  Re: 11th specimen of Archaeopteryx‏  Denver Fowler  From:
Jaime Headden <qi_leong@hotmail.com>    I do agree that when I
said that the toes grade from two to four, then one, I  was
basing this on back of hand recollection, and am admitting my
error. I was  focusing, at the time, on terrestrial animals and
basal paravians, where this  is true at the base of extinct
*Avialae*. Even *Cathayornis yandica* has a  relatively short
first ungual compared to at least unguals 2 and 3, even if 4  is
shorter (I think), and it appears even in *Protopteryx
fengningensis*, both  birds apparently highly arboreal.   What
does "highly arboreal" mean? And based on what?  >  I didn't say
anything about Fowler not being cited, although it should be
>noted that the work in question (Fowler, Freedman & Scannella,
2009) appears  >to focus on claw _curvature_ and _size_, but not
other aspects of morphology.   Like what? Claw thickness? cross
section? there are some descriptions in there  about that (some
of the only descriptions o