Well-known cases dealing with the application of this legal concept include Shepard v. United States, Palmer v. Hoffman, and Ohio v. Roberts. However, its definition has recently been radically change
Well-known cases dealing with the application of this legal concept include Shepard v. United States, Palmer v. Hoffman, and Ohio v. Roberts. However, its definition has recently been radically changed by Scalia in the watershed case of Crawford v. Washington. Covered by the 800 rules of the Federal Rules of Evidence, exceptions to it include present sense impressions, excited utterances, business records, and dying declarations, which all tend to provide sufficient credibility to overcome the inability to cross-examine. Defined as a statement offered for the truth of the matter asserted made by someone outside of court, FTP, name this type of statement that an attorney might object to.
Well-known cases dealing with the application of this legal concept include Shepard v. United States, Palmer v. Hoffman, and Ohio v. Roberts.
{hearsay} rule