  Re: Future releases of Debian  >  This is pretty old... who
still uses it, anyway?  More specifically, >  does anyone use
libdb2++, and if so, are they only things which  >  aren't
supposed to be transitioned?  OK, this is an odd list: Package:
libdb2++ Reverse Depends:   libdb4.1++,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-3
libdb4.0++c102,libdb2++ 2:2.7.7-3   libdb3++c102,libdb2++
2:2.7.7-3   libdb2++-dev,libdb2++ 2:   animals,libdb2++
2:2.7.7-4  What exactly is going on here?  It appears that apart
from 'animals', the only things depending on libdb2++ (the C++
interface to libdb2) are *future* versions of the C++ interface
to libdb.  Why are they depending on it?  This seems odd to me.
Nathanael Nerode  <neroden at gcc.gnu.org>  Reply to: