The requirement for "actual malice" to be shown in a libel suit against a media outlet was established in a 1964 case which began when this entity published a full-page ad titled "Heed Their Rising Voices." Besides winning that lawsuit versus Sullivan, this company successfully sued the United States to gain the right to publish the Pentagon Papers with the Washington Post. Owned for over a century by the Ochs-Sulzburger family is, FTP, what newspaper which claims to present "All the news that's fit to print," based in 
The requirement for "actual malice" to be shown in a libel suit against a media outlet was established in a 1964 case which began when this entity published a full-page ad titled "Heed Their Rising Voices." Besides winning that lawsuit versus Sullivan, this company successfully sued the United States to gain the right to publish the Pentagon Papers with the Washington Post. Owned for over a century by the Ochs-Sulzburger family is, FTP, what newspaper which claims to present "All the news that's fit to print," based in Manhattan.
The requirement for "actual malice" to be shown in a libel suit against a media outlet was established in a 1964 case which began when this entity published a full-page ad titled "Heed Their Rising Voices."
{New York Times}