 Thread beginning with comment 438760 To view parent comment,
click here. Member since:  Just so you know, there is no 100%
proof of evolution or climate change, both have a lot of holes
in them, that is why they are currently classified as theories
and not laws (no matter what Carl Sagan said - LOL).  Sorry,
this is off-topic and I do not want to start a discussion on
climate change, but the "just a theory" line of reasoning always
annoys me:  Summary: in science, laws are observations and
theories are explanations. Really good theories don't become
laws, they become established and accepted scientific theories.
The theory of evolution explains why we observe evolution. The
theory of global warming explains why we see global warming. Of
course, if the theory does not match the facts, then it is a bad
theory, but an established scientific theory will have
experiments and measurements that give reason to believe it is a
good model for the way the world works. Science never "proves"
anything; it provides eviden