  Components rendered the same  From: Michael Cooper
<michaelc@watchfire.com> Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 17:49:48 -0400
Message-ID: <A0666B3C59F1634290FDC88674D87C32021251D5@1WFEMAIL.o
ttawa.watchfire.com>  Christophe, Gian, Yvette, and I took an
action [1] to make a proposal regarding the removed success
criterion "controls that look or sound the same should be
designed to act the same" in one of last week's polls [2]. We
still feel strongly that this should exist as a success
criterion. We propose the following wording for a success
criterion in Guideline 3.2:  "Within a set of delivery units,
components that are rendered the same have the same function."
We prefer this at level 2 but have discussed the possibility
that it may end up at level 3.  Some reasoning for this
(extracted from comments from Yvette and Christophe):  We
already have an SC that says that items that have similar
functionality should look the same. I think the reverse should
also be true: if it walks like a duck and talks like a duck, it
ha