Home HealthTopics Health Centers Reference Library Research
Join us on Facebook Join us on Facebook Share on Facebook

Lung diseases

Suspicious infiltrates



My son is 17 years old and had his x-rays taken 3 days ago stating suspicious infiltrates, right upper lobe. The next day , his apico-lordotic view shows clear lungs. 3 years ago x-ray results is also clear lungs. I`m worried, I`m confused with the result. When he was born he had neo-natal pneumonia, is this related? What do I do next?


It is difficult to be certain what these interpretations mean without seeing the actual films. 

Keep in mind that in a way x-rays are "shadow pictures" (made by shining a special energy source through a person and seeing how much of it gets through to the other side.)  Sometimes the images that are seen aren't entirely clear.  When radiologists use the term "suspicious," I usually interpret that to mean that they are seeing something in the area that they aren't quite sure of - it might be a  pneumonia, or it might just be another structure (some normal blood vessels are airways, for instance) that simply are casting some funny shadows.  Sometimes to clarify these concerns, a second picture is taken from a different angle - hoping to get the normal structures "out of the way" so that what's underneath them is a little clearer.  A lordotic view is an example of this type of "different angle."

Since the radiologist didn't see the worrisome shadow on the lordotic view just 24 hours after the first x-ray, probably the first x-ray didn't actually show a pneumonia after all.  (Pneumonia's don't go away that quickly, even with medicine.)

Your son's "clear" x-rays in his teen years are reassuring.  The neonatal pneumonia is long gone, and hasn't left any lasting marks. 

For more information:

Go to the Lung diseases health topic, where you can:

Response by:

Elizabeth D Allen, MD Elizabeth D Allen, MD
Clinical Associate Professor of Pediatrics
College of Medicine
The Ohio State University