Comment: Quickly  (See in situ)  In reply to comment: PLEASE
READ (see in situ)   "those States, have done nothing to change
it."  States cannot do anything.  In fact a Dictator named
Washington conscripted an Army in 1794 and then invaded
Pennsilvania to collect on a tax, which was to enforce a money
monopoly.  Washington did something. A State did nothing, it
can't, a State is a fictitious legal being, so it is merely a
convenience to employ one name, State, instead of listing all
the names of all the people who do things in that State.  I
don't have time for this, so if you want to competitively offer
viewpoints then address your understanding of what Washington
did during what became known as The Whiskey Rebellion.  Shays's
Rebellion occurred under The Articles of Confederation, in one
State, Massachusetts.  Those events that became known as Shays's
Rebellion exemplify how The Articles of Confederation Limited
what "The President" could or could not do, and that can be
compared to what was done by "The Pr