ITEM 1. BUSINESS
All references to "Notes" are to Notes to Financial Statements contained in this report.
The registrant, JMB Income Properties, Ltd. - XI (the "Partnership"), is a limited partnership formed in 1983 and currently governed under the Revised Uniform Limited Partnership Act of the State of Illinois to invest in improved income-producing commercial and residential real property. The Partnership sold $173,406,000 in limited partnership interests (the "Interests") commencing on July 11, 1984, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933 (Registration No. 2-90503). A total of 173,406 Interests were sold to the public at $1,000 per Interest and the holders of 173,406 Interests were admitted to the Partnership in fiscal 1985. The offering closed on November 30, 1984. No Investor has made any additional capital contribution after such date. The Investors in the Partnership share in the benefits of ownership of the Partnership's real property investments according to the number of Interests held.
The Partnership is engaged solely in the business of the acquisition, operation and sale and disposition of equity real estate investments. Such equity investments are held by fee title and/or through joint venture partnership interests. The Partnership's real estate investments are located throughout the nation and it has no real estate investments located outside the United States. A presentation of information about industry segments, geographic regions, raw materials or seasonality is not applicable and would not be material to an understanding of the Partnership's business taken as a whole. Pursuant to the Partnership agreement, the Partnership is required to terminate on or before October 31, 2034. Accordingly, the Partnership intends to hold its remaining properties for investment purposes until such time as sale or other disposition appears to be advantageous. Unless otherwise described, the Partnership expects to hold its properties for long-term investment where, due to current market conditions, it is impossible to forecast the expected holding period. At sale of a particular property, the proceeds, if any, are generally distributed or reinvested in existing properties rather than invested in acquiring additional properties.
The Partnership has made the real property investments set forth in the following table:
The Partnership's real property investments are subject to competition from similar types of properties (including, in certain areas, properties owned or advised by affiliates of the General Partners) in the respective vicinities in which they are located. Such competition is generally for the retention of existing tenants. Additionally, the Partnership is in competition for new tenants in markets where significant vacancies are present. Reference is made to Item 7 below for a discussion of competitive conditions and future renovation and capital improvement plans of the Partnership and certain of its significant investment properties. Approximate occupancy levels for the properties are set forth in the table in Item 2

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES
The Partnership owns directly or through joint venture partnerships the properties or interests in the properties referred to under Item 1 above to which reference is hereby made for a description of said properties.
The following is a listing of principal businesses or occupations carried on in and approximate occupancy levels by quarter during fiscal years 1994 and 1993 for the Partnership's investment properties owned during 1994:
ITEM 3.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
The Partnership is not subject to any material pending legal proceedings.
ITEM 4.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS
There were no matters submitted to a vote of security holders during 1994 or 1993.
PART II
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR THE PARTNERSHIP'S LIMITED PARTNERSHIP INTERESTS AND RELATED SECURITY HOLDER MATTERS
As of December 31, 1994, there were 14,754 record holders of Interests of the Partnership. There is no public market for Interests and it is not anticipated that a public market for Interests will develop. Upon request, the Managing General Partner may provide information relating to a prospective transfer of Interests to an investor desiring to transfer his Interests. The price to be paid for the Interests, as well as any other economic aspects of the transaction, will be subject to negotiation by the investor.
Reference is made to Item 6

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
On July 11, 1984, the Partnership commenced an offering to the public of $60,000,000, subject to increase up to $200,000,000, pursuant to a Registration Statement on Form S-11 under the Securities Act of 1933. On November 30, 1984, the initial and final closing of the offering was consummated with the dealer manager of the public offering (an affiliate of which is a limited partner of the Associate General Partner of the Partner- ship), and 173,406 Interests were issued by the Partnership.
After deducting selling expenses and other offering costs, the Partnership had approximately $156,493,000 with which to make investments in commercial real property, to pay legal fees and other costs (including acquisition fees) related to such investments and for working capital. A portion of such proceeds was utilized to acquire the properties described in Item 1 above.
At December 31, 1994, the Partnership had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $7,200,000. Such funds and short-term investments of approximately $7,531,000 may be utilized for distributions to partners and for working capital requirements including operating deficits, re-leasing costs of vacant space, and certain capital improvements currently being incurred at Riverside Square Mall. Bank overdrafts of approximately $415,000 as of December 31, 1994 have been subsequently repaid as of January 1995. Additionally, funds may be utilized to fund the Partnership's share of releasing costs and capital improvements at certain portions of the Park Center Financial Plaza. As discussed in Note 2(c), a major tenant at the Bank of Delaware investment property, brought a lawsuit against the Partnership which was decided in the tenant's favor pursuant to an arbitration ruling. The Partnership reimbursed the tenant approximately $802,000, all of which was paid as of December 1992. The Partnership was released from any further obligations pursuant to the assignment of title to the property in November 1994 as described below. The Partnership and its consolidated venture have currently budgeted in 1995 approximately $2,110,000 for tenant improvements and other capital expenditures excluding amounts budgeted for the renovation at Riverside Square Mall as discussed below. The Partnership's share of such items and its share of such similar items for its unconsolidated ventures for 1995 is currently budgeted to be $2,716,000. Actual amounts expended in 1995 may vary depending on a number of factors including actual leasing activity, results of property operations, liquidity considerations and other market conditions over the course of the year. The General Partners have been deferring receipt of distributions in accordance with the subordination requirement of the Partnership Agreement as discussed in Notes 5 and 8. The source of capital for such items and for both short-term and long-term future liquidity and distributions is expected to be through net cash generated by the Partnership's investment properties and through the sale and/or refinancing of such investments. In such regard, reference is made to the Partnership's property specific discussions below and also to the Partnership's disclosure of certain property lease expirations in Item 6. The Partnership's and its ventures' mortgage obligations are all non- recourse. Therefore, the Partnership and its ventures are not obligated to pay mortgage indebtedness unless the related property produces sufficient net cash flow from operations or sale.
During August 1994, San Jose received notification from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose of its offer to purchase one of the parking garage structures in the office building complex, for an approved Agency project for $4,090,000. The price offered is deemed by the Agency to be just compensation in compliance with applicable State and Federal laws relating to the government's power of eminent domain. San Jose is currently investigating its options with regard to the Agency's offer, including the impact of any purchase on garage spaces leased to tenants of other Partnership properties in the complex. Should the Agency proceed to purchase the property, San Jose would recognize a gain for financial reporting and Federal income tax purposes. However, it is uncertain at this time whether a transfer of the garage to the Agency will occur, or upon what terms.
San Jose, during the fourth quarter of 1994, finalized a loan extension and modification with the mortgage lender on the 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings and certain parking areas as the mortgage loan secured by this portion of the complex matured on October 1, 1993 and was extended to December 1, 1993. The modified and extended loan has an interest rate of 8.4% per annum, requires monthly interest payments only beginning December 1, 1994 through December 1, 1997 when the loan begins to amortize until it matures November 30, 2001, when the unpaid principal and interest balance is due. The refinancing resulted in a partial paydown of the outstanding principal balance in the amount of $2.5 million of which the Partnership's share was $1.25 million. (Reference is made to Note 3 (b)).
San Jose notified the tenants in and invitees to the complex that some of the buildings, particularly the 100-130 Park Center Plaza Buildings and the garage below them, could pose a life safety hazard under certain unusually intense earthquake conditions. While the buildings and the garage were designed to comply with the applicable codes for the period in which they were constructed, and there is no legal requirement to upgrade the buildings for seismic purposes, San Jose is working with consultants to analyze ways in which such a potential life safety hazard could be eliminated. Tenants occupying approximately 55,000 square feet (approximately 13% of the buildings) of the Park Center Plaza investment property have leases that expire in 1995, for which there can be no assurance of renewals. In addition, new leases will likely require expenditures for lease commissions and tenant improvements prior to tenant occupancy. These anticipated costs upon re-leasing will result in a decrease in cash flow from operations over the near term. However, since the costs of both re-leasing space and any seismic program could be substantial, San Jose has commenced discussions with the appropriate lender for additional loan proceeds to pay for all or a portion of these costs. Furthermore, should lender assistance be required to fund significant costs at the 100-130 Park Center Plaza buildings but not be obtained, the Partnership may decide not to commit any additional amounts to this portion of the complex since such amounts are likely to be large in comparison to the Partnership's current equity in this portion of the complex and the likelihood of recovering such funds through increased capital appreciation is remote. The result would be that the Partnership would no longer have an ownership interest in this portion of the complex.
