For 10 points, name this NYU philosopher, the author of "What is it Like to be a Bat?"
Derek Parfit developed the terms "agent-relative" and "agent-neutral" to describe this philosopher's ideas, and this man developed a model of action that says that if a predicate R is true of an action A, then R constitutes a "reason" for a person to "promote" A.  One work by this man replies to Bernard William's rejection of an impersonal morality in its section "Living Right and Living Well," and in that work this author joins with David Chalmers in promoting a dual aspect theory of the mind.  That work by this man attempts to reconcile the inherently subjective nature of a philosopher's viewpoint with the titular objective stance and is titled, The View from Nowhere.  Another work by this author posits the existence of facts unknowable by humans and imagines a Martian without concept of visual perception that still understands the physical phenomena of lightning.  That work rejects reductionist explanations of the mind-body problem due to the inherently subjective nature of consciousness, using the example of understanding the experiences of an animal that perceives the world through echolocation.  For 10 points, name this NYU philosopher, the author of "What is it Like to be a Bat?"
Derek Parfit developed the terms "agent-relative" and "agent-neutral" to describe this philosopher's ideas, and this man developed a model of action that says that if a predicate R is true of an action A, then R constitutes a "reason" for a person to "promote" A.  One work by this man replies to Bernard William's rejection of an impersonal morality in its section "Living Right and Living
{Thomas Nagel}