Although the use of this amendment was watered down by cases like Robertson v. Baldwin and Butler v. Perry, the same era witnessed it used to strike down a law in Bailey v. Alabama. Potter Stewart used this amendment as the basis of his controversial decision in Jones v. Mayer, which empowered Title 42, Section 1982 of the U.S. Code. This amendment's language resulted from a combination of the proposal of James Wilson with that of James Ashley and John Henderson. Its text was based on a portion of the Northwest Ordinance, and much of its jurisprudence concerns "badges and incidents." Discussed extensively in the Peonage Cases, it was explicitly expanded to Mexican and Chinese labor by the Slaughterhouse Cases. FTP, name this amendment ratified shortly after the Civil War, which bans slavery.
Although the use of this amendment was watered down by cases like Robertson v. Baldwin and Butler v. Perry, the same era witnessed it used to strike down a law in Bailey v. Alabama. Potter Stewart used this amendment as the basis of his controversial decision in Jones v. Mayer, which empowered Title 42, Section 1982 of the U.S. Code. This amendment's language resulted from a combination of the proposal of James Wilson with that of James Ashley and John Henderson. Its text was based on a portion of the Northwest Ordinance, and much of its jurisprudence concerns "badges and incidents." Discussed extensively in the Peonage Cases, it was explicitly expanded to Mexican and Chinese labor by the Slaughterhouse Cases. FTP, name this amendment ratified shortly after the Civil War, which bans slavery.
Although the use of this amendment was watered down by cases like Robertson v. Baldwin and Butler v. Perry, the same era witnessed it used to strike down a law in Bailey v. Alabama.
{Thirteenth} Amendment