Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination that continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions, and it suggested the temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality.
The Supreme Court further suggested that the temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality. Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination that continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions.
Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination that continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions. The Supreme Court further suggested that the temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality.
Finally, the Supreme Court upheld the 1975 extension of Section 5 because of the record of discrimination that continued to persist in the covered jurisdictions. The Supreme Court further suggested that the temporary nature of the special provisions was a relevant consideration in determining Section 5's constitutionality.