text: The “Transcendental Aesthetic” section of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason defines this thing as the “form of pure intuition” corresponding to the “inner sense.
full_question: The “Transcendental Aesthetic” section of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason defines this thing as the “form of pure intuition” corresponding to the “inner sense.” In the eleventh book of St. Augustine’s [au-GUS-tin’s] Confessions, he struggles to grasp this concept but eventually concludes that God must exist outside of it. J. M. E. McTaggart’s work about the (*) unreality of this concept argues that an absolute form of it is self-contradictory and that a “B-theory” of this concept implies its tenselessness. A-theorists of this thing believe it flows along a single causal line. For 10 points, give this concept studied in the fields of Presentism and Eternalism, which Aristotle in his work Physics defines as “a number of change with respect to the before and after.”
first_sentence: The “Transcendental Aesthetic” section of Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason defines this thing as the “form of pure intuition” corresponding to the “inner sense.