    2013 Nissan 370Z  Source: Motor Trend  Comments    
Threshold   Turbo vs Naturally aspirated By chillingrsx on
8/27/2013 12:19:57 PM , Rating: 2 I don't believe this is true
with turbo have better gas mileage than the non turbo. If you
look at the Acura RDX, it was the coolest thing ever when it
first came out. A turbo 4 bangers CUV. It didn't do so well. So
what did Honda do, switch it up a v6 and it's selling like hot
cakes. I know because I own one. I did test drove the turbo and
boy it was day and night difference. The v6 is more refine.
Guess what, the v6 still have better gas mileage.  RE: Turbo vs
Naturally aspirated By Pneumothorax on 8/27/2013 1:16:04 PM ,
Rating: 2 Yup, many of these forced-induction direct injection
4-bangers have great EPA numbers on paper, but in RL barely get
1-2MPG better than their V6 forebears. They also add a ton of
complexity with the addition of turbos/HPFP along with worse
NVH.  RE: Turbo vs Naturally aspirated By lagomorpha on
8/27/2013 1:50:09 PM , Rating: 2 A lot o