The preponderance of ™ and ® symbols in the body text strongly suggests that the core intent was rather than encyclopedic, and this isn't actually making or sourcing a "better" claim of notability than the first version did, either.
And this isn't actually making or sourcing a "better" claim of notability than the first version did, either. The preponderance of ™ and ® symbols in the body text strongly suggests that the core intent was rather than encyclopedic.
The preponderance of ™ and ® symbols in the body text strongly suggests that the core intent was rather than encyclopedic. And this isn't actually making or sourcing a "better" claim of notability than the first version did, either.
The preponderance of ™ and ® symbols in the body text strongly suggests that the core intent was rather than encyclopedic. And this isn't actually making or sourcing a "better" claim of notability than the first version did, either.