Daniel Huger, James Petrigru, and Joel Poinset founded the Union Party in order to oppose proponents of this issue. George McDuffie galvanized public support for this issue by propounding his "forty-bale" theory. James Hamilton led the political campaign in favor of this issue, and called a special convention to discuss it. A Senator in favor of this issue defended it in the Fort Hill Address, and supported it with his theory of the "concurrent majority." A resolution introduced by Samuel Foot sparked a debate over this issue between Robert Hayne and Daniel Webster. This issue was first introduced to American politics, along with interposition, by the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. Later, it was invoked in the South Carolina Exposition and Protest against the Tariff of Abominations. For 10 points, name this issue central to an 1832 cr
Daniel Huger, James Petrigru, and Joel Poinset founded the Union Party in order to oppose proponents of this issue. George McDuffie galvanized public support for this issue by propounding his "forty-bale" theory. James Hamilton led the political campaign in favor of this issue, and called a special convention to discuss it. A Senator in favor of this issue defended it in the Fort Hill Address, and supported it with his theory of the "concurrent majority." A resolution introduced by Samuel Foot sparked a debate over this issue between Robert Hayne and Daniel Webster. This issue was first introduced to American politics, along with interposition, by the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions. Later, it was invoked in the South Carolina Exposition and Protest against the Tariff of Abominations. For 10 points, name this issue central to an 1832 crisis over whether states have the power to invalidate federal laws.
Daniel Huger, James Petrigru, and Joel Poinset founded the Union Party in order to oppose proponents of this issue.
{nullification}