User talk:Harikrishna/Architecture/Data Model  < User
talk:Harikrishna Revision as of 09:43, 28 August 2008 by
Harikrishna (Talk | contribs)  Jump to: navigation, search
Rebuilding yet another "ontology" from scratch is not really an
"ontology" because it misses the chance of a shared
understanding once again. We do already have thousands of
"ontologies" that are rather "schemas", in particular, scheamas
nobody knows and uses... Our nepomuk ontology is at least shared
by some Nepomukians. That's one step towards really building a
semantic web...  So, We plan to use PIMO and User Context
ontologies for modeling how the data would be stored in Nepomuk.
We need to discuss further on resources ontology to define how
resource are stored...  To Remember : All data in Nepomuk should
be modelled along an ontology which should also be installed
along with the application (in this case context lib/service )
Discussions for actual modeling  Sebastian Trüg says: I still
think Context is a good name for the generic bas