Alan Hajek "waged war" on it by suggesting a mixed strategy: make the decision based on whether you win the lottery.  His suggested fixes were to require overriding utility and distinguishable expectations.  Diderot's contemperaneous objection was that it assumed the existance of a single entity, and Schlesinger attempted to refute the "many gods" critique by arguing that its formulator's God was more probable than any other.  Assuming a payoff matrix with an infinite gain regardless of how small the probability, for ten points, is what philosophical argument for God by French mathematician?
Alan Hajek "waged war" on it by suggesting a mixed strategy: make the decision based on whether you win the lottery.  His suggested fixes were to require overriding utility and distinguishable expectations.  Diderot's contemperaneous objection was that it assumed the existance of a single entity, and Schlesinger attempted to refute the "many gods" critique by arguing that its formulator's God was more probable than any other.  Assuming a payoff matrix with an infinite gain regardless of how small the probability, for ten points, is what philosophical argument for God by French mathematician?
Alan Hajek "waged war" on it by suggesting a mixed strategy: make the decision based on whether you win the lottery.  