In many ways he is somewhat of a foil to Wittgenstein turning his study inwards towards the everyday mechanics of moral problems, actions that are right or wrong, and away from meta-ethics which focuses more on logic and language.
He asks questions about which actions are right or wrong, and shies away from meta-ethics which focuses more on logic and language. In many ways, he serves as a foil to Wittgenstein, directing his study inwards to address the everyday mechanics of moral problems.
In many ways, he serves as a foil to Wittgenstein, directing his study inwards to address the everyday mechanics of moral problems. He asks questions about which actions are right or wrong, and shies away from meta-ethics which focuses more on logic and language.
In many ways, he serves as a foil to Wittgenstein, directing his study inwards to address the everyday mechanics of moral problems. He asks questions about which actions are right or wrong, and shies away from meta-ethics which focuses more on logic and language.