  Re: [#832] Clear link text - priority and acceptability of
supplemental text  From: Al Gilman <Alfred.S.Gilman@IEEE.org>
Date: Mon, 21 Jun 2004 18:01:26 -0400 Message-Id:
<p0611040bbcfcfd652fc2@[]> To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Cc: w3c-wai-
ua@w3.org  This is a good discussion to be having.  At 4:35 PM
-0400 6/21/04, Michael Cooper wrote: >The requirement to make
clear link text is currently a Level 3 success >[1]. In my
opinion this should be a level 1. In discussion with the >task
force, we thought it might be a level 3 because of the
possibility to >supplemental text to clarify the link (e.g., the
"title" attribute in HTML). >for that to work, we need to know
that the supplemental text will be >to the user when needed. But
the UAAG [2] does not provide a single mandate >how this is to
be accomplished, and further permits supplemental text to be
>presented instead of the orginal text, not just alongside.
Please cite more specific language -- OK, I found it.  <quote
cite=  If C is a summary, title, alternative, de