Al-Ghazali conceived of these things as only being able to gain attributes through ‘arad [UH-rahd] or "accidents" of God's intent. A different notion of these things posits that they exist along with kenon and was created by the "laughing philosopher." Free will exists due to the clinamen [KLIH-nah-men] or "swerve" of these things according to On the Nature of Things by (*) Lucretius. They are contrasted with "corpuscules" because the latter form part of an infinite real
Al-Ghazali conceived of these things as only being able to gain attributes through ‘arad [UH-rahd] or "accidents" of God's intent. A different notion of these things posits that they exist along with kenon and was created by the "laughing philosopher." Free will exists due to the clinamen [KLIH-nah-men] or "swerve" of these things according to On the Nature of Things by (*) Lucretius. They are contrasted with "corpuscules" because the latter form part of an infinite reality and thus cannot be split. According to Epicurus, all existence consisted of the void and these. This word's use in the modern scientific sense was promoted by John Dalton. For 10 points, Democritus thought that the universe was made of what indivisible units, which in real life are divisible into nucleons and electrons?
Al-Ghazali conceived of these things as only being able to gain attributes through ‘arad [UH-rahd] or "accidents" of God's intent.
atoms [do not accept or prompt on “substances” or “monads”] &lt;WA, PhilO&gt;