From the first set, the first two contrasts proved statistically significant for technical stimuli contrast 1: F1,21=11,69, p=,003, but not for everyday stimuli. The second contrast was significant for both types of stimulus everyday: F1,21=9,93, p=,005; technical: F1,21=54,66, p=,010. This demonstrates that, for the technical stimuli, both the order of causal presentation and the inclusion of the connective seem to be conditioning factors for comprehension.
Del primer grupo, los dos primeros contrastes resultaron estadísticamente significativos para los estímulos técnicos contraste 1: F1,21=7,07, p=,015; contraste 2: F1,21=11,69, p=,003, pero no para los cotidianos; mientras el tercer contraste fue significativo para los dos tipos de estímulos cotidianos: F1,21=9,93, p=,005; técnicos: F1,21=54,66, p=,010.