This case arose when the defendant, Golde, amassed property over a period of seven years without informing the plaintiff.
This case arose when the defendant, Golde, amassed property over a period of seven years without informing the plaintiff. Central to the disposition of this case was the fact that the plaintiff did not expect to retain possession of the property in question. This case denied the plaintiff's claim of conversion but did hold that doctors have a duty to inform their patients if they plan to profit from research done on them. For 10 points, name this case in which the California Supreme Court ruled that the University of California had sole possessory rights to the plaintiff's hairy cell leukemia cell line.
This case arose when the defendant, Golde, amassed property over a period of seven years without informing the plaintiff.
Moore v. Regents of the University of California