Its last section is devoted to the "Doctrine of Method," and in that section, the author treats a "discipline, a canon, an architectonic, and... a history," of the titular concept. Its penultimate section explores the antinomy of the titular subject, while the first chapter focuses on the transcendental exposition of space and time. Noting in the introduction that "all attempts to extend our knowledge of objects by establishing something in regard to them a priori" have ended in failure, this philosophical texts purports to apply the methods of Copernicus to metaphysics. Famously outlining the categories of perception and putting forth the claim that we cannot directly perceive the noumena, for ten points, identify this 1781 work, the first of three major critiques
Its last section is devoted to the "Doctrine of Method," and in that section, the author treats a "discipline, a canon, an architectonic, and... a history," of the titular concept. Its penultimate section explores the antinomy of the titular subject, while the first chapter focuses on the transcendental exposition of space and time. Noting in the introduction that "all attempts to extend our knowledge of objects by establishing something in regard to them a priori" have ended in failure, this philosophical texts purports to apply the methods of Copernicus to metaphysics. Famously outlining the categories of perception and putting forth the claim that we cannot directly perceive the noumena, for ten points, identify this 1781 work, the first of three major critiques of Immanuel Kant.
Its last section is devoted to the "Doctrine of Method," and in that section, the author treats a "discipline, a canon, an architectonic, and... a history," of the titular concept.