As a result, there is uncertainty about the ability to recover the net carrying value of the property through future operations and sale and accordingly, San Jose has made provisions for value impairment on the 100- 130 Park Center Plaza buildings and certain parking areas and the 170 Almaden building of $944,335 in the aggregate. Such provisions at September 30, 1994 were recorded to reduce the net carrying values of these buildings to the then outstanding balances of the related non-recourse financing. Furthermore, at September 30, 1993, San Jose recorded a provision for value impairment on the 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings and certain parking areas of $15,549,935 to reduce the net carrying value of these buildings to the then outstanding balance of related non-recourse financing. Additionally, at December 31, 1992, San Jose recorded a provision for value impairment of $8,142,152 on certain other portions of the complex to amounts equal to the then outstanding balances of the related non-recourse financing. In the event the lender on the 100-130 Park Center Plaza portion of the complex exercised its remedies as discussed above, the result would likely be that San Jose would no longer have an ownership interest in such portion. See Note 3(b) for further discussion of this investment property.
Riverside Square Mall has been experiencing decreasing sales levels as well as increasing competition for new tenants since a competing regional retail center expanded its operations in 1990. Occupancy at the mall, not including Saks Fifth Avenue, has decreased from 81% at December 31, 1993 to 72% at December 31, 1994 primarily due to a certain tenant vacating its space as described below more fully. In an effort to improve the property's competitive position, the Partnership has substantially completed its renovation and is continuing to remerchandise the center. In connection with the renovation, the Partnership, in early 1994, signed 15- year operating covenant extensions with both Saks and Bloomingdales, the latter of which owns their own store. In return for the additional 15-year commitment to the center, the Partnership reimbursed Saks for their recent store renovation in the amount of $6,100,000 and is obligated to pay Bloomingdales $5,000,000 toward their upcoming store renovation (which payment is expected to occur in 1995). In connection with the payment to Saks, the Partnership also acquired title to the Saks building which had previously been owned by Saks. The Partnership is also required to complete the renovation of the mall, with an additional estimated cost of approximately $12,000,000 which has been substantially completed as of December 31, 1994. The Partnership continues to consider expanding the mall at some point in the future as well. Furthermore, the Partnership has commenced a $7,500,000 restoration of the parking deck. This restoration should be completed by the end of 1995. During the third quarter of 1994, the Partnership finalized a refinancing of the existing mortgage loan with a new loan in the amount of $36,000,000. The new loan has an initial interest rate of 8.35% per annum, requires monthly principal and interest 2payments of $286,252 beginning September 1, 1994, and matures December 1, 2006, when the unpaid principal and interest balance is due. The refinancing resulted in net proceeds of approximately $22,300,000 (after retirement of the previous mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of approximately $13,000,000, and payment of a prepayment penalty of approximately $650,000 which has been reflected as an extraordinary item in 1994 in the accompanying financial statements and as discussed in note 2(b)). Of such proceeds, approximately $11,200,000 was escrowed by the lender pursuant to the loan agreement and will be released (none released as of December 31, 1994), including interest earned, to fund certain costs of the renovation and restoration as discussed above. The remaining $11,100,000 represents the replenishment of the Partnership's working capital for amounts paid or to be paid to Saks and Bloomingdales for tenant allowances as discussed above. In connection with the negotiations relating to the refinancing, the Partnership had escrowed approximately $801,000 to serve as collateral to secure a letter of credit. Such letter of credit was released and the funds were refunded to the Partnership in September 1994 in connection with the loan funding.
The Partnership is continuing to attempt to lease the vacant space in the mall, but the competitive nature of the surrounding retail area and the fact that the mall was in need of a renovation has extended the time period required to re-lease space as tenant leases expire and are not renewed. On January 7, 1994, Conran's, a tenant occupying approximately 28,000 square feet or 12% of the building, filed for protection pursuant to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. During 1994, the Partnership bought the rights to the Conran's lease for $475,000 through the bankruptcy auction and is in control of the space. The Partnership is reviewing its possible alternatives with respect to replacement tenants for the Conran's lease which was originally scheduled to expire in January 2000.
In November 1994, due to the Partnership's default in payment of debt service, the mortgage lender concluded proceedings to realize upon its mortgage security interest represented by the land, building, and related improvements of the Bank of Delaware investment property via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. As a result of the disposition of the property, the Partnership recognized a gain in 1994 for financial reporting purposes of $447,650 and a loss for Federal income tax purposes of $4,756,937 with no corresponding distributable proceeds. In December 1993, a major tenant, E.I. duPont de Nemours ("duPont"), which comprised approximately 27% of the building, vacated their space upon expiration of their lease. The property had been operating at a cash deficit due to the significant costs incurred in connection with the re-leasing of vacant space and certain capital improvements. Due to the competitive nature of this marketplace, the Partnership estimated the costs associated with re-leasing any vacant space during the next few years, including those costs to remove the remaining asbestos in tenant space, would have been substantial. As a result of these leasing concerns, the Partnership recorded a provision for value impairment on the Bank of Delaware Building at June 30, 1992 of $11,476,030 to reduce the net carrying value of the Bank of Delaware Building to the then outstanding balance of the related non-recourse debt. Further, the Partnership had commenced discussions with the building's first mortgage lender in order to seek a loan modification. In connection with these discussions, effective January 1994, the Partnership had suspended payment of debt service to the lender. Under the terms of a mortgage and security agreement, the Partnership, in its capacity as mortgagor of the building, agreed to indemnify the mortgage lender, under certain circumstances, against damages, claims, liabilities and expenses incurred by or asserted against the mortgage lender in relation to asbestos in the building. Asbestos had been abated or encapsulated in approximately 62% of the building's space. The Partnership did not believe that any remaining asbestos in the building presented a hazard and did not believe that such asbestos was required to be removed. The Partnership estimated that the cost of asbestos abatement in a portion of the building that could be incurred under certain circumstances in the future would have been approximately $800,000. However, the Partnership did not believe that it would have likely been required to incur (or to indemnify the mortgage lender against) any such cost, although there is no assurance that the Partnership would not have been required to pay such cost or indemnification. In conjunction with the transfer of title, the Partnership paid the mortgage lender a sum of approximately $681,000 which included the net cash flow of the property since the suspension of debt service and an indemnification release fee for which the mortgage lender released the Partnership from all liabilities respecting the property, including those related to asbestos.
JWP, Inc. leased approximately 78,000 square feet of space (approximately 29% of the property) at Royal Executive Park II in August 1992. As a result of the JWP, Inc. lease, the property has produced sufficient cash flow to fund the Partnership's preferred level of return for 1994 and in addition, recovered a portion of the cumulative shortfall in this return since 1989. The Partnership expects to receive its preferred level of return for 1995 in addition to a partial recovery of its cumulative shortfall in this return since 1989. In early 1994, JWP filed for protection pursuant to a Chapter 11 bankruptcy petition. JWP subsequently subleased approximately 62,000 square feet of its space and these subtenants have assumed the terms of JWP's lease and have become direct tenants. Additionally, JWP formally rejected its lease and vacated the remainder of its space in January 1995. However, this remaining space (of approximately 16,000 square feet) has been leased for a term of one year to a tenant who previously had assumed space sublet by JWP. Thus, through 1995, all of the former JWP space has been re-leased. The previous manager of the property, an affiliate of the venture partner, continued an aggressive marketing program to lease the remaining vacant space but the competitive nature of the market continued to extend the time period required to lease space to initial tenants which will result in a decrease in cash flow from operations over the near term. Effective July 1, 1994, management and leasing activities at the complex were transferred to an affiliate of the General Partners of the Partnership, who managed the property until December 1994. In December 1994, one of the affiliated property managers sold substantially all of its assets and assigned its interest in its management contracts to an unaffiliated third party. In addition, certain of the management personnel of the property manager became management personnel of the purchaser and its affiliates.
Due to uncertainty about the ability to recover the net carrying value of the property through future operations and sale, Royal Executive has made a provision for value impairment of $25,378,894. Such provision at September 30, 1994 was recorded to reduce the net carrying value of the property to the then estimated valuation. The provision for value impairment has been allocated fully to the venture partner to reflect their subordination to the Partnership in distributions with regard to future operation and sale or financing proceeds as discussed in Note 3(c).
There are certain risks associated with the Partnership's investments made through joint ventures including the possibility that the Partnership's joint venture partners in an investment might become unable or unwilling to fulfill their financial or other obligations, or that such joint venture partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with those of the Partnership.
Though the economy has recently shown signs of improvement and financing is generally becoming more available for certain types of higher- quality properties in healthy markets, real estate lenders are typically requiring a lower loan-to-value ratio for mortgage financing than in the 2past. This has generally made it difficult for owners to refinance real estate assets at their current debt levels unless the value of the underlying property has appreciated significantly. As a consequence, and due to the weakness of some of the local real estate markets in which the Partnership's properties operate, the Partnership is taking steps to preserve its working capital.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The aggregate decrease in cash and cash equivalents and short-term investments as of December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to funds utilized in 1994 for the acquisition of the Saks Fifth Avenue building, and renovation work as described above at Riverside Square Mall partially offset by the receipt of $11,100,000 in loan proceeds from the refinancing of long-term debt at the Riverside Square Mall property.
The increase in rents and other receivables at December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to the timing of rents collected from certain tenants at the Riverside Square Mall property.
