It follows for large exponents if the Bogomolov-Miyaoki-Yau inequality is true, while if certain conditions are met by Wieferich primes the ABC conjecture proves it as well. A key idea in its proof was the replacement of elliptic curves with Galois representations, circumventing a clash between Selmer Groups and the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, thus allowing for the use of the class formula. Proven by Andrew Wiles, FTP, what is this theorem stating that there are no integer solutions for the equation x to the n plus y to the n equals z to the n when n is greater than 2, famously proposed in the margins of a book by it
It follows for large exponents if the Bogomolov-Miyaoki-Yau inequality is true, while if certain conditions are met by Wieferich primes the ABC conjecture proves it as well. A key idea in its proof was the replacement of elliptic curves with Galois representations, circumventing a clash between Selmer Groups and the Taniyama-Shimura conjecture, thus allowing for the use of the class formula. Proven by Andrew Wiles, FTP, what is this theorem stating that there are no integer solutions for the equation x to the n plus y to the n equals z to the n when n is greater than 2, famously proposed in the margins of a book by its namesake?
It follows for large exponents if the Bogomolov-Miyaoki-Yau inequality is true, while if certain conditions are met by Wieferich primes the ABC conjecture proves it as well.
Fermat's Last Theorem