Described in a 1904 book analyzing the success of Calvinist groups in early European capitalism, FTP name this concept that Max Weber suggests is responsible for the spirit of capitalism.
Instead of this concept, R. H. Tawney argued that individualism and social pressure were more significant factors in the development of industry. Criticized by Kurt Samuelsson in Religion and Economic Action, it assigns value to hard work and efficiency, which are signs of predestined salvation. Described in a 1904 book analyzing the success of Calvinist groups in early European capitalism, FTP name this concept that Max Weber suggests is responsible for the spirit of capitalism.
Instead of this concept, R. H. Tawney argued that individualism and social pressure were more significant factors in the development of industry.
{Protestant ethic}; or {Protestantische ethik}