Is a theory that cannot be empirically evaluated not considered a good theory?
Why a theory that cannot be evaluated empirically is not a good theory?
Why can a scientific theory only be disproven and not proven? Is a scientific theory an irrefutable fact? How do I design a theory? How can the evaluation process influence in a theory? What is the best theory in science? When does a theory become a new theory? Why do hypotheses have to be testable and falsifiable? When does a theory become the New Theory? Should predictive accuracy be the overriding consideration in judging the usefulness of a theory? Has a scientific theory been recently disproved? How would a Theist logically prove that the theory of evolution is wrong? What makes creationism a bad theory? What are the characteristics of a good theory in science? What if there's no unified field theory, would it mean there are things in nature that science wouldn't be able to conciliate? What are the criticisms of rationalism? Can a scientific law become a scientific theory? Other than string theory, what other physical theories are built upon that which has never been observed? Can a scientific theory become a scientific law? When does a theory become a law? Is the theory of evolution not falsifiable? Is the theory of evolution not falsifiable? Is the theory of evolution not actually falsifiable? When is rationality dangerous? Why is the cell theory a theory, not a law? Why should physicists try to interpret reality rather than staying content with what Mathematics offers ? Is the theory of evolution unfalsifiable? What is the most interesting theory in science? What are scientific theories/hypotheses that are not widely accepted but have some evidence? Why is the theory of relativity called a theory? Isn't evolution just a theory that remains unproven? Why do people say philosophy is useless and/or not practical? (My view in the description) Why do people say philosophy is useless and/or not practical?(My view in the description)