He argued against the need to fulfill vows and for the spontaneity of Christianity in On the Religious Profession. He demonstrated that divine prescience and a belief in human autonomy could not be reconciled in On the Free Will. In another work, he presented three distinct points of view on the compatibility of religion and the righteousness of man pursuing his natural appetites. That tract, On Pleasure, preceded a work that considered the question, "if Solomon could fall into idolatry," could not the same thing happen in the case of a "supreme pontiff." That question culminated in an argumen
He argued against the need to fulfill vows and for the spontaneity of Christianity in On the Religious Profession. He demonstrated that divine prescience and a belief in human autonomy could not be reconciled in On the Free Will. In another work, he presented three distinct points of view on the compatibility of religion and the righteousness of man pursuing his natural appetites. That tract, On Pleasure, preceded a work that considered the question, "if Solomon could fall into idolatry," could not the same thing happen in the case of a "supreme pontiff." That question culminated in an argument that Rome's claim that it is "entitled by prescription to what it posseses" is based on the misattribution of a document allegedly given to Sylvester I in the 4th Century.For 10 points, identify this religious thinker who proved in 1440 that the Donation of Constantine was a forgery.
He argued against the need to fulfill vows and for the spontaneity of Christianity in On the Religious Profession.
Lorenzo Valla