" This legislation's reporting requirement defined a 48-hour window for submitting an explanatory report, while the next section held that within 60 days of submitting the report, all armed forces had to be withdrawn barring specific authorization or a formal declaration.
This legislation was the subject of the appeals court case Campbell v. Clinton, which did not result in a ruling, holding instead that Tom Campbell and other House members lacked standing to bring suit. Primarily sponsored in the Senate by Jacob Javits, this legislation came under attack in 1988 by Sam Nunn, John Warner, and George Mitchell, who called it ineffective because it (*) "oversteps Constitutional bounds." This legislation's reporting requirement defined a 48-hour window for submitting an explanatory report, while the next section held that within 60 days of submitting the report, all armed forces had to be withdrawn barring specific authorization or a formal declaration. Passed over Nixon's veto in 1973, for 10 points, identify this legislation which sought to limit the unilateral use of the military by the executive branch.
This legislation was the subject of the appeals court case Campbell v. Clinton, which did not result in a ruling, holding instead that Tom Campbell and other House members lacked standing to bring suit.
{War Powers} Act