At the end of this work, the author attacks "the fallacy of all prohibitory, sumptuary, and moral legislation," particularly targeting the temperance movement. Previously, the author makes the assertion that "we can never annihilate a penalty." He argues that the size of the United States makes it an ideal working environment for the unskilled classes and blasts trade unions for restricting the supply of workers. The central argument of this work is that a dollar that is used for charity or welfare is diverted from useful capital, and the worker who would have otherwise been employed using that money is the title char
At the end of this work, the author attacks "the fallacy of all prohibitory, sumptuary, and moral legislation," particularly targeting the temperance movement. Previously, the author makes the assertion that "we can never annihilate a penalty." He argues that the size of the United States makes it an ideal working environment for the unskilled classes and blasts trade unions for restricting the supply of workers. The central argument of this work is that a dollar that is used for charity or welfare is diverted from useful capital, and the worker who would have otherwise been employed using that money is the title character of this work. Beginning with two people, A and B, who "decide what C shall be made to do for D," for ten points, identify this essay by William Graham Sumner, whose title refers to person C, who is not considered by A, B, or D.
At the end of this work, the author attacks "the fallacy of all prohibitory, sumptuary, and moral legislation," particularly targeting the temperance movement.
The {Forgotten Man}