John Bickle's "ruthless" approach to this phenomenon is a prime example of a so-called "new wave" approach to it. John Kemeny and Paul Oppenheim equated this phenomenon with explanation. In his essay "Testability and Meaning," Rudolf Carnap revised his criteria for how this phenomenon applies to language, which he had put forth in The Logical Struc
John Bickle's "ruthless" approach to this phenomenon is a prime example of a so-called "new wave" approach to it. John Kemeny and Paul Oppenheim equated this phenomenon with explanation. In his essay "Testability and Meaning," Rudolf Carnap revised his criteria for how this phenomenon applies to language, which he had put forth in The Logical Structure of the World. Ernest Nagel defined a "homogeneous" instance of this phenomenon as one that does not require bridge laws. Eliminative materialism stands in (*) opposition to this type of materialism. Along with the analytic-synthetic distinction, this theory was attacked by Quine in his "Two Dogmas of Empiricism." This phenomenon is often invoked in a derogatory sense, because the end-result does not reflect the complexity of the start; an example is treating the sensation of love as a series of chemical reactions in the brain. For 10 points, name this philosophical phenomenon in which a complex theory or process is boiled down to something simpler.
John Bickle's "ruthless" approach to this phenomenon is a prime example of a so-called "new wave" approach to it.