The court extended this decision to misdemeanors that carry possible jail sentences in a case involving a conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, Argersinger v. Hamlin.
In Burgett v. Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that convictions that violated this case cannot be used for subsequent decisions. The court extended this decision to misdemeanors that carry possible jail sentences in a case involving a conviction for carrying a concealed weapon, Argersinger v. Hamlin. The decision, written by Hugo Black, rejected the precedent of Betts v. Brady, instead citing Powell v. Alabama and the Scottsboro Boys case.  The lower court's overruled decision in this case contended that only defendants at risk of facing the death penalty applied for the Constitutional protection sought, and the adversarial nature of the legal system was important in the court's ruling.  Centering on a plaintiff who had been convicted of the burglary of a pool hall in Florida, but who argued that his Sixth Amendment rights had been violated, FTP, name this 1963 Supreme Court case that ruled that states are required to provide counsel, even if the defendant cannot afford it.
In Burgett v. Texas, the Supreme Court ruled that convictions that violated this case cannot be used for subsequent decisions.
{Gideon} v. {Wainwright} (accept either underlined answer)