The "explanatory gap" is the inability to explain this phenomenon from physical facts, and "What is It Like to Be a Bat" used its subjectivity to argue against physicalist theories it.
Peacocke argued against one theory of this phenomenon using an example of two trees at different distances. This phenomenon is analogized to fame in a theory claiming it occurs from probes elevating certain content. An objection to one theory of this phenomenon asks why rocks do not obtain it when someone has a belief about them, and is meant to counter the "higher order" theory of it. Transparency of experience is used to argue this phenomenon is fully exhausted by representational properties. A criterion for one type of this phenomenon is reportability, and that "access" type is available for use in reasoning, as opposed to the "phenomenal" type. The "explanatory gap" is the inability to explain this phenomenon from physical facts, and "What is It Like to Be a Bat" used its subjectivity to argue against physicalist theories it. For 10 points, name this phenomenon, sometimes defined as self-awareness.
Peacocke argued against one theory of this phenomenon using an example of two trees at different distances.
consciousness