The decision in this case claimed that the character of an act depends on its circumstances, citing Aikens v. Wisconsin.  The precedent established by this case was altered in the case whose dissent introduced the marketplace of ideas, Abrams v. U.S., and was officially established in Brandenburg v. Ohio after being repeatedly cited by Louis Brandeis.  Its plaintiff, a general secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espio
The decision in this case claimed that the character of an act depends on its circumstances, citing Aikens v. Wisconsin.  The precedent established by this case was altered in the case whose dissent introduced the marketplace of ideas, Abrams v. U.S., and was officially established in Brandenburg v. Ohio after being repeatedly cited by Louis Brandeis.  Its plaintiff, a general secretary of the Socialist party, was charged with violating the Espionage Act for distributing anti-draft pamphlets.  For 10 points, name this 1919 Supreme Court case with a majority opinion by Oliver Wendell Holmes that placed limitations on the First Amendment with the "clear and present danger" test.
The decision in this case claimed that the character of an act depends on its circumstances, citing Aikens v. Wisconsin.  
Schenck v. United States [accept in reverse order]