Item 1. Business
General Description of Partnership
Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (the "Partnership" or the "Registrant"), is a partnership formed under a public serial limited partnership offering denominated Swift Energy Income Partners III (Registration Statement No. 33-11773 on Form S-1, originally declared effective March 19, 1987, and amended effective March 28, 1988, May 4, 1989 and May 1, 1990 [the "Registration Statement"]). The Partnership was formed effective September 30, 1990 under a Limited Partnership Agreement dated September 30, 1990. The initial 539 limited partners made capital contributions of $5,695,200.
The Partnership is principally engaged in the business of acquiring, developing and, when appropriate, disposing of working interests in proven oil and gas properties within the continental United States. The Partnership does not engage in exploratory drilling. Each working interest held by the Partnership entitles the Partnership to receive, in kind or in value, a share of the production of oil and gas from the producing property, and obligates the Partnership to participate in the operation of the property and to bear its proportionate share of all operating costs associated therewith. The Partnership typically holds less than the entire working interest in its producing properties.
At December 31, 1996, the Partnership had expended or committed to expend 100% of the limited partners' net commitments (i.e., limited partners' commitments available to the Partnership for property acquisitions after payment of organization fees and expenses) in the acquisition and development of producing properties, which properties are described under Item 2, "Properties," below. The Partnership's revenues and profits are derived almost entirely from the sale of oil and gas produced from its properties and from the sale of acquired oil and gas properties, when the sale of such properties is economically preferable to continued operation.
The Partnership's business and affairs are conducted by its Managing General Partner, Swift Energy Company, a Texas corporation ("Swift"). The Partnership's Special General Partner, VJM Corporation, a California corporation ("VJM"), consults with and advises Swift as to certain financial matters. Swift is the designated operator of many of the properties in which the Partnership owns interests. The remaining properties are operated by industry operators designated by the owners of a majority of the working interest in each property.
The general manner in which the Partnership acquires producing properties and otherwise conducts its business is described in detail in the Registration Statement under "Proposed Activities," which is incorporated herein by reference. The following is intended only as a summary of the Partnership's manner of doing business and specific activities to date.
Manner of Acquiring Properties; Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement
For the sake of legal and administrative convenience, the producing properties owned by the Registrant have typically been acquired initially by Swift, which then conveyed ownership of each such property to the Registrant. The Registrant acquires producing properties from Swift at the property acquisition cost of such properties to Swift, as adjusted for intervening operations.
The Registrant entered into a Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement dated September 30, 1990 (the "NP/OR Agreement") with Swift Energy Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-C, Ltd. (the "Pension Partnership"). The Pension Partnership is a Texas limited partnership that is also managed by Swift and VJM. The Pension Partnership was formed to acquire nonoperating interests, such as net profits, royalty and overriding royalty interests, in producing oil and gas properties.
I-1
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Under the NP/OR Agreement, the Registrant and the Pension Partnership have, in effect, combined their funds in acquiring producing properties; using funds committed to the NP/OR Agreement by both partnerships, the Registrant acquires producing properties, then promptly conveys nonoperating interests therein to the Pension Partnership. The Registrant initially committed $5,200,650 and the Pension Partnership initially committed $3,072,822 for acquisitions under the NP/OR Agreement. The Registrant is obligated under the NP/OR Agreement to convey to the Pension Partnership a 37% fixed net profits interest and a variable overriding royalty interest in specified depths of every producing property it acquires, except that (i) properties anticipated to require significant development operations, and (ii) nonoperating interests offered to the Registrant by third parties may be purchased by the registrant outside the NP/OR Agreement, without participation by the Pension Partnership. The Registrant is entitled to withdraw up to 30% of its committed funds under the NP/OR Agreement for such acquisitions.
All properties acquired by the Registrant since the date of the NP/OR Agreement have been acquired subject to the NP/OR Agreement and the nonoperating interests created thereby. At December 31, 1996, the Registrant had not made any withdrawals to acquire properties anticipated to require significant development.
In accordance with its obligations under the NP/OR Agreement, as of December 31, 1996 the Registrant had conveyed to the Pension Partnership a net profits interest burdening certain depths of all producing properties acquired by the Registrant since the date of the NP/OR Agreement. Typically, a net profits interest in an oil and gas property entitles the owner to a specified percentage share of the gross proceeds generated by the burdened property, net of operating costs. The 37% net profits interest conveyed to the Pension Partnership under the NP/OR Agreement differs from the typical net profits interest in that it is calculated over the entire group of producing properties acquired under the NP/OR Agreement; i.e., all operating costs attributable to the burdened depths of such properties are aggregated, and the total is then subtracted from the total of all gross proceeds attributable to such depths in order to calculate the net profits to which the Pension Partnership is entitled. The net profits interest conveyed to the Pension Partnership burdens only those depths of each subject property which were evaluated to contain proved reserves at the date of acquisition, to the extent such depths underlie specified surface acreage.
The Registrant has also conveyed to the Pension Partnership under the NP/OR agreement an overriding royalty interest in each property acquired since the date of the NP/OR Agreement. An overriding royalty interest is a fractional interest in the gross production (or the gross proceeds therefrom) of oil and gas from a property, free of any exploration, development, operation or maintenance expenses. Under the NP/OR Agreement, the overriding royalty interest burdens the portions of each producing property that were evaluated at the date of acquisition not to contain proved reserves.
Competition, Markets and Regulations
Competition
The oil and gas industry is highly competitive in all its phases. The Partnership encounters strong competition from many other oil and gas producers, many of which possess substantial financial resources, in acquiring economically desirable Producing Properties.
Markets
The amounts of and price obtainable for oil and gas production from Partnership Properties will be affected by market factors beyond the control of the Partnership. Such factors include the extent of domestic production, the level of imports of foreign oil and gas, the general level of market demand on a regional, national and worldwide basis, domestic and foreign economic conditions that determine levels of industrial production, political events in foreign oil-producing regions, and variations in governmental regulations and tax laws and the imposition of new governmental requirements upon the oil and gas industry. There can be no assurance that oil and gas prices will not decrease in the future, thereby decreasing net Revenues from Partnership Properties.
From time to time, there may exist a surplus of natural gas or oil supplies, the effect of which may be to reduce the amount of hydrocarbons that the Partnerships may produce and sell while such oversupply exists. In recent years, initial steps have been taken to provide additional gas transportation lines from Canada to the United States. If additional Canadian gas is brought to the United States market, it could create downward pressure on United States gas prices.
I-2
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Regulations
Environmental Regulation
The federal government and various state and local governments have adopted laws and regulations regarding the control of contamination of the environment. These laws and regulations may require the acquisition of a permit by Operators before drilling commences, prohibit drilling activities on certain lands lying within wilderness areas or where pollution arises and impose substantial liabilities for pollution resulting from operations, particularly operations near or in onshore and offshore waters or on submerged lands. These laws and regulations may also increase the costs of routine drilling and operation of wells. Because these laws and regulations change frequently, the costs to the Partnership of compliance with existing and future environmental regulations cannot be predicted. However, the Managing Partner does not believe that the Partnership is affected in a significantly different manner by these regulations than are its competitors in the oil and gas industry.
Federal Regulation of Natural Gas
The transportation and sale of natural gas in interstate commerce is heavily regulated by agencies of the federal government. The following discussion is intended only as a summary of the principal statutes, regulations and orders that may affect the production and sale of natural gas from Partnership Properties. This summary should not be relied upon as a complete review of applicable natural gas regulatory provisions.
FERC Orders
Several major regulatory changes have been implemented by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission ("FERC") from 1985 to the present that affect the economics of natural gas production, transportation and sales. In addition, the FERC continues to promulgate revisions to various aspects of the rules and regulations affecting those segments of the natural gas industry that remain subject to the FERC's jurisdiction. In April 1992, the FERC issued Order No. 636 pertaining to pipeline restructuring. This rule requires interstate pipelines to unbundle transportation and sales services by separately stating the price of each service and by providing customers only the particular service desired, without regard to the source for purchase of the gas. The rule also requires pipelines to (i) provide nondiscriminatory "no-notice" service allowing firm commitment shippers to receive delivery of gas on demand up to certain limits without penalties, (ii) establish a basis for release and reallocation of firm upstream pipeline capacity and (iii) provide non-discriminatory access to capacity by firm transportation shippers on a downstream pipeline. The rule requires interstate pipelines to use a straight fixed variable rate design. The rule imposes these same requirements upon storage facilities.
