Letting alone special cases, such as previously agreed retagging
- is serial editing acceptable in general?  First of all, I have
a prejudice against serial editing at all. For a close watcher
of couple tags, it disturbs me, when many questions gets
bubbling up in numbers. It takes time to review them. Also, I
have a strong belief that editing should be only supplementary,
but by no means the main occupation of the participant. If
someone has no knowledge to answer, they shouldn't edit anything
at all.  I have a feeling that edits should be occasional, not
planned. The scenario is "I come across this question, in the
area I have some experience, and I feel I can contribute a bit",
not "Today I'll edit 50 questions just for sake of it!". It
looks to me as people jumps to editing craze just out of nothing
to do. And the outcome of such campaigns is from none to
harmful.  So, the question is: is serial editing frowned upon in
general, especially for insignificant make-up cleanings?  Good
edits are good. Bad edit