In 2007, the University of Maryland Undergraduate History Journal published an article by Ivan Szpakowski claiming that this concept was a response to ethnic heterogeneity. Jean-Paul Sartre wrote a 1976 article about this concept in the New Left Revi
In 2007, the University of Maryland Undergraduate History Journal published an article by Ivan Szpakowski claiming that this concept was a response to ethnic heterogeneity. Jean-Paul Sartre wrote a 1976 article about this concept in the New Left Review, calling it an "ideological monstrosity" and the product of personal conflicts. This concept forms the subtitle of an E.H. Carr book on Soviet history. A fake letter from "Comrade Ivanov" was used to defend this concept in an issue of Pravda. This concept's most notable critic called it an impossibility in a work subtitled A Criticism of Fundamentals, as well as in the postscript to his book A Program of Peace and in his book The Year 1905. This concept formulated by Nikolai Bukharin was formally adopted at the Third Communist International, and was opposed by those favoring the "permanent revolution" doctrine of Leon Trotsky. For ten points, name this Stalinist doctrine which said that the worker's revolution did not have to be universal and that dictatorships of the proletariat could exist with physical borders.
In 2007, the University of Maryland Undergraduate History Journal published an article by Ivan Szpakowski claiming that this concept was a response to ethnic heterogeneity.
{Socialism} in One {Country} [accept {clear} equivalents, like “{Socialism Within} One {State}”]