In the case of the Basin, the conflicts were settled, in the first instance, by the Supreme National Court, where public discussion arenas were represented by the public hearings which took place before the 2008 decision, and subsequently by an innovative process in which they continued to take place.
En el caso de la Cuenca, el conflicto se dirime por un lado en la CSJN, donde las arenas de deliberación estuvieron marcadas por las audiencias públicas previas al fallo del 2008 y posteriores, marcadas por un proceso innovador de participación en las mismas.