Shortly after this Supreme Court case was decided, Katherine Franke scathingly reviewed the languageused in its majority opinion in a Columbia Law Review article titled for this case's "domesticated liberty."An amicus brief filed in this case challenged Warren Burger's assertion in an earlier case that classifying acertain act as a fundamental right "would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching," and was written by agroup of historians including John D'Emilio, Nancy Cott, and George (*) Chauncey.
Shortly after this Supreme Court case was decided, Katherine Franke scathingly reviewed the languageused in its majority opinion in a Columbia Law Review article titled for this case's "domesticated liberty."An amicus brief filed in this case challenged Warren Burger's assertion in an earlier case that classifying acertain act as a fundamental right "would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching," and was written by agroup of historians including John D'Emilio, Nancy Cott, and George (*) Chauncey. The majority opinion inthis case claimed that the legal basis for an earlier case had since been eroded by decisions in Planned Parenthoodv. Casey and Romer v. Evans. This 2003 decision overturned Bowers v. Hardwick. For 10 points, name thisSupreme Court case that mandated the legalization of same-sex sexual activity throughout the U.S.
Shortly after this Supreme Court case was decided, Katherine Franke scathingly reviewed the languageused in its majority opinion in a Columbia Law Review article titled for this case's "domesticated liberty."An amicus brief filed in this case challenged Warren Burger's assertion in an earlier case that classifying acertain act as a fundamental right "would be to cast aside millennia of moral teaching," and was written by agroup of historians including John D'Emilio, Nancy Cott, and George (*) Chauncey.
Lawrence v. Texas [accept in either order] 