Part V of this work asserts that Proudhon's veneration of violence made his ideas incompatible with those of its subject.  This work traces the paradoxical nature of a man who is able to express the "oscillations of feeling" that animate the individual, yet champions a metaphysics based on determinism.  It analyzes a definition of "greatness" that turns on the incapacity of persons like Marx to recognize their own insignificance, and traces the influence of Joseph de Maistre's ideas on a certain writer who, as this work
Part V of this work asserts that Proudhon's veneration of violence made his ideas incompatible with those of its subject.  This work traces the paradoxical nature of a man who is able to express the "oscillations of feeling" that animate the individual, yet champions a metaphysics based on determinism.  It analyzes a definition of "greatness" that turns on the incapacity of persons like Marx to recognize their own insignificance, and traces the influence of Joseph de Maistre's ideas on a certain writer who, as this work asserts, should be treated as a philosopher rather than a novelist.  This work, which posits a distinction between two types of intellectuals, begins with a fragment taken from Archilochus stating that although one of the title creatures knows "many things," the other knows "one big thing." For 10 points, identify this work subtitled "An Essay on Tolstoy's View of History," a work by Isaiah Berlin.
Part V of this work asserts that Proudhon's veneration of violence made his ideas incompatible with those of its subject.  
"The Hedgehog and the Fox"