This philosopher explains his inability to understand interactions from sense-data, ending an essay that tackles skepticism by claiming the absolute certainty of a few beliefs.
This philosopher explains his inability to understand interactions from sense-data, ending an essay that tackles skepticism by claiming the absolute certainty of a few beliefs. This philosopher argues that goodness is non-natural and indefinable in terms of other properties. This author invites the reader to substitute "pleasant" for anything in the sentence "Is it good that x is pleasant?" to argue that value cannot be analyzed in the open-question argument. That question is further examined by this philosopher for his refutation of the "naturalistic fallacy." For 10 points, name this British philosopher who wrote Principia Ethica.
This philosopher explains his inability to understand interactions from sense-data, ending an essay that tackles skepticism by claiming the absolute certainty of a few beliefs.
George Edward {Moore}