Eritha probably asserted her claim on behalf of the goddess Potnia, thus that the land of the sanctuary should be classified as a privileged one, presumably free of obligations, rather than a regular leasehold which would have been subject to taxes.
Thus, according to her, the land of the sanctuary should have been classified as a privileged one, presumably free of obligations, rather than a regular leasehold subject to taxes. Eritha probably asserted her claim on behalf of the goddess Potnia.
Eritha probably asserted her claim on behalf of the goddess Potnia. Thus, according to her, the land of the sanctuary should have been classified as a privileged one, presumably free of obligations, rather than a regular leasehold subject to taxes.
Eritha probably asserted her claim on behalf of the goddess Potnia. Thus, according to her, the land of the sanctuary should have been classified as a privileged one, presumably free of obligations, rather than a regular leasehold subject to taxes.