The ruling in this court case is called to be overruled in the lone dissent in Coppage v. Kansas. A dissent in this case cited the need for "a plain, palpable invasion of rights" to justify the "power of the courts to review legislative action." Henry Weismann argued for the defendant in this case, 
The ruling in this court case is called to be overruled in the lone dissent in Coppage v. Kansas. A dissent in this case cited the need for "a plain, palpable invasion of rights" to justify the "power of the courts to review legislative action." Henry Weismann argued for the defendant in this case, which overturned the earlier ruling of Holden v. Hardy and upheld the result of Allgeyer v. Louisiana. A dissent in this case cites "Sunday laws and usury laws" as examples of accepted state action that contradicts this case's ruling, which was delivered by Rufus (*) Peckham. West Coast Hotel v. Parrish ended a period of pro-employer judicial decisions known as this case's "era." A dissent from this case states that "the Fourteenth Amendment does not enact Mr. Herbert Spencer's Social Statics" and was written by Justice Holmes. For 10 points, name this 1905 Supreme Court case that overturned a law limiting the working hours of bakers in New York.
The ruling in this court case is called to be overruled in the lone dissent in Coppage v. Kansas.
Lochner v. New York [accept in either order] 