The increase in escrow deposits as of December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to escrow payments made pursuant to the loan refinancing at Riverside Square Mall of approximately $11,500,000 including interest earned on escrowed fund. Reference is made to Note 2(b).
The decrease in land, accumulated depreciation, prepaid expenses, and current portion of long-term debt as of December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to the lender obtaining title to the Bank of Delaware building via a deed in lieu of foreclosure in November 1994 as discussed above. See Note 2(c).
The increase in building and improvements as of December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to tenant improvements renovation work, and the purchase of the Saks store of approximately $22,260,000 incurred in 1994 at Riverside Square Mall, as discussed above, partially offset by the lender obtaining title to the Bank of Delaware building via a deed in lieu of foreclosure as discussed above.
The increase in deferred expenses at December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993 is primarily due to $371,000 of certain costs associated with the August 31, 1994 refinancing of the mortgage loan at the Riverside Square Mall property and $558,000 of deferred expenses due to increased leasing activity during the fourth quarter of 1994.
The increase in accrued interest payable and long-term debt, less current portion, as of December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 and the increase in mortgage interest expense for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 is due to the refinancing of the debt at the Riverside Square Mall property. Reference is made to Note 2(b).
The increase in construction costs payable as of December 31, 1994 as compared to December 31, 1993, is due to the renovation at the Riverside Square Mall property. See Note 2(b).
The decrease in rental income for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 is primarily due to receiving two months less of rent at the Bank of Delaware building due to the lender taking title to the property via a deed in lieu of foreclosure and also due to lower average occupancy at the Bank of Delaware building and the Riverside Square Mall property. The decrease in rental income for the year ended December 31, 1993 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1992 is due to lower occupancy at the Bank of Delaware and tenant billing adjustments in 1993 of approximately $223,000 at Riverside Square Mall.
The increase in interest income for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 is primarily due to approximately $203,000 of interest earned on escrowed funds and net loan proceeds related to the refinancing at Riverside Square Mall. The decrease in interest income for the year ended December 31, 1993 as compared to December 31, 1992 is primarily due to lower effective yields being earned on U.S. Government obligations held during 1993.
The increase in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 is primarily due to the depreciation taken in 1994 on the Saks Fifth Avenue building acquired in 1994 at the Riverside Square Mall property. The decrease in depreciation expense for the year ended December 31, 1993 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1992 is primarily due to a reduction of approximately $223,000 in depreciation expense at the Bank of Delaware building due to the $11,476,000 provision for value impairment recorded at September 30, 1992. See Note 2(c).
The increase in property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 is primarily due to an increase in real estate taxes (partially recoverable from tenants) of approximately $140,000 and an increase in the provision for doubtful accounts of approximately $276,000 at the Riverside Square Mall property. The increase in property operating expenses for the year ended December 31, 1993 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1992 is partially due to an increase of approximately $272,000 of snow removal costs primarily due to a blizzard in early 1993 at the Riverside Square Mall property.
The decrease in professional services for the year ended December 31, 1993 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1992 is primarily due to legal fees incurred in 1992 by the Partnership in its defense of a lawsuit and its subsequent appeal brought against the Riverside Square Mall property concerning public access issues.
The provision for value impairment for the year ended December 31, 1992 is due to the Partnership recording a provision for value impairment of $11,476,030 at the Bank of Delaware building at June 30, 1992 to reduce the net carrying value of the investment property to the then outstanding balance of the related non-recourse debt. See Note 1.
The Partnership's share of operations of unconsolidated ventures increased for the year ended December 31, 1994 as compared to the year ended December 31, 1993 primarily due to a provision for value impairment of approximately $15,550,000 recorded at the San Jose investment property at September 30, 1993 (of which the Partnership's share was approximately $7,775,000), partially offset by the provision for value impairment recorded at the San Jose investment property at September 30, 1994 of approximately $944,000, of which the Partnership's share is approximately $472,000. See Note 3(b).
The gain on disposition of investment property for the year ended December 31, 1994 is due to the lender taking title to the Bank of Delaware building via a deed in lieu of foreclosure in November 1994. See Note 2(c).
The $2,206,781 extraordinary item for the year ended December 31, 1994 is due to the refinancing of long-term debt at Riverside Square Mall. See Note 2(b). INFLATION
Due to the decrease in the level of inflation in recent years, inflation generally has not had a material effect on rental income or property operating expenses.
To the extent that inflation in future periods does have an adverse impact on property operating expenses, the effect will generally be offset by amounts recovered from tenants as many of the long-term leases at the Partnership's commercial properties have escalation clauses covering increases in the cost of operating and maintaining the properties as well as real estate taxes. Therefore, there should be little effect on operating earnings if the properties remain substantially occupied. In addition, substantially all of the leases at the Partnership's shopping center investments contain provisions which entitle the Partnership to participate in gross receipts of tenants above fixed minimum amounts.
Future inflation may also cause capital appreciation of the Partnership's investment properties over a period of time to the extent that rental rates and replacement costs of properties increase.
ITEM 8.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
INDEX
Independent Auditors' Report Consolidated Balance Sheets, December 31, 1994 and 1993 Consolidated Statements of Operations, years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Consolidated Statements of Partners' Capital Accounts (Deficit), years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
SCHEDULE --------
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation III
SCHEDULES NOT FILED:
All schedules other than the one indicated in the index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.
ROYAL EXECUTIVE PARK II (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)
INDEX
Independent Auditors' Report Balance Sheets, December 31, 1994 and 1993 Statements of Operations, years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Statements of Partners' Capital Accounts, years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Statements of Cash Flows, years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 Notes to Financial Statements
SCHEDULE --------
Real Estate and Accumulated Depreciation III
SCHEDULES NOT FILED:
All schedules other than the one indicated in the index have been omitted as the required information is inapplicable or the information is presented in the financial statements or related notes.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI:
We have audited the financial statements of JMB Income Properties, Ltd. - XI (a limited partnership) as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements and financial statement schedule are the responsibility of the General Partners of the Partnership. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the General Partners of the Partnership, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of JMB Income Properties, Ltd. - XI at December 31, 1994 and 1993, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Chicago, Illinois March 27, 1995
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, 1993 AND 1992
(1) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The equity method of accounting has been applied in the accompanying financial statements with respect to the Partnership's interest in Royal Executive Park II ("Royal Executive") and JMB/San Jose Associates ("San Jose") (note 3). Accordingly, the accompanying financial statements do not include the accounts of Royal Executive and San Jose.
The Partnership's records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting as adjusted for Federal income tax reporting purposes. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from such records after making appropriate adjustments to present the Partnership's accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Such adjustments are not recorded on the records of the Partnership. The net effect of these items for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 is summarized as follows:
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
The net earnings (loss) per limited partnership interest is based upon the number of limited partnership interests outstanding at the end of the period (173,411). Deficit capital accounts will result, through the duration of the Partnership, in net gain for financial reporting and income tax purposes.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 requires the Partnership to present a statement which classifies receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing or financing activities. The required information has been segregated and accumulated according to the classifications specified in the pronouncement. Partnership distributions from unconsolidated ventures are considered cash flow from operating activities only to the extent of the Partnership's cumulative share of net earnings. The Partnership records amounts held in U.S. Government obligations at cost, which approximates market. For the purposes of these statements, the Partnership's policy is to consider all such amounts held with original maturities of three months or less ($7,200,333 and $0 at December 31, 1994 and 1993, respectively) as cash equivalents with any remaining amounts (generally with original maturities of one year or less) reflected as short-term investments being held to maturity.
Deferred expenses consist primarily of loan fees and lease commissions which are amortized over the terms stipulated in the related loan agreements or over the terms of the related leases using the straight-line method.
Although certain leases of the Partnership provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or increases in the minimum lease payments over the term of the lease, rental income is accrued for the full period of occupancy on a straight-line basis.
In response to the uncertainties relating to the future recovery of the carrying value of the Bank of Delaware investment property through future operations or sale, the Partnership recorded a provision for value impairment on the Bank of Delaware investment property of $11,476,030. Such provision, made as of June 30, 1992, was recorded to reduce the net carrying value of the investment property to the then outstanding balance of the related non-recourse debt. Reference is made to note 2(c) for further discussion of the current status of this investment property.
In response to the uncertainties relating to the San Jose joint venture's ability to recover the net carrying value of certain buildings within the Park Center Plaza investment property through future operations or sale, the San Jose joint venture, at December 31, 1992, recorded a provision for value impairment on certain portions of the complex of $8,142,152. Such provision was recorded to reduce the net basis of these portions to the then outstanding balance of the related non-recourse debt. Additionally, a provision for value impairment on the 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings and certain parking areas of $15,549,935 was recorded at September 30, 1993 to reduce the net basis to the then outstanding balance of the related non-recourse debt. Furthermore, the San Jose joint venture, recorded a provision for value impairment at September 30, 1994 on the 100-130 Park Center Plaza buildings and certain parking areas, and the 170 Almaden building of $944,335, in aggregate, to reduce the net carrying values to the then outstanding balances of related non-recourse debt. Reference is made to note 3(b) for further discussion of the current status of this investment property.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
Due to uncertainty about the ability to recover the net carrying value of the property through future operations and sale, Royal Executive has made a provision for value impairment of $25,378,894. Such provision at September 30, 1994 was recorded to reduce the net carrying value of the property to the then estimated valuation. The provision for value impairment has been allocated fully to the venture partner to reflect their subordination to the Partnership in distributions with regard to future operation and sale or financing proceeds as discussed in note 3(c).
