This case was decided jointly with Vignera v. New York and Westover v. United States.
This case was decided jointly with Vignera v. New York and Westover v. United States. This case revised an earlier decision from Illinois that was based on the Sixth Amendment rights of Danny Escobedo. The defendant in this case confessed to raping an eighteen-year-old woman, but the Supreme Court ruled his confession (*) inadmissible because his Fifth Amendment rights had not been upheld. For 10 points, name this Supreme Court case, which requires officers to read apprehended suspects their rights.
This case was decided jointly with Vignera v. New York and Westover v. United States.
{Miranda} v. Arizona