    ERD Case No. CR200002461, EEOC Case No. 26GA01514
Paragraph 10 of the administrative law judge's FINDINGS OF FACT
is deleted and the following paragraphs are substituted
therefor:  "10. Worzalla's decision to change Mr. Stroik's
status to part-time and its subsequent decision to terminate his
employment were related to his disability.  "11. Mr. Stroik's
disability interfered with his ability to perform the job.  "12.
Worzalla did not refuse to provide Mr. Stroik with a reasonable
accommodation."   The decision of the administrative law judge
(copy attached) is modified, and as modified, is affirmed.
Dated and mailed July 16, 2004 stroifr . rsd : 164 : 9  /s/
James T. Flynn, Chairman  /s/ David B. Falstad, Commissioner
/s/ Robert Glaser, Commissioner   In his petition for commission
review and supporting brief the complainant argues that he was
demoted and discharged because of his disability. (1)   The
complainant contends that his demotion was occasioned by
absences caused by his diabetes, and that