No provision for State or Federal income taxes has been made as the liability for such taxes is that of the Partners rather than the Partnership. However, in certain instances, the Partnership has been required under applicable law to remit directly to the tax authorities amounts representing withholding from distributions paid to partners.
Certain amounts in the 1993 and 1992 financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the 1994 presentation.
(2) INVESTMENT PROPERTIES
(a) General
The Partnership has acquired, either directly or through joint ventures, two shopping centers and three office complexes. In June 1990, the Partnership sold its interest in the Genesee Valley Shopping Center. In November 1994, the lender realized upon its security interest and took title to the Bank of Delaware building via a deed in lieu of foreclosure (note 2(c)). All of the remaining properties were in operation at December 31, 1994. The cost of the investment properties represents the total cost to the Partnership plus miscellaneous acquisition costs.
Depreciation on the properties has been provided over the estimated useful lives of the various components as follows:
YEARS -----
Building and Improvements -- straight-line. . . 30 Personal property -- straight-line. . . . . . . 5 ==
The investment properties are pledged as security for the long-term debt, for which there is no recourse to the Partnership.
Maintenance and repair expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
Significant betterments and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives. Provisions for value impairment are recorded with respect to the investment properties whenever the estimated future cash flows from a property's operations and projected sales are less than the property's carrying value.
(b) Riverside Square Mall
During October 1983, the Partnership acquired an existing enclosed regional shopping center in Hackensack, New Jersey. The Partnership's purchase price for the mall was $36,236,282. The Partnership made a cash down payment at closing of $20,000,000. The balance of the purchase price was represented by a first mortgage loan which had a balance at closing of $16,236,282 prior to unamortized discount, based upon an imputed interest rate of 12%. During the third quarter of 1994, the Partnership finalized
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
a refinancing of the first mortgage loan with a new loan in the amount of $36,000,000 which matures December 1, 2006 and bear's interest at 8.35%. See Note 4. The refinancing resulted in net proceeds of approximately $22,300,000 (after retirement of the previous mortgage loan with an outstanding balance of approximately $13,000,000 and payment of a prepayment penalty of $649,163). Of such proceeds, approximately $11,200,000 has been escrowed by the lender pursuant to the loan agreement and will be released, including interest, to fund certain costs of the renovation and restoration as discussed below. The remaining $11,100,000 represents the replenishment of the Partnership's working capital for amounts paid or to be paid to Saks and Bloomingdales for tenant allowances as discussed below. In connection with the negotiations relating to the refinancing, the Partnership had escrowed approximately $801,000 to serve as collateral to secure a letter of credit. Such letter of credit was released and the funds were refunded to the Partnership in September 1994 in connection with the loan funding. Additionally, the Partnership has recorded an extraordinary loss on refinancing of $2,206,791 representing the write-off of unamortized discount on the original mortgage loan of $1,557,628 and the $649,163 prepayment penalty as discussed above.
The Partnership has substantially completed its renovation of Riverside Square Mall and is continuing to remerchandise the center. In connection with the renovation, the Partnership, in early 1994, signed 15- year operating covenant extensions with both Saks and Bloomingdales, the latter of which owns their own store. In return for the additional 15-year commitment to the center, the Partnership reimbursed Saks for their recent store renovation in the amount of $6,100,000 and is obligated to pay Bloomingdales $5,000,000 toward their upcoming store renovation. In connection with the payment to Saks, the Partnership also acquired title to the Saks building which had previously been owned by Saks. The Partnership is also required to complete the renovation of the mall, with an additional estimated cost of approximately $12,000,000 which has substantially been completed as of December 31, 1994. The Partnership continues to consider expanding the mall at some point in the future as well. Furthermore, the Partnership has commenced a $7,500,000 restoration of the parking deck. This restoration should be completed by the end of 1995.
(c) Bank of Delaware - office building
In December 1984, the Partnership acquired an interest in an existing office building in Wilmington, Delaware. The Partnership's purchase price for the building was $20,900,000, of which approximately $5,945,000, was represented by an existing first mortgage loan. In February 1989, the Partnership refinanced the existing first mortgage loan and received net refinancing proceeds of approximately $4,696,000 which were utilized primarily to pay for the substantially completed renovation program and other capital improvements.
A major tenant in the building brought a lawsuit against the Partnership which sought reimbursement from the Partnership for certain improvements made by the tenant to its space in the building. Pursuant to an arbitration ruling, the Partnership reimbursed the tenant approximately $802,000, all of which was paid as of December 1992. The Partnership was released from any further obligations pursuant to the assignment of title to the property in November 1994 as described below.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
In December 1993, a major tenant, E.I. duPont de Nemours ("duPont"), which comprised approximately 27% of the building, vacated their space upon expiration of their lease. The property had been operating at a cash deficit due to the significant costs incurred in connection with the re- leasing of vacant space and certain capital improvements. Due to the competitive nature of this marketplace, the Partnership estimated the costs associated with re-leasing any vacant space during the next few years, including those costs to remove the remaining asbestos in tenant space, would have been substantial. As a result, the Partnership had commenced discussions with the building's first mortgage lender in order to seek a loan modification. In connection with these discussions, effective January 1994, the Partnership had suspended payment of debt service to the lender. Under the terms of a mortgage and security agreement, the Partnership, in its capacity as mortgagor of the building, agreed to indemnify the mortgage lender, under certain circumstances, against damages, claims, liabilities and expenses incurred by or asserted against the mortgage lender in relation to asbestos in the building. Asbestos had been abated or encapsulated in approximately 62% of the building's space. The Partnership did not believe that any remaining asbestos in the building presented a hazard and did not believe that such asbestos would have been required to be removed. The Partnership estimated that the cost of asbestos abatement in a portion of the building that could be incurred under certain circumstances in the future would have been approximately $800,000. However, the Partnership did not believe that it would have likely been required to incur (or to indemnify the mortgage lender against) any such cost, although there was no assurance that the Partnership would not have been required to pay such cost or indemnification. In November 1994, due to the Partnership's default in payment of debt service, the mortgage lender concluded proceedings to realize upon its mortgage security interest represented by the land, building, and related improvements of the property via a deed in lieu of foreclosure. As a result of the disposition of the property, the Partnership recognized a gain in 1994 for financial reporting purposes of $447,650 and a loss for federal income tax purposes of $4,756,937 with no corresponding distributable proceeds. In conjunction with the transfer of title, the Partnership paid the mortgage lender a sum of approximately $681,000 which included the net cash flow of the property since the suspension of debt service and an indemnification release fee for which the mortgage lender released the Partnership from all liabilities respecting the property, including those related to asbestos.
An affiliate of the General Partner of the Partnership managed the office building through the November 1994 date of property title assignment for a fee equal to 3% of the gross revenues of the building plus leasing commissions, subject to an aggregate annual maximum amount of 6% of the gross receipts of the property.
(3) VENTURE AGREEMENTS
(a) General
The Partnership at December 31, 1994 is a party to two operating venture agreements (San Jose and Royal Executive) and has made capital contributions to the respective ventures as discussed below. Under certain circumstances, either pursuant to the venture agreements or due to the Partnership's obligations as a General Partner, the Partnership may be required to make additional cash contributions to the ventures.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
There are certain risks associated with the Partnership's investments made through joint ventures including the possibility that the Partnership's joint venture partners in an investment might become unable or unwilling to fulfill their financial or other obligations, or that such joint venture partners may have economic or business interests or goals that are inconsistent with those of the Partnership.
(b) San Jose
The Partnership has acquired, through San Jose, an interest in an existing office building complex in San Jose, California (Park Center Financial Plaza). San Jose acquired nine office buildings and two parking garage structures in June 1985 for a purchase price of approximately $32,472,000 subject to long-term indebtedness of approximately $6,347,000. All of the properties were in operation when acquired.
In addition, in May 1986, San Jose purchased an additional office building (150 Almaden) and a parking and retail building (185 Park Avenue) in the Park Center Financial Plaza complex for a total purchase price of approximately $47,476,000. In conjunction with the acquisitions, San Jose reserved approximately $31,590,000 to fund debt service, leasing commissions, and capital and tenant improvements.
In 1991, all remaining amounts originally set aside by the Partnership to fund debt service, leasing commissions and capital and tenant improvement costs at Park Center Financial Plaza were utilized.
