Read the following premise and answer if the hypothesis is true.
-- I really think this is an important question and, as Justice O'Connor points out, if we have to ask what's the most plausible explanation for this rule, to reward existing vested interest or to stimulate former new works, it seems to me that it's probably the former.
Hypothesis: The most plausible explanation of this rule favors stimulating former new works . Is the answer "Yes", "No", or "It's impossible to say"? Respond with only the answer and no additional text.
No
No.