Motl's measured support for "Topological field theory of the initial singularity of spacetime", however, stands in stark contrast to Robert Oeckl's official MathSciNet review, which states that the paper is "rife with nonsensical or meaningless statements and suffers from a serious lack of coherence," follows up with several examples to illustrate his point, and concludes that the paper "falls short of scientific standards and appears to have no meaningful content." An official report from the Centre national de la recherche scientifique (CNRS), which became public in 2010, concluded that the paper " ne peut en aucune façon être qualifié de contribution scientifique " ("cannot in any way be considered a scientific contribution"). The CNRS report summarized the Bogdanovs' theses thusly: " Ces thèses n’ont pas de valeur scientifique. […] Rarement aura-t-on vu un travail creux habillé avec une telle sophistication " ("These theses have no scientific value. [...] Rarely have we seen a hollow work dressed with such sophistication ").