One year after its passage, this legislation withstood a direct constitutional challenge in the Katzenbach case. Among the provisions of this legislation was a triggering clause that required federal pre-clearance of procedural changes. This legislation's second section was 
One year after its passage, this legislation withstood a direct constitutional challenge in the Katzenbach case. Among the provisions of this legislation was a triggering clause that required federal pre-clearance of procedural changes. This legislation's second section was amended in 1982 for the purposed of overturning the ruling of the Supreme Court in City of Mobile v. Bolden and employed a "totality of circumstances" approach, while its fourth section was likewise amended in the same year to allow jurisdictions to opt out of coverage if they had been in compliance for the past decade. Pursuant to Section 5 of this legislation, the Justice Department would obtain the right to prosecute such practices as "single-shot," as a result of the 1969 Allen v. Board of Election decision, and this law's 8th section provided for federal overseers to make sure that its title practice was not being unconstitutionally restricted. For 10 points, identify this landmark piece of civil rights legislation, which effectively provided for the enforcement of the 15th Amendment.
One year after its passage, this legislation withstood a direct constitutional challenge in the Katzenbach case.
Voting Rights Act of 1965