One part of this work dis
One part of this work distinguishes between the Stoic and Christian conceptions of morality, by claiming the Stoics made "the consciousness of strength of mind the pivot on which all moral dispositions should turn," while Christians use "simplicity of nature, prudence, wisdom and holiness" instead. At its end, the author claims two things fill his mind, "the starry heavens above and the moral law within." This work begins by describing he "universal moral law." The first of the two chapters called (*) "Dialectic" in this work espouses that the best usage of the title faculty is to attain "summum bonum" or "the highest good." This work expands upon the idea of a categorical imperative introduced in its author's previous Groundwork for a Metaphysics of Morals. For 10 points, name this second Critique by Immanuel Kant, which was followed up with his Critique of Judgment.
One part of this work distinguishes between the Stoic and Christian conceptions of morality, by claiming the Stoics made "the consciousness of strength of mind the pivot on which all moral dispositions should turn," while Christians use "simplicity of nature, prudence, wisdom and holiness" instead.
Critique of {Practical Reason}