In September 1986, San Jose obtained a mortgage loan in the amount of $25,000,000 secured by the 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings and certain parking areas. The outstanding principal balance, which was non- amortizable, bore interest at the rate of 9.5% per annum and had a scheduled maturity in October 1993 and was extended to December 1, 1993. San Jose, during the fourth quarter of 1994, finalized a loan extension and modification with the mortgage lender. The modified and extended loan has an interest rate of 8.4% per annum, requires monthly interest payments only beginning December 1, 1994 through December 1, 1997 when the loan begins to amortize until it matures November 30, 2001, when the unpaid principal and interest balance is due. The refinancing resulted in the 1994 partial paydown of the outstanding principal balance in the amount of $2.5 million.
The property was managed by an affiliate of the General Partners of the Partnership for a fee calculated as 3% of gross receipts until December 1994 when the affiliated property manager sold substantially all of its assets and assigned its interests in its management contracts to an unaffiliated third party.
The partners of San Jose are the Partnership and JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-XII, another partnership sponsored by the Managing General Partner of the Partnership ("JMB-XII"). The terms of San Jose's partnership agreement generally provide that contributions, distributions, cash flow, sale or refinancing proceeds and profits and losses will be distributed or allocated to the Partnership in their respective 50% ownership percentages.
During August 1994, San Jose received notification from the Redevelopment Agency of the City of San Jose of its offer to purchase one of the parking garage structures in the office building complex, for an approved Agency project for $4,090,000. The price offered is deemed by the Agency to be just compensation in compliance with applicable State and Federal laws relating to the government's power of eminent domain. San Jose is currently investigating its options with regard to the Agency's
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
offer, including the impact of any purchase on garage spaces leased to tenants of other Partnership properties in the complex. Should the Agency proceed to purchase the property, San Jose would recognize a gain for financial reporting and Federal income tax purposes. Therefore, it is uncertain at this time whether a transfer of the garage to the Agency will occur or upon what terms.
San Jose notified the tenants in and invitees to the Park Center Plaza complex that some of the buildings, particularly the 100-130 Park Center Plaza Buildings and the garage below them, could pose a life safety hazard under certain unusually intense earthquake conditions. While the buildings and the garage were designed to comply with the applicable codes for the period in which they were constructed, and there is no legal requirement to upgrade the buildings for seismic purposes, San Jose is working with consultants to analyze ways in which such a potential life safety hazard could be eliminated. In addition, tenants occupying approximately 55,000 square feet (approximately 13% of the building) of the Park Center Plaza investment property have leases that expire in 1995, for which there can be no assurance of renewals. However, since the costs of both re-leasing space and any seismic program at the 100-130 Park Center Plaza buildings could be substantial, San Jose has commenced discussions with the appropriate lender for additional loan proceeds to pay for all or a portion of these costs. Should lender assistance be required to fund significant costs at the 100-130 Park Center Plaza buildings but not be obtained, San Jose may decide not to commit any additional amounts to this portion of the complex, since such amounts are likely to be large in comparison to the Partnership's current equity in this portion of the complex and the likelihood of recovering such funds through increased capital appreciation is remote. The result would be that San Jose would no longer have an ownership interest in this portion of the complex.
As a result, there is uncertainty about the ability to recover the net carrying value of the property through future operations and sale and accordingly, San Jose has made provisions for value impairment on the 100- 130 Park Center Plaza buildings and certain parking areas and the 170 Almaden building of $944,335 in the aggregate. Such provisions at September 30, 1994 were recorded to reduce the net carrying values of these buildings to the then outstanding balances of the related non-recourse financing. Additionally, at September 30, 1993, San Jose recorded a provision for value impairment on the 150 Almaden and 185 Park Avenue buildings and certain parking areas of $15,549,935 to reduce the net carrying value of these buildings to the then outstanding balance of related non-recourse financing. Additionally, at December 31, 1992, San Jose recorded a provision for value impairment of $8,142,152 on certain other portions of the complex to amounts equal to the then outstanding balances of the related non-recourse financing. In the event the lender on the 100-130 Park Center Plaza portion of the complex exercised its remedies as discussed above, the result would likely be that San Jose would no longer have an ownership interest in such portion.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(c) Royal Executive
In December 1985, the Partnership entered into a commitment to fund a $27,000,000 convertible first mortgage note on a three building office park then under construction in Rye Brook, New York (Royal Executive Park II). The first mortgage note called for monthly installments of interest only at a rate of 10% through the period of equity conversion.
During February 1987, the Partnership exercised its option of converting the $27,000,000 mortgage into an ownership position. Upon the conversion of the mortgage note, the Partnership entered into a joint venture (Royal Executive) with the borrower (joint venture partners). Pursuant to the terms of the venture agreement, until certain rental achievement levels are attained, the Partnership is entitled to a cumulative preferred annual return equal to $2,430,000 per year. The next $2,439,732 of annual cash flow is distributable to the joint venture partners, on a non-cumulative basis, with any remaining cash flow distributable 49.9% to the Partnership and 50.1% to the joint venture partners. Therefore, the Partnership's receipt of cash distributions is subject to the actual operations of the property. The Partnership is entitled to any deficiency in its preferred annual return on a cumulative basis as an annual priority distribution from future available operating cash flow. The cumulative deficiency in the preferred annual return is approximately $4,700,000 at December 31, 1994. The Partnership is entitled to priority level of distribution of sale and refinancing proceeds of $27,000,000 plus the cumulative deficiency in its preferred annual return.
Operating profits of the joint venture, in general, will be allocated in proportion to, and to the extent of, distributions and then based on relative ownership percentages. Operating losses, in general, will be first allocated to the joint venture partners to the extent of any additional contributions made to fund operations or the Partnership's guaranteed return. Remaining losses, if any, will be allocated based upon relative ownership interests. Depreciation and amortization will be allocated based upon the relative ownership interests.
Due to uncertainty about the ability to recover the net carrying value of the property through future operations and sale, Royal Executive has made a provision for value impairment of $25,378,894. Such provision at September 30, 1994 was recorded to reduce the net carrying value of the property to the then estimated valuation. The provision for value impairment has been allocated fully to the venture partner to reflect their subordination to the Partnership in distributions with regard to future operation and sale or financing proceeds as discussed above.
Effective July 1, 1994, management and leasing activities at the complex were transferred to an affiliate of the General Partners of the Partnership, who managed the property until December 1994. In December 1994, this affiliated property manager sold substantially all of its assets and assigned its interest in its Management contracts to an unaffiliated third party. In addition, certain of the management personnel of the property manager became management personnel of the purchaser and its affiliates. (4) LONG-TERM DEBT
Long-term debt consists of the following at December 31, 1994 and 1993:
1994 1993 ---------- ---------- 8.35% mortgage note, secured by Riverside Square Mall in Hackensack, New Jersey; payable in monthly installments of principal and interest of $286,252 through December 1, 2006, the scheduled maturity date at which time the unpaid principal and interest is due (note 2(b)) $35,891,996 --
9-1/2% first mortgage note, secured by Riverside Square Mall in Hackensack, New Jersey which was retired by the loan described above. Balance is net of unamortized discount of $1,658,738 at December 31, 1993 based on an imputed interest rate of 12%. . . . -- 11,634,669
10-3/8% mortgage note, secured by Bank of Delaware Office Building in Wilmington, Delaware; retired at disposition in November 1994; was payable in monthly installments of interest only of $82,135 through March 1, 1999 the scheduled maturity date (see note 2(c)) . -- 9,500,000 ----------- ----------
Total debt . . . . . . . . . . . 35,891,996 21,134,669
Less current portion of long-term debt . . 455,199 9,837,354 ----------- ----------
Total long-term debt . . . . . . $35,436,797 11,297,315 =========== ==========
Five year maturities of long-term debt are summarized as follows for the years ending:
1995 . . . . . . . . . . $455,199 1996 . . . . . . . . . . 494,697 1997 . . . . . . . . . . 537,623 1998 . . . . . . . . . . 584,273 1999 . . . . . . . . . . 634,971 ========
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(5) PARTNERSHIP AGREEMENT
Pursuant to the terms of the Partnership Agreement, net profits or losses of the Partnership from operations are allocated 96% to the Limited Partners and 4% to the General Partners. Profits from the sale or refinancing of investment properties will be allocated to the General Partners: (i) to the greater of 1% of such profits or the amount of cash distributable to the General Partner from any such sale or refinancing (as described below); and (ii) in order to reduce deficits, if any, in the General Partners' capital accounts to a level consistent with the gain anticipated to be realized from the sale of properties. Losses from the sale or refinancing of investment properties will be allocated 1% to the General Partners. The remaining sale or refinancing profits and losses will be allocated to the Limited Partners.
The General Partners are not required to make any additional capital contributions except under certain limited circumstances upon termination of the Partnership. In general, distributions of cash from operations will be made 90% to the Limited Partners and 10% to the General Partners. However, a portion of such distributions to the General Partners is subordinated to the Limited Partners' receipt of a stipulated return on capital.
