A Roman man could engage in same-sexual relations without loss to his status or perceived masculinity, as long as he took the dominant or penetrative role, but making sexual use of a fellow citizen's body was a violation of the principle of liberty.
Making sexual use of a fellow citizen's body was a violation of the principle of liberty. A Roman man could engage in same-sexual relations without loss to his status or perceived masculinity, as long as he took the dominant or penetrative role.
A Roman man could engage in same-sexual relations without loss to his status or perceived masculinity, as long as he took the dominant or penetrative role. Making sexual use of a fellow citizen's body was a violation of the principle of liberty.
A Roman man could engage in same-sexual relations without loss to his status or perceived masculinity, as long as he took the dominant or penetrative role. Making sexual use of a fellow citizen's body was a violation of the principle of liberty.