A rule arising from case with this party name operates to give a party a fee simple absolute after the Doctrine of Merger is applied.
This was the first party name in a case argued concurrently with McGhee v. Sipes in which the Supreme Court ruled that court enforcement constituted a state action and was thus subject to the Fourteenth Amendment. This is the first party name, followed by Kraemer, in that Supreme Court case, which held that racially restrictive covenants are unconstitutional. A rule arising from case with this party name operates to give a party a fee simple absolute after the Doctrine of Merger is applied. For 10 points, give this name that denotes a case whose rule states that a person with a fee tail or life estate actually had a fee simple if the remainder was given to that person's heirs.
This was the first party name in a case argued concurrently with McGhee v. Sipes in which the Supreme Court ruled that court enforcement constituted a state action and was thus subject to the Fourteenth Amendment.
{Shelley}