Springer v. U.S. held that an 1864 bill introducing this concept was constitutional, although the bill had ceased to apply after the Civil War.
Springer v. U.S. held that an 1864 bill introducing this concept was constitutional, although the bill had ceased to apply after the Civil War. David Wells derided this concept as "flagrant spoliation" when it was reintroduced in the Wilson-Gorman tariff. This concept was redefined to be "direct" and therefore unconstitutional in Hyde v. Continental Trust and Pollock v. Farmers Loan and Trust. In 1917 this concept was applied to corporations that had greater than eight percent profit. For 10 points, the sixteenth amendment legalized what levy on earned money?
Springer v. U.S. held that an 1864 bill introducing this concept was constitutional, although the bill had ceased to apply after the Civil War.
federal {income tax}