Generate a series of (instruction, response) pairs that are similar in context and structure to the example provided below. Each pair should consist of a concise instruction followed by an appropriate, detailed response. The instruction should pose a clear task or question, while the response should provide a comprehensive answer or solution that could be understood by someone with a basic understanding of the subject.

Example pair: 
Instruction: Read the article below:

Middle-of-funnel content

At this next stage, your target audience is now aware of your business and the solution you provide, and they’re interested.

They trust you enough to make slightly bigger commitments, like signing up for a webinar and engaging with longer-form content; and they’re interested enough in your offering to read brand-specific material like case studies, testimonials, and newsletter emails.

Their goal is to learn more about the solution you provide—both in general and the one specifically offered by your business.

Your goal is to educate them on your offering and set your business apart from competitors—not just with your features and benefits but with your expertise and knowledge.

Next, write a summary of what it says about Middle-of-funnel content
Response: Middle-of-funnel content includes brand-specific content that educates interested audiences that are already considering an offer.

Your task is to generate more pairs that maintain this level of clarity and detail. The topic is Summarization. Write a long text of instruction by yourself, then summarize the given instruction in a response. Ensure that the responses are informative and accurate, suitable for an educational context. 

Store the generated pairs in valid JSON format, with each pair as an object within an array. Each object should have two key-value pairs: "instruction" and "response". For instance: 

{"contents": [{"instruction": "text", "response": "text"}, {"instruction": "text", "response": "text"}, ...]} 

Remember to maintain consistency in the format and ensure the generated pairs are diverse and cover a broad range of subjects. You must return the response in the asked format and you must not add any additional text in your response.

Evaluating the quality of automatically generated summaries is a crucial aspect of text summarization research and development. Several metrics have been proposed to assess the effectiveness of summarization systems, including both intrinsic and extrinsic measures. Intrinsic evaluation methods focus on assessing the content and linguistic quality of the generated summaries, often by comparing them to human-written reference summaries. Common intrinsic metrics include ROUGE (Recall-Oriented Understudy for Gisting Evaluation), which measures the overlap between the system summary and reference summaries, and PYRAMID, which evaluates the content coverage based on semantic units. Extrinsic evaluation methods, on the other hand, measure the usefulness of the summaries for specific tasks or applications, such as information retrieval, question answering, or decision-making. Describe the importance of evaluating automatically generated summaries and discuss the advantages and limitations of intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation methods in the context of text summarization.
user
Evaluating the quality of automatically generated summaries is crucial for assessing the effectiveness of text summarization systems and driving improvements in this field. Intrinsic evaluation methods, such as ROUGE and PYRAMID, focus on assessing the content and linguistic quality of the summaries by comparing them to human-written reference summaries. While these methods provide valuable insights into the content coverage and fluency of the summaries, they may not fully capture the usefulness of the summaries for specific tasks or applications. Extrinsic evaluation methods, on the other hand, measure the impact of the summaries on downstream tasks like information retrieval or decision-making, providing a more practical assessment of their utility. However, extrinsic evaluations can be time-consuming and domain-specific. A balanced approach combining both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluation techniques can provide a comprehensive understanding of the strengths and limitations of summarization systems, guiding further research and development efforts.
assistant