The first section offers some historical background, including discussion of such pairings as "Scott" and "the author of Waverley," before considering the claim that "No bachelor is married."  
In its fourth section, the author considers the claim that "Brutus killed Caesar" and notes that it would be false even if the word "killed" were to mean "begat."   In its final section, the author asserts that as a "lay physicist" he doesn't believe in Homer's gods, but insists that questions about centaurs, brick houses on Elm Street, and classes are more or less on par.  The first section offers some historical background, including discussion of such pairings as "Scott" and "the author of Waverley," before considering the claim that "No bachelor is married."  The author attacks Lockian and Humian definitions of the titular concept, and claims to espouse a "more thorough pragmatism" than that of C. I. Lewis or Carnap by repudiating the imagined boundary between the analytic and synthetic.  FTP, name this seminal 1951 essay which appears in From a Logical Point of View, a work by Willard Van Orman Quine.
In its fourth section, the author considers the claim that "Brutus killed Caesar" and notes that it would be false even if the word "killed" were to mean "begat."   
"Two Dogmas of Empiricism"