This work criticizes a pr
This work criticizes a priori reasoning because it implies such fallacies as a falling pebble being able to destroy the sun. One section of this work begins by lauding Dr. Tillotson's argument against the real presence, and hypothesizes an Indian prince who refuses to believe that frost and water are the same substance, to argue against taking the testimony of witnesses at face value. This work distinguishes between "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact," and contains the sections "Of Liberty and Necessity" and "On Miracles." Written in response to the failure of its author's earlier Treatise of Human Nature, for 10 points, name this empiricist philosophical tract by David Hume.
This work criticizes a priori reasoning because it implies such fallacies as a falling pebble being able to destroy the sun.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding