  Re: possible confusion about tabula rasa context (KR and RDF
Redux)  From: Richard H. McCullough <rhm@cdepot.net> Date: Sat,
23 Nov 2002 00:50:19 -0800 Message-ID:
<009701c292cd$5aaf3ce0$bd7ba8c0@rhm8200> To: "Richard H.
McCullough" <rhm@cdepot.net>, "Frank Manola" <fmanola@mitre.org>
Cc: "Jon Hanna" <jon@spin.ie>, <www-rdf-interest@w3.org> Dick
McCullough said: KR's built-in "tabula rasa" context says:
That's a bit misleading: "tabula rasa" defines high-level
classes including "entity","attribute","action", etc., but the
much of the information listed comes directly from the syntax.
For this example, the syntax structure already tells us we're
talking about an action:     entity do action to final
characteristic done and KR can automatically classify entity,
action & final characteristic. For an attribute
(adjective/adverb type properties) the syntax is     existent
has attribute = value and KR can automatically classify the
property (as in RDF-MT inferences)  Similar automatic
classifications (inference