Daniel Dennet argued for this position by positing the possibility of constructing a deterministic deliberator in his book Elbow Room, and in general arguments for this position affirm the possibility of assigning moral responsibility despite the fact that every event is causally determined by previous events.
Derek Pereboom has developed a so-called "Four-Case" argument against this philosophical position. Peter Strawson argued for this philosophical doctrine on the basis of resentment by analyzing the psychological impossibility of abandoning reactive attitudes. John Martin Fischer advocates a "semi-" version of this philosophical position by denying the "principle of transfer of blamelessness" in fail-safe situations, while Harry Frankfurt argued for this philosophical position in a 1969 paper by denying the Principle of Alternative possibilities. Daniel Dennet argued for this position by positing the possibility of constructing a deterministic deliberator in his book Elbow Room, and in general arguments for this position affirm the possibility of assigning moral responsibility despite the fact that every event is causally determined by previous events. For ten points, identify this philosophical view which holds that there is no contradiction between determinism and free will.
Derek Pereboom has developed a so-called "Four-Case" argument against this philosophical position.
compatibilism [prompt on "free will"]