The Partnership Agreement provides that the General Partners shall receive as a distribution from the sale of a real property by the Partnership amounts equal to the cumulative deferrals of any portion of their 10% cash distribution and 3% of the selling price, and that the remaining proceeds (net after expenses and retained working capital) be distributed 85% to the Limited Partners and 15% to the General Partners. However, the Limited Partners shall receive 100% of such net sale proceeds until the Limited Partners (i) have received cash distributions of sale or refinancing proceeds in an amount equal to the Limited Partners' aggregate initial capital investment in the Partnership, (ii) have received cumulative cash distributions from the Partnership's operations which, when combined with sale or refinancing proceeds previously distributed, equal a 7% annual return on the Limited Partners' average capital investment for each year (their initial capital investment as reduced by sale or refinancing proceeds previously distributed) commencing with the first fiscal quarter of 1985 and (iii) have received cash distributions of sale and refinancing proceeds and of the Partnership operations, in an amount equal to the Limited Partners' initial capital investment in the Partnership plus a 10% annual return on the Limited Partners' average capital investment.
(6) MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT
An affiliate of the General Partners of the Partnership manages Riverside Square Mall for a fee equal to 4% of the fixed and percentage rents of the shopping center plus leasing and operating covenant commissions, subject to deferral if in excess of an aggregate annual maximum amount of 6% of the gross receipts of the property.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(7) LEASES
At December 31, 1994, the Partnership's principal asset is one shopping center. The Partnership has determined that all leases relating to this property are properly classified as operating leases; therefore, rental income is reported when earned and the cost of the properties, excluding the cost of the land, is depreciated over the estimated useful lives. Leases with tenants range in term from one to thirty-five years and provide for fixed minimum rent and partial reimbursement of operating costs. In addition, leases with shopping center tenants provide for additional rent based upon percentages of tenants' sales volumes. A substantial portion of the ability of retail tenants to honor their leases is dependant upon the retail economic sector.
Cost and accumulated depreciation of the leased assets are summarized as follows at December 31, 1994:
Shopping Center: Cost. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $65,406,740 Accumulated depreciation. . . . . (12,951,168) ----------- $52,455,572 ===========
Minimum lease payments, including amounts representing executory costs (e.g. taxes, maintenance, insurance) and any related profit, to be received in the future under the operating leases are as follows:
1995. . . . . . . . . . $ 4,924,779 1996. . . . . . . . . . 5,173,086 1997. . . . . . . . . . 5,226,960 1998. . . . . . . . . . 4,911,355 1999. . . . . . . . . . 4,470,724 Thereafter. . . . . . . 17,529,690 -----------
Total . . . . . . . $42,236,594 ===========
Contingent rent (based on sales by property tenants) included in rental income was as follows:
1992 . . . . . . . $296,014 1993 . . . . . . . 302,809 1994 . . . . . . . 274,431 =========
(8) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Fees, commissions and other expenses required to be paid by the Partnership to the General Partners and their affiliates as of December 31, 1994 and for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 were as follows:
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI (A LIMITED PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONCLUDED
The General Partners have deferred receipt of certain of their distributions (see note 5) of net cash flow of the Partnership. The amount of such deferred distributions aggregated $1,323,705 as of December 31, 1994. The amount is being deferred in accordance with the subordination requirements of the Partnership Agreement. In addition, an affiliate of the General Partner has deferred $300,000 in leasing fees at Riverside Square Mall pursuant to the management agreement (note 6). This amount or amounts currently payable do not bear interest and may be paid in future periods.
(9) INVESTMENT IN UNCONSOLIDATED VENTURES
Summary of combined financial information for San Jose and Royal Executive (note 3) as of and for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 are as follows: 1994 1993 ------------ -----------
Current assets . . . . . . . . $ 8,388,581 2,535,033 Current liabilities. . . . . . (1,409,508) (26,399,404) ------------ ----------- Working capital. . . . . . 6,979,073 (23,864,371) ------------ ----------- Investment property, net . . . 54,189,046 80,714,163 Other assets, net. . . . . . . 1,585,304 4,293,567 Long-term debt . . . . . . . . (25,880,881) (3,784,508) Other liabilities. . . . . . . (239,741) (190,834) Venture partners' equity . . . (12,120,193) (35,040,476) ------------ ----------- Partnership's capital. . . $ 24,512,608 22,127,541 ============ =========== Represented by: Invested capital . . . . . . $ 76,505,181 74,947,712 Cumulative distributions . . (36,233,524) (34,443,911) Cumulative losses. . . . . . (15,759,050) (18,376,260) ------------ ----------- $ 24,512,607 22,127,541 ============ =========== Total income . . . . . . . . . $ 15,799,775 16,499,948 ============ =========== Expenses applicable to operating loss . . . . . . . $ 38,119,456 28,375,860 ============ =========== Net loss . . . . . . . . . . . $ 22,319,680 11,875,912 ============ ===========
Reference is made to note 3(b) regarding the provisions for value impairments of $944,335 and $15,549,935 which were recorded in 1994 and 1993, respectively, by San Jose and to 3(c) regarding the provision for value impairment of $25,378,894 which was recorded in 1994 by Royal Executive.
The total income, expenses related to operating loss and net loss for the above-mentioned ventures for the year ended December 31, 1992 were $15,934,326, $21,658,285 and $5,723,959, respectively.
(10) SUBSEQUENT EVENT - DISTRIBUTION TO PARTNERS
In February 1995, the Partnership paid a distribution of $520,233 ($3.00 per Interest) to the Limited Partners.
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
The Partners Royal Executive Park II:
We have audited the financial statements of Royal Executive Park II (a general partnership) as listed in the accompanying index. In connection with our audits of the financial statements, we also have audited the financial statement schedule as listed in the accompanying index. These financial statements are the responsibility of the General Partners of the Partnership. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by the General Partners of the Partnership, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Royal Executive Park II at December 31, 1994 and 1993, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles. Also in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.
KPMG PEAT MARWICK LLP
Chicago, Illinois March 27, 1995
ROYAL EXECUTIVE PARK II (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1994, 1993 AND 1992
(1) BASIS OF ACCOUNTING
The accompanying financial statements have been prepared for the purpose of complying with Rule 3.09 of Regulation S-X of the Securities and Exchange Commission. They include the accounts of the unconsolidated joint venture, Royal Executive Park II venture ("Venture"), in which JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-XI ("JMB Income-XI") and an unaffiliated venture are the partners.
The Venture's records are maintained on the accrual basis of accounting as adjusted for Federal income tax reporting purposes. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared from such records after making appropriate adjustments to present the Venture's accounts in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles ("GAAP"). Such adjustments are not recorded on the records of the Venture. The net effect of these items for the years ended December 31, 1994 and 1993 is summarized as follows:
ROYAL EXECUTIVE PARK II (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)
Notes to Financial Statements - Continued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 95 requires the Venture to present a statement which classifies receipts and payments according to whether they stem from operating, investing or financing activities. The required information has been segregated and accumulated according to the classifications specified in the pronouncement. In addition, the Venture records amounts held in U.S. Government obligations at cost, which approximates market. For purposes of these statements, the Venture's policy is to consider all such amounts held with original maturities of three months or less ($692,065 at December 31, 1994) as cash equivalents with any remaining amounts (generally with original maturities of one year or less) reflected as short-term investments being held to maturity.
Depreciation on buildings and improvements has been provided over the estimated useful lives of the assets (5 to 30 years) using the straight- line method.
Deferred expenses consist primarily of lease commissions which are amortized over the terms stipulated in the related leases using the straight-line method.
Although certain leases of the Venture provide for tenant occupancy during periods for which no rent is due and/or increases in the minimum lease payments over the term of the lease, rental income is accrued for the full period of occupancy on a straight-line basis.
Maintenance and repair expenses are charged to operations as incurred.
Significant betterments and improvements are capitalized and depreciated over their estimated useful lives.
In 1994, the Venture recorded a provision for value impairment of $25,378,894.
No provision for State or Federal income taxes has been made as the liability for such taxes is that of the venture partners rather than the Venture.
(2) VENTURE AGREEMENT
A description of the acquisition of the property is contained in Note 3(c) of the consolidated financial statements of JMB Income - XI. Such note is incorporated herein by reference.
(3) MANAGEMENT AGREEMENT - OTHER THAN VENTURES
Effective July 1, 1994, management and leasing activities at the complex were transferred to an affiliate of the General Partners of the Partnership, who managed the property until December 1994. In December 1994, this affiliated property manager sold substantially all of its assets and assigned its interest in its Management contracts to an unaffiliated third party. In addition, certain of the management personnel of the property manager became management personnel of the purchaser and its affiliates.
