The first of the earlier attempts is rejected as only an example of the central concept, and the namesake "dilemma" of this work is brought up in response to the title character's definition of the central concept, which another character questions, using the example that something that is "carried" is called such just because it is being carried.
In this work, one character attempts to use the idea of gifts to define the central idea, which is disputed by another man's claims that this concept would then be pleasing to the concerned entities, but not beneficial or dear, a contradiction of the title character's earlier assertions. The first of the earlier attempts is rejected as only an example of the central concept, and the namesake "dilemma" of this work is brought up in response to the title character's definition of the central concept, which another character questions, using the example that something that is "carried" is called such just because it is being carried. For 10 points, what is this Platonic dialogue in which the title character defines piety as something that all the gods love?
In this work, one character attempts to use the idea of gifts to define the central idea, which is disputed by another man's claims that this concept would then be pleasing to the concerned entities, but not beneficial or dear, a contradiction of the title character's earlier assertions.
{Euthyphro}