This book argues that relativism falsely holds all knowledge to be illusory, and instead claims that all knowledge is partially true, and can be synthesized into wider historical truth, which its author calls "relationism." This book discusses Thomas Munzer's belief in the "Eternal Present" to analyze Anabaptistism as an example of "orgiastic chiliasm," one of the four types of revolutionary consciousness it delineates along with liberal-humanitarianism, conservatism, and socialist-communism. In another section, the author borrows Alfred Weber's terminology to describe a "relatively classless stratum" as the "socially unattached intellegentsia." and he quotes Lamartine as saying that examples of one of the titular concepts of this work are often "premature truths," in a section concerned with the titular ideas and "the problem of reality." This work distinguishes
This book argues that relativism falsely holds all knowledge to be illusory, and instead claims that all knowledge is partially true, and can be synthesized into wider historical truth, which its author calls "relationism." This book discusses Thomas Munzer's belief in the "Eternal Present" to analyze Anabaptistism as an example of "orgiastic chiliasm," one of the four types of revolutionary consciousness it delineates along with liberal-humanitarianism, conservatism, and socialist-communism. In another section, the author borrows Alfred Weber's terminology to describe a "relatively classless stratum" as the "socially unattached intellegentsia." and he quotes Lamartine as saying that examples of one of the titular concepts of this work are often "premature truths," in a section concerned with the titular ideas and "the problem of reality." This work distinguishes between "particular" and "total" types of the first title concept, and contrasts that concept, which it defines as attempting to understand reality in terms of the past, with the second title concept, which transcends the present and tends to "shatter" the prevailing order. For 10 points, name this book which outlines its author's sociology of knowledge, written by Karl Mannheim. 
This book argues that relativism falsely holds all knowledge to be illusory, and instead claims that all knowledge is partially true, and can be synthesized into wider historical truth, which its author calls "relationism.
{Ideology} and {Utopia} [or {Ideologie und Utopie}]