ROYAL EXECUTIVE PARK II (A GENERAL PARTNERSHIP)
NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - CONTINUED
(4) LEASES
As Property Lessor
At December 31, 1994, the Venture's principal asset is an office building complex. The Venture has determined that all leases relating to this property are properly classified as operating leases; therefore, rental income is reported when earned and the cost of the property, excluding the cost of the land, is depreciated over the estimated useful life. Leases with tenants range in term from one to twenty-five years and provide for fixed minimum rent and partial reimbursement of operating costs.
Minimum lease payments, including amounts representing executory costs (e.g. taxes, maintenance, insurance) and any related profit, to be received in the future under the operating leases are as follows:
1995. . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,654,415 1996. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,460,232 1997. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,455,040 1998. . . . . . . . . . . . . 5,330,098 1999. . . . . . . . . . . . . 4,804,742 Thereafter. . . . . . . . . . 6,858,801 ----------- $33,563,328 ===========
(5) TRANSACTIONS WITH AFFILIATES
Fees, commissions and other expenses required to be paid by the Venture to the General Partners and their affiliates as of December 31, 1994 and for the years ended December 31, 1994, 1993 and 1992 were as follows:
ITEM 9.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
There were no changes of or disagreements with accountants during 1993 and 1994.
PART III
ITEM 10.

ITEM 10. DIRECTORS AND EXECUTIVE OFFICERS OF THE PARTNERSHIP
The Managing General Partner of the Partnership is JMB Realty Corporation ("JMB"), a Delaware corporation. JMB has responsibility for all aspects of the Partnership's operations, subject to the requirement that sales of real property must be approved by the Associate General Partner of the Partnership, Income Associates-XI, L.P., an Illinois limited partnership with JMB as the sole general partner. The Associate General Partner shall be directed by a majority in interest of its limited partners (who are generally officers, directors and affiliates of JMB or its affiliates) as to whether to provide its approval of any sale of real property (or any interest therein) of the Partnership. Various relationships of the Partnership to the Managing General Partner and its affiliates are described under the caption "Conflicts of Interest" at pages 12-16 of the Prospectus, of which description is hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3-A to the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993.
The names, positions held and length of service therein of each director and executive officer and certain officers of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership are as follows:
SERVED IN NAME OFFICE OFFICE SINCE ---- ------ ------------
Judd D. Malkin Chairman 5/03/71 Director 5/03/71 Neil G. Bluhm President 5/03/71 Director 5/03/71 Burton E. Glazov Director 7/01/71 Stuart C. Nathan Executive Vice President 5/08/79 Director 3/14/73 A. Lee Sacks Director 5/09/88 John G. Schreiber Director 3/14/73 H. Rigel Barber Executive Vice President 1/02/87 Chief Executive Officer 8/01/93 Glenn E. Emig Executive Vice President 1/01/93 Chief Operating Officer 1/01/95 Jeffrey R. Rosenthal Managing Director-Corporate 4/22/91 Chief Financial Officer 8/01/93 Douglas H. Cameron Executive Vice President 1/01/95 Gary Nickele Executive Vice President 1/01/92 General Counsel 2/27/84 Ira J. Schulman Executive Vice President 6/01/88 Gailen J. Hull Senior Vice President 6/01/88 Howard Kogen Senior Vice President 1/02/86 Treasurer 1/01/91
There is no family relationship among any of the foregoing directors or officers. The foregoing directors have been elected to serve a one-year term until the annual meeting of the Managing General Partner to be held on June 7, 1995. All of the foregoing officers have been elected to serve one-year terms until the first meeting of the Board of Directors held after the annual meeting of the Managing General Partner to be held on June 7, 1995. There are no arrangements or understandings between or among any of said directors or officers and any other person pursuant to which any director or officer was elected as such.
JMB is the corporate general partner of Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-VII ("Carlyle-VII"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-IX ("Carlyle-IX"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-X ("Carlyle-X"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XI ("Carlyle-XI"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XII ("Carlyle-XII"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XIII ("Carlyle-XIII"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XIV ("Carlyle-XIV"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XV ("Carlyle-XV"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XVI ("Carlyle- XVI"), Carlyle Real Estate Limited Partnership-XVII ("Carlyle-XVII"), JMB Mortgage Partners, Ltd. ("Mortgage Partners"), JMB Mortgage Partners, Ltd.-II ("Mortgage Partners-II"), JMB Mortgage Partners, Ltd.-III ("Mortgage Partners-III"), JMB Mortgage Partners, Ltd.-IV ("Mortgage Partners-IV"), Carlyle Income Plus, Ltd. ("Carlyle Income Plus") and Carlyle Income Plus, Ltd.-II ("Carlyle Income Plus-II") and the managing general partner of JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-IV ("JMB Income-IV"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-V ("JMB Income-V"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-VI ("JMB Income-VI"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-VII ("JMB Income-VII"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-VIII ("JMB Income-VIII"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-IX ("JMB Income-IX"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-X ("JMB Income-X"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-XI ("JMB Income-XI"), JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-XII ("JMB Income-XII") and JMB Income Properties, Ltd.-XIII ("JMB Income-XIII"). Most of the foregoing directors and officers are also officer and/or directors of various affiliated companies of JMB including Arvida/JMB Managers, Inc. (the general partner of Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P. ("Arvida")), Arvida/JMB Managers-II, Inc. (the general partner of Arvida/JMB Partners, L.P.-II ("Arvida-II")) and Income Growth Managers, Inc. (the corporate general partner of IDS/JMB Balanced Income Growth, Ltd. ("IDS/BIG")). Most of such directors and officers are also partners of certain partnerships which are associate general partners in the following real estate limited partnerships: Carlyle-VII, Carlyle-IX, Carlyle-X, Carlyle-XI, Carlyle-XII, Carlyle-XIII, Carlyle-XIV, Carlyle-XV, Carlyle-XVI, Carlyle-XVII, JMB Income-VI, JMB Income-VII, JMB Income-VIII, JMB Income-IX, JMB Income-X, JMB Income-XII, JMB Income-XIII, Mortgage Partners, Mortgage Partners-II, Mortgage Partners-III, Mortgage Partners-IV, Carlyle Income Plus, Carlyle Income Plus-II and IDS/BIG.
The business experience during the past five years of each such director and officer of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership in addition to that described above is as follows:
Judd D. Malkin (age 57) is an individual general partner of JMB Income-IV and JMB Income-V. Mr. Malkin has been associated with JMB since October, 1969. Mr. Malkin is a director of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., an affiliate of JMB that is a real estate investment trust in the business of owning, managing and developing shopping centers, and a director of Catellus Development Corporation, a major diversified real estate development company. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
Neil G. Bluhm (age 57) is an individual general partner of JMB Income-IV and JMB Income-V. Mr. Bluhm has been associated with JMB since August, 1970. Mr. Bluhm is a director of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., an affiliate of JMB that is a real estate investment trust in the business of owning, managing and developing shopping centers. He is a member of the Bar of the State of Illinois and a Certified Public Accountant.
Burton E. Glazov (age 56) has been associated with JMB since June, 1971 and served as an Executive Vice President of JMB until December 1990. He is a member of the Bar of the State of Illinois and a Certified Public Accountant.
Stuart C. Nathan (age 53) has been associated with JMB since July, 1972. Mr. Nathan is also a director of Sportmart Inc., a retailer of sporting goods. He is a member of the Bar of the State of Illinois.
A. Lee Sacks (age 61) (President and Director of JMB Insurance Agency, Inc.) has been associated with JMB since December, 1972.
John G. Schreiber (age 48) has been associated with JMB since December, 1970 and served as an Executive Vice President of JMB until December 1990. Mr. Schreiber is President of Schreiber Investments, Inc., a company which is engaged in the real estate investing business. He is also a senior advisor and partner of Blackstone Real Estate Partners, an affiliate of the Blackstone Group, L.P. Since 1994, Mr. Schreiber has also served as a trustee of Amli Residential Property Trust, a publicly-traded real estate investment trust that invests in multi-family properties. Mr. Schreiber is also a director of Urban Shopping Centers, Inc., an affiliate of JMB that is a real estate investment trust in the business of owning, managing and developing shopping centers. He is also a director of a number of investment companies advised or managed by T. Rowe Price Associates and its affiliates. He holds a Masters degree in Business Administration from Harvard University Graduate School of Business.
H. Rigel Barber (age 45) has been associated with JMB since March, 1982. He holds a J.D. degree from Northwestern Law School and is a member of the Bar of the State of Illinois.
Glenn E. Emig (age 47) has been associated with JMB since December, 1979. Prior to becoming Vice President of JMB in 1993, Mr. Emig was Executive Vice President and Treasurer of JMB Institutional Realty Corporation. He holds a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the Harvard University Graduate School of Business and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Jeffrey R. Rosenthal (age 43) has been associated with JMB since December, 1987. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
Douglas H. Cameron (age 45) is Executive Vice President of JMB. Mr. Cameron has been associated with JMB since April, 1977. Prior to becoming Executive Vice President of JMB in 1995, Mr. Cameron was Managing Director of Capital Markets -- Property Sales from June 1990. He holds a Masters Degree in Business Administration from the University of Southern California.
