He argued against testimony and revealed religion as a basis for proofs of God's existence in a section called "Of Miracles."
The eleventh chapter of one of his treatises contains a dialogue between the author and an imaginary Epicurean friend, who attacks Stoicism to illustrate the author's point that rationalism is incompatible with religious experience. In the seventh section of that work, he argued that uniform past experience leads to the impression that necessity creates all (*) causal connections. He argued against testimony and revealed religion as a basis for proofs of God's existence in a section called "Of Miracles." This thinker argued that it is not necessary for the mind to be exposed to a concept for it to imagine it by using the example of a "missing shade of blue." For 10 points, name this author of An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding, a Scottish empiricist.
The eleventh chapter of one of his treatises contains a dialogue between the author and an imaginary Epicurean friend, who attacks Stoicism to illustrate the author's point that rationalism is incompatible with religious experience.
David Hume