Though its underlying principle was seemingly supported by the previous year's Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell, Justice Cardozo agreed with Hughes' statement in this decision that "extraordinary conditions" do not create or enlarge constitutional power.
This case's decision is almost always cited along with the Panama Refining case, specifically by Byron White in INS v. Chadha where he noted "restrictions on the scope of the power that could be delegated… have all but disappeared." Though its underlying principle was seemingly supported by the previous year's Home Building and Loan v. Blaisdell, Justice Cardozo agreed with Hughes' statement in this decision that "extraordinary conditions" do not create or enlarge constitutional power. Derided by the sitting president as a "horse and buggy" interpretation of the Constitution, and affecting the drafting of the National Labor Relations Act, for 10 points, name this 1935 case, a dagger in FDR's NIRA, that revolved wage, hour and quality conditions at some Brooklyn slaughterhouses.
This case's decision is almost always cited along with the Panama Refining case, specifically by Byron White in INS v. Chadha where he noted "restrictions on the scope of the power that could be delegated… have all but disappeared."
{Schechter Poultry} Corp. v. United States [accept {Sick Chicken} case]