Ronald Dworkin described these entities as "trumps" in explaining their ability to override other objectives in a book about taking them "seriously."
A thinker described how complex "molecular" versions of these entities arise from four "incidents," which he listed in tables of opposites and correlatives. Proponents of the "will theory" of these entities argue that they reduce to a single, fundamental one, in contrast to the "interest theory." Wesley Hohfeld developed an influential analysis of these entities. Jeremy Bentham described the idea of an imprescriptible natural version of these entities as "nonsense upon stilts." Ronald Dworkin described these entities as "trumps" in explaining their ability to override other objectives in a book about taking them "seriously." Robert Nozick described these entities as side-constraints on action, emphasizing their negative kind over the positive kind. Utilitarians argue that they are conferred upon people only by the law, in contrast to John Locke. For 10 points, name these principles that describe what people are free or entitled to do, including free speech and freedom of religion.
A thinker described how complex "molecular" versions of these entities arise from four "incidents," which he listed in tables of opposites and correlatives.
human rights [or natural rights; or civil rights]