[Top] [All Lists]  Re: ANDing  1999-04-27 19:48:35 This seemed
obvious to me before my first post, but it didn't match when I
tested it. I shall keep trying.  "David W. Tamkin" wrote:  Dale
Neumann asked,  | Is it acceptable to use the ^TO macro in two
separate condition lines in a | given recipe?  E.g... |     :0 |
* ^TOregexp |     * ^TOregexp |     some-action | I want to
perform an action only upon the existence of two specific |
addresses in the (To|Cc|Bcc) fields.  But those addresses could
be in a | different order every time; I'm not yet crafty enough
with regular | expresstions to be able to do this on a single
condition line.  That's exactly the right way to do it, Dale.
Because it is acceptable for them to appear in either order, you
have to use two conditions.  (Well, it could be done in one, but
it would be an awful mess to type and read, so two are better.)
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>