Florence Kelley and Josephine Goldmark lent assistance to the developer of this. Its was inspired by a dissent in New State Ice Company v. Leibmann and in 2005, one of these was controversially used in Roper v. Simmons, leading critics like Ginsburg to point out that they represent a severe relaxation of judicial notice. Used in Brown vs. Board of Education to demonstrate the psychological repercussions of segregated education on African-American
Florence Kelley and Josephine Goldmark lent assistance to the developer of this. Its was inspired by a dissent in New State Ice Company v. Leibmann and in 2005, one of these was controversially used in Roper v. Simmons, leading critics like Ginsburg to point out that they represent a severe relaxation of judicial notice. Used in Brown vs. Board of Education to demonstrate the psychological repercussions of segregated education on African-American children, it was first employed by its namesake in the 1908 case Muller v. Oregon. Featuring analysis of extra-legal data and the theory of other sciences, FTP, name this type of expansive legal brief named for the first Jewish justice of the Supreme Court.
Florence Kelley and Josephine Goldmark lent assistance to the developer of this.
{Brandeis} Brief