The majority opinion in this case notes that California's continual invocation of worthless remedies is "buttressed by the experience of other States.
The majority opinion in this case notes that California's continual invocation of worthless remedies is "buttressed by the experience of other States." The dissent alludes to "untoward practical ramifications" that would be had regarding the in forma pauperis cases that relied on the legal procedure invalidated by this case. The dissent also mentions that an inability to recognize the weight carried by stare decisis made it seem like the Court "reached out" to overturn (*) Wolf v. Colorado. This case saw Justice Clark note that "Nothing can destroy a government more quickly than its failure to observe its own laws." The Boyd and Weeks decisions provided precedents for this case, which exemplified the "fruit of the poisonous tree" doctrine with regards to a trunk of pornographic materials. For 10 points, identify this case which ruled that the exclusionary rule made evidence taken by the Cleveland police inadmissible in court.
The majority opinion in this case notes that California's continual invocation of worthless remedies is "buttressed by the experience of other States.
{Mapp} v. {Ohio}