Fallacies And Fooleries    “When the two theories have the same
evidence they must both be accepted at equal value.” This is the
first of letter writer Pete Greer’s many logical fallacies and
fooleries. Two theories, in dramatic contradiction, one
scientific, one mythological, must each be given equal respect
as long as they are both based on the same evidence?
“Manipulating the genetics of a kind (or form) of life has never
caused a new kind to appear.” By this does he mean, like, trying
to cross-breed a duck with a crocodile and getting a
“crockoduck” in Kirk Cameron’s brilliant formulation? Do
creationists forward such infantilisms as serious arguments?
Evolution, Greer says, “has to violate the Cell Theory and The
Law of Biogenesis in order to be true.” What does he mean by
“Cell Theory” in this context and how does evolution violate it?
I’m guessing “Law of Entropy” refers to the Second Law of
Thermodynamics.  Pete, you might check with Answers in Genesis,
“Arguments we think creationists should no lon