In one essay he accepts that laws can govern causal explanations but rejects them for rationalizations after using the example of turning a light on alerting a prowler in the bushes to divide actions into intentional and unintentional classes.
In one essay he accepts that laws can govern causal explanations but rejects them for rationalizations after using the example of turning a light on alerting a prowler in the bushes to divide actions into intentional and unintentional classes. In addition to that work in which he defended reasons for acting as a cause of actions, "Actions, Reasons, and Causes," this philosopher proposed an answer of "the agent has no reason" to the title question of "‘How is Weakness of the Will Possible?" He attached an appendix in which the state of emeralds being green and roses being red are confounded by the statement "All Emeroses are Gred" to an essay in which he accepts the materialist premise that all events are physical but denies that mental phenomena can be given purely physical explanations. For 10 points name this philosopher who considered "anomalous monism" in his essay "Mental Events."
In one essay he accepts that laws can govern causal explanations but rejects them for rationalizations after using the example of turning a light on alerting a prowler in the bushes to divide actions into intentional and unintentional classes.
Donald {Davidson}