Rather than becoming “oases of quality of life”, these projects show the vulnerability of middle-income groups with poor resources to inhabit the peri-urban area of the city. In this case, while private real estate developers internalize all construction costs, dwellers have financial difficulties in terms of access due to the private nature of amenities transportation, medical centers, and sport clubs and the real socioeconomic background of inhabitants.
Estos proyectos lejos de constituir un "oasis de calidad de vida", exhiben la vulnerabilidad de grupos medios con precarias herramientas para habitar la periferia urbana si bien el promotor privado internaliza los costos asociados a la urbanización, el habitante muestra dificultades económicas de acceso por el carácter privado del equipamiento transporte, centro médico, clubes deportivos y el perfil socioeconómico real del habitante.