A study by the University of Minnesota about this project counted 25 trillion of its so-called "persistent word views" and found that nearly half of those PWVs was attributed to less than 0.1% of all possible sources. A 10th anniversary survey of this project showed that barely 10% of its population was female, which worried CEO Sue Gardner of the Foundation that runs it. The 2007 development of a namesake scanner for this project allowed tracing of anonymous changes made to this project to institutions like Congress and the CIA, a link that could determine violations of its Neutral Point of View policy. A notable 2005 study by Nature controversially concluded that this project was just as r
A study by the University of Minnesota about this project counted 25 trillion of its so-called "persistent word views" and found that nearly half of those PWVs was attributed to less than 0.1% of all possible sources. A 10th anniversary survey of this project showed that barely 10% of its population was female, which worried CEO Sue Gardner of the Foundation that runs it. The 2007 development of a namesake scanner for this project allowed tracing of anonymous changes made to this project to institutions like Congress and the CIA, a link that could determine violations of its Neutral Point of View policy. A notable 2005 study by Nature controversially concluded that this project was just as reliable as the Encyclopedia Britannica, despite being crowd-sourced. For 10 points, name this free, online encyclopedia.
A study by the University of Minnesota about this project counted 25 trillion of its so-called "persistent word views" and found that nearly half of those PWVs was attributed to less than 0.1% of all possible sources.
English Wikipedia [prompt on "Wikimedia"]