The plaintiff in the case overturned by this one was convicted of conspiring to perform abortions. It incorporated the right upheld in Weeks v. U.S. against the states, and did not deal with the issue that later arose in Miller v. California, although the plaintiff had been convicted of possession of obscene material. Overturning Wolf v. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff's Fourth Amendment protection from "unreasonable searches and seizures" was violated when evidence seized without a warrant was used against her in court. For 10 points, name this case, which mandated in all
The plaintiff in the case overturned by this one was convicted of conspiring to perform abortions. It incorporated the right upheld in Weeks v. U.S. against the states, and did not deal with the issue that later arose in Miller v. California, although the plaintiff had been convicted of possession of obscene material. Overturning Wolf v. Colorado, the Supreme Court ruled that the plaintiff's Fourth Amendment protection from "unreasonable searches and seizures" was violated when evidence seized without a warrant was used against her in court. For 10 points, name this case, which mandated in all criminal cases the use of the exclusionary rule.
The plaintiff in the case overturned by this one was convicted of conspiring to perform abortions.
{Mapp} v. {Ohio} [or {Ohio} v. {Mapp}]