Loyal Followers  Monday, December 03, 2012   In "Secular or non-
secular? - What history tells us", I have reproduced a section
of the Reid Commission report with a sentence unintentionally
omitted. I wish to take responsibility and apologise for that
omission. The particular section should read as follows (with
the omitted part in bold):   I wish to thank the writer of
Secular or non-secular: How Art Harun got it wrong on the Reid
Commission for bringing to my attention the aforesaid omission.
The fact that there is someone who cares enough to write a
2214-word article on my accidental and unintentional omission to
reproduce 10 words from the Reid Commission is heart-warming, to
say the least. I value such effort and support.  I have written
to the Malay Mail, who published my said article to include this
corrigendum (in a shorter form) in my next article. I hope they
would accede to my request.  Thank you.  * Update : this
corrigendum appears in my article published by the Malay mail
today on page 14. The sa