The fact that jade fragments into jadeite and nephrite, thus failing the nomicness test of projectibility is one objection to this philosophical position articulated by Jaegwon Kim, and Kim also argued that this theory forces
The fact that jade fragments into jadeite and nephrite, thus failing the nomicness test of projectibility is one objection to this philosophical position articulated by Jaegwon Kim, and Kim also argued that this theory forces recourse to "structure specific bridge laws" and "local reductions." One philosopher formulated this theory as a response to Ernest Nagel's "intertheoretic account", and that philosopher also used this theory to show that physicalist type identity theories are not sufficiently abstract, unlike functionalist ones. Besides Jerry Fodor, another supporter of this position used the existence of pain in a wide variety of species to show that the correspondence between mental and neural kinds posited by "brain state theory" was untenable. Developed by Hilary Putnam, for ten points, name this philosophical position arguing that a psychological kind can correspond to many possible physical kinds.
The fact that jade fragments into jadeite and nephrite, thus failing the nomicness test of projectibility is one objection to this philosophical position articulated by Jaegwon Kim, and Kim also argued that this theory forces recourse to "structure specific bridge laws" and "local reductions.
{Multiple Realizability}