To help explain this, Lord Kelvin computed the time for stellar collapse ignoring relativistic effects at 20  million years, and Harrison's lookout limit is also utilized in connection to this problem, The foggy forest interpretation was adopted by its namesake and Cheseaux to explain this inconsistency. First mentioned by Thomas Digges in 1576, Hermann Biondi's redshift solution could only completely work in a steady-state universe and in the work, Eureka: A Prose Poem,  Edgar Allen Poe suggest
To help explain this, Lord Kelvin computed the time for stellar collapse ignoring relativistic effects at 20  million years, and Harrison's lookout limit is also utilized in connection to this problem, The foggy forest interpretation was adopted by its namesake and Cheseaux to explain this inconsistency. First mentioned by Thomas Digges in 1576, Hermann Biondi's redshift solution could only completely work in a steady-state universe and in the work, Eureka: A Prose Poem,  Edgar Allen Poe suggested that the age of the universe was insufficient in order to resolve this. Paul Wesson and others suggest that in a Big Bang Universe, Poe's explanation is a pretty good one to resolve, for 10 points, this paradox that suggests that in an infinite universe the number of stars should make the night sky as luminous as the Sun.
To help explain this, Lord Kelvin computed the time for stellar collapse ignoring relativistic effects at 20  million years, and Harrison's lookout limit is also utilized in connection to this problem, The foggy forest interpretation was adopted by its namesake and Cheseaux to explain this inconsistency.
Olbers' Paradox