Its discussion of plurality is illustrated by an enumeration of various immaterial intelligences, while its argument that an individual's soul is part of a single universal soul was critiqued by Aquinas in his
Its discussion of plurality is illustrated by an enumeration of various immaterial intelligences, while its argument that an individual's soul is part of a single universal soul was critiqued by Aquinas in his "On the Unity of the Intellect Against" [*] its author's followers. It tackles the misconception that a "First Cause" is superfluous, by noting that a series of causes must depend upon a cause necessary in itself, from which it must follow that God, as the first cause, exists. Its author does not articulate many of the points he would later make in his On the Harmony of the Religion and Philosophy, rather he attempts to specifically respond to Al Ghazali's critique. FTP identify this work by Averroes which took its title from the work it sought to debunk, The Incoherence of the Philosophers.
Its discussion of plurality is illustrated by an enumeration of various immaterial intelligences, while its argument that an individual's soul is part of a single universal soul was critiqued by Aquinas in his
{The Incoherence of the Incoherence} or {Tahafut al-Tahafut}