In this work's last chapter, the author cites Karl-Otto Apel's comparison of Wittgenstein and Heidegger's questioning of metaphysics and considers the difference between mainstream and peripheral thinkers in contrasting "systematic" and "edifying" forms of the first title entity. In a section on psychology, this work cites the confusion between causation and inference in cognitive psychology contra Fodor. This work contrasts Sellars's criticism of the idea of givenness with Quine's criticism of the structure-content distinction, claiming that a premise of both arguments is that knowledge is "a matter of conversation and of social practice." T
In this work's last chapter, the author cites Karl-Otto Apel's comparison of Wittgenstein and Heidegger's questioning of metaphysics and considers the difference between mainstream and peripheral thinkers in contrasting "systematic" and "edifying" forms of the first title entity. In a section on psychology, this work cites the confusion between causation and inference in cognitive psychology contra Fodor. This work contrasts Sellars's criticism of the idea of givenness with Quine's criticism of the structure-content distinction, claiming that a premise of both arguments is that knowledge is "a matter of conversation and of social practice." The author of this work describes his position as "epistemological behaviorism." For 10 points, name this attack on representationalism and "truth as correspondence" that called epistemological questions about the accuracy of the title reflector of reality unanswerable and irrelevant to social theory, a work by Richard Rorty.
In this work's last chapter, the author cites Karl-Otto Apel's comparison of Wittgenstein and Heidegger's questioning of metaphysics and considers the difference between mainstream and peripheral thinkers in contrasting "systematic" and "edifying" forms of the first title entity.
{Philosophy} and the {Mirror} of {Nature}