Mapp v. Ohio ruled that the "exclusionary rule" of this amendment's construction applies to the states.
In 2011, the Supreme Court granted cert in a case arising from this amendment, Jones v. United States, in which the D.C. Circuit had previously created the "mosaic" interpretation of its protections. The Katz case ties this amendment's protection to a "reasonable expectation of privacy." Mapp v. Ohio ruled that the "exclusionary rule" of this amendment's construction applies to the states. For 10 points, name this amendment in the Bill of Rights that guarantees protection from unreasonable searches and seizures.
In 2011, the Supreme Court granted cert in a case arising from this amendment, Jones v. United States, in which the D.C. Circuit had previously created the "mosaic" interpretation of its protections.
Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States