FERC Order No. 500 affects the transportation and marketability of natural gas. Traditionally, natural gas has been sold by producers to pipeline companies, which then resold the gas to end-users. FERC Order No. 500 alters this market structure by requiring interstate pipelines that transport gas for others to provide transportation service to producers, distributors and all other shippers of natural gas on a nondiscriminatory, "first-come, first-served" basis ("open access transportation"), so that producers and other shippers can sell natural gas directly to end-users. FERC Order No. 500 contains additional provisions intended to promote greater competition in natural gas markets.
It is not anticipated that the marketability of and price obtainable for natural gas production from Partnership Properties will be significantly affected by FERC Order No. 500. Gas produced from Partnership Properties normally will be sold to intermediaries who have entered into transportation arrangements with pipeline companies. These intermediaries will accumulate gas purchased from a number of producers and sell the gas to end-users through open access pipeline transportation.
I-3
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
State Regulations
Production of any oil and gas from Partnership Properties will be affected to some degree by state regulations. Many states in which the Partnership will operate have statutory provisions regulating the production and sale of oil and gas, including provisions regarding deliverability. Such statutes, and the regulations promulgated in connection therewith, are generally intended to prevent waste of oil and gas and to protect correlative rights to produce oil and gas between owners of a common reservoir. Certain state regulatory authorities also regulate the amount of oil and gas produced by assigning allowable rates of production to each well or proration unit.
Federal Leases
Some of the Partnership's properties are located on federal oil and gas leases administered by various federal agencies, including the Bureau of Land Management. Various regulations and orders affect the terms of leases, exploration and development plans, methods of operation and related matters.
Employees
The Partnership has no employees. Swift, however, has a staff of geologists, geophysicists, petroleum engineers, landmen, and accounting personnel who administer the operations of Swift and the Partnership. As of December 31, 1996, Swift had 191 employees. Swift's administrative and overhead expenses attributable to the Partnership's operations are borne by the Partnership.
I-4
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Item 2.

Item 2. Properties
As of December 31, 1996, the Partnership has acquired interests in producing oil and gas properties which are generally described below.
Principal Oil and Gas Producing Properties
The most valuable fields in the Partnership, based upon year-end engineering estimates of discounted future net revenues using constant pricing and costs, are described below.
1. The Velrex Field is located in Schleicher County, Texas, and accounts for 33% of the value in this Partnership. Wells in this field produce from the Henderson and Canyon Sands, (Sugarland acquisition).
The remaining value in the Partnership is attributable to numerous properties none of which equals or exceeds 15 percent of the total Partnership value.
Title to Properties
Title to substantially all significant producing properties of the Partnership has been examined. The properties are subject to royalty, overriding royalty and other interests customary in the industry. The Managing General Partner does not believe any of these burdens materially detract from the value of the properties or will materially detract from the value of the properties or materially interfere with their use in the operation of the business of the Partnership.
Production and Sales Price
The following table summarizes the sales volumes of the Partnership's net oil and gas production expressed in MCFs. Equivalent MCFs are obtained by converting oil to gas on the basis of their relative energy content; one barrel equals 6,000 cubic feet of gas.
I-5
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Net Proved Oil and Gas Reserves
Presented below are the estimates of the Partnership's proved reserves as of December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. All of the Partnership's proved reserves are located in the United States.
Revisions of previous quantity estimates are related to upward or downward variations based on current engineering information for production rates, volumetrics and reservoir pressure. Additionally, changes in quantity estimates are the result of the increase or decrease in crude oil and natural gas prices at each year end which have the effect of adding or reducing proved reserves on marginal properties due to economic limitations.
I-6
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
The following table summarizes by acquisition the Registrant's reserves and gross and net interests in producing oil and gas wells as of December 31, 1996:
There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting the future rates of production, timing and plan of development. Oil and gas reserve engineering must be recognized as a subjective process of estimating underground accumulations of oil and gas that cannot be measured in an exact way, and estimates of other engineers might differ from those above, audited by H. J. Gruy and Associates, Inc., an independent petroleum consulting firm. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate, and, as a general rule, reserve estimates based upon volumetric analysis are inherently less reliable than those based on lengthy production history. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered.
In estimating the oil and natural gas reserves, the Registrant, in accordance with criteria prescribed by the Securities and Exchange Commission, has used prices received as of December 31, 1996 without escalation, except in those instances where fixed and determinable gas price escalations are covered by contracts, limited to the price the Partnership reasonably expects to receive. The Registrant does not believe that any favorable or adverse event causing a significant change in the estimated quantity of proved reserves has occurred between December 31, 1996 and the date of this report.
Future prices received for the sale of the Partnership's products may be higher or lower than the prices used in the evaluation described above; the operating costs relating to such production may also increase or decrease from existing levels. The estimates presented above are in accordance with rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Item 3.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings
The Partnership is not aware of any material pending legal proceedings to which it is a party or of which any of its property is the subject.
Item 4.

Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of limited partners during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this report.
I-7
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
PART II
Item 5.

Item 5. Market Price of and Distributions on the Registrant's Units and Related Limited Partner Matters
Market Information
Units in the Partnership were initially sold at a price of $100 per Unit. Units are not traded on any exchange and there is no established public trading market for the Units. Swift is aware of negotiated transfers of Units between unrelated parties; however, these transfers have been limited and sporadic. Due to the nature of these transactions, Swift has no verifiable information regarding prices at which Units have been transferred.
Holders
As of December 31, 1996, there were 539 Limited Partners holding Units in the Partnership.
Distributions
The Partnership generally makes distributions to Limited Partners on a quarterly basis, subject to the restrictions set forth in the Limited Partnership Agreement. In the fiscal years ended December 31, 1995 and 1996, the Partnership distributed a total of $72,700 and $140,000, respectively to the holders of its Units. Cash distributions constitute net proceeds from sale of oil and gas production after payment of lease operating expenses and other partnership expenses. Some or all of such amounts or any proceeds from the sale of partnership properties could be deemed to constitute a return of investors' capital.
Oil and gas investments involve a high risk of loss, and no assurance can be given that any particular level of distributions to holders of Units can be achieved or maintained. Although it is anticipated that quarterly distributions will continue to be made through 1997, the Partnership's ability to make distributions could be diminished by any event adversely affecting the oil and gas properties in which the Partnership owns interests or the amount of revenues received by the Partnership therefrom.
The Partnership's Limited Partnership Agreement contains various provisions which might serve to delay, defer or prevent a change in control of the Partnership, such as the requirement of a vote of Limited Partners in order to sell all or substantially all of the Partnership's properties or the requirement of consent by the Managing General Partner to transfers of limited partnership interests and provisions prohibiting the transfer of Limited Partnership Units in any fiscal year in excess of a limit which has been established in order to comply with certain federal income tax regulations.
II-1
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Item 6.

Item 6. Selected Financial Data
The following selected financial data, prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles as of December 31, 1996, 1995, 1994, 1993 and 1992, should be read in conjunction with the financial statements included in Item 8:
Item 7.

Item 7. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Partnership has expended all of the partners' net commitments available for property acquisitions and development by acquiring producing oil and gas properties. The partnership invests primarily in proved producing properties with nominal levels of future costs of development for proven but undeveloped reserves. Significant purchases of additional reserves or extensive drilling activity are not anticipated. Oil and gas reserves are depleting assets and therefore often experience significant production declines each year from the date of acquisition through the end of the life of the property. The primary source of liquidity to the Partnership comes almost entirely from the income generated from the sale of oil and gas produced from ownership interests in oil and gas properties. This source of liquidity and the related results of operations will decline in future periods as the oil and gas produced from these properties also declines.
Subject to 1997 market conditions remaining comparable with 1996, the Managing General Partner anticipates an increase in liquidity provided that certain development work scheduled in 1997 is completed successfully. The Partnership plans to spend in 1997 an estimated $65,000 for capital expenditures needed for this development work and the enhancement of proved oil and gas reserves. The Managing General Partner anticipates that the Partnership will have adequate liquidity from income from continuing operations to satisfy any future capital expenditure requirements. Funds generated from bank borrowings and proceeds from the sale of oil and gas properties will be used to supplement this effort if deemed necessary.
