This man attacked F.H. Bradley's Principles of Log
This man attacked F.H. Bradley's Principles of Logic in "The Nature of Judgment." One work by this author argues that there is no reason to believe there can't be physical facts independent of mental facts, and that work asserts the absolute truth of a list of propositions including "there exists at present a human body, which is my body." Another of his works shows that "blue" cannot be the same as "the sensation of blue" in order to argue against the idea that esse is percipi. In addition to "A Defense of Common Sense" and "The Refutation of Idealism," he wrote a work that uses the open-question argument to show that there cannot be a meaningful definition of the concept of "good," a result known as the "naturalistic fallacy." For 10 points, name this British analytic author of Principia Ethica.
This man attacked F.H. Bradley's Principles of Logic in "The Nature of Judgment.
George Edward Moore