Twelve deforming tendencies of this activity were identified by an advocate of its "non-transparent" type named Antoine Berman. The difficulties of this activity when faced with non-disjunctive concepts, such as Homer's chloros, are discussed in an essay by Friedrich Schleiermacher. Eugene Nida contrasted the "formal equivalent" variety of this activity with the "dynamic equivalence" variety, which is essentially the same as its (*) "sense-for-sense" implementation. Walter Benjamin argued that this activity is a form of art in his essay about the "Task" of people who do it. This activity is made difficult by the inscrutability of reference, a
Twelve deforming tendencies of this activity were identified by an advocate of its "non-transparent" type named Antoine Berman. The difficulties of this activity when faced with non-disjunctive concepts, such as Homer's chloros, are discussed in an essay by Friedrich Schleiermacher. Eugene Nida contrasted the "formal equivalent" variety of this activity with the "dynamic equivalence" variety, which is essentially the same as its (*) "sense-for-sense" implementation. Walter Benjamin argued that this activity is a form of art in his essay about the "Task" of people who do it. This activity is made difficult by the inscrutability of reference, as demonstrated by the example of "gavagai." The book Word and Object by William van Orman Quine discusses the "indeterminacy" of this practice. For 10 points, name this activity in which words are rendered in a different language.
Twelve deforming tendencies of this activity were identified by an advocate of its "non-transparent" type named Antoine Berman.