Results of Operations
Oil and gas sales increased 9 percent in 1996 vs. 1995. Increases in both 1996 gas and oil prices were major contributors to the increased revenues. The Partnership experienced an increase in gas prices of 40 percent or $.58/MCF and an increase in oil prices of 21 percent or $3.26/BBL. The average sales price per equivalent MCF increased 30 percent in 1996. Production volumes decreased 15 percent due to a 41 percent oil production decrease and a 8 percent gas production decline. The production declines partially offset the effect of increased oil and gas prices impacting partnership performance.
Production cost per equivalent MCF decreased 4 percent in 1996 compared to 1995 and total production costs decreased 17 percent in 1996.
Oil and gas sales decreased 33 percent in 1995 vs. 1994. Production volumes decreased 23 percent due to a 25 percent gas production decrease and a 10 percent oil production decline. Since the Partnership's reserves are 87 percent gas, the decrease in gas production, due to accelerated production declines on mature wells, a reduction in development drilling in the current year and production curtailments due to declining prices, had a major impact on partnership performance. A decline in the 1995 gas prices of 24 percent or $.45/MCF further contributed to the Partnership's decreased revenues. The average sales price per equivalent MCF decreased 15 percent in 1995.
II-2
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Production cost per equivalent MCF decreased 4 percent in 1995 compared to 1994. In addition, total production costs decreased 26 percent in 1995.
Associated depreciation expense decreased 40 percent in 1995 when compared to 1994.
The Partnership recorded an additional provision in depreciation, depletion and amortization in 1995 and 1994 when the present value, discounted at ten percent, of estimated future net revenues from oil and gas properties, using the guidelines of the Securities and Exchange Commission, was below the fair market value paid for oil and gas properties resulting in a full cost ceiling impairment.
During 1997, Partnership revenues and costs will be shared between the limited partners and general partners in a 90:10 ratio, based on the annualized rate of cash distributions by the Partnership during a certain period prior to December 31, 1996. Based on current oil and gas prices, current levels of oil and gas production and expected cash distributions during 1997, the Managing General Partner anticipates that the Partnership sharing ratio will continue to be 90:10.
Item 8.

Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
See Part IV, Item 14(a) for index to financial statements.
Item 9.

Item 9. Disagreements on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
II-3
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
PART III
Item 10.

Item 10. Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant
As a limited partnership, the Registrant has no directors or executive officers. The business and affairs of the Registrant are managed by Swift as Managing General Partner. Set forth below is certain information as of March 17, 1997 regarding the directors and executive officers of Swift.
III-1
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
From time to time, Swift as Managing General Partner of the Partnership purchases Units in the Partnership from investors who offer the Units pursuant to their right of presentment, which purchases are made pursuant to terms set out in the Partnership's original Limited Partnership Agreement. Due to the frequency and large number of these transactions, Swift reports these transactions under Section 16 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 on an annual rather than a monthly basis. In some cases such annual reporting may constitute a late filing of the required Section 16 reports under the applicable Section 16 rules.
Item 11.

Item 11. Executive Compensation
As noted in Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant," above, the Partnership has no executive officers. The executive officers of Swift and VJM are not compensated by the Partnership.
Certain fees and allowances contemplated by the Limited Partnership Agreement have been paid by the Partnership to Swift and VJM. See Note (4) in Notes To Financial Statements (Related-Party Transactions) for further discussion.
Item 12.

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
Swift Energy Company, the Managing General Partner, located at 16825 Northchase Drive, Suite 400, Houston, Texas 77060, owns 3,565 Limited Partnership Units, which is 6.26 percent of all outstanding Limited Partnership Units. All Limited Partnership Units owned by Swift were acquired from investors who offered the Limited Partnership Units pursuant to their right of presentment. As the Managing General Partner, Swift is not permitted generally, under the Limited Partnership Agreement, to vote its Limited Partnership Units. Swift also owns a general partnership interest of 9 percent of all partnership interests in the Partnership.
Swift and VJM are not aware of any arrangement, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the Partnership.
Item 13.

Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
As noted in Item 10, "Directors and Executive Officers of the Registrant," above, the Partnership has no executive officers or directors, and thus has not engaged in any transactions in which any such person had an interest. The Partnership is permitted to engage in certain transactions with Swift as Managing General Partner and VJM as Special General Partner, subject to extensive guidelines and restrictions described in the "Conflicts of Interest" section of the Amended Prospectus contained in the Registration Statement, which is incorporated herein by reference.
Summarized below are the principal transactions that have occurred between the Partnership and Swift, VJM and their affiliates.
1. The oil and gas properties acquired by the Partnership, as described in Item 2, "Properties" above, were typically acquired initially by Swift from the seller thereof and subsequently transferred to the Partnership. Such transfers were made by Swift at its Property Acquisition Costs (as defined in the Limited Partnership Agreement), less any amounts received from sale of production between the time of acquisition by Swift and the time of sale to the Partnership.
2. Swift acts as operator for many of the wells in which the Partnership has acquired interests and has received compensation for such activities in accordance with standard industry operating agreements.
3. The Partnership paid to Swift and VJM certain fees as contemplated by the Limited Partnership Agreement. See Note (4) in Notes To Financial Statements (Related-Party Transactions) for further discussion.
III-2
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
PART IV
a(2) FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
All schedules required by the SEC are either inapplicable or the required information is included in the Financial Statements, the Notes thereto, or in other information included elsewhere in this report.
a(3) EXHIBITS
3.1 Limited Partnership Agreement of Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., dated September 30, 1990. (Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990, Exhibit 3.1).
3.2 Certificate of Limited Partnership of Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., as filed September 27, 1990, with the Texas Secretary of State. (Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990, Exhibit 3.2).
10.1 Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement between Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd. and Swift Energy Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-C, Ltd. dated September 30, 1990. (Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990, Exhibit 10.1).
99.1 A copy of the following section of the Amended Prospectus dated March 28, 1988, contained in Post-Effective Amendment No. 1 to Registration Statement No. 33-11773 on Form S-1 for Swift Energy Income Partners III, as filed on March 25, 1988, which have been incorporated herein by reference: "Proposed Activities" (pp 36 - 50) and "Conflicts of Interest" (pp. 70 - 78). (Form 10-K for year ended December 31, 1990, Exhibit 28.1).
b(1) REPORTS ON FORM 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K have been filed during the quarter ended December 31, 1996.
IV-1
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD.
Supplemental Information to be Furnished with Reports Filed Pursuant to Section 15(d) of the Act by Registrants Which Have Not Registered Securities Pursuant to Section 12 of the Act.
No annual report to security holders covering the Partnership's 1996 fiscal year, or proxy statement, form of proxy or other proxy soliciting material has been sent to Limited Partners of the Partnership.
IV-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS
To Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd.:
We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., (a Texas limited partnership) as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related statements of operations, partners' capital and cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994. These financial statements are the responsibility of the general partner's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ARTHUR ANDERSEN LLP
Houston, Texas February 10, 1997
IV-3
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 1996 AND 1995
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-4
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-5
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. STATEMENTS OF PARTNERS' CAPITAL FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-6
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 1996, 1995 AND 1994
See accompanying notes to financial statements.
IV-7
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(1) Organization and Terms of Partnership Agreement -
Swift Energy Income Partners 1990-C, Ltd., a Texas limited partnership (the Partnership), was formed on September 30, 1990, for the purpose of purchasing and operating producing oil and gas properties within the continental United States. Swift Energy Company ("Swift"), a Texas corporation, and VJM Corporation ("VJM"), a California corporation, serve as Managing General Partner and Special General Partner of the Partnership, respectively. The general partners are required to contribute up to 1/99th of limited partner net contributions. The 539 limited partners made total capital contributions of $5,695,200.
Property acquisition costs and the management fee are borne 99 percent by the limited partners and one percent by the general partners. Organization and syndication costs were borne solely by the limited partners.
Initially, all continuing costs (including development costs, operating costs, general and administrative reimbursements and direct expenses) and revenues are allocated 90 percent to the limited partners and ten percent to the general partners. If prior to partnership payout, as defined, however, the cash distribution rate for a certain period equals or exceeds 17.5 percent, then for the following calendar year, these continuing costs and revenues will be allocated 85 percent to the limited partners and 15 percent to the general partners. After partnership payout, continuing costs and revenues will be shared 85 percent by the limited partners, and 15 percent by the general partners, even if the cash distribution rate is less than 17.5 percent. Payout had not occurred as of December 31, 1996.
(2) Significant Accounting Policies -
Use of Estimates --
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from estimates.
