Larry Laudan distinguished between a strong and weak form of this concept while arguing against Adrian Grünbaum, who gave this concept its name; Imre Lakatos also divided it into a strong and weak form.  
Larry Laudan distinguished between a strong and weak form of this concept while arguing against Adrian Grünbaum, who gave this concept its name; Imre Lakatos also divided it into a strong and weak form.  Its original form explicitly did not apply to (*) physiology, one of four distinctions made by Jules Vuillemin; another important difference between its two forms is the addition of the words "come what may."  Both forms dispute the idea of "crucial experiments."  For 10 points, name this thesis whose modern form showed up in Two Dogmas of Empiricism, which generally states that a single experiment cannot in and of itself disprove a single hypothesis.
Larry Laudan distinguished between a strong and weak form of this concept while arguing against Adrian Grünbaum, who gave this concept its name; Imre Lakatos also divided it into a strong and weak form.  
{Duhem-Quine} thesis or {Quine-Duhem} thesis [prompt on {underdetermination} thesis or anything mentioning {Quine} or {Duhem} by itself] (5) [DW]