The "offensive" form of this concept was frowned upon in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore because it allows plaintiffs to take a "wait and see" approach.
One notable case on this concept involved D.C.'s red light cameras. The "offensive" form of this concept was frowned upon in Parklane Hosiery Co. v. Shore because it allows plaintiffs to take a "wait and see" approach. This concept was held not to apply in a landmark case centering on Jessie's loss of Bertha's companionship, Illinois Central Railroad v. Parks. For 10 points, name this concept that prevents topics already litigated from being relitigated, also known as collateral estoppel, and contrasted with a similar prohibition on relitigating claims.
One notable case on this concept involved D.C.'s red light cameras.
issue preclusion [or collateral estoppel before mentioned; prompt on preclusion]