Oil and Gas Properties --
For financial reporting purposes, the Partnership follows the "full-cost" method of accounting for oil and gas property costs. Under this method of accounting, all productive and nonproductive costs incurred in the acquisition and development of oil and gas reserves are capitalized. Such costs include lease acquisitions, geological and geophysical services, drilling, completion, equipment and certain general and administrative costs directly associated with acquisition and development activities. General and administrative costs related to production and general overhead are expensed as incurred. No general and administrative costs were capitalized during the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994.
Future development, site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment costs, net of salvage values, are estimated on a property-by-property basis based on current economic conditions and are amortized to expense as the Partnership's capitalized oil and gas property costs are amortized.
The unamortized cost of oil and gas properties is limited to the "ceiling limitation", (calculated separately for the Partnership, limited partners, and general partners). The "ceiling limitation" is calculated on a quarterly basis and represents the estimated future net revenues from proved properties using current prices, discounted at ten percent, and the lower of cost or fair value of unproved properties. Proceeds from the sale or disposition of oil and gas properties are treated as a reduction of oil and gas property costs with no gains or losses being recognized except in significant transactions.
IV-8
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
The Partnership computes the provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization of oil and gas properties on the units-of-production method. Under this method, the provision is calculated by multiplying the total unamortized cost of oil and gas properties, including future development, site restoration, dismantlement and abandonment costs, by an overall amortization rate that is determined by dividing the physical units of oil and gas produced during the period by the total estimated units of proved oil and gas reserves at the beginning of the period.
The calculation of the "ceiling limitation" and the provision for depreciation, depletion, and amortization is based on estimates of proved reserves. There are numerous uncertainties inherent in estimating quantities of proved reserves and in projecting the future rates of production, timing and plan of development. The accuracy of any reserve estimate is a function of the quality of available data and of engineering and geological interpretation and judgment. Results of drilling, testing and production subsequent to the date of the estimate may justify revision of such estimate. Accordingly, reserve estimates are often different from the quantities of oil and gas that are ultimately recovered.
Statements of Cash Flows --
Highly liquid debt instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents.
(3) Oil and Gas Capitalized Costs -
The following table sets forth capital expenditures related to the Partnership's oil and gas operations:
All oil and gas property acquisitions are made by Swift on behalf of the Partnership. The costs of the properties include the purchase price plus any costs incurred by Swift in the evaluation and acquisition of properties.
During 1995 and 1994, the Partnership's unamortized oil and gas property costs exceeded the quarterly calculations of the "ceiling limitation" resulting in an additional provision for depreciation, depletion and amortization of $417,905 and $1,142,899, respectively. In computing the Partnership's third quarter 1994 "ceiling limitation", the Partnership utilized the product prices in effect at the date of the filing of the Partnership's report on Form 10-Q. Utilizing these subsequent prices, the write down recorded by the Partnership was $659,872 less than the amount that would have been recorded using product prices in effect at September 30, 1994. No such write downs were required in 1996.
In addition, the limited partners' share of unamortized oil and gas property costs exceeded their "ceiling limitation" in 1995 and 1994, resulting in a valuation allowance of $370,152 and $1,000,733, respectively. This amount is included in the income (loss) attributable to the limited partners shown in the statement of partners' capital together with a "combining adjustment" for the difference between the limited partners' valuation allowance and the Partnership's valuation allowance. The "combining adjustment" changes quarterly as the Partnership's total depreciation, depletion and amortization provision is more or less than the combined depreciation, depletion and amortization provision attributable to general and limited partners.
IV-9
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
(4) Related-Party Transactions -
An affiliate of the Special General Partner, as Dealer Manager, received $141,508 for managing and overseeing the offering of limited partnership units.
A one-time management fee of $142,380 was paid to Swift in 1990 for services performed for the Partnership. During 1996, 1995 and 1994, the Partnership paid Swift $78,034, $46,966 and $75,884, respectively, as a general and administrative overhead allowance.
Effective September 30, 1990, the Partnership entered into a Net Profits and Overriding Royalty Interest Agreement ("NP/OR Agreement") with Swift Energy Managed Pension Assets Partnership 1990-C, Ltd. (Pension Partnership), managed by Swift for the purpose of acquiring working interests in producing oil and gas properties. Under the terms of the NP/OR Agreement, the Partnership has conveyed to the Pension Partnership a nonoperating interest in the aggregate net profits (i.e., oil and gas sales net of related operating costs) of the properties acquired equal to its proportionate share of the property acquisition costs.
(5) Note Payable to a Bank -
Note payable to a bank at December 31, 1996 and 1995 follows:
Note was paid in full at maturity. As provided by the Partnership Agreement, the note payable was obtained to fund development wells. As of December 31, 1996, the Partnership had no outstanding note payable to a Bank.
(6) Federal Income Taxes -
The Partnership is not a tax-paying entity. No provision is made in the accounts of the Partnership for federal or state income taxes, since such taxes are liabilities of the individual partners, and the amounts thereof depend upon their respective tax situations.
The tax returns and the amount of distributable Partnership income are subject to examination by the federal and state taxing authorities. If the Partnership's ordinary income for federal income tax purposes is ultimately changed by the taxing authorities, the tax liability of the limited partners could be changed accordingly. Ordinary income reported on the Partnership's federal return of income for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was $429,938, $202,609 and $363,644, respectively. The difference between ordinary income for federal income tax purposes reported by the Partnership and net income or loss reported herein primarily results from the exclusion of depletion (as described below) from ordinary income reported in the Partnership's federal return of income.
IV-10
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (CONTINUED)
For federal income tax purposes, depletion with respect to production of oil and gas is computed separately by the partners and not by the Partnership. Since the amount of depletion on the production of oil and gas is not computed at the Partnership level, depletion is not included in the Partnership's income for federal income tax purposes but is charged directly to the partners' capital accounts to the extent of the cost of the leasehold interests, and thus is treated as a separate item on the partners' Schedule K-1. Depletion for federal income tax purposes may vary from that computed for financial reporting purposes in cases where a ceiling adjustment is recorded, as such amount is not recognized for tax purposes.
(7) Gas Imbalances -
The gas imbalance receivable and deferred revenues represent imbalances assumed as part of property acquisitions. The imbalances are accounted for on the entitlements method, whereby the Partnership records its share of revenue, based on its entitled amount. Any amounts over or under the entitled amount are recorded as an increase or decrease to the gas imbalance receivable or deferred revenues as applicable.
(8) Vulnerability Due to Certain Concentrations -
The Partnership's revenues are primarily the result of sales of its oil and natural gas production. Market prices of oil and natural gas may fluctuate and adversely affect operating results.
The Partnership extends credit to various companies in the oil and gas industry which results in a concentration of credit risk. This concentration of credit risk may be affected by changes in economic or other conditions and may accordingly impact the Partnership's overall credit risk. However, the Managing General Partner believes that the risk is mitigated by the size, reputation, and nature of the companies to which the Partnership extends credit. In addition, the Partnership generally does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables.
(9) Fair Value of Financial Instruments -
The Partnership's financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents and short-term receivables and payables. The carrying amounts approximate fair value due to the highly liquid nature of the short-term instruments.
IV-11
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. (Registrant)
By: SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY General Partner
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b A. Earl Swift -------------- ---------------------------------- A. Earl Swift President
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b John R. Alden -------------- ---------------------------------- John R. Alden Principal Financial Officer
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Alton D. Heckaman, Jr. -------------- ---------------------------------- Alton D. Heckaman, Jr. Principal Accounting Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD. (Registrant)
By: SWIFT ENERGY COMPANY General Partner
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b A. Earl Swift -------------- ---------------------------------- A. Earl Swift Director and Principal Executive Officer
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Virgil N. Swift -------------- ---------------------------------- Virgil N. Swift Director and Executive Vice President - Business Development
IV-12
SWIFT ENERGY INCOME PARTNERS 1990-C, LTD
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b G. Robert Evans -------------- ---------------------------------- G. Robert Evans Director
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Raymond O. Loen -------------- ---------------------------------- Raymond O. Loen Director
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Henry C. Montgomery -------------- ---------------------------------- Henry C. Montgomery Director
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Clyde W. Smith, Jr. -------------- ---------------------------------- Clyde W. Smith, Jr. Director
Date: March 17, 1997 By: s/b Harold J. Withrow -------------- ---------------------------------- Harold J. Withrow Director
IV-13


ITEM 1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL. The business of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. (the "Company" or the "Registrant"), which was incorporated in 1950, is the production and sale of lime and limestone products. The Company extracts high-quality limestone from its quarries and then processes the limestone for sale as aggregate, pulverized limestone, quicklime and hydrated lime. These operations are conducted through three wholly-owned subsidiaries of the Company: Arkansas Lime Company, Corson Lime Company and Texas Lime Company. References to the Company herein include references to its subsidiaries.
