Mirrorless cameras part 2.  Started 9 months ago | Discussions
thread Senior MemberPosts: 1,977Gear list Re: Mirrorless cameras
part 2. In reply to EinsteinsGhost, 9 months ago  EinsteinsGhost
wrote:  joejack951 wrote:  EinsteinsGhost wrote:     You seem to
be missing my point. There's no use discussing lens size if you
are going to ignore non-equivalent field of views and apertures.
You can make a very tiny, fast, wide angle lens but if you put
it in front of a tiny sensor it's no longer a wide angle and
it's no longer considered fast (relative to a larger sensor
camera).  APS-C has a lot of the same issues as current
mirrorless cameras in that for an equivalent lens, the system
isn't any smaller. It's only smaller when you live with smaller
apertures. My 24-120/4 zoom lens would need to be a 16-80/2.8
lens on DX. I have a 17-55/2.8 lens for DX and it's already
heavier and bigger than the FX lens. So much for DX making for a
smaller kit.    Wow, you can go off topic really quick. I'm
referring to the lack of