    (Source: Getty Images)      Samsung Japan     Source:
Reuters  Comments     Threshold   RE: It's actually valid. By
Reclaimer77 on 6/23/2013 9:32:01 AM , Rating: 4 Samsung claims
they did, Apple claims they did not.  Apple's reputation in such
areas is to the point that nobody would believe their side of
the story except the most fervent fanboi. Like you.  Should
Apple now halt production of all of their devices, because
Samsung made an unreasonable offer - or pay way over the odds
for a FRAND patent?  That's the point of arbitration. It's not
up to Apple to decide "oh well, I don't like the way this is
going, I'll just use the technology anyway and pay zero."  Apple
has gone years, literally years, without paying one red cent for
the technology that Samsung spent billions in R&D to develop.
And you're sitting here talking about "FRAND abuse"? There's
only one party here that's abusing the system, and everyone
knows it.  Also just fyi, but you keep using the term
"reasonable" as if there's some concrete l