One part of this work refutes the idea that novelties should be rejected because they upset people by stating that rejecting a baseless notion isn't unsettling. One category of qualities in this work is delineated based on whether a cursory examination is sufficient to determine its properties; those are sensible qualities. This work elucidates the Assimilation Argument to show that physical qualities are subsumed into (*) mental states. One argument in this work uses the example of conceiving of a tree independent of all minds, which leads to a contradiction; that is 
One part of this work refutes the idea that novelties should be rejected because they upset people by stating that rejecting a baseless notion isn't unsettling. One category of qualities in this work is delineated based on whether a cursory examination is sufficient to determine its properties; those are sensible qualities. This work elucidates the Assimilation Argument to show that physical qualities are subsumed into (*) mental states. One argument in this work uses the example of conceiving of a tree independent of all minds, which leads to a contradiction; that is the Master Argument. One character represents John Locke and rails against the skepticism of the other, who advocates the position that the material world doesn't exist. For 10 points, name this philosophical work expounding its author's idealism, a work by George Berkeley framed as a conversation between two Greeks.
One part of this work refutes the idea that novelties should be rejected because they upset people by stating that rejecting a baseless notion isn't unsettling.
Three Dialogues Between Hylas and Philonus