Ruling that Article 1196 of the Texas Penal Code "sweeps too broadly," FTP, name this 1973 Supreme Court case which struck down severe state restrictions on abortion.
The majority opinion cites the 1939 English case Rex v. Bourne.  Earlier, it begins by citing Holmes' dissent in Lochner v. New York, acknowledging that "one's exposure to the raw edges of human existence" and other things "are all likely to influence" one's thinking on the subject at hand.  In addition to the main ruling, the court held that Dr. James Hallford did not have standing to sue.  The court also cites the 1971 case U.S. v. Vuitch to infer that the Fourteenth Amendment does not apply prenatally.  Ruling that Article 1196 of the Texas Penal Code "sweeps too broadly," FTP, name this 1973 Supreme Court case which struck down severe state restrictions on abortion.
The majority opinion cites the 1939 English case Rex v. Bourne.  
Roe v. Wade