This amendment was applied to a government agency in Dow Chemical Company vs US. In another decision Antonin Scalia placed "off the wall" items outside the purview of this. Another case about this amendment extended Minnesota
This amendment was applied to a government agency in Dow Chemical Company vs US. In another decision Antonin Scalia placed "off the wall" items outside the purview of this. Another case about this amendment extended Minnesota v Dickerson. The Horton test is the current standard for meeting this amendment, and besides Bond v US, the grounds for complying with this amendment were outlined in Arizona v. Hicks, which extended Coolidge v New Hampshire's creation of the (*) "Plain View" Doctrine. This amendment was originally proposed due to the use of writs of assistance, and this amendment was extended to the states in a case involving pornography being found in a suitcase, called Mapp v. Ohio. For 10 points, name this amendment to the US constitution that protects against unreasonable search and seizure.
This amendment was applied to a government agency in Dow Chemical Company vs US.
Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution