The dissent to this court case cited West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette in explaining a freedom from "embarrassments and pleasures" and also cited the fourth stanza of the "Star Spangled Banner." The precedent established in this case was later upheld in Abington v. Schempp and Lee v. Weisman, which involved a guest speaker at a Rhode Island middle school. The majority opinion in this case mentioned the historical persecution of John Bunyan and commented 
The dissent to this court case cited West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette in explaining a freedom from "embarrassments and pleasures" and also cited the fourth stanza of the "Star Spangled Banner." The precedent established in this case was later upheld in Abington v. Schempp and Lee v. Weisman, which involved a guest speaker at a Rhode Island middle school. The majority opinion in this case mentioned the historical persecution of John Bunyan and commented on the briefness of a twenty-two word statement opposed by a group which included the Ethical Culture movement. Byron White took no part in the case and Felix Frankfurter had suffered a stroke which resulted in a 6-1 decision. The opinion in this case was delivered by Hugo Black and stated that the items in question violated the Establishment Clause, and the case was brought about by Jewish associations in New York. For 10 points, name this 1962 supreme court decision which stated that forced recitation of prayer in public schools was unconstitutional.
The dissent to this court case cited West Virginia State Board of Education v. Barnette in explaining a freedom from "embarrassments and pleasures" and also cited the fourth stanza of the "Star Spangled Banner.
{Engel} v. {Vitale} [accept either]