This work argues that Kant believed his method was capable of "limitless expansion" while claiming that the "behaviour of industry" and the "dialectical relation between subject and object" is ignored in Engels' Anti-Duhring. Its first section decries the "vulgar materialism" which men such as Eduard Berstein have tried to disguise. This work contends that insoluble antinomies were the only thing 
This work argues that Kant believed his method was capable of "limitless expansion" while claiming that the "behaviour of industry" and the "dialectical relation between subject and object" is ignored in Engels' Anti-Duhring. Its first section decries the "vulgar materialism" which men such as Eduard Berstein have tried to disguise. This work contends that insoluble antinomies were the only thing classical philosophy could give to the bourgeois, and this work's central section consists of the essay "Reification and the Consciousness of the Proletariat." Ending with an essay "Towards a Methodology of the Problem of Organization",  it attributes an "overestimation of the spontaneous, elemental forces of the Revolution" to Rosa Luxemburg and  Contending all classes but the proletariats are trapped in a "false consciousness", for 10 points, name this work of Gyorgy Lukacs.
This work argues that Kant believed his method was capable of "limitless expansion" while claiming that the "behaviour of industry" and the "dialectical relation between subject and object" is ignored in Engels' Anti-Duhring.
{History} and {Class} Consciousness