The constitutional decision in this case was effectively overturned by a case that also upheld New York courts' conviction for the publication of the Left-Wing Manifesto. This case dealt with an incident where one of the parties had lowered the water level in the city harbor and thus cut off the source of revenue for the other party's wharf leaving it "of little or no value." This case was largely overturned by Gitlow v New York. This case's decision regarding property rights was nullified by the Fourteenth Amendment's 
The constitutional decision in this case was effectively overturned by a case that also upheld New York courts' conviction for the publication of the Left-Wing Manifesto. This case dealt with an incident where one of the parties had lowered the water level in the city harbor and thus cut off the source of revenue for the other party's wharf leaving it "of little or no value." This case was largely overturned by Gitlow v New York. This case's decision regarding property rights was nullified by the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause. In this case, Chief Justice Marshall ruled that the Constitution's Fifth Amendment was not binding on State Governments. For 10 points, name this 1833 eminent domain case against the largest city of Maryland.
The constitutional decision in this case was effectively overturned by a case that also upheld New York courts' conviction for the publication of the Left-Wing Manifesto.
Barron v. Baltimore