That essay by this man calls science "a field of force whose boundary conditions are experience" and recalls the theories of Pierre Duhem that the truth or falsity of statements cannot be tested separately from all other beliefs.
This man claimed that the objects of study in physics and the gods of Homer "differ only in degree and not in kind" from an epistemological view. He rejected Leibniz's notion of interchangeability used in explaining the synonymy of "bachelor" and "unmarried man" in his discussion of the difference between statements that are true by virtue of their meaning and those that are true by virtue of fact. One of his essays argues that the belief that any statement can be separated into a linguistic component and factual component has led to unwarranted support for reductionism and the (*) analytic/synthetic distinction. That essay by this man calls science "a field of force whose boundary conditions are experience" and recalls the theories of Pierre Duhem that the truth or falsity of statements cannot be tested separately from all other beliefs. For 10 points, name this author of "Two Dogmas of Empiricism".
This man claimed that the objects of study in physics and the gods of Homer "differ only in degree and not in kind" from an epistemological view.
Willard Van Orman Quine [or W.V.O. Quine; do not accept or prompt on “William Van Orman Quince”] &lt;Bailey&gt;