A version of this man's work "For Ladies" was written by Francesco Algarotti. In an article titled after this man's field "In Feminism", Sandra Harding characterized this man's magnum opus as a "rape manual". This anti-Trinitarian published an article about the forgery of 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16, entitled A Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture. Emilie du Chatelet produced a commentary and French translation of this man's magnum opus, which he appended with an essay stating "hypothesis non fingo", entitled General Scholium, in the second edition. That work received criticism over its purported introduction of occultism into science, because it posited invisible forces acting over long distances in order to re-derive Kepler's Laws of Plane
A version of this man's work "For Ladies" was written by Francesco Algarotti. In an article titled after this man's field "In Feminism", Sandra Harding characterized this man's magnum opus as a "rape manual". This anti-Trinitarian published an article about the forgery of 1 John 5:7 and 1 Timothy 3:16, entitled A Historical Account of Two Notable Corruptions of Scripture. Emilie du Chatelet produced a commentary and French translation of this man's magnum opus, which he appended with an essay stating "hypothesis non fingo", entitled General Scholium, in the second edition. That work received criticism over its purported introduction of occultism into science, because it posited invisible forces acting over long distances in order to re-derive Kepler's Laws of Planetary motion. In that work, he posited a namesake inverse-square law. For 10 points, name this author of Opticks and Principia Mathematica.
A version of this man's work "For Ladies" was written by Francesco Algarotti.
Isaac Newton