Selmer Bringsjord articulated strategies to judge if this were passed, including asking participants to write a short story. Levesque, Davis, and Morgenstern propose an alternative: resolving referential ambiguities called the Winograd Schema Challenge. Mark Halpern’s “The Trouble with” ~this~ criticized the Loebner prize. Searle’s Chinese Room argues that it, along with all strong AI, did not imply consciousness. Name this thought experiment derived from “the imitation game” that asks a judge to determine whether a conversational partner is human or computer named for a British computer scientist and that, for ten points, is said to determine when a computer is intelligent.
Selmer Bringsjord articulated strategies to judge if this were passed, including asking participants to write a short story. Levesque, Davis, and Morgenstern propose an alternative: resolving referential ambiguities called the Winograd Schema Challenge. Mark Halpern’s “The Trouble with” ~this~ criticized the Loebner prize. Searle’s Chinese Room argues that it, along with all strong AI, did not imply consciousness. Name this thought experiment derived from “the imitation game” that asks a judge to determine whether a conversational partner is human or computer named for a British computer scientist and that, for ten points, is said to determine when a computer is intelligent.
Selmer Bringsjord articulated strategies to judge if this were passed, including asking participants to write a short story.