"
This book uses the example of knowledge about art enhancing aesthetic enjoyment of art to explain the idea of "value as a part," or a situational enhancement of certain values beyond their necessary nature. The last chapter of this book lists what is good and what is evil, putting "consciousness of pain" in the latter category and "the appreciation of beauty" and "friendship" in the former. One section of this work says that things which are fundamentally the same must have the same moral weight, in "The Conception of Intrinsic Value." Its first chapters says that definitions which do not clarify understanding are useless for closing questions, using that premise to attack those who related the good to pleasure or evolutionary events. After condemning that "naturalistic fallacy," it proposes that its subject cannot be studied with either empiricism or Kantian rationalism, laying out an intuitionist approach. For 10 points, name this 1903 text, based on the author's lecture series "The Elements of Ethics," the chief work of G.E. Moore.
This book uses the example of knowledge about art enhancing aesthetic enjoyment of art to explain the idea of "value as a part," or a situational enhancement of certain values beyond their necessary nature.
{Principia Ethica}