Paul Friedlander identified a "polyphonic" form of this concept in a work in which the "very stupid question" is asked, "can there be no such thing as an erroneous action?
Paul Friedlander identified a "polyphonic" form of this concept in a work in which the "very stupid question" is asked, "can there be no such thing as an erroneous action?" Jean-Paul once proposed that a new punctuation mark in addition to the question and exclamation be used to indicate this concept. Hegel believed that this concept and its formulator's maieutics were key to allowing a philosopher to "put forth their principles" even though Hegel wrote that this concept is "vanity" in his Phenomenology of Spirit. Another thinker asserted that just like "there is no true science without doubt", there is "no genuinely human life" without this concept in a text that claims Aristophanes' portrayal of this concept's user is realistic since a philosopher is full of this concept, which is called "infinite absolute negativity". A dissertation by Kierkegaard that makes continual reference to Socrates is about Socrates's use of, for 10 points, what concept?
Paul Friedlander identified a "polyphonic" form of this concept in a work in which the "very stupid question" is asked, "can there be no such thing as an erroneous action?
Socratic irony