Why does Australia deny the legitimacy of the Arbitration in Hague which Australia recognised it as an international court and law?
Why does Australia support illegal ruling by black-box operated Arbitration on SCS, but deny legitimacy of PCA ruling between Australia & East Timor?
Why does the U.S. recognise the Private & Black Box Operated Arbitration as an International law, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? Why does the U.S. respect the black-box operated, private and temporary Arbitration, but oppose the UN International Court of Justice? Why does the U.S. treat the black-box operated, corrupted and private Arbitration as universal standards in the world? Why does the U.S. love the private and black-box operated Arbitration and want to make it as UN backed court, but oppose UN backed ICJ in the world? Why are the G7 only countries in the world to support the private owned arbitration to violate the UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes? PCA has no relation with UN, the Temporary Arbitration is not part of PCA. Then What is the temporary Arbitration in Hague? Why didn't the U.S. accept the true international law by UN backed ICJ in 1986, but press China to accept the illegal rule by Private Arbitration? Why does the U.S. oppose the ruling by the UN International Court of Justice but support the ruling by the Permanent Court of Arbitration? Why did the Permanent Court of Arbitration vomit the Western Institution itself by making illegal and ridiculous ruling in the world? How do you think of Chinese claims that the present Private Arbitration is illegal, its verdict violates the UNCLOS and is illegal? Why is there a fake UN-backed Arbitration in Hague? Why does Permanent Court of Arbitration violate UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes and ask Asia-geography illiterates to produce rubbish paper? Shouldn't Philippine take the Permanent Court of Arbitration of violation of UNCLOS verdicts to Chinese courts to enforce the verdicts? Why does Philippine refuse opening the black-box of the amount Philippine paid to the Private Arbitration, but wish world to accept the black-box? Would it be illegal for a political party to contractually restrict a member's political decisions in Australian parliament? How do some countries regard the verdict by the Permanent Court of Arbitration, legally empowered arbitration? Why is the Permanent Court of Arbitration of violation of UNCLOS of no role in territory disputes regarded as a piece of waste paper in the world? Why is gay marriage still not recognized in Australia? How many countries still regard the Permanent Court of Arbitration as an international law on territory sovereignty disputes ruling on SCS? If China does not recognise the authority of the Permanent Court of Arbitration concerning South China Sea disputes, how will this ever be resolved? What should the world do about Permanent Court of Arbitration? CPA or ACCA, which is more valid in Australia? Why China don't want to follow United nations tribunal court decision but advocate international laws when it comes to other country? What's next after the Permanent Court of Arbitration is exposed to be a fake UN-backed Arbitration ? What will China lose when they do not accept the result of the Permanent Court of Arbitration on the South China Sea? Why does the U.S. oppose the UN international court of Justice as an international court? What is the role of ICC in arbitration and conciliation? Is the temporary tribunal paid by the Philippines and others on South China Sea a legal part of the Permanent Court of Arbitration? Is there any difference in creating a non-disclosure agreement for Western Australia? Or can I use the same agreement I would in the United States? Is the formation of the Temporary Arbitration Panel in the Hague fraud, its rule illegal, and its verdict illegal?