Near the end its author follows a number of tangential discussions, arguing that there is no rational justification for belief in miracles and that human and animal reason are analogous.
Near the end its author follows a number of tangential discussions, arguing that there is no rational justification for belief in miracles and that human and animal reason are analogous. The author turns his conclusions to a compatibilist view of free will and determinism, exempting prisoners of course. It begins by distinguishing between impressions and ideas and continues by differentiating between relations of ideas and matters of fact. FTP, name this reworking of the first book of Treatise of Human Nature, a work by David Hume not to be confused with an essay by John Locke.
Near the end its author follows a number of tangential discussions, arguing that there is no rational justification for belief in miracles and that human and animal reason are analogous.
An {Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding}