Daniel Dombrowski's book entitled "Rethinking this" includes a defence of Charles Hartshorne's formulation of it. Another formulation of it by Norman Malcolm was criticized by a man who later presented his own version of it, Alvin Plantinga. The fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is always one hundred eighty degrees was used in Descartes' version of this argument, and its original formulation was criticized by Kant, who argued that existence is not a predicate. Gaunilo's In Defense of the Fool attacks, for 10 points, what a priori argument for God's existenc
Daniel Dombrowski's book entitled "Rethinking this" includes a defence of Charles Hartshorne's formulation of it. Another formulation of it by Norman Malcolm was criticized by a man who later presented his own version of it, Alvin Plantinga. The fact that the sum of the angles in a triangle is always one hundred eighty degrees was used in Descartes' version of this argument, and its original formulation was criticized by Kant, who argued that existence is not a predicate. Gaunilo's In Defense of the Fool attacks, for 10 points, what a priori argument for God's existence originally proposed by St. Anselm?
Daniel Dombrowski's book entitled "Rethinking this" includes a defence of Charles Hartshorne's formulation of it.
ontological argument or proof