Proclus argued that this concept is characterized by a parhupostasis, or "parasitic existence" in an essay "On the Subsistence" of this concept. In an appendix to the Ethics, Spinoza defined this concept as "whatsoever things hinder man's perfecting of his reason" in contrast to things that allow him to enjoy "the intellectual life." Kant analyzed this concept in terms of the frailty of human nature, impurity of the heart, and perversity in the first section of Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason, which addresses its (*) "radical" type. Hannah Arendt asserted that this concept arose from "sheer thoughtlessness" in the case of Adolf Eichmann in a book subtitled for this concept's "banal
Proclus argued that this concept is characterized by a parhupostasis, or "parasitic existence" in an essay "On the Subsistence" of this concept. In an appendix to the Ethics, Spinoza defined this concept as "whatsoever things hinder man's perfecting of his reason" in contrast to things that allow him to enjoy "the intellectual life." Kant analyzed this concept in terms of the frailty of human nature, impurity of the heart, and perversity in the first section of Religion Within the Bounds of Bare Reason, which addresses its (*) "radical" type. Hannah Arendt asserted that this concept arose from "sheer thoughtlessness" in the case of Adolf Eichmann in a book subtitled for this concept's "banality." Gottfried Leibniz coined the term "theodicy" for works that attempt to reconcile the existence of God with the existence of this concept. For 10 points, name this concept, the opposite of good.
Proclus argued that this concept is characterized by a parhupostasis, or "parasitic existence" in an essay "On the Subsistence" of this concept.