On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard arguments from John J. Burch and Mark Rosenbaum for a case about this policy. The Supreme Court found that it does not amount to a quota system, and is therefore constitutional. A concurrence written for a case regarding this policy claimed it would be unnecessary in 20 years in Grutter v. Bollinger.  Race was cited as "a factor
On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard arguments from John J. Burch and Mark Rosenbaum for a case about this policy. The Supreme Court found that it does not amount to a quota system, and is therefore constitutional. A concurrence written for a case regarding this policy claimed it would be unnecessary in 20 years in Grutter v. Bollinger.  Race was cited as "a factor of a factor of a factor" in a dissenting opinion regarding this policy. Justice Ginsburg argued that race-blind admission would not be a suitable replacement for this in Fisher v. University of Texas. For 10 points, name this policy favoring a group suffering from discrimination.
On October 15, 2013, the Supreme Court heard arguments from John J. Burch and Mark Rosenbaum for a case about this policy.
affirmative action 