The arguments from contingency and degree are among the "Five Ways" concerning this statement by (*) Thomas Aquinas, and Russell's teapot shifts the burden of proof for it.
The concept of "transworld depravity" is used in a "defense" of this idea by Alvin Plantinga. The arguments from contingency and degree are among the "Five Ways" concerning this statement by (*) Thomas Aquinas, and Russell's teapot shifts the burden of proof for it. St. Anselm conceived of the ontological argument for this statement, and there exist teleological arguments for it. Believing in this statement and being wrong is infinitely better than the alternative according to Pascal's wager, and one argument for it asserts there must have been some "first" being. For 10 points, name this general statement that atheists do not agree with.
The concept of "transworld depravity" is used in a "defense" of this idea by Alvin Plantinga.
existence of God (accept anything that describes an argument/proof for the existence of a higher being; prompt on just God, I guess; prompt on statements like “religion is right” or “believing in religion”; anti-prompt [ask for less specific] on ontological or teleological argument)