One dissent in this case argued that the majority's approach would have extended constitutional protections to the broadcasts of Tokyo Rose. The Supreme Court invalidated section 441b in this case and took issue with the anti-distortion rationale of Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. Holding later precedents to be inconsistent with Buckley v. Valeo, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in this case overruled portions of (*) McConnell v. FEC and vindicated the creators of Hillary: The Movie. For 10 points, name this 2010 case that struck down limitations on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns in the McCain-Feingold Act
One dissent in this case argued that the majority's approach would have extended constitutional protections to the broadcasts of Tokyo Rose. The Supreme Court invalidated section 441b in this case and took issue with the anti-distortion rationale of Austin v. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. Holding later precedents to be inconsistent with Buckley v. Valeo, Justice Kennedy's majority opinion in this case overruled portions of (*) McConnell v. FEC and vindicated the creators of Hillary: The Movie. For 10 points, name this 2010 case that struck down limitations on independent corporate expenditures in political campaigns in the McCain-Feingold Act.
One dissent in this case argued that the majority's approach would have extended constitutional protections to the broadcasts of Tokyo Rose.
{Citizens United} v. Federal Election Commission [or FEC]