  [Bug 5744] Improved Fragment Identifiers  From:
<bugzilla@wiggum.w3.org> Date: Fri, 13 Jun 2008 17:42:43 +0000
To: public-html-bugzilla@w3.org Message-Id:
<E1K7DIR-00061x-Fw@wiggum.w3.org>   Erik Wilde
<dret@berkeley.edu> changed:             What    |Removed
|Added                  CC|
|dret@berkeley.edu  --- Comment #2 from Erik Wilde
<dret@berkeley.edu>  2008-06-13 17:42:43 --- "What problem are
we solving here? Is giving a fragment identifier into a document
really something that causes difficulties? Most people seem to
deal fine with just saying "Look at bla on this page" with a URI
without a fragment identifier, no?"  that's correct, but kind of
a tautology, because nowadays it's the only option that people
have. whether people are dealing "fine" or not is kind of hard
to say, but it is hard to build better tools (such as a browser
providing the capability to create more specific links) when the
spec does not support that because only @id elements can be