A critique of this work utilized an argument in which one million people each gave Wilt Chamberlain twenty-five cents. The author of this work later expanded on his theory of a device that permits only inequalities that help the most needy; that device is the Difference Principle. The first chapter of this work imagines the title concept "as Fairness." As an alternative to Hobbes' brutal "state of nature," this work discusses the "original position" from which people decide the principles of society while blinded by a "veil of ignorance." Robert Nozick criticized this work in Anarchy, State, and Utopia. FTP, name this
A critique of this work utilized an argument in which one million people each gave Wilt Chamberlain twenty-five cents. The author of this work later expanded on his theory of a device that permits only inequalities that help the most needy; that device is the Difference Principle. The first chapter of this work imagines the title concept "as Fairness." As an alternative to Hobbes' brutal "state of nature," this work discusses the "original position" from which people decide the principles of society while blinded by a "veil of ignorance." Robert Nozick criticized this work in Anarchy, State, and Utopia. FTP, name this philosophical work written by John Rawls.
A critique of this work utilized an argument in which one million people each gave Wilt Chamberlain twenty-five cents.
Theory of Justice