The majority opinion for this case referenced Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York and Allied Stores of Ohio while arguing against using the principle of "equal application" to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment. The issue discussed in this case had previously been used to grant an annulment in Kirby v. Kirby, and this case is celebrated in a holiday on June 12. The result of this case was only enforced in Alabama after United States v. Brittain. Though it's not McLaughlin v. Florida, Justice Potter Stewart stated in a concurring opinion that a law cannot be valid if it depends on the (*) race of the actor. This Supreme Court case overturned Pace v. Alabama, and it has been cited as precedent in Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Obergefell v. Hodges due to its claim that marriage is an unenu
The majority opinion for this case referenced Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York and Allied Stores of Ohio while arguing against using the principle of "equal application" to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment. The issue discussed in this case had previously been used to grant an annulment in Kirby v. Kirby, and this case is celebrated in a holiday on June 12. The result of this case was only enforced in Alabama after United States v. Brittain. Though it's not McLaughlin v. Florida, Justice Potter Stewart stated in a concurring opinion that a law cannot be valid if it depends on the (*) race of the actor. This Supreme Court case overturned Pace v. Alabama, and it has been cited as precedent in Perry v. Schwarzenegger and Obergefell v. Hodges due to its claim that marriage is an unenumerated right. For 10 points, name this 1967 case that ended anti-miscegenation laws in the US.
The majority opinion for this case referenced Railway Express Agency, Inc. v. New York and Allied Stores of Ohio while arguing against using the principle of "equal application" to interpret the Fourteenth Amendment.
Loving v. Virginia