  Re: Finally clauses  On Thu, 29 Aug 2002, Michael Sperber [Mr.
Preprocessor] wrote:  >Bear> They could capture continuations or
call captured continuations >Bear> the same as any other
procedure.  No critical resources or >Bear> global variables are
implied or required, nothing that creates >Bear> a race
condition in multiprocessing is entangled, and the >Bear>
semantics becomes clean and provable again. >What precisely are
the semantic issues with SRFI 34 you're worried >about?  I sure
don't see any that would create race conditions or >interact
unpleasantly with multiprocessing.  I am concerned that the
"current exception handler" seems to be global -- a property of
the program rather than an individual  In a situation where I
want to have different threads doing different things, it makes
sense to have different exception handlers for them.  For
example, I may have one thread that's trying to compute a
regression average; if it attempts to divide by zero because
there are no data, I want its exception h