Read the following premise and answer if the hypothesis is true.
This Court's interpretation of "limited times" could, of course, eviscerate that term of any meaning, but under the principle of enumeration as this Court has articulated it, this Court should interpret that clause in a way that gives its terms effect in a simple way.
Hypothesis: The way the court interpreted "limited times" makes it meaningless.. Is the answer "Yes", "No", or "It's impossible to say"? Respond with only the answer and no additional text.
Yes
It's impossible to say based on the given information. The hypothesis makes an assumption about the court's interpretation without providing the interpretation itself.