[R6RS] Modules  Michael Sperber sperber Tue Nov 2 14:37:48 EST
2004  I've attached a---from my point of view---minimal revision
of Kent's proposal to make me happy.  Manuel and, I think,
Richard, agree with the changes and their rationale, but may
want to make more changes. There are some notes (specifically
some marked "KENT") and some unresolved issues.  Cheers =8-}
Mike Friede, V?lkerverst?ndigung und ?berhaupt blabla  This
proposal is based on Kent's presentation in Snowbird.  It is
supposed to represent a set of minimal modifications to make
Mike happy.  The important difference is that the module
definition language is completely separate from the core
language used to define the module body.  This makes the module
definition language intentially non-extensible, which in turn
enables:  - a human-accessible process for looking where an
identifier comes   from, construct a dependency graph, and so on
(This is the main point.)  - writing of simple tools to
construct the dependency graph, perform   make,