One thinker sought to Restore this concept by showing that genuine claims that concept obtains need not be derived from non-innocuous generalities; that attempt was made by Mary Mothersill. It was once thought that Albertus Magnus's commentary on Dionysius' writings on this concept, which linked it to "the good", were by Aquinas because they were in his handwriting. In part six of the first Ennead, Plotinus claimed that the incorporeality of fire means it has this property. A different thinker argued that perception of 
One thinker sought to Restore this concept by showing that genuine claims that concept obtains need not be derived from non-innocuous generalities; that attempt was made by Mary Mothersill. It was once thought that Albertus Magnus's commentary on Dionysius' writings on this concept, which linked it to "the good", were by Aquinas because they were in his handwriting. In part six of the first Ennead, Plotinus claimed that the incorporeality of fire means it has this property. A different thinker argued that perception of objects with this property is accompanied by a (*) disinterested pleasure. That thinker argued that objects with this property appear "purposive without purpose." The "Analytic of" this concept is the first section of Kant's Critique of Judgment. For 10 points, name this central subject of aesthetic philosophy.
One thinker sought to Restore this concept by showing that genuine claims that concept obtains need not be derived from non-innocuous generalities; that attempt was made by Mary Mothersill.
beauty [or beautiful; do not accept or prompt on other answers]