Because the relevant statute's purpose was sanitary conditions, sheep washed overboard did not involve this concept in the case Gorris v. Scott.
Because the relevant statute's purpose was sanitary conditions, sheep washed overboard did not involve this concept in the case Gorris v. Scott. The doctrine of last clear chance can be used to circumvent a defense for this. The Hand formula can be used to determine whether or not an element of this exists. The ruling in Palsgraf v. Long Island established foreseeability as a test for proximate cause, which is a condition for this to hold. (*) Res ipsa loquitur can infer this activity from the nature of the situation. Its "contributory" form is sometimes replaced by its "comparative" form, and the right to sue for the "gross" form of this action cannot usually be waived in a contract. For 10 points, name this tort that requires a duty and a breach of that duty, which often causes car accidents.
Because the relevant statute's purpose was sanitary conditions, sheep washed overboard did not involve this concept in the case Gorris v. Scott.
negligence [accept negligence per se before "last clear chance"] 