When I flagged my question for migration, it received a
"helpful" flag, but nothing happened; apparently this means the
target site rejected the migration. The same issue is raised in
this meta post.  A flag for migration that is "deemed helpful"
but where nothing happens is confusing, because "deemed helpful"
is easily interpreted as "you are right and we shall migrate". I
propose that when a user flags a posts for migration, that in
addition to a "flag deemed helpful/was disputed/declined"
feedback, there is an additional feedback as to what happened to
the migration — preferably with a motivation such as "target
site considered question off-topic/NARQ/...".  There is a
similar question "Provide direct feedback for rejected
migrations", but this relates to users with the power to vote
for migration, as opposed to users that can merely flag to
suggest a migration.  share|improve this question It sucks,
doesn't it? Sometimes, I'll just break protocol (flags & their
responses are supposed to be private) and po