Atheist Nexus Logo  As I write, another federal court has ruled
the wicked, perverted Defense of Marriage Act unconstitutional. 
While I have not seen the opinion, just out now, I can raise at
least five good arguments why it could not pass Constitutional
muster.  Take for example the Due Process and Equal Protection
guarantees.  What is good for some is good for all, and  if 
some want to define marriage as "between one man and one woman,"
they demand strict scrutiny in their claims.  It is akin to
claims about the existence of God: fantastic claims demand
extraordinary proof.  Now that we know that we have a
presidential candidate whose grandpa had more than one wife, we
learn how glibly Mitt Romney can go along with DOMA-pushers,
although the law should be called the Offense to Marriage
Equality Act (OTOME).  His support of heterosexuals-only
marriage is mostly to curry the favor his base -- and I do mean
base.  Stick around, Mitt may etch another sketch.  Want to bet
Justice Scalia is salivating to slathe