All right. Now, previously, on September 12th, the Court entered an order which went to the motion for reconsideration. That related specifically to -- filed by the reporters. That went specifically to our August 2nd order which, in effect, said that the reporters would have to testify at certain depositions.
Question: It was not the motion, but the order that came from it that directly caused the reporters having to testify. True, False, or Neither? 