Take the 2-minute tour ×  Given the vast infinite nature of
universe, billions of worlds, distances and masses that we
cannot comprehend, do you feel Big Bang theory is inadequate and
in some ways tells you that it was all there from beginning.
share|improve this question  closed as unclear what you're
asking by Donald.McLean May 3 at 5:17   What tells YOU that it
was all there from the beginning as you say? What do you mean by
distances and masses we cannot comprehend? The universe and it's
general structure is pretty much well understood to a certain
degree. –  harogaston May 3 at 3:10  1 Answer 1  Big Bang theory
is rather adequate, with respect to observations. But it's
incomplete. Your question is about the pre-planck epoch, a state
of the universe, when space and time didn't exist in a way we
are used to in standard physics.  Nothing is really known (by
empirical evidence) about this state, although there are
theoretical approches (e.g. this one), which try to describe
even those highly non-local and n