The Company's principal corporate office is located at 12221 Merit Drive, Suite 500, Dallas, Texas 75251.
BUSINESS AND PRODUCTS. The Company extracts raw limestone and then processes it for sale as aggregate, pulverized limestone, quicklime and hydrated lime. Aggregate is raw limestone which has been crushed to specified sizes. Pulverized limestone is a dried product ground to granular and finer sizes. Quicklime is produced when carbon dioxide is removed from limestone in a heat process called calcination. Hydrated lime is formed in a process called hydration in which water is added to quicklime to produce a soft powder.
Aggregate is used by the construction industry in concrete, asphalt and road base. Pulverized limestone is used primarily in the production of construction materials such as asphalt paving and roofing shingles, as an additive to agriculture feeds and as a soil enhancement. Quicklime is used primarily in the manufacturing of paper products, in sanitation and water filtering systems and in metal processing. Hydrated lime is used primarily in municipal sanitation/water treatment, soil stabilization in highway and building construction, the production of chemicals and the production of construction materials such as stucco, plaster and mortar.
PRODUCT SALES. The Company sells its lime and limestone products primarily in the states of Arkansas, Connecticut, Delaware, Kansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oklahoma, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas and Virginia. Sales are made primarily by the Company's eight sales employees. Sales personnel call on potential customers and solicit orders which are generally made on a purchase-order basis. The Company also receives orders in response to bids that it prepares and submits to potential customers.
Principal customers for the Company's lime and limestone products are highway, street and parking lot contractors, chemical producers, paper manufacturers, roofing shingle manufacturers, glass manufacturers, municipal sanitation/water treatment facilities, poultry and cattle feed producers, governmental agencies, steel producers and electrical utility companies.
During the year ended December 31, 1996, approximately 1,500 customers accounted for the Company's sales of lime and limestone products. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of such sales. The Company is not subject to significant customer risks as its customers are considerably diversified as to geographic location and industrial concentration. However, given the nature of the lime and limestone industry, the Company's profits are very sensitive to changes in volume.
Lime and limestone products are transported by rail and truck to customers generally within a radius of 400 miles of each of the Company's processing plants. Sales of lime and limestone products are highest during the months of March through November.
Substantially all of the Company's sales are made within the United States.
ORDER BACKLOG. The Company does not believe that backlog information accurately reflects anticipated annual revenues or profitability from year to year.
SEASONALITY. The Company's sales have historically reflected seasonal trends, with the largest percentage of total annual revenues being realized in the second and third quarters. Low seasonal demand normally results in reduced shipments and revenues in the first quarter. Inclement weather conditions have a negative impact on the demand for lime and limestone products.
LIMESTONE RESERVES. The Company extracts limestone from three open-pit quarries, all of which are Company-owned. The Cleburne Quarry is located 14 miles from Cleburne, Texas; the Batesville Quarry is located near Batesville, Arkansas; and the Corson Quarry is located at Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania. Access to each location is provided by paved roads.
Texas Lime Company operates out of the Cleburne Quarry, which is situated upon a tract of land containing approximately 459 acres. In addition, the Company owns 2,149 acres of land adjacent to the Cleburne tract containing known high-quality limestone reserves in a bed averaging 28 feet in thickness, with an overburden which ranges from 0 to 50 feet. The Company also has mineral interests in the 560 acres of land adjacent to the Northwest boundary of the Company's property. This tract of land has 531 acres of proven limestone reserves. The calculated reserves are approximately 117,000,000 tons. Assuming the present level of production at the Quarry is maintained, the Company estimates the reserves are sufficient to sustain operations for approximately 100 years.
Arkansas Lime Company operates out of the Batesville Quarry, which is situated upon a tract of 725 acres, 90 of which contain known deposits of high-quality limestone reserves. The average thickness of the chemical-quality limestone sequence in this deposit is approximately 70 feet, with an overburden averaging 35 feet. Additional drilling was done in 1996 to validate the present reserves. The total calculated available reserves are approximately 26,000,000 tons. Assuming the present level of production at the quarry is maintained, the Company estimates that reserves are sufficient to sustain operations for approximately 50 years.
Corson Lime Company operates out of the Corson Quarry, which is situated at Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania upon a tract of land containing approximately 315 acres, approximately 153 acres of which are underlain by dolomitic limestone reserves. Permitted reserves are calculated to be approximately 79,000,000 tons at the Quarry. The overburden averages approximately 39 feet over the nonexposed portion of the Quarry. The Company estimates that, assuming the present level of production at the Quarry is maintained, the reserves are sufficient to sustain operations for approximately 50 years.
MINING. The Company extracts limestone by the open-pit method at its three operating quarries. The open-pit method, which consists of removing the top layer of soil, trees and other substances and then extracting the exposed limestone, is generally less expensive than underground mining. The principal disadvantage of the open-pit method is that operations are subject to inclement weather. To extract limestone, the Company utilizes standard mining equipment which is Company-owned. After extraction, limestone is crushed, screened and ground in the case of aggregate and pulverized limestone, or further processed in kilns and hydrators in the case of quicklime and hydrated lime, before shipment. The Company has no knowledge of any recent changes in the physical quarrying conditions on any of its properties which have materially affected its operations, and no such changes are anticipated.
PLANTS AND FACILITIES. The Company produces lime and limestone products in the following plants:
The Texas plant is located adjacent to the Cleburne Quarry on a tract of land covering approximately 8.4 acres. This plant is equipped with three rotary kilns and has a daily-rated capacity of 1,200 tons of quicklime. The plant has pulverized limestone equipment which has a capacity to produce 550,000 tons of pulverized limestone annually, depending on the product mix. In addition to this plant, the Company owns a plant which is located near Blum, Texas on a tract of land covering approximately 40 acres. It is equipped with two vertical kilns and has a daily-rated capacity of 600 tons of quicklime. The Blum plant was acquired in 1989 and has not been operated since that time; however, the plant's storage and shipment facilities are currently being utilized.
The Arkansas plant, situated on a tract of approximately 290 acres, is located roughly two miles from the Batesville Quarry and is connected to the Quarry by a Company-owned railway. Utilizing six vertical kilns, this plant has a daily-rated capacity of 345 tons of quicklime. The plant has two grinding systems which, depending on the product mix, has the capacity to produce 700,000 tons of pulverized limestone annually.
The Pennsylvania plant is located adjacent to the Corson Quarry on a tract of land covering approximately 147 acres. It is equipped with a dual crushing system and six vertical kilns and has a daily-rated capacity of 8,000 tons of aggregate and 300 tons of quicklime.
The Company maintains lime hydrating equipment and limestone drying equipment at all three plants. Storage facilities, lime and pulverized limestone products at each of its plants consist primarily of cylindrical tanks, which are considered by the Company to be adequate to protect its lime and limestone products and to provide an available supply for customers' needs at the existing volume of shipments. Equipment is maintained at each plant to load trucks and at the Arkansas and Blum plants to load railroad cars.
The Company believes that its processing plants for the most part are being properly maintained and are adequately insured. Much of the equipment in the plants is aging and will require maintenance and repair in the future. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" regarding the Company's expected capital expenditures for modernizing and re-equipping the plants.
