It prohibited regionalized below-cost sales and interlocking directorates and preceded the Robinson-Patman Act in prohibiting anticompetitive price discrimination.
Its second section declared that any company charged with violating it had the burden of proving innocence. In light of the Danbury Hatters' Case, it exempted unions from its provisions and other restraint of trade laws, and it formalized the rights of strike, picket, and boycott. It prohibited regionalized below-cost sales and interlocking directorates and preceded the Robinson-Patman Act in prohibiting anticompetitive price discrimination. FTP, name this industrial law of 1914.
Its second section declared that any company charged with violating it had the burden of proving innocence.
Clayton Antitrust Act