For 10 points, what was this 1973 case, the other two prongs of which stated that for a work to be obscene it had to be patently offensive and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
The decision in this case led to the abandonment of the so-called "Memoirs" test. Vagueness in this case's definition of its central focus led to challenges to its own namesake test by using worries over incitement to violence against women, though many city ordinances using this rationale were struck down by the decision in American Booksellers v. Hudnut in 1985. Its third prong was narrowed by the holding in Jenkins v. Georgia that the movie Carnal Knowledge could not be found patently offensive solely by the view of community standards regarding pornography. For 10 points, what was this 1973 case, the other two prongs of which stated that for a work to be obscene it had to be patently offensive and lack serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value?
The decision in this case led to the abandonment of the so-called "Memoirs" test.
{Miller} v. {California}