This man called David Lewis a modal reductionist in his Two Concepts of Modality. He used examples like the "Epistemically Inflexible Climber" to show that proper cognitive faculties are key to rational beliefs as part of his theory of "warrant". This man stated that morally free creatures suffer from "transworld depravity". This man argued that evolved cognitive faculties correspond to survival, rather than reliability, in his evolutionary argument against (*) naturalism. In one work, this man juxtaposed the existence of other minds and the teleological argument. This man posited that if a being has maximal excellence in every possible world
This man called David Lewis a modal reductionist in his Two Concepts of Modality. He used examples like the "Epistemically Inflexible Climber" to show that proper cognitive faculties are key to rational beliefs as part of his theory of "warrant". This man stated that morally free creatures suffer from "transworld depravity". This man argued that evolved cognitive faculties correspond to survival, rather than reliability, in his evolutionary argument against (*) naturalism. In one work, this man juxtaposed the existence of other minds and the teleological argument. This man posited that if a being has maximal excellence in every possible world, it has maximal greatness, which is possible and therefore true in some possible world. For 10 points, name this Notre Dame philosopher who propounded a modal logic version of the ontological argument and the free will defense against the problem of evil.
This man called David Lewis a modal reductionist in his Two Concepts of Modality.
Alvin Plantinga