It provides an independent assessment of conclusions. It allows laboratories to practice science. It creates more job opportunities for scientists. It ensures all scientists will study similar phenomena.
I am hesitating between 4 options to answer the following question, which option should I choose?
Question: Which of these best explains why peer review is critical to the advancement of science?
Possibilities:
- It provides an independent assessment of conclusions.
- It allows laboratories to practice science.
- It creates more job opportunities for scientists.
- It ensures all scientists will study similar phenomena.

It provides an independent assessment of conclusions.