This book distinguishes between general jealousy towards all richer social classes and particular jealously towards an individual in its section "The Problem of Envy." This work's second part concludes with a section "The Role of Civil Disobedience" and the title of the first chapter equates the title concept with fairness. Allowing inequalities in the distribution of goods only if it will benefit the needy is called the difference principle, which was countered by the entitlement theory in a no
This book distinguishes between general jealousy towards all richer social classes and particular jealously towards an individual in its section "The Problem of Envy." This work's second part concludes with a section "The Role of Civil Disobedience" and the title of the first chapter equates the title concept with fairness. Allowing inequalities in the distribution of goods only if it will benefit the needy is called the difference principle, which was countered by the entitlement theory in a notable critique. This work discusses the "original position" in which people decide society's principles unaware of their social position blinded by a "veil of ignorance." Critiqued by Robert Nozick's Anarchy, State, and Utopia, for 10 points, name this 1971 work by John Rawls.
This book distinguishes between general jealousy towards all richer social classes and particular jealously towards an individual in its section "The Problem of Envy.
A Theory of Justice