After roughly two weeks of smooth reviewing I failed another
audit and got me a review ban. It was one of those posts that I
find quite borderline: An answer with a small list of short
things relevant to the question and a "further read here" link.
It is certainly not a good answer, and probably deserved
downvoting, but I would not call it "delete-worthy" as it seems
to be a genuine attempt at summing up what the link describes.
This is after all what we tell the people to do in link only
cases: we want the core of the link content here, and the link
is there for reference and "more in depth reading". Removing the
link should give an answer too (and in this case I would argue
it would have been an attempt to answer, though a bad one that
should have been downvoted).  Now I find these disagreements
between me and the community somewhat annoying, and it kills the
motivation to do reviews. Then I thought, maybe thats exactly
what they should do.  I seem to disagree with the community in
that I don't think bad an