It may be read as an examination of the works of Wolff and Baumgarten, whose texts its author used while teaching at a university. Its section on the "Antithetic" of the title concept discusses conflicts over the notions of causality through freedom and the existence of a necessary being, among other transcendental ideas. The one entitled "Ideals" of the title concept show
It may be read as an examination of the works of Wolff and Baumgarten, whose texts its author used while teaching at a university. Its section on the "Antithetic" of the title concept discusses conflicts over the notions of causality through freedom and the existence of a necessary being, among other transcendental ideas. The one entitled "Ideals" of the title concept shows that certain types of proofs of the existence of God cannot exist. It was published in two additions, the first preferred by idealists, the second by realists, and its author set out in what he called a "Copernican revolution" in philosophy. It asks the question, "How are a priori synthetic judgments possible?" FTP, identify this most famous work of Immanuel Kant.
It may be read as an examination of the works of Wolff and Baumgarten, whose texts its author used while teaching at a university.
Critique of Pure Reason or Kritik der reinen Vernunft