Who created the fake UN tribunal in Hague in the world?
How do people in the world think that the U.S. calls the ruling by the fake UN tribunal in Hague as an international law?
Is the formation of the Temporary Arbitration Panel in the Hague fraud, its rule illegal, and its verdict illegal? Why does the U.S. oppose the ruling by the UN International Court of Justice but support the ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration? How did the U.S. deal with the ruling by the UN International Court of Justice in 1986? What was the U.S' reaction to UN backed International Court of Justice ruling in 1986? Why does the U.S. recognise the Private & Black Box Operated Arbitration as an International law, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? Why does the U.S. respect the black-box operated, private and temporary Arbitration, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? Is international law a real law? Why does the U.S. love the private and black-box operated Arbitration and want to make it as UN backed court, but oppose UN backed ICJ in the world? Why did the Permanent Court of Arbitration vomit the Western Institution itself by making illegal and ridiculous ruling in the world? Why does Australia deny the legitimacy of the Arbitration in Hague which Australia recognised it as an international court and law? What do people think about the Permanent Court of Arbitration? Is international law really a law? Why China don't want to follow United nations tribunal court decision but advocate international laws when it comes to other country? Why is the Permanent Court of Arbitration of violation of UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes regarded as a piece of waste paper in the world? Why does the U.S. treat the black-box operated, corrupted and private Arbitration as universal standards in the world? How many countries still regard the Permanent Court of Arbitration as an international law on territory sovereignty disputes ruling on SCS? How do you think of Chinese claims that the present Private Arbitration is illegal, its verdict violates the UNCLOS and is illegal? What should the world do about Permanent Court of Arbitration? Does the U.S. Supreme Court actually have the right to declare a law unconstitutional? Is it possible to invoke the doctrine of abuse of rights without basing it on a treaty but basing it on other sources of international law? Shouldn't Australia accept the legitimacy of the Tribunal as Australia regards it as Australia's international law in the world? How do some countries regard the verdict by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, legally empowered arbitration? What is the International Court of Justice? Why didn't the U.S. accept the true international law by UN backed ICJ in 1986, but press China to accept the illegal rule by Private Arbitration? Does the Australia FM deny the legitimacy of the tribunal on Australia and East Timor? What are the sources of international law? Why can the UK and Sweden ignore the UN panel that declared Julian Assange to be in arbitrary detention? How can the U.S. convince the world that the U.S. is upholding the UNCLOS by refusing signing the UNCLOS? Does the U.S. Supreme Court have the ability to exercise judicial review of legislative acts and declare such acts unconstitutional? Does the international war crimes tribunal hold actual power?