This thinker claimed that the fact that Hobbes and Foucault both spoke of a "war of all against all" leads many to think that they have more in common besides "the fact that, with the exception of Hobbes, both were bald." One of his texts arose from a debate with Gananath Obeyesekere about the distinction between "Western" and "indigenous" thought, which arose from Obeyesekere's book about a certain figure who was mistaken for Lono. He relied on Richard B. Lee's studies among the !Kung (pronounced "[tongue-click] Kung") for a symposium about "M
This thinker claimed that the fact that Hobbes and Foucault both spoke of a "war of all against all" leads many to think that they have more in common besides "the fact that, with the exception of Hobbes, both were bald." One of his texts arose from a debate with Gananath Obeyesekere about the distinction between "Western" and "indigenous" thought, which arose from Obeyesekere's book about a certain figure who was mistaken for Lono. He relied on Richard B. Lee's studies among the !Kung (pronounced "[tongue-click] Kung") for a symposium about "Man the Hunter" at which he proposed one of his notable theses, which was later expounded on in his Stone Age Economics. This thinker wrote (*) How "Natives" Think about Captain Cook, for Example and posited that hunter-gatherer economies were the "original affluent society." For 10 points, name this University of Chicago anthropologist.
This thinker claimed that the fact that Hobbes and Foucault both spoke of a "war of all against all" leads many to think that they have more in common besides "the fact that, with the exception of Hobbes, both were bald.
{Marshall David Sahlins}