An analogue of this doctrine, codified one section later in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was interpreted in Chiquita International v. Bolero Reefer.
An analogue of this doctrine, codified one section later in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was interpreted in Chiquita International v. Bolero Reefer. This doctrine is codified in Rule 26(b)(3). The case establishing this doctrine stated that mental impressions, conclusions, opinions, and legal theories are always encompassed in it. For 10 points, name this doctrine, established in Hickman v. Taylor, which states that materials prepared by attorneys for trial purposes are not discoverable.
An analogue of this doctrine, codified one section later in the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, was interpreted in Chiquita International v. Bolero Reefer.
work product doctrine [or Hickman v. Taylor doctrine before read]