Another case about this amendment extended Minnesota v Dickerson.
This amendment was applied to a government agency in Dow Chemical Company vs US. In another decision Antonin Scalia placed "off the wall" items outside the purview of this. Another case about this amendment extended Minnesota v Dickerson. The Horton test is the current standard for meeting this amendment, and besides Bond v US, the grounds for complying with this amendment were outlined in Arizona v. Hicks, which extended Coolidge v New Hampshire's creation of the (*) "Plain View" Doctrine. This amendment was originally proposed due to the use of writs of assistance, and this amendment was extended to the states in a case involving pornography being found in a suitcase, called Mapp v. Ohio. For 10 points, name this amendment to the US constitution that protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
This amendment was applied to a government agency in Dow Chemical Company vs US.
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution