What Is Newtonian Mechanics?

Billiard balls do not move until struck because objects at rest tend to stay at rest.
The force exerted by an object is proportional to its mass, which is why cars receive the most damage in train-auto collisions.
A bullet would travel forever if it wasn't affected by gravity and air resistance.
The force a bat exerts on a baseball is equal and opposite to what the ball has exerted on the bat.
Article Details
  • Written By: John Kinsellagh
  • Edited By: Michelle Arevalo
  • Last Modified Date: 25 July 2014
  • Copyright Protected:
    Conjecture Corporation
  • Print this Article
Free Widgets for your Site/Blog


Newtonian mechanics is the study of the causal relationship, in the natural world, between force, mass, and motion. Natural philosopher and 17th century scientist Isaac Newton developed a set of universal principles, elegant in their simplicity, to help explain and predict the motion of objects in the natural world, and the degree to which these objects change their relative motion by interacting with external forces. Newton embodied the interrelationship between the physical concepts of force, mass, and acceleration into his three laws of motion. The ability of these mechanics to accurately describe natural phenomenon under observation is derived from the application of these distinct laws of motion.

The first law of motion holds that a body in motion tends to remain in motion, and a body at rest tends to stay at rest. This principle explains the concept of inertia, namely, the application of force that is required to move a stationary object. Similarly, the deceleration of a body, otherwise moving at a constant speed, can only occur when an outside force acts on it. For example, a bullet fired from a rifle would continue its motion in a certain direction perpetually, were it not for the simultaneous forces of gravity and the resistance of the air in the atmosphere. These forces act together on the bullet to cause it to stop at a certain distance from the spot where it was initially fired.


Newton’s second law of motion is a mathematical or quantitative formula that describes the inherent nature of force. Newton postulated that the amount of force exerted is directly proportional to the mass of a body, times its acceleration, or f=ma. If two distinct bodies are moving at a constant acceleration, the object with the larger mass will produce the greater force. This principle can be illustrated by the example of an automobile and a locomotive that are traveling towards each other at an equal rate of speed. When the two objects collide, the force exerted on the automobile will be vastly greater due to the much greater mass of the locomotive.

The third law of motion can be summarized with the statement for every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction. In other words, the forces of two bodies acting upon each other are always equal and directly opposite. For instance, the force that a baseball exerts on a bat is equal and opposite to the force that the bat exerts on the baseball.

Newtonian mechanics provides analytical tools that an observer can use to accurately predict changes in a body’s motion resulting from external forces acting upon it. These principles are equally applicable to the movement of large celestial objects or the motion of a simple tennis ball. By using vectors to depict the magnitude and direction of a body in motion, as well as the manner in which external forces impact that body, an observer can accurately predict the net resultant velocity and direction of a body — which is the sum of all the external forces acting on that body at any given point in time.


Discuss this Article

Post 1

I think, while teaching basic mechanics, we have to be concerned with testing students' learning and motivation - otherwise we will have to celebrate IYP-2005, again, for popularizing physics among students and society. That is why I became worried about contrasting answers given by engineering students on the questions on circular motion, as reported by John Warren, Brunel, UK, in 1971.

I contributed a Letter in Physics Education, UK, in March 1984 and also repeated that point while commenting on the article of Carl Wieman in the CHANGE, May-June 2008, p. 5,

We should also remember the statement of E.E. Witmer and A.V. Bushkovitch in American Physics Teacher, August 1937. According to them, in many branches of physics, a completely logical presentation is not possible because of the incompleteness of our present knowledge. In brief, the views of Witmer, Bushkovitch and Sciama are very similar.

This seems to be true in the light of Frank Wilczek's comment (Physics Today, October 2004) who had maximum difficulty in learning classical mechanics. That is why I am pointing (in my lectures also) that although Frank Wilczek remained in physics - in spite of those difficulties and won the Nobel Prize, there could be many more Franks who left physics due to the same difficulties.

So we, teachers, have to restudy physics so as to make it logically more perfect and avoid losses of bright students and the necessity of re-celebrating another Einstein Year. I am looking forward to your response.

Post your comments

Post Anonymously


forgot password?