  Re: Comments on the 6 Apr Draft  Date: Fri, 11 May 2001
18:03:59 -0400 Message-Id: <> To: "Blair Dillaway"
<blaird@microsoft.com>, "Takeshi Imamura" <IMAMU@jp.ibm.com> Cc:
<xml-encryption@w3.org> [Resulting version:         Includes
changes from feedback from Dillaway, Schaad,         Simon,
Takeshi, and Schaad/Farrell .]  At 09:50 5/4/2001 -0700, Blair
Dillaway wrote: >Below are comments on the latest rought draft.
I've tried not to repeat >issues/problems already posted by
others. >2. - In the example, it shows a CipherData element with
a URI attribute >and an 'encrypted' value.  Mixing these
together doesn't track with >proposed syntax. The expectation is
that one has an element with a URI >reference and optional
Transforms, or the actual encrypted data as >base64Binary.
We've discussed separating these two constructs out as >separate
types.  I assume once this is done we can clean up the example.
This pseudo-BNF (that Don came up with for dsig) is supposed to
simply show  what is possible: exercises