View Single Post Join Date: Sep 2012 Posts: 609 Default Why do
people say Nadal is the undisputed clay GOAT?  He isn't.  I mean
you can call him the clay GOAT but it's hilarious to me that
being a mere ONE RG behind Nadal, completely disqualifies him
from the discussion. That is even more laughable once you
consider that RG and slams in general didn't have the weight
that they hold now. Borg skipped several RG tournaments if I
recall correctly. How fair is it to judge him on something that
only gained the weight it has now, after he retired?  Not to
mention, the "Nadal would beat Borg" nonsense is pathetic as
well. Well, yes he would. With his Babolat racket. Good luck
trying to hit heavy spin with a wooden racket though.  In my
book they are both co GOATs on that surface. Nadal hasn't done
enough to be considered the clear cut best ever on that surface.
dangalak is offline   Reply With Quote