It was praised as a well-written discussion of science that acknowledged the limitations of genetic research on homosexuality and usefully explored its ethical implications, but Hamer's use of the term "gay gene" was criticized as misleading.
However, Hamer's use of the term "gay gene" was criticized as misleading. It was praised as a well-written discussion of science that acknowledged the limitations of genetic research on homosexuality and usefully explored its ethical implications.
It was praised as a well-written discussion of science that acknowledged the limitations of genetic research on homosexuality and usefully explored its ethical implications. However, Hamer's use of the term "gay gene" was criticized as misleading.
It was praised as a well-written discussion of science that acknowledged the limitations of genetic research on homosexuality and usefully explored its ethical implications. However, Hamer's use of the term "gay gene" was criticized as misleading.