This thinker argued that propositions were the true objects of thought in an early paper titled, "The Nature of Judgment", the ideas of which are taken largely from this philosopher's dissertation, "The Metaphysical Basis of Ethics". This thinker denied that one could conclude that all relations are internal from Leibniz's law in the paper "External and Internal Relations", while another famous paper by this philosopher asked whether esse was principi en route to arguing against A.E. Taylor's version of the titular philosophy. This philosopher offered his hands as the titular concept in his paper titled "Proof of an e
This thinker argued that propositions were the true objects of thought in an early paper titled, "The Nature of Judgment", the ideas of which are taken largely from this philosopher's dissertation, "The Metaphysical Basis of Ethics". This thinker denied that one could conclude that all relations are internal from Leibniz's law in the paper "External and Internal Relations", while another famous paper by this philosopher asked whether esse was principi en route to arguing against A.E. Taylor's version of the titular philosophy. This philosopher offered his hands as the titular concept in his paper titled "Proof of an external world", and in his most famous work argued that it was impossible to define goodness in natural terms. The author of "The Refutation of Idealism", for 10 points, identify this thinker who critiqued the naturalistic fallacy in his magnum opus, Principia Ethica.
This thinker argued that propositions were the true objects of thought in an early paper titled, "The Nature of Judgment", the ideas of which are taken largely from this philosopher's dissertation, "The Metaphysical Basis of Ethics".
George Edward Moore