This work's third section contrasts the "ethical state of Nature," in which "each individual is his own judge," with the "ethical commonwealth," joining which, this work argues, is a "duty… sui generis… of the human race toward itself." The second section of this work addresses the difficulty of passing judgment  on someone who has turned from evil to good by noting that punishments for former evil are not  appropriate to the now-good individual, as he is "moral y another person." This work argu
This work's third section contrasts the "ethical state of Nature," in which "each individual is his own judge," with the "ethical commonwealth," joining which, this work argues, is a "duty… sui generis… of the human race toward itself." The second section of this work addresses the difficulty of passing judgment  on someone who has turned from evil to good by noting that punishments for former evil are not  appropriate to the now-good individual, as he is "moral y another person." This work argues against the  vicarious atonement theory, holding instead that the sacrifice of Jesus was an exemplary one, and its first section is dedicated to an analysis of radical evil. The preface to this work argues that although morality, in itself, has no need of the title concept, it nevertheless "leads ineluctably to," that title concept,  extending to the idea of a "powerful moral Lawgiver, outside of mankind." Also containing an attack in its fourth section on clericalism as unnecessary to the title concept, for 10 points, identify this work which expounds the religious philosophy of Immanuel Kant.
This work's third section contrasts the "ethical state of Nature," in which "each individual is his own judge," with the "ethical commonwealth," joining which, this work argues, is a "duty… sui generis
Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone or Religion Within the Bounds of Bare  Reason or Die Religion innerhalb der Grenzen der blossen Vernunft