The petitioners stated that Griesa's ruling must be enforced, because Argentina has plenty of resources to pay both the amounts owed on the bonds that were the subject of the case, as well as the amounts owed on the restructured bonds.
Los litigantes alegaron que se la sentencia de Griesa debía quedar firme, puesto que Argentina dispone de amplios recursos para pagar ambos -los montos para pagar los bonos adeudados en litigio, así como los montos adeudados a los bonos reestructurados-.