Though Pierre Teihlard de Chardin was a prime suspect, the 1996 discovery of a trunk which had belonged to Martin A.C. Hinton suggested that he may have created this to revenge himself on his employer, A.S. Woodward, who publicized it. Nevertheless, that publication had litt
Though Pierre Teihlard de Chardin was a prime suspect, the 1996 discovery of a trunk which had belonged to Martin A.C. Hinton suggested that he may have created this to revenge himself on his employer, A.S. Woodward, who publicized it. Nevertheless, that publication had little consequence, as the discovery of Australopithicenes marked this subject's exit from the anthropological spotlight. Discovered by Charles Dawson, for ten points, this hoax, which was actually an orangutan jaw and a modern skull, was named for the common in Sussex where it was discovered.
Though Pierre Teihlard de Chardin was a prime suspect, the 1996 discovery of a trunk which had belonged to Martin A.C. Hinton suggested that he may have created this to revenge himself on his employer, A.S. Woodward, who publicized it.
{Piltdown Man}