved' only has  >evolutionary
meaning in re