This text identifies learning from experiences and inferring causal connections between events as two abilities that humans share with animals. It opens by contrasting two approaches to moral philosophy, one of which offers easy and accessible thoughts to the "man of action" and the other of which assumes man wants to analyze his actions. This book claims that less civilized nations report transgressions of the laws of nature more frequently. As an exception to its claim that the memory of an experience is weaker than the experience was itself, this book imagines a seeing person who has never come across a particular shade of blue. This work divides its subject into "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact," one manifestation of its author's namesake "fork." For 10 points, name this revis
This text identifies learning from experiences and inferring causal connections between events as two abilities that humans share with animals. It opens by contrasting two approaches to moral philosophy, one of which offers easy and accessible thoughts to the "man of action" and the other of which assumes man wants to analyze his actions. This book claims that less civilized nations report transgressions of the laws of nature more frequently. As an exception to its claim that the memory of an experience is weaker than the experience was itself, this book imagines a seeing person who has never come across a particular shade of blue. This work divides its subject into "relations of ideas" and "matters of fact," one manifestation of its author's namesake "fork." For 10 points, name this revision of A Treatise of Human Nature, written by David Hume.
This text identifies learning from experiences and inferring causal connections between events as two abilities that humans share with animals.
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding