Associate Justice William Brennan authored the Supreme Court's majority opinion in this case, relying on Chaplinsky v. U.S., stating, "All ideas having even the slightest rede
Associate Justice William Brennan authored the Supreme Court's majority opinion in this case, relying on Chaplinsky v. U.S., stating, "All ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance – unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion – have the full protection of the guaranties…" The Court went on to deem obscenities as without redeeming social importance, thereby not under protection of the First Amendment. FTP, identify this 1957 Supreme Court case that affirmed the constitutionality of the federal obscenity statute.
Associate Justice William Brennan authored the Supreme Court's majority opinion in this case, relying on Chaplinsky v. U.S., stating, "All ideas having even the slightest redeeming social importance – unorthodox ideas, controversial ideas, even ideas hateful to the prevailing climate of opinion – have the full protection of the guaranties…
{Roth v. United States}