Gary Nickele (age 42) has been associated with JMB since February, 1984. He holds a J.D. degree from the University of Michigan Law School and is a member of the Bar of the State of Illinois.
Ira J. Schulman (age 43) has been associated with JMB since February, 1983. He holds a Masters degree in Business Administration from the University of Pittsburgh.
Gailen J. Hull (age 46) has been associated with JMB since March 1982.
He holds a Masters degree in Business Administration from Northern Illinois University and is a Certified Public Accountant.
Howard Kogen (age 59) has been associated with JMB since March, 1973. He is a Certified Public Accountant.
ITEM 11.

ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
The Partnership has no officers or directors. The General Partners of the Partnership are entitled to receive a share of cash distributions, when and as cash distributions are made to the Investors, and a share of profits or losses as described under the caption "Compensation and Fees" at pages 8-12, "Cash Distributions" at pages 56-58, "Allocation of Profits or Losses for Tax Purposes" at page 58 and "Cash Distributions; Allocations of Profits and Losses" at pages A-8 to A-12 of the Partnership Agreement included as an exhibit to the Prospectus, which descriptions are hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3-A to Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993. Reference is also made to Notes 5 and 7 for a description of such transactions, distributions and allocations. In 1994, 1993 and 1992, no cash distributions were paid to the General Partners.
Affiliates of the Managing General Partner provided property management services to the Partnership for 1994 for the Riverside Square Mall in Hackensack, New Jersey at a fee not to exceed 4% of the fixed and percentage rent of property, plus leasing commissions and the Bank of Delaware Office Building in Wilmington, Delaware at fees calculated at 3% of the gross revenues of the property plus leasing commissions. In 1994, such affiliates earned property management and leasing fees amounting to $608,703, of which $300,000 was unpaid as of December 31, 1994. As set forth in the Prospectus of the Partnership, the Managing General Partner must negotiate such agreements on terms no less favorable to the Partnership than those customarily charged for similar services in the relevant geographical area (but in no event at rates greater than 6% of the gross receipts from a property), and such agreements must be terminable by either party thereto, without penalty, upon 60 days' notice.
JMB Insurance Agency, Inc., an affiliate of the Managing General Partner, earned and received insurance brokerage commissions in 1994 aggre- gating $45,765 in connection with the provision of insurance coverage for certain of the real property investments of the Partnership and its venture. Such commissions are at rates set by insurance companies for the classes of coverage provided.
The General Partners of the Partnership may be reimbursed for their direct salaries and expenses relating to the administration of the Partnership and the operation of the Partnership's real property investments. In 1994, an affiliate of the General Partners earned reimbursement for such expenses in the amount of $144,232, of which $41,116 was unpaid at December 31, 1994.
The Partnership is permitted to engage in various transactions involving affiliates of the Managing General Partner of the Partnership, as described under the captions "Compensation and Fees" at pages 8-12, "Conflicts of Interest" at pages 12-16 and "Rights, Powers and Duties of General Partners" at pages A-12 to A-22 of the Partnership Agreement, included as an exhibit to the Prospectus, which descriptions are hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3-A to Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993. The relationship of the Managing General Partner (and its directors and officers) to its affiliates is set forth above in Item 10 above and Exhibit 21 hereto.
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS
There were no significant transactions or business relationships with the Managing General Partner, affiliates or their management other than those described in Items 10 and 11 above.
PART IV
ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES, AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
(a) The following documents are filed as part of this report:
1. Financial Statements (See Index to Financial Statements filed with this annual report).
2. Exhibits.
3-A. The Prospectus of the Partnership dated July 11, 1984 as supplemented July 24, 1984 and November 26, 1984, as filed with the Commission pursuant to Rules 424(b) and 424(c), is hereby incorporated herein by reference. Copies of pages 8-12, 56-58 and A-8 to A-12 are hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3-A to the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993.
3-B. Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership set forth as Exhibit A to the Prospectus, which agreement is hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 3-B to the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993.
4-A. Mortgage loan agreement, Mortgage and Security Agreement, Secured Promissory Note B, Secured Promissory Note A and Assignment of Leases and Rents between the Partnership and Principal Mutual Life Insurance Company dated August 30, 1994 are hereby incorporated herein by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1994 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 27, 1995.
4-B. Mortgage loan agreement between the Partnership and Equitable Real Estate Investment Management, Inc. dated February 28, 1989 relating to the Bank of Delaware is hereby incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 4-B to the Partnership's Report on Form 10-K for December 31, 1992 (File No. 0-15966) dated March 19, 1993.
4-C. Mortgage loan agreement between San Jose and Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. dated June 20, 1985 relating to Park Center Plaza are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-15966) dated June 20, 1985.
4-D. Mortgage loan agreement, Amended and Restated Deed of Trust, Security Agreement with assignment of Rents and Fixture Filing and Real Estate tax escrow and Security Agreement between San Jose and Connecticut General Life Insurance Co. dated November 30, 1994 is filed herewith.
10-A.Acquisition documents relating to the purchase by the Partnership of Riverside Square in Hackensack, New Jersey are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's prospectus on Form S-11 (File No. 2-90503) dated July 11, 1984.
10-B.Acquisition documents relating to the purchase by the Partnership of the Bank of Delaware Office Building in Wilmington, Delaware are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-15966) dated December 27, 1984.
10-C.Acquisition documents including the venture agreement relating to the purchase by the Partnership of Park Center Plaza in San Jose, California are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-15966) dated June 20, 1985.
10-D.Sale documents and exhibits thereto relating to the Partnership's sale of the Genesee Valley Shopping Center in Flint, Michigan are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-15966) dated June 29, 1990.
10-E.Deed in Lieu of Foreclosure Agreement and Memorandum of Mutual Releases dated November 15, 1994 between Three Hundred Delaware Avenue Associates, L.P. and EML Associates are hereby incorporated by reference to the Partnership's Report on Form 8-K (File No. 0-15966) dated November 15, 1994.
21. List of Subsidiaries
24. Powers of Attorney
27. Financial Data Schedule
--------------
Although certain additional long-term debt instruments of the Registrant have been excluded from Exhibit 4 above, pursuant to Rule 601(b)(4)(iii), the Registrant commits to provide copies of such agreements to the Securities and Exchange Commissions upon request.
(b) The following report on Form 8-K has been filed for the quarter covered by this report.
(i) The Partnership report on Form 8-K (File No.0-15966) describing the deed in lieu of foreclosure agreement for the Bank of Delaware.
No annual report or proxy material for the year 1994 has been sent to the Partners of the Partnership. An annual report will be sent to the Partners subsequent to this filing.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Act of 1934, the Partnership has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI
By: JMB Realty Corporation Managing General Partner
GAILEN J. HULL By: Gailen J. Hull Senior Vice President Date: March 27, 1995
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
By: JMB Realty Corporation Managing General Partner
JUDD D. MALKIN* By: Judd D. Malkin, Chairman and Director Date: March 27, 1995
NEIL G. BLUHM* By: Neil G. Bluhm, President and Director Date: March 27, 1995
H. RIGEL BARBER* By: H. Rigel Barber, Chief Executive Officer Date: March 27, 1995
GLENN E. EMIG* By: Glenn E. Emig, Chief Operating Officer Date: March 27, 1995
JEFFREY R. ROSENTHAL* By: Jeffrey R. Rosenthal, Chief Financial Officer Principal Financial Officer Date: March 27, 1995
GAILEN J. HULL By: Gailen J. Hull, Senior Vice President Principal Accounting Officer Date: March 27, 1995
A. LEE SACKS* By: A. Lee Sacks, Director Date: March 27, 1995
By: STUART C. NATHAN* Stuart C. Nathan, Executive Vice President and Director Date: March 27, 1995
*By: GAILEN J. HULL, Pursuant to a Power of Attorney
GAILEN J. HULL By: Gailen J. Hull, Attorney-in-Fact Date: March 27, 1995
JMB INCOME PROPERTIES, LTD. - XI
EXHIBIT INDEX
DOCUMENT INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE Page ------------ ----
3-A. Pages 8-12, 56-58 and A-8 to A-12 of the Prospectus dated July 11, 1984 Yes
3-B. Amended and Restated Agreement of Limited Partnership Yes
4-A. Mortgage loan agreement related to Riverside Square Yes
4-B. Mortgage loan agreement related to Bank of Delaware Yes
4-C. Mortgage loan agreement related to Park Center Financial Center Yes
4-D. Mortgage loan agreement related to Park Center Plaza No
10-A. Acquisition documents related to Riverside Square Yes
10-B. Acquisition documents related to Bank of Delaware Yes
10-C. Acquisition documents related to Park Center Plaza Yes
10-D. Sale documents related to Genesee Valley Yes
10-E. Disposition documents related to Bank of Delaware Yes
21. List of Subsidiaries No
24. Powers of Attorney No
27. Financial Data Schedule No