EMPLOYEES. The Company employed, at December 31, 1996, 318 persons, 38 of whom are engaged in sales, administrative and management activities. Of the Company's 280 production employees, 224 are covered by collective bargaining agreements. These agreements expire as follows:
Pennsylvania facility in July 1998 Texas facility in November 1999 Arkansas facility in December 1999
COMPETITION. The lime and limestone industry has certain limiting factors, including: the availability of high-quality limestone (calcium carbonate) reserves, the ability to secure mining and operating permits for a facility, the cost of building processing plants to create the lime and limestone products and the transportation costs associated with delivering the products to customers. There is not a large number of producers in the United States as a whole, but producers tend to concentrate on known limestone formations where competition takes place on a local basis. The contraction of the U.S. steel industry in the late 1970's and the early 1980's created an excess of supply over demand, thus impacting prices and profit levels. The industry as a whole has expanded its customer base and, while still selling heavily to the steel industry, also counts paper producers and road builders among its major customers. In recent years, the environmental-related uses for lime have been expanding, including use in flue gas desulfurization and the treatment of both waste and potable water.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS. The Company's operations are subject to various federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations, including the Clean Air Act, the Clean Water Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act as well as the Toxic Substances Control Act. Management does not believe that any lack of compliance by the Company with applicable environmental laws will have a material adverse effect on the Company. In part in response to requirements of environmental regulatory agencies, the Company incurred capital expenditures of approximately $200,000 in 1996 on environmental compliance and is planning to incur approximately $200,000 in 1997 excluding major projects. See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations." In the judgment of management, forecastable expenditure requirements for the future are not of such dimension as to have a materially adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position. The Company's recurring costs associated with managing and disposing of potentially hazardous substances (such as fuels and lubricants used in operations) and maintaining pollution control equipment amounted to approximately $100,000 in 1996 and $150,000 in 1995. The Company has not been named as a potentially responsible party in any superfund cleanup site.
DISPOSITION OF ASSETS. Effective July 15, 1992, substantially all of the assets and business of Virginia Lime Company ("VLC"), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, were sold to Eastern Ridge Lime Company, L.P.
ITEM 2.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.
Reference is made to Item 1 of this Report for a description of the properties of the Company, and such description is hereby incorporated by reference in answer to this Item 2. As discussed in Note 2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, plant facilities and mineral reserves are subject to encumbrances to secure the Company's loans.
ITEM 3.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
Information regarding legal proceedings is set forth in Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and is hereby incorporated by reference in answer to this Item 3.
ITEM 4.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.
The Company did not submit any matters to a vote of security holders during the fourth quarter of 1996.
PART II
ITEM 5.

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
The Company's Common Stock is quoted on the Nasdaq National Market under the symbol "USLM." As of February 28, 1997, the Company had 899 shareholders of record.
As of December 31, 1996, 500,000 shares of $5.00 par value preferred stock were authorized, and none was issued.
The high and low sales prices for the Company's Common Stock for the periods indicated, as well as dividends declared, were:
ITEM 6.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA. (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
- ---------------
(1) Includes a gain of $372,000, net of related taxes ($425,000 gross), due to the expiration of certain potential post-closing obligations relating to the sale of VLC assets.
(2) Includes a gain on sale of VLC assets of $10,679, net of related taxes.
See "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations", and Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
ITEM 7.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The following table sets forth selected financial information of the Company expressed as a percentage of revenues for the periods indicated:
1996 VS 1995
Revenues decreased from $41,419,000 in 1995 to $40,159,000 in 1996, a decrease of $1,260,000 or 3.0%. This decrease was a result of a 6.9% decrease in sales volume, partially offset by a 3.9% increase in sales prices. Sales volumes were down at all plants, with the largest percentage of reductions attributed to the Arkansas and Texas plants. The single largest reason for Arkansas's reduced sales volume was the loss of a pulverized limestone customer. The increase in sales prices was attributed principally to the Texas plant.
The Company's gross profit was $7,883,000 for 1996 compared to $10,543,000 for 1995, a 25.2% decrease. The decrease was the result of a number of factors. The lower sales volume reduced the gross profit as fixed costs, including greater depreciation expense, were absorbed by fewer units. The increased cost of fuel, particularly natural gas prices, impacted all three plants, but particularly the Pennsylvania plant. The Pennsylvania plant's continued operating and productivity problems accounted for approximately 50% of the reduction in gross profit. The 9% reduction in sales volume at the Arkansas plant also contributed to the decrease in gross profit.
Selling, general and administrative ("SG&A") expenses decreased from $4,881,000 in 1995 to $4,359,000 in 1996, a 10.7% decrease. SG&A expenses declined as a percent of revenues to 10.9% in 1996,
from 11.8% in 1995. The reduction in SG&A was primarily the result of lower bonus payments, professional fees and insurance costs.
Interest expense decreased by $160,000 in 1996 from 1995, primarily due to lower debt outstanding
The Company's net income for 1996 decreased $1,658,000 or 38.9% from $4,260,000 ($1.11 per share) in 1995, to $2,602,000 ($0.67 per share) principally due to the decrease in gross profit.
1995 VS 1994
Revenues increased from $36,865,000 in 1994 to $41,419,000 in 1995, an increase of $4,554,000 or 12.4%. This resulted from a 12.0% increase in sales volume and a 0.4% increase in sales prices. Sales volume was up at all plants in 1995. Sales prices received for lime and limestone products at the Arkansas and Texas plants increased slightly in 1995 compared to 1994. Sales prices received for lime and limestone products, including aggregates, at the Pennsylvania plant were down slightly when compared to 1994.
The Company's gross profit was $10,543,000 for 1995 compared to $7,365,000 for 1994, a 43.2% increase. In addition to increased revenues, gross profit was enhanced by improved efficiencies at the plants and lower amortization of costs in excess of net assets acquired.
SG&A expenses increased by $20,000 in 1995 compared to 1994. SG&A expenses declined as a percent of revenues to 11.8% in 1995, from 13.2% in 1994.
Interest expense decreased by $161,000 in 1995 from 1994. This decrease was due to lower debt outstanding.
The Company's net income for 1995 increased by $2,344,000 or 122.3% from $1,916,000 ($0.50 per share) in 1994, to $4,260,000 ($1.11 per share) principally due to the increase in gross profit.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
The Company's financial condition is reflected by the following key financial measurements (dollars in thousands):
In 1996, cash flow from operations was $7,050,000, a decline of $893,000 or 11.2% from 1995. In 1996, this cash flow fully funded the Company's capital expenditure program and reduced the Company's bank debt by $1,143,000.
The Company has a financing agreement with a commercial bank. The agreement, as amended in November, 1996, provides for a five-year $8,000,000 term loan with monthly principal repayments of $95,238 maturing in October, 2000. The agreement also provides for a $6,000,000 revolving credit facility which matures in June, 1998. Both facilities are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets. Beginning in
March, 1997, all borrowings under the agreement carry an interest rate of the bank's prime rate. In addition, the Company has the option to borrow at a LIBOR rate plus 2 1/2% for the term loan, and LIBOR plus 2 1/4% for the revolving credit facility. The terms of the agreement contain, among other provisions, requirements for maintaining defined levels of working capital, net worth, financial ratios and capital expenditure limitations. The covenants also restrict incurrence of debt, liens and lease obligations, mergers, and consolidation or acquisition of assets.
As part of the same amended agreement, the Company has negotiated a $10,000,000 secured line of credit, which is available to finance capital expenditures. The term of any borrowings under this facility would match the assets financed, and the interest rate would be the same as for borrowings under the term loan portion of the Company's credit agreement. The Company has also arranged for a secured line of credit for purposes of acquisitions. This facility is for up to $10,000,000, and the interest rate would be the bank's prime rate. Both the capital expenditure and acquisition facilities are available, if not extended, through 1997 and are subject to approval by the bank.
Capital expenditures for 1996 totaled $6,121,000 compared to $4,851,000 in 1995. The Company expects to spend $4,000,000 to $5,000,000 per year over the next several years to continue modernizing and re-equipping plant facilities to improve efficiency and reduce costs, to effect environmental improvements and to ensure that capacity is in place to meet market demand. Management believes that the necessary funds will be generated by operations. The Company is not contractually committed to any planned capital expenditures until actual orders are placed for equipment.
In addition to the above capital expenditures, the Company currently plans to undertake major modernization and expansion projects at the Arkansas and Texas facilities. The Company has for some time considered constructing a new kiln at the Arkansas plant. As part of this process, a new plant-wide permit was recently obtained in order to be in position to build the new kiln. Recent firm bid proposals indicate that the current costs of the new kiln have increased substantially from the preliminary cost estimates supplied from the vendors. Because of this change, management believes it is now necessary to again review in detail the various kiln processing systems that can be employed at Arkansas. In addition, the crushing, handling, loadout, and storage facilities at Arkansas will be evaluated in order to develop a comprehensive modernization and expansion plan for this facility.
The Company has decided to move ahead with the Texas modernization and expansion project at this time. The Texas plans are a result of a thorough study of both the projected replacement horizon of the existing equipment and certain current inefficiencies of the plant. The plans include the installation of a new stone crushing and stone handling system, the addition of a pre-heater to one of the existing kilns, additional storage, screening and shipping capacity, and a new support building which will house a laboratory and administrative and shop facilities.
