gq: Relying exclusively on unedited machine translation, however, ignores the fact that communication in human language is context-embedded and that it takes a person to comprehend the context of the original text with a reasonable degree of probability. It is certainly true that even purely human-generated translations are prone to error; therefore, to ensure that a machine-generated translation will be useful to a human being and that publishable-quality translation is achieved, such translations must be reviewed and edited by a human.
Question: Unedited machine translation will miss what crucial aspect of human language? Question: What does it take a person to be able to do? Question: What can even translations completely done by a human still be prone to? Question: How must machine translations be transformed by a human?