In response to the first chapter of this book, Henry Sidgwick claimed that what society needed was "fire and strength", a claim considered in this work's final chapter. In this work, two strains of thinking are dichotomized as strictness vs. spontaneity of consciousness. This work defines perfection as: "the growth and predominance of our humanity proper", and calls the first title entity "the study of perfection". This work claims that "the sheer desire to see things as they are" is the (*) "scientific passion" that distinguishes the first title entity from religion. This work, which distinguishes between Hellenism and Hebraism, defines its first title entity as "the best which has been thought and said in the world", and calls the lower classes, the aristocracy, and the middle classes the Populace, the Barbarian
In response to the first chapter of this book, Henry Sidgwick claimed that what society needed was "fire and strength", a claim considered in this work's final chapter. In this work, two strains of thinking are dichotomized as strictness vs. spontaneity of consciousness. This work defines perfection as: "the growth and predominance of our humanity proper", and calls the first title entity "the study of perfection". This work claims that "the sheer desire to see things as they are" is the (*) "scientific passion" that distinguishes the first title entity from religion. This work, which distinguishes between Hellenism and Hebraism, defines its first title entity as "the best which has been thought and said in the world", and calls the lower classes, the aristocracy, and the middle classes the Populace, the Barbarians, and the Philistines. For 10 points, name this major work of social criticism by Matthew Arnold.
In response to the first chapter of this book, Henry Sidgwick claimed that what society needed was "fire and strength", a claim considered in this work's final chapter.
Culture and Anarchy