Defending its author's conversion to Catholicism from the Anglican church, for 10 points, name this work of John Henry Newman.
The narrator of this work countenances his belief in daimonia by the mention of the 'Prince of Persia' in Daniel and cites the Alexandrian school of Origen and Clement as providing his notion of angels as "the Economy of the Visible World", as well as claiming that "I thought life might be a dream, or I an Angel" after mentioning "I used to wish the Arabian Nights were true." He recounts a "humorous revenge" in which he was placed among "the least intellectual men" by Dr. Whately and the narrator speaks of the teachings "so pure, so beautiful" of John Keble, though he admits that Keble's intellectual principles merely recast the teachings of Joseph Butler's The Analogy of Religion. This work also recounts involvement in the (*) Oxford movement in sections like "History of My Religious Opinions from 1839 to 1841", and this work published in Macmillan's Magazine was a response to Charles Kingsley. Defending its author's conversion to Catholicism from the Anglican church, for 10 points, name this work of John Henry Newman.
The narrator of this work countenances his belief in daimonia by the mention of the 'Prince of Persia' in Daniel and cites the Alexandrian school of Origen and Clement as providing his notion of angels as "the Economy of the Visible World", as well as claiming that "I thought life might be a dream, or I an Angel" after mentioning "I used to wish the Arabian Nights were true."
{Apologia Pro Vita Sua}