J. Hillis Miller described two characters in this poem as "opaque spheres" which "can never, likesoap bubbles, become one". A 38-line "perviligium" was deleted from an early draft of this poem,whose speaker describes a time "for a hundred indecisions, and for a hundred visions and revisions"and claims to be "an attendant lord", rather than "Prince Hamlet". Its third stanza describes thecatlike actions of a (*) "yellow fog". Its speaker wonders "Would it have been worth it, after all?", worriesabout being told "That is not what I meant at all", and asks "Do I dare disturb the universe?" This poem'srefrain describes wom
J. Hillis Miller described two characters in this poem as "opaque spheres" which "can never, likesoap bubbles, become one". A 38-line "perviligium" was deleted from an early draft of this poem,whose speaker describes a time "for a hundred indecisions, and for a hundred visions and revisions"and claims to be "an attendant lord", rather than "Prince Hamlet". Its third stanza describes thecatlike actions of a (*) "yellow fog". Its speaker wonders "Would it have been worth it, after all?", worriesabout being told "That is not what I meant at all", and asks "Do I dare disturb the universe?" This poem'srefrain describes women who "come and go, talking of Michelangelo". The line "Let us go then, you andI" opens, for 10 points, which 1915 poem by T.S. Eliot?
J. Hillis Miller described two characters in this poem as "opaque spheres" which "can never, likesoap bubbles, become one".
"The Love Song of J. Alfred Prufrock" [prompt on "Prufrock"]