Several authors have the species a "nomen dubium", questioning its supposed diagnostic characteristics, especially in light of its presumed immature status, and the validity of the taxon has therefore been controversial.
The validity of the taxon has therefore been controversial. Several authors have deemed the species a "nomen dubium", questioning its supposed diagnostic characteristics, especially in light of its presumed immature status.
Several authors have deemed the species a "nomen dubium", questioning its supposed diagnostic characteristics, especially in light of its presumed immature status. The validity of the taxon has therefore been controversial.
Several authors have deemed the species a "nomen dubium", questioning its supposed diagnostic characteristics, especially in light of its presumed immature status. The validity of the taxon has therefore been controversial.