The second section of this work ends with a distinction between the author's own theory and Nicholas Malebranche's occasionalism, citing the importance of the latter's belief that the soul is purely non-corporeal.
One section of this work begins by attempting to distinguish gold from that of an illusion of an evil scientist, but further on, the author wonders how we even know what composes gold in the first place. The second section of this work ends with a distinction between the author's own theory and Nicholas Malebranche's occasionalism, citing the importance of the latter's belief that the soul is purely non-corporeal. It ends by claiming that atheists are wrong because there would be no case of "an infinite cause" and that physics will become much easier to think about once matter is removed from all equations. In another section of this work, the author claims that since things that cannot be thought of are always thought of, there are no such examples of the former; that idea is called the Master Argument. For 10 points, name this work that dismisses materialism and argues all objects are ideas, framed as three instances of the two title characters talking, a work of George Berkeley.
One section of this work begins by attempting to distinguish gold from that of an illusion of an evil scientist, but further on, the author wonders how we even know what composes gold in the first place.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonous