Unjust enrichment, value disproportionate to the benefit, and this situation are the only exceptions to the validity of the Webb v. McGowan rule, codified in Restatement Section 86, which makes promises made in recognition of benefits alreamdy received binding. The "Williston's Tramp" thought experiment exemplifies the difference between a contract and a conditional one. In Dougherty v. Salt, the court held that the presence of a seal could not transform a promise of this type into an enforceable contract. For 10 points, name these promises unsupported by consideration, which can be made inter
Unjust enrichment, value disproportionate to the benefit, and this situation are the only exceptions to the validity of the Webb v. McGowan rule, codified in Restatement Section 86, which makes promises made in recognition of benefits alreamdy received binding. The "Williston's Tramp" thought experiment exemplifies the difference between a contract and a conditional one. In Dougherty v. Salt, the court held that the presence of a seal could not transform a promise of this type into an enforceable contract. For 10 points, name these promises unsupported by consideration, which can be made inter vivos or causa mortis.
Unjust enrichment, value disproportionate to the benefit, and this situation are the only exceptions to the validity of the Webb v. McGowan rule, codified in Restatement Section 86, which makes promises made in recognition of benefits alreamdy received binding.
gifts