Barton v Armstrong and Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Helicopter Charter Ptd Ltd respectively concerned physical and economic duress in the context of these entities.
Barton v Armstrong and Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Helicopter Charter Ptd Ltd respectively concerned physical and economic duress in the context of these entities. One antiquated doctrine concerning these things was the "last shot" rule. An exception to their common-law treatment occurs via the mailbox rule. These entities are formed during impending injustice via promissory estoppel. Officious intermeddlers cannot create them, despite offering consideration. Little room exists for favorable negotiation in the "boilerplate" variety of these entities. Prior to creating one of these entities, one party usually provides an invitation to treat. In basic terms, they require a "meeting of the minds" in which an offer is met with an acceptance. For 10 points, name these agreements made by two or more parties that create legal obligations.
Barton v Armstrong and Hawker Pacific Pty Ltd v Helicopter Charter Ptd Ltd respectively concerned physical and economic duress in the context of these entities.
contracts