This book's author concludes that he must have a self that is being deceived even if an evil demon is deceiving him.
Bernard Williams interprets the use of "I" in this work to refer to the reader, a view he put forth in a book about its author's "Project of Pure Inquiry." Objections to this work were written by Pierre Gassendi (gas-on-DEE) and Thomas Hobbes, some of which accuse its argument involving the reliability of "clear and distinct perceptions" of being circular. Its sixth section notes the difference between looking at a triangle and at a one-thousand-sided chiliagon to distinguish between imagination and pure intellect, which is also distinguished in its second section with the example of a melting piece of wax. This book's author concludes that he must have a self that is being deceived even if an evil demon is deceiving him. For 10 points, name this magnum opus of René Descartes, written after the Discourse on Method.
Bernard Williams interprets the use of "I" in this work to refer to the reader, a view he put forth in a book about its author's "Project of Pure Inquiry."
Meditations on First Philosophy &lt;Mehr&gt;