Do We Have a Right to [this practice]?"
A majority opinion in a case about this practice included the declaration that "the power to limit speech on the ground that truth has not yet prevailed and is not likely to prevail implies the power to declare truth." An essay about this practice jokingly compares it to "breakfast television" in its supposed encouragement of absenteeism, before critiquing the "goal-based" strategy for permitting it, which was advocated by a committee headed by Bernard Williams. That essay, which argues for a "right to moral independence," is titled "Do We Have a Right to [this practice]?" Robert Jensen and Gail Dines wrote a 1997 book about this practice subtitled for "the production and consumption of inequality." This subject of the Canadian Supreme Court Case (*) R. v. Butler was characterized as a civil rights violation in ordinances passed in Minneapolis and Indianapolis, the later of which was struck down in American Booksellers v. Hudnut. Those ordinances banning this practice were co-drafted by Catharine MacKinnon and Andrea Dworkin. For 10 points, name this practice engaged in by performers like Linda Lovelace and Sasha Grey.
A majority opinion in a case about this practice included the declaration that "the power to limit speech on the ground that truth has not yet prevailed and is not likely to prevail implies the power to declare truth.
pornography [accept things like distributing pornography or filming pornography] 