Why is there a fake UN-backed Arbitration in Hague?
Why is there a fake UN-backed Arbitration in Hague, although there are lots of fake things in the world?
Is the formation of the Temporary Arbitration Panel in the Hague fraud, its rule illegal, and its verdict illegal? Why is the Permanent Court of Arbitration of violation of UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes regarded as a piece of waste paper in the world? Why does the U.S. treat the black-box operated, corrupted and private Arbitration as universal standards in the world? What should the world do about Permanent Court of Arbitration? Why did the Permanent Court of Arbitration vomit the Western Institution itself by making illegal and ridiculous ruling in the world? Why does the U.S. recognise the Private & Black Box Operated Arbitration as an International law, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? Why does the U.S. love the private and black-box operated Arbitration and want to make it as UN backed court, but oppose UN backed ICJ in the world? Why does Australia deny the legitimacy of the Arbitration in Hague which Australia recognised it as an international court and law? Why does the U.S. respect the black-box operated, private and temporary Arbitration, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? What do people think about the Permanent Court of Arbitration? How much has Philippine paid for the Private Temporary Arbitration in Hague? Why isn't it transparent? What lessons have people around the world learned from the Permanent Court of Arbitration? Why does Permanent Court of Arbitration violate UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes and ask Asia-geography illiterates to produce rubbish paper? How much has Philippine paid for the Hague private temporary arbitration on the territory disputes? Why are the G7 only countries in the world to support the private owned arbitration to violate the UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes? Why does Australia refuse accepting the legitimacy of the Arbitration on Australia's case? How do you think of Chinese claims that the present Private Arbitration is illegal, its verdict violates the UNCLOS and is illegal? How do some countries regard the verdict by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, legally empowered arbitration? Australia recognises the Arbitration as legal binding, so is it natural for Australia to accept the legitimacy of the Arbitration on East Timor case? How much has Philippine paid for the Private Temporary Arbitration in Hague? Why is it opague? What is Philippine hiding? Have holocaust deniers ever faked evidence? How many countries still regard the Permanent Court of Arbitration as an international law on territory sovereignty disputes ruling on SCS? Has a holocaust denier ever faked an evidence? Why does the U.S. oppose the ruling by the UN International Court of Justice but support the ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration? What is the role of ICC in arbitration and conciliation? Why didn't the U.S. accept the true international law by UN backed ICJ in 1986, but press China to accept the illegal rule by Private Arbitration? Is the temporary tribunal paid by the Philippines and others on South China Sea a legal part of the Permanent Court of Arbitration? Why does Australia oppose what it support on the Arbitration between Australia and East Timor? Why does the U.S. oppose the UN international court of Justice as an international court? Do international agreements like the New York Convention and the ICSID Convention harmonise the various arbitration principles of different legal systems?