A thought experiment re: justice and money  What’s up fam,  I
have thought experiment that I have mulled around for a while
now. For full disclosure, I am enamored by the work of
Philosopher John Rawls and his theory of creating justice from
“behind the veil.” So here it goes. Tomorrow morning, you turn
on the news to find out that some super computer virus has
deduced everyone’s bank accounts to zero. Let’s also assume that
there is no way verify the bank account balance before the
computer virus attack. To be sure, I am talking about
governments, corporations, and individuals…everybody.  How world
would rebuild from such scenario says much about how much about
how we as a society think about justice. Just think about it,
how do you think society would reorganize itself. I know some
people are thinking, “They could look at paystubs, newspaper
clips, etc. Be that as it may, who gets to justify what form of
proof is sufficient? Whose word is most trustworthy? In other
words, who gets the set the rules? Here ar