" They notably [emphasize] do not include the ontological argument.
The emphasis on "change," rather than "existence" in one of these statements was criticized in a 1979 book by Richard Swinburne. Frederick Copleston divided these statements into in fieri and in esse classes. The analogy of locating a "worm lower down" and a "dog higher" is used in one of these statements. The originator of these statements justified their necessity by referencing "The Philosopher's" claim that "no one can mentally admit the opposite of what is self-evident" to respond to an objection stemming from John 4:16. The first of these statements claims that something must cause change without itself changing, called the concept of the "unmoved mover." They notably [emphasize] do not include the ontological argument. For 10 points, identify these statements alternately called the quinque viae ("KWIN-kway VEE-eye"), five arguments that appear in an author's Summa Theologica.
The emphasis on "change," rather than "existence" in one of these statements was criticized in a 1979 book by Richard Swinburne.
Thomas Aquinas’s five proofs of the existence of God [accept Aquinas’s five ways or Aquinas’s quinque viae until read; prompt on partial answers] &lt;Philosophy&gt;