In section 46, the author criticizes Pierre Poiret's view that eternal truths are arbitrary.  
In section 46, the author criticizes Pierre Poiret's view that eternal truths are arbitrary.  Section 16 includes a criticism of Pierre Bayle's article on Jerome Rorarius, who had written a book arguing that animals reason better than people.  Section 85 offers the author's definition of the City of God as the "assemblage of all rational minds," while the 90th and final section concludes that if we could understand the order of the universe, we would find that it surpasses our wisest wishes.  Section 33 distinguishes between truths of reason and truths of fact, while the preceding sections define the two principles on which reasoning is based, those being the Principle of Non-Contradiction and the Principle of Sufficient Reason.  In the first section, we learn that the subject of the discourse is nothing else than a simple substance which enters into composites, and later we learn that the titular objects are the "real atoms of nature" which exist in a pre-established harmony.  FTP, name this work written in 1714 which asserts that we live in the best of all possible worlds, a treatise by Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz.
In section 46, the author criticizes Pierre Poiret's view that eternal truths are arbitrary.  
the Monadology