  Re: Saxonica Comments on XProc last-call draft, sections 1 and
2  From: Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007
13:59:25 -0400 To: Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com> Message-ID:
<m23ax1tiiq.fsf@nwalsh.com> / Michael Kay <mike@saxonica.com>
was heard to say: | 1. Technical (but non-normative). Fig 1
Example. Since the example is trying | to illustrate that a
pipeline takes XML documents as input, it would be | better if
the input consisted of "schema documents" rather than "schemas".
| (A schema document is an XML document, a schema is not).
Fair enough; I think we could change the labels in the diagram
to read "source document", "schema documents", and "result
document".  | 2. Nomenclature. "validate-xml-schema" is a
misleading name for a step that | validates an instance.  Uhm. I
suppose. I guess we could rename them "validate-with-xml-
schema", "validate-with-relax-ng", "validate-with-schematron" if
you think that would be a significant improvement.  | 3.
Clarification. It becomes clear later,