text: This book considers if Aristotle was wrong about motion being divided into natural and force parts in the section "What Were Our Ancestors
full_question: This book considers if Aristotle was wrong about motion being divided into natural and force parts in the section "What Were Our Ancestors Talking About?" which examines the impossibility of finding a deterministic answer to the general question "What did they mean?" Another section of this book examines the Copernicus-Bellarmine debates and suggests that Thomas Kuhn's incommensurability thesis makes them incomparable to the Lenin-Kerensky debates. Its second chapter opens with a thought experiment in which a group of bipeds on the other side of the galaxy developed breakthroughs in neurology and biochemistry, and thus conceived of human pain as the stimulation of C-fibers. That section on the Antipodeans appears in a portion of this text about "persons without minds" in an attempt to refute a certain Greek ocular metaphor. The correspondence theory of truth and the view that epistemology reflects reality are rejected in, for 10 points, what pragmatist book by Richard Rorty?
first_sentence: This book considers if Aristotle was wrong about motion being divided into natural and force parts in the section "What Were Our Ancestors
raw_answer: Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature