Results 1 to 6 of 6   1. #1      Default WDC Canon EOS M review
I'm confused as to how this camera got reviewed so favourably.
It seems that WDC has a policy of automatically adding an extra
2-3 points on to each category on the basis that the camera has
a Canon badge.      Despite the 18mp sensor showing its age
compared to the competition (eg. the 16mp Sony sensor), the
camera is awarded the same image quality score as the NEX-5R.
Moreover, even after alluding to the camera's poor AF (compared
to the competition) and slow burst rate, it is awarded 19/20 for
performance!      So, despite the fact that the EOS M has
comparitively poor image quality and is out-featured and out-
performed by the competition, WDC see fit to give it a gold
award.      I also notice that the reviewer, Phil Hall, gave the
camera only 8/10 on another review site - on WDC it seems to be
worth an extra 10%!    2. #2       Hello Lotus Eater,
Thanks for your comments regarding the EOS M review. Firstly,
can I assure you th