Liar42 liar42 at Thu Oct 4 09:03:45 EST 2001  >Then Crick turned
to Neuroscience and we all should be very grateful for  Why, did
he object the atrocious crimes there against others?  Or  you
just try to dictate all others how they have to feel towards
someone?  >(...) something like the Thalamic searchlight
hypothesis. Haven't read it and and I don't give it an
intellectual hoot about consciousness per se, <
Consciousnesses.  (And though I do not regard the sequencer as
an I consciousness, I wrote about that aspect and it more
extensively in the past, concerning speculated prestages and
someone's experiment there, but do not wish to repeat that now).
>let alone human consciousness. <  Could as well say mammal.
(Apart from that in my brain two consciousnesses both registered
older than mammal, and mine as Urwes(en) already in the water,
and there a while, a looong while. Simplified old stuff in the
brain that many have in variations.)  >I do not think
consciousness is rooted in some gross anatomical struct