" Part 3 of Reasons and Persons describes the branch-line thought experiment, which induces a "fission" in this concept, to illustrate that this concept is not what matters.
In one paper titled for this concept, a thinker uses a thought experiment in which we ask John Updike a series of questions about Rabbit Angstrom to model interpersonal interactions. That paper argues treating this concept as a concrete object would be a category mistake, calling it a "theorist's fiction." Part 3 of Reasons and Persons describes the branch-line thought experiment, which induces a "fission" in this concept, to illustrate that this concept is not what matters. It's not the future, but in a work titled for this concept, the thinker rewrites a thought experiment in the second person to argue against a (*) memory-based conception of it. Bernard Williams included that rebuke alongside a paper on "ethical consistency" in his work titled for "The Problems of [this concept]," and Daniel Dennett described this concept as a "center of narrative gravity." Hume argued that this concept does not exist via his bundle theory. For 10 points, name this concept often contrasted with "the other."
In one paper titled for this concept, a thinker uses a thought experiment in which we ask John Updike a series of questions about Rabbit Angstrom to model interpersonal interactions.
The  self [accept I or Myself or personal  identity]