Jenna Callista LITTLEGEORGE, Appellant, v. Adam HALL, Enrollment Officer, and Ho-Chunk Nation Office of Tribal Enrollment, and Sara Abbott and Cecilia A. Kraus, Howard L. Swallow and Ho-Chunk General Council, Willy Cleveland, Chair, and Ho-Chunk Nation Legislature as a Body in its Official Capacity and Legislators Doug Greengrass, Susan Weber, Jim Greendeer, John Hoist, Andrea Estebo, Hope Smith, Heather Cloud, Shelby Visitin, Greg Littlejohn, Robert TwoBears, Patrick Redeagle, Forrest Whiterabbit, in their official capacity (sic), Appellees
Littlegeorge v. Hall
12 Am. Tribal Law 99
Jenna Callista LITTLEGEORGE, Appellant, v. Adam HALL, Enrollment Officer, and Ho-Chunk Nation Office of Tribal Enrollment, and Sara Abbott and Cecilia A. Kraus, Howard L. Swallow and Ho-Chunk General Council, Willy Cleveland, Chair, and Ho-Chunk Nation Legislature as a Body in its Official Capacity and Legislators Doug Greengrass, Susan Weber, Jim Greendeer, John Hoist, Andrea Estebo, Hope Smith, Heather Cloud, Shelby Visitin, Greg Littlejohn, Robert TwoBears, Patrick Redeagle, Forrest Whiterabbit, in their official capacity (sic), Appellees.
Jenna Callista LITTLEGEORGE, Appellant, v. Adam HALL, Enrollment Officer, and Ho-Chunk Nation Office of Tribal Enrollment, and Sara Abbott and Cecilia A. Kraus, Howard L. Swallow and Ho-Chunk General Council, Willy Cleveland, Chair, and Ho-Chunk Nation Legislature as a Body in its Official Capacity and Legislators Doug Greengrass, Susan Weber, Jim Greendeer, John Hoist, Andrea Estebo, Hope Smith, Heather Cloud, Shelby Visitin, Greg Littlejohn, Robert TwoBears, Patrick Redeagle, Forrest Whiterabbit, in their official capacity (sic), Appellees.
No. SU12-03,
Trial Court No. CV11-82.
Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court.
June 14, 2012.
SCHEDULING ORDER
MARY JO B. HUNTER, Chief Justice.
This matter came before the Court on June 13, 2012 based upon the Notice of Appeal filed on May 29,2012 by the Appellant. Associate Justice Todd Matha, Asso- date Justice Dennis Funmaker and Chief Justice Mary Jo Hunter reviewed the matter. The Court hereby ORDERS:
1. That this matter is accepted for appeal.
2. That the Request for Waiver of Appellant Fee is denied as it was not a properly filed motion and did not contain supporting documentation.
3. That the briefs should be filed in accordance with the HCN Rules of Appellate Procedure, Rule 12.
4. That the decision to hold Oral Argument on this matter is reserved.
EGI HESKEKJET.