proposition: Proposition double_cat_are_conjoints_right {C : double_cat} {x y : C} {h : y -->h x} {v : x -->v y} (c : double_cat_are_conjoints h v) : transportf_square (idpath _) (id_v_left _) (transportf_square (id_v_right _) (idpath _) (unit_double_cat_are_conjoints c ⋆v counit_double_cat_are_conjoints c)) = id_h_square v.
proof: Proof. exact (pr222 c). Defined.
imports: UniMath.MoreFoundations.All UniMath.CategoryTheory.Core.Prelude UniMath.CategoryTheory.TwoSidedDisplayedCats.TwoSidedDispCat UniMath.Bicategories.Core.Bicat UniMath.Bicategories.DoubleCategories.Basics.DoubleCategoryBasics UniMath.Bicategories.DoubleCategories.Core.DoubleCats UniMath.Bicategories.DoubleCategories.DerivedLaws.TransportLaws UniMath.Bicategories.DoubleCategories.Underlying.HorizontalBicategory