A definitive study of this work is Stephen Buckle's monograph, which is subtitled "the unity and purpose of [this work]." This work argues that no theory of will can provide an intuition of the natural science's concepts of energy or work, and it cites Alexander the False Prophet and Cato as part of its three reasons against the validity of "testimony," but its author claims that a fourth reason is that testimony about the fantastic is inherently self-defeating. This work defends the notions of chance in its short section "Of Probability" and borrows from John Locke to call colors "complex ideas." This work discusses natural connections in order to provide a coherent account of the author's 
A definitive study of this work is Stephen Buckle's monograph, which is subtitled "the unity and purpose of [this work]." This work argues that no theory of will can provide an intuition of the natural science's concepts of energy or work, and it cites Alexander the False Prophet and Cato as part of its three reasons against the validity of "testimony," but its author claims that a fourth reason is that testimony about the fantastic is inherently self-defeating. This work defends the notions of chance in its short section "Of Probability" and borrows from John Locke to call colors "complex ideas." This work discusses natural connections in order to provide a coherent account of the author's own theory of causation. Another section of this work illustrates that causation by discussing a man who is able to discern a tint that he has never experienced. For 10 points, identify this treatise that discusses the "missing shade of blue," a work written by David Hume.
A definitive study of this work is Stephen Buckle's monograph, which is subtitled "the unity and purpose of [this work].
An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding