Nevertheless, he did not find significant differences. With respect to condylar distraction recorded in API, we found a horizontal direction x horizontal discrepancy of -0.25 mm between GAT and PCT, a 0 mm z, vertical with respect to the articular rod of0mmaswell astransversal of 0 mm. Although differences found between both techniques are not significant they exhibited with GAT recordings greater degrees of distraction.
En cuanto al grado de distracción condilar registrada en el IPAC encontramos una discrepancia entre TAG y TCP en sentido horizontal x de -0.25 mm, vertical z de 0 mm, vertical con respecto al vástago del articulador de 0 mm y transversal de 0 mm. Aunque las diferencias entre ambas técnicas no son significativas muestran mayor grado de distracción los registros con TAG.