"
This case centered on a theory of wrongdoing based on parallel conduct. One commonly cited line from this decision mentions "nudging across the line." This case arose from an alleged secretive price-fixing agreement in violation of the Sherman Antitrust Act. For 10 points, name this case, extended in Iqbal v. Ashcroft, which reinterpreted Conley to hold that a complaint must state facts that raise the plaintiff's right to relief about a speculative level.
This case centered on a theory of wrongdoing based on parallel conduct.
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly [prompt on Bell Atlantic]