Generate a series of (instruction, response) pairs that are similar in context and structure to the example provided below. Each pair should consist of a concise instruction followed by an appropriate, detailed response. The instruction should pose a clear task or question, while the response should provide a comprehensive answer or solution that could be understood by someone with a basic understanding of the subject.

Example pair: 
Instruction: Read the following: 

If a Spanish class were to go on an in-country immersion in Spain, they’d be flooded by the sights and sounds of native speakers going about their business. Good times! But that would make a huge dent in everybody’s budget. So why not bring a native speaker to class instead?

Pick somebody who’s outgoing, a natural extrovert who loves interacting with people and doesn’t take himself too seriously. Ask him to prepare a short talk. And he can really talk about anything—so long as he does it in Spanish. He can tell his personal story, talk about his job or share some interesting quirk about his culture.

You may be a native speaker yourself, but count yourself out. Bring some new face to stand in front of the class. (There’s just something more effective about a fresh face.)

Now, please summarize what it says about having a native speaker visit the classroom.
Response: Bringing a native speaker into the classroom can help immerse students in a foreign language. Invite a guest speaker who is outgoing, extroverted, and has something interesting to share. 

Your task is to generate more pairs that maintain this level of clarity and detail. The topic is Summarization. Write a long text of instruction by yourself, then summarize the given instruction in a response. Ensure that the responses are informative and accurate, suitable for an educational context. 

Store the generated pairs in valid JSON format, with each pair as an object within an array. Each object should have two key-value pairs: "instruction" and "response". For instance: 

{"contents": [{"instruction": "text", "response": "text"}, {"instruction": "text", "response": "text"}, ...]} 

Remember to maintain consistency in the format and ensure the generated pairs are diverse and cover a broad range of subjects. You must return the response in the asked format and you must not add any additional text in your response.

The following text discusses strategies for writing a research paper summary. Read it carefully and summarize the main points in a clear, concise way:

Writing an effective research paper summary demonstrates your ability to comprehend complex information and condense it into a concise overview. This skill is crucial for researchers, students, and professionals in many fields.

Begin by thoroughly understanding the research aims, methods, results, and implications discussed in the paper. Make notes on the key arguments, evidence, and conclusions. Identify the underlying logic and reasoning that connects the different sections.

Don't simply paraphrase each section sequentially. Instead, synthesize the critical points to create an overarching synopsis. Highlight the research goals, key findings, limitations, and broader significance or applications. Omit excessive procedural details unless they provide important context.

Maintain a clear, logical flow by grouping related concepts together. Use objective and precise language rather than subjective evaluations. Integrate thoughtful analysis to demonstrate your engagement with the research, but avoid injecting personal opinions or tangential discussions.

Finally, ensure you properly attribute all direct quotes and clearly differentiate your own analysis from the authors' original work. An effective summary accurately captures a research paper's essence while being succinct and easy to comprehend.
user
An effective research paper summary distills the key arguments, evidence, and conclusions into a concise overview. It synthesizes the research aims, methods, major findings, limitations, and significance while maintaining objectivity and proper attribution. The summary should have a clear logical flow, grouping related concepts together, rather than simply paraphrasing sections sequentially. The goal is to capture the essence of the research accurately yet succinctly.
assistant