In order to justify his celestial mechanics, he detailed a theory of electromagnetism for large bodies in Cosmos without Gravitation, and he analyzed the Ipuwer Papyrus's documentation of the Israelite Exodus in Theses for the Reconstruction of Ancient History.
Steven Jay Gould suggested that this person is at least "gloriously wrong," and a work by Alfredo Garzia subtitled "Scientism vs. Science" documents the intellectual and academic controversy caused by this man's work. In order to justify his celestial mechanics, he detailed a theory of electromagnetism for large bodies in Cosmos without Gravitation, and he analyzed the Ipuwer Papyrus's documentation of the Israelite Exodus in Theses for the Reconstruction of Ancient History. In his most controversial work, he uses a comparative analysis of myths to argue that the Earth has been subjected to a number of cosmological catastrophes and near-catastrophes, which has been in part obscured by a global "cultural amnesia." FTP, name this controversial ? Russian thinker, the author of Worlds in Collision.
Steven Jay Gould suggested that this person is at least "gloriously wrong," and a work by Alfredo Garzia subtitled "Scientism vs. Science" documents the intellectual and academic controversy caused by this man's work.
{Immanuel Velikovsky}