In the introduction to this work's first edition, its author claimed that "everything which bears the least semblance of an hypothesis must be excluded," from the considerations of this text. It contains a chapter that points out the flaws of the physico-theological, and ontological arguments, while the history, architectonic, discipline, and canon of the titular concept are addressed in its secon
In the introduction to this work's first edition, its author claimed that "everything which bears the least semblance of an hypothesis must be excluded," from the considerations of this text. It contains a chapter that points out the flaws of the physico-theological, and ontological arguments, while the history, architectonic, discipline, and canon of the titular concept are addressed in its second section on the "Transcendental Doctrines of Method." Containing a derivation of "pure conceptions of the understanding," called categories, for ten points, identify this philosophical work which argues for synthetic a priori truths, the first major critique of Immanuel Kant.
In the introduction to this work's first edition, its author claimed that "everything which bears the least semblance of an hypothesis must be excluded," from the considerations of this text.
{Critique of Pure Reason} or {Kritik der reinen Vernunft}