Justice Sutherland's dissent in this case argued that the ruling was "that the words of the Constitution mean today what they did not mean when written" in contrasty to the majority opinion, which argued that "the economic conditions have supervened" and demanded a reconsideration of police power.
Justice Sutherland's dissent in this case argued that the ruling was "that the words of the Constitution mean today what they did not mean when written" in contrasty to the majority opinion, which argued that "the economic conditions have supervened" and demanded a reconsideration of police power. Justice Stone was absent from the arguments in this case due to illness. The ruling in this case cited Muller v. Oregon regarding the state's interest in protecting (*) maternity. This case's plaintiff aimed to recover the difference between what she was paid and a state law establishing a minimum wage for women. This case, which is generally regarded as having ended the "Lochner era," overturned the decision of Adkins v. Children's Hospital. For 10 points, identify this case affected by the "switch in time that saved nine," a ruling against a Washington lodging business.
Justice Sutherland's dissent in this case argued that the ruling was "that the words of the Constitution mean today what they did not mean when written" in contrasty to the majority opinion, which argued that "the economic conditions have supervened" and demanded a reconsideration of police power.
West Coast Hotel Co. v. Parrish [accept either underlined portion]