A revisionist explanation for the absence of this text is the Farrer-Goulder hypothesis. Divisions of it include the "stratification" proposed by John Kloppenborg and the identification of late "Hellenistic" elements by Siegfried Schultz. A possible scribal error in this text regarding the growth of lilies may be evidence that it was, at least once, written in Greek. This text is suggested as the source of such passages as the one that calls woe unto the towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida, and it may have been a "sayings text" used by early Jewish Christians. Coined in name by the German scholar Johannes Weiss, it is proposed as the common origin for material found in Matthew and Luke but not in Mark. FTP, name this hypothesized gospel which takes its single-letter na
A revisionist explanation for the absence of this text is the Farrer-Goulder hypothesis. Divisions of it include the "stratification" proposed by John Kloppenborg and the identification of late "Hellenistic" elements by Siegfried Schultz. A possible scribal error in this text regarding the growth of lilies may be evidence that it was, at least once, written in Greek. This text is suggested as the source of such passages as the one that calls woe unto the towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida, and it may have been a "sayings text" used by early Jewish Christians. Coined in name by the German scholar Johannes Weiss, it is proposed as the common origin for material found in Matthew and Luke but not in Mark. FTP, name this hypothesized gospel which takes its single-letter name from the German word for "source."
A revisionist explanation for the absence of this text is the Farrer-Goulder hypothesis.
Q source [or gospel or document]