By late 1603, he had joined the new King's Men, apparently as a hired man rather than a sharer, as his name is not mentioned in the original royal patent.
He apparently joined as a hired man rather than a sharer, as his name is not mentioned in the original royal patent. By late 1603, he had joined the new King's Men.
By late 1603, he had joined the new King's Men. He apparently joined as a hired man rather than a sharer, as his name is not mentioned in the original royal patent.
By late 1603, he had joined the new King's Men. He apparently joined as a hired man rather than a sharer, as his name is not mentioned in the original royal patent.