The planned Texas improvements will allow the Company to better serve its customers by improving both quality and service. With the improvements, the Company will be in a position to compete for customers who currently cannot use the Company's lime in their processes. The additional storage will improve both kiln utilization and the plant's ability to meet peek customer demand. The storage and load-out facilities will also substantially reduce the amount of time required for the loading of bulk quicklime trucks. The pre-heater addition to a current kiln will reduce fuel consumption and will also increase the plant's quicklime capacity by approximately 25%. These improvements will result in lower operating costs and in more efficient utilization of the work force. The cost of the Texas modernization and expansion project is currently expected to be approximately $20,000,000. The project is subject to obtaining various permits. This project will be financed from a combination of internally generated funds and banking facilities.
The Company's results for 1996 were adversely impacted by the continued operating and productivity problems at the Pennsylvania plant. The Company continues to take corrective action to address these problems. Specifically, the Company has begun to implement certain projects to improve the profitability of the plant. They include: an electric power costs reduction program, an increase in capacity to produce manufactured sand, improvements in product yields, eliminating bottlenecks between the primary crusher and the secondary crushing plants, and improvements in work force productivity. The Company also implemented price increases at the beginning of 1997. As the management is working to restore the Pennsylvania facility to profitability, it is also considering other alternatives to ensure that this plant does not continue to impact adversely the Company's overall results.
ENVIRONMENTAL MATTERS
The Company's operations are subject to various environmental laws and regulations. In part in response to requirements of environmental regulatory agencies, the Company incurred capital expenditures of approximately $200,000 in 1996. In the judgment of management, forecastable expenditure requirements for the future are not of such dimension as to have a materially adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operations, liquidity or competitive position. See "Business--Environmental Matters."
ITEM 8.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
United States Lime & Minerals, Inc.
We have audited the consolidated balance sheets of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the related consolidated statements of income, stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with generally accepted auditing standards. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 1996 and 1995, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 1996, in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles.
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Dallas, Texas
January 24, 1997
-F1-
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(dollars in thousands)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-F2- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (CONTINUED) (dollars in thousands)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-F3- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-F4-
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(dollars in thousands)
Years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements
-F5-
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(dollars in thousands)
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
-F6- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994
(1) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) Organization
The Company is a manufacturer of lime and limestone products supplying primarily the steel, paper, agriculture, municipal sanitation/water treatment and construction industries. The Company is headquartered in Dallas, Texas and operates lime and aggregate plants in Arkansas, Pennsylvania and Texas through its wholly owned subsidiaries, Arkansas Lime Company, Corson Lime Company and Texas Lime Company, respectively.
(b) Principles of Consolidation
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and all of its subsidiaries. All material intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
(c) Use of Estimates
The preparation of the financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) Statements of Cash Flows
For purposes of reporting cash flows, the Company considers all certificates of deposit and highly-liquid debt instruments, such as U.S. treasury bills and notes, with original maturities of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are carried at cost plus accrued interest, which approximates fair market value.
Supplemental cash flow information is presented below:
(e) Trade Receivables
Trade receivables are presented net of the related allowance for doubtful accounts, which totaled $71 and $115 at December 31, 1996 and 1995, respectively.
-F7- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(f) Inventories
Inventories are valued principally at the lower of cost or market determined using the average cost method. Such costs include materials, labor and production overhead.
A summary of inventories is as follows:
(g) Property, Plant and Equipment
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment is being provided for by the straight-line and declining-balance methods over estimated useful lives as follows:
Buildings and building improvements 3-40 years
Machinery and equipment 3-20 years
Furniture and fixtures 3-10 years
Automotive equipment 3-8 years
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred; renewals and betterments are capitalized. When units of property are retired or otherwise disposed of, their cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts, and any resulting gain or loss is credited or charged to income.
The Company reviews its long-term assets for impairment when changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Impairment is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount of the asset exceeds the estimated fair value of the asset less disposal costs.
(h) Other Assets
Other assets consist of the following:
-F8- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
It is the Company's policy to make available for sale assets considered excess and no longer necessary for operations. The carrying values of such assets are periodically reviewed and adjusted downward to market, when appropriate.
Deferred stripping costs are amortized by the unit-of-production method based on the estimated recoverable reserves in the underlying area.
Deferred financing costs are expensed over the shorter of the life of the debt or expected life of the loan using the interest method.
(i) Environmental Expenditures
Environmental expenditures that relate to current operations are expensed or capitalized as appropriate. Expenditures that relate to an existing condition caused by past operations, and which do not contribute to current or future revenue generation, are expensed. Liabilities are recorded when environmental assessments and/or remedial efforts are probable, and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Generally, the timing of these accruals will coincide with completion of a feasibility study or the Company's commitment to a formal plan of action.
(j) Stock Options
The Company has elected to follow Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, "Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees" (APB 25) in accounting for its employee stock options. Under APB 25, if the exercise price of an employee's stock options equals or exceeds the market price of the underlying stock on the date of grant, no compensation expense is recognized.
(k) Earnings Per Share of Common Stock
Earnings per share of common stock are based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during each year, which amounted to 3,890,646 shares for the year ended December 31, 1996 and 3,836,063 shares for the years ended December 31, 1995 and 1994. The dilutive affect of outstanding stock options was not significant during any of the periods presented.
(l) Reclassifications
Certain previously reported amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current presentation.
-F9- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(2) Long-Term Debt
The Company has a financing agreement with a commercial bank. The agreement, as amended in November, 1996, provides for a five-year $8,000 term loan with monthly principal repayments of $95 maturing in October, 2000. The agreement also provides for a $6,000 revolving credit facility which matures in June, 1998. Both facilities are secured by substantially all of the Company's assets. Beginning in March, 1997, all borrowings under the agreement carry an interest rate of the bank's prime rate. In addition, the Company has the option to borrow at a LIBOR rate plus 2 1/2% for the term loan and LIBOR plus 2 1/4% for the revolving credit facility. The terms of the agreement contain, among other provisions, requirements for maintaining defined levels of working capital, net worth, financial ratios and capital expenditure limitations. The covenants also restrict incurrence of debt, liens and lease obligations, mergers, and consolidation or acquisition of assets.
As part of the same amended agreement, the Company has negotiated a $10,000 secured line of credit, which is available to finance capital expenditures. The term of any borrowings under this facility would match the assets financed, and the interest rate would be the same as for borrowings under the term loan portion of the Company's credit agreement. The Company has also arranged for a secured line of credit for purposes of acquisitions. This facility is for up to $10,000, and the interest rate would be the bank's prime rate. Both the capital expenditure and acquisition facilities are available, if not extended, through 1997 and are subject to approval by the bank.
A summary of long-term debt is as follows:
Amounts payable on long-term debt in 1997 and thereafter are: 1997, $1,143; 1998, $1,143; 1999, $1,143; 2000, $952.
The carrying amount of the Company's long-term debt approximates its fair values.
-F10- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(3) Income Taxes
Income tax expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 was as follows:
A reconciliation of income taxes expense computed at the federal statutory rate to income taxes expense for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994 is as follows:
At December 31, 1996, the Company had deferred tax liabilities of $555, deferred tax assets of $3,657 and a valuation allowance of $3,102. The principal temporary difference related to the deferred tax liabilities is depreciation ($555). The principal temporary differences related to the deferred tax assets were net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards ($109), general business credits ($357), certain financial statement accruals ($598) and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards ($2,593).
At December 31, 1995, the Company had deferred tax liabilities of $653, deferred tax assets of $4,188 and a valuation allowance of $3,535. The principal temporary difference related to the deferred tax liabilities is depreciation ($653). The principal temporary differences related to the deferred tax assets were net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards ($1,047), general business credits ($510), certain financial statement accruals ($656) and alternative minimum tax credit carryforwards ($1,975).
-F11- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
The Company has NOL carryforwards for tax purposes of $287 which will, if unused, expire in 2008. General business credits of $357 are available to reduce the Company's federal income tax, which expire starting 1997 through 2001.
Deferred tax assets have been reduced by a valuation allowance as realization of some portion of these future tax benefits is dependent on generating sufficient taxable income. Favorable resolution of these uncertainties would result in the reduction of the valuation allowance.
