The dissenting opinion in this case noted "precedent lies like an open weapon in the hand that can bring a plausible claim for an urgent need" and notes how the plaintiff was given two contradictory orders: one to stay in one place, and one to evacuate.
Dale Minami led a group of lawyers that sought to correct this decision by filing a coram nobis writ that Judge Patel certified. The dissenting opinion in this case noted "precedent lies like an open weapon in the hand that can bring a plausible claim for an urgent need" and notes how the plaintiff was given two contradictory orders: one to stay in one place, and one to evacuate. Ruth Bader Ginsberg cited the odiousness of this other court case in her concurring opinion for the court case Adarand Constructors v. Pena. Hugo (*) Black wrote the majority opinion in this case that was handed down the same day as Ex Parte Endo, even though this case claimed Congress was within its bounds due to fear of an invasion from even if the plaintiff was a Nisei. For 10 points, name this Supreme Court case that ruled Executive Order 9066 was constitutional, upholding the legality of Japanese internment camps.
Dale Minami led a group of lawyers that sought to correct this decision by filing a coram nobis writ that Judge Patel certified.
Korematsu v. U.S