FTP, name this 1824 case regarding steamboat monopolies and federal power to regulate commerce.
The plaintiff in this case cited a specific clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Congress to support his cause.  It resulted in the Court overturning the decisions of the Court of Errors and Court of Chancery of a state, whose actions were deemed "repugnant to . . . the Constitution."  It arose out of the plaintiff's use of a path between Elizabethtown and New York, which trod upon the monopoly passed onto the defendant by Livingston and Fulton.  FTP, name this 1824 case regarding steamboat monopolies and federal power to regulate commerce.
The plaintiff in this case cited a specific clause in Article I, Section 8 of the Congress to support his cause.  
Gibbons v. Ogden