(4) Employee Retirement Plans
The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all union employees of its wholly-owned subsidiary, Corson Lime Company. Benefits for the Corson Lime Union Pension Plan (Corson Plan) are based on certain multiples of years of service. The Company's funding policy is to contribute annually not less than the minimum required nor more than the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes. Contributions are intended to provide not only for benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future. The Company funded pension costs of $162 for 1996, $127 for 1995 and $96 for 1994.
A summary of the funding status of the Corson Plan and the amounts recognized in the consolidated balance sheets are as follows:
-F12- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
A summary of the components of net periodic pension expense for the Corson Plan follows:
The Company also has a contributory retirement (401(k)) savings plan for nonunion employees. The Company contributions to the plan were $61 during 1996, $58 during 1995 and $23 during 1994. The Company has a contributory retirement (401(k)) savings plan for union employees of Texas Lime Company. The Company contributions to this plan were $14 in 1996, $12 in 1995 and $11 in 1994.
In December 1986, the Company purchased 1,550,000 shares of its outstanding common stock for $10.50 per share. Subsequent to that purchase, 200,000 shares (300,000 shares after stock split) were sold to the Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) for $8.20 per share. The Company obtained a note receivable from the ESOP for the purchase of the shares, which was classified as a reduction of stockholders' equity. As of December 1994, the Company had made all of the necessary contributions to the ESOP to repay all principal and interest due on the note.
The ESOP covers substantially all full-time nonunion employees and is designed to invest primarily in the Company's common stock. Contributions to the ESOP are currently made at the option of the Company. The Company did not make a contribution during 1996 or 1995 and contributed $205 during 1994.
-F13- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(5) Stock Option Plan
The Company has a stock option plan under which options for shares of common stock may be granted to key employees. The options expire ten years from the date of grant and generally become exercisable after the expiration of one year from the grant date. As of December 31, 1996, 35,000 shares are available for future grant under this plan.
A summary of the Company's stock option activity and related information for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994, is as follows:
-F14- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123, "Accounting For Stock Based Compensation" (SFAS 123), requires the disclosure of pro forma net income and income per share of common stock information computed as if the Company had accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, under the fair value method set forth in SFAS 123. The fair value for these options was estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions for the 1995 grant: a risk-free interest rate of 6%; a dividend yield of 2%; and a volatility factor of .34. In addition, the fair value of these options was estimated based on an expected life of three years.
The Black-Scholes options valuation model was developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective assumptions including the expected stock price volatility. Because the Company's employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in management's opinion the existing models do not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value of its employee stock options. In addition, because SFAS 123 is applicable only to options granted subsequent to December 31, 1994, the pro forma information does not reflect the pro forma effect of all previous stock option grants of the Company, and thus the pro forma information is not necessarily indicative of future amounts until SFAS 123 is applied to all outstanding stock options.
For purposes of pro forma disclosures, the estimated fair value of the options is amortized to expense over the options vesting period. The Company's pro forma information follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
(6) Commitments and Contingencies
The Company leases some of the equipment used in its operations. Generally, the leases are for periods varying from one to five years and are renewable at the option of the Company. Total rent expense was $75 for 1996, $232 for 1995 and $134 for 1994. As of December 31, 1996, future minimum payments under non-cancelable operating leases are as follows: 1997, $77; 1998, $75; and 1999, $36.
The Company is party to lawsuits and claims arising in the normal course of business, none of which, in the opinion of management, is expected to have a material adverse effect on the Company's financial condition, results of operation, liquidity or competitive position.
-F15- UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
(7) Summary of Quarterly Financial Data (unaudited)
-F16-
ITEM 9.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE.
NONE
PART III
The information required in response to Items 10, 11, 12 and 13 is hereby incorporated by reference to the information under the captions "Election of Directors", "Executive Officer of the Company Who Is Not Also a Director", "Executive Compensation", "Voting Securities and Principal Shareholder", and "Shareholdings of Company Directors and Executive Officers" in the definitive Proxy Statement for the Company's 1997 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The Company anticipates that it will file the definitive Proxy Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before April 30, 1997.
PART IV
ITEM 14.

ITEM 14. EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES AND REPORTS ON FORM 8-K.
(a) 1. The following financial statements are included in Item 8:
Report of Independent Auditors
Consolidated Financial Statements:
Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December, 31, 1996 and 1995;
Consolidated Statements of Income for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994;
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity for the years ended December, 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994;
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 1996, 1995 and 1994; and
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
2. All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not applicable or the required information is presented in the consolidated financial statements or the related notes.
3. The following documents are filed with or incorporated by reference into this Report:
3(a) Articles of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of Scottish Heritable, Inc. dated January 25th, 1994 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(a) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File Number 0-4197).
3(b) Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1993, File number 0-4197).
3(c) Composite Copy of Bylaws of the Company, as currently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(b) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1991, File Number 0-4197).
10(a) United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan, as restated and amended effective August 1, 1989 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (b) to the Company's Annual Report on form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1995, File Number 0-4197).
10(b) Amendment No. Two to United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. Employee Stock Ownership Plan effective August 1, 1996.
10(c) United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan effective August 1, 1983 as amended and restated effective January 1, 1997.
10(d) Texas Lime Company Bargaining Unit 401(k) Plan effective as of January 1, 1992 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(f) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June, 30, 1992, File Number 0-4197).
10(e) Executive Retention Agreements dated as of June 10, 1992 between the Company and certain officers of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(b) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1992, File Number 0-4197).
10(f) Employment Agreements between the Company and certain officers of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 19(c) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1992, File Number 0-4197).
10(g) United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. 1992 Stock Option Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit A to the Company's definitive Proxy Statement for its 1992 Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on June 9, 1992, File Number 0-4197).
10(h) Stock Purchase Agreement dated October 23,1986 between Rangaire Corporation and InterFirst Bank Fort Worth, N.A. as trustee of the Rangaire Corporation Employee Stock Ownership Trust (incorporated by reference to Exhibit (c) (2) to the Company's Tender Offer Statement on Schedule 13E-4 for a tender offer first published sent or given to security holders on October 30, 1986, File Number 0-4197).
10(i) Employment Agreement dated as of September 27, 1993 between Scottish Heritable, Inc. and Robert F. Kizer (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(a) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1994, File Number 0-4197).
10(j) Employment Agreement dated November 27, 1993 between Scottish Heritable, Inc. and Robert K. Murray (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31, 1994, File Number 0-4197).
10(k) Separation Agreement effective as of December 19, 1996 between United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and Robert K. Murray.
10(l) Loan and Security Agreement dated October 20, 1993 among Scottish Heritable, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A.(incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(p) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September, 30, 1993, File Number 0-4197).
10(m) Asset Purchase Agreement dated as of July 13, 1992 among Eastern Ridge Lime Company, L.P., Virginia Lime Company, Eastern Ridge Lime, Inc., and Scottish Heritable, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2 to the Company's Current Report on Form 8-K dated July 15, 1992, File Number 0-4197).
10(n) First Amendment to Term Note dated as of March 1, 1994, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(b) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,1994, File Number 0-4197).
10(o) Amendment No. 1 to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of December 23, 1994, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(y) to the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 1994, File number 0-4197).
10(p) Amendment No. 2 to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of April 28, 1995, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(z) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 1995, File number 0-4197).
10(q) Amendment No. 3 to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of September 29, 1995, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(aa) to the Company's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 1995, File number 0-4197).
10(r) Letter Agreement dated October 26, 1995, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A.
10(s) Amendment No. 5 to Loan and Security Agreement dated as of November 27, 1996, among United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and subsidiaries and CoreStates Bank, N.A.
10(t) Consulting Agreement dated April 18, 1996 between United States Lime & Minerals, Inc. and Wallace G. Irmscher.
11 Statement re computation of per share earnings.
21 Subsidiaries of the Company.
23 Consent of Independent Auditors.
27 Financial Data Schedule.
- ------------- Exhibits 10(a) through 10(g); 10(i) through 10(k); and 10(t) are management contracts or compensatory plans or arrangements required to be filed as exhibits.
(b) The Company did not file any Current Reports on Form 8-K during the fourth quarter of 1996.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
Date: March 28, 1997 By: /s/ Robert F. Kizer --------------------- Robert F. Kizer, President and Chief Executive Officer
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
UNITED STATES LIME & MINERALS, INC.
Annual Report on Form 10-K Index to Exhibits
Certain exhibits to this annual report on Form 10-K have been incorporated by reference. For the list of these exhibits see Item 14 hereof.
The following exhibits are being filed herewith: