One textbook with this central tenet was rewritten after Edwards v. Aguillard on constitutional grounds, but left the typo "proponentsists" when referring to its guiding principle. That book, Of Pandas and People, cited evidence supporting this biological principle including the lack of transitional fossils and the sudden appearance of organisms with complicated traits like the bacterial flagella. Though it's not creationism, Carl Linnaeus noted that classification of organisms would reveal this within the universe. One notable advocate for this mode of thought is Ken Ham of the Discovery Institute, who famously debated Bill Nye supporting this subject. For ten points, name this counter-movement to natural selection, which noted that some form of higher agency planned all existing organisms.
One textbook with this central tenet was rewritten after Edwards v. Aguillard on constitutional grounds, but left the typo "proponentsists" when referring to its guiding principle. That book, Of Pandas and People, cited evidence supporting this biological principle including the lack of transitional fossils and the sudden appearance of organisms with complicated traits like the bacterial flagella. Though it's not creationism, Carl Linnaeus noted that classification of organisms would reveal this within the universe. One notable advocate for this mode of thought is Ken Ham of the Discovery Institute, who famously debated Bill Nye supporting this subject. For ten points, name this counter-movement to natural selection, which noted that some form of higher agency planned all existing organisms.
One textbook with this central tenet was rewritten after Edwards v. Aguillard on constitutional grounds, but left the typo "proponentsists" when referring to its guiding principle.