A book on this concept argues against the "semantic sting", which holds that argument over this concept is only possible when certain criteria are shared.
A book on this concept argues against the "semantic sting", which holds that argument over this concept is only possible when certain criteria are shared. A thinker used the example of a bank robbery to refute John Austin's command theory of this concept, and argued that the rule of recognition decides what counts as it. A hypothetical figure capable of arriving at the best moral justification of this thing is dubbed "Hercules" in a book partly titled for this concept. Differing views on this subject's connection to morality separates the positivist and "natural" conceptions of it. H. L. A. Hart wrote about the "concept" of this subject, the "Empire" of which titles a Ronald Dworkin book. For 10 points, name this subject interpreted by judges, which is the system of rules enforced by governments.
A book on this concept argues against the "semantic sting", which holds that argument over this concept is only possible when certain criteria are shared.
law [or legal thought; or Law's Empire; or The Concept of Law]