The "common" type of this state is defined via an infinitary hierarchical definition in David Lewis's Convention. Gilbert Ryle distinguished between the "how" and "that" forms of this state. Alvin Goldman advanced a causal theory of this state in which a fact p may cause someone to believe that p. A paper contesting a noted definition of this concept imagines that (*) Smith believes a man with ten coins in his pocket will get a job. Michel Foucault combines this term and power with a slash, and he described the disunity underlying discursive formations in a book on "The Archaeology of" it. Edmund Gettier contested a definition of this concept considered in Plato's Theaetetus, that of "justified true belief." For 10 points, name this subject matter of epistemology, 
The "common" type of this state is defined via an infinitary hierarchical definition in David Lewis's Convention. Gilbert Ryle distinguished between the "how" and "that" forms of this state. Alvin Goldman advanced a causal theory of this state in which a fact p may cause someone to believe that p. A paper contesting a noted definition of this concept imagines that (*) Smith believes a man with ten coins in his pocket will get a job. Michel Foucault combines this term and power with a slash, and he described the disunity underlying discursive formations in a book on "The Archaeology of" it. Edmund Gettier contested a definition of this concept considered in Plato's Theaetetus, that of "justified true belief." For 10 points, name this subject matter of epistemology, the opposite of ignorance.
The "common" type of this state is defined via an infinitary hierarchical definition in David Lewis's Convention.
knowledge