Read the following premise and answer if the hypothesis is true.
In the first one, the petitioners call upon the government to put the surplus accumulated in the employment insurance account back into the pockets of the unemployed by revoking the current eligibility rules for new entrants and using surpluses for training for the unemployed, thereby promoting direct employment.
Hypothesis: The petitioners are unemployed. . Is the answer "Yes", "No", or "It's impossible to say"? Respond with only the answer and no additional text.
It's impossible to say
It's impossible to say. The petitioners' employment status is not explicitly stated in the premise.