As this philosophical work opens, the author rejects Kant's "thing-in- itself", instead arguing that one of the title concepts exists as a split between "en-soi" and "pour-soi", summing up the relationship between the two with the phrase "existence precedes essence".
As this philosophical work opens, the author rejects Kant's "thing-in- itself", instead arguing that one of the title concepts exists as a split between "en-soi" and "pour-soi", summing up the relationship between the two with the phrase "existence precedes essence". Coining the term "nihilation" to describe the existence of the human consciousness, the author concludes by claiming that "authentic existence" is still possible, as long as people do not ignore the responsibility of choice by practicing "bad faith". FTP, what is this 1943 masterpiece of existentialism by Jean-Paul Sartre?
As this philosophical work opens, the author rejects Kant's "thing-in- itself", instead arguing that one of the title concepts exists as a split between "en-soi" and "pour-soi", summing up the relationship between the two with the phrase "existence precedes essence".
Being and Nothingness (L'Etre et le neant)