This work discusses how incomplete knowledge of causes leads to a belief in luck in the section "Of Probability". It argues that ideas lack the forcefulness of actual and that the source of all ideas is ultimately impressions in "Of the Origin of Ideas", though it provides a possible counter-example of a "missing shade of blue". It distinguishes "relations of ideas" from "matters of fact", known as the author's namesake fork, and goes on to question whether we can trust 
This work discusses how incomplete knowledge of causes leads to a belief in luck in the section "Of Probability". It argues that ideas lack the forcefulness of actual and that the source of all ideas is ultimately impressions in "Of the Origin of Ideas", though it provides a possible counter-example of a "missing shade of blue". It distinguishes "relations of ideas" from "matters of fact", known as the author's namesake fork, and goes on to question whether we can trust induction. For 10 points, name this empiricist text which built on the ideas of John Locke, a work of the Scottish philosopher David Hume.
This work discusses how incomplete knowledge of causes leads to a belief in luck in the section "Of Probability".
An {Enquiry} Concerning {Human Understanding}