The standard in this case was limited in Whitney vs. California, which replaced it with the nebulous "bad tendency" standard.
The standard in this case was limited in Whitney vs. California, which replaced it with the nebulous "bad tendency" standard. The material tested in this case included leaflets distributed that urged people not to "submit to intimidation." Brandenburg vs Ohio superseded entirely the test from this case with its "imminent lawless action" test; that test, established in this case with the example of (*) "shouting fire in a crowded theater," is the clear and present danger test. For 10 points, name this 1917 First Amendment case that limited the free speech of a man speaking against the draft.
The standard in this case was limited in Whitney vs. California, which replaced it with the nebulous "bad tendency" standard.
{Schenck} v. United States