Universal Basic Income would solve all our problems


Universal Basic Income or UBI is an attractive political and economic idea that’s gaining popularity.

Guaranteed basic income would provide means for people to meet their basic needs regardless of their employment status or socioeconomic standing.

What is Universal Basic Income (UBI)?

Universal Basic Income or UBI is a minimum amount of money paid to a person by a government with no obligations of how they spend it.

Unlike income from a job, UBI does not need to be earned. It is no-strings-attached cash for people to spend on whatever they might need.

Unsurprisingly, UBI benefits most those living at or below the poverty line. Families and individuals who struggle to meet their basic needs due to lack of money have the most to gain from a universal basic income.

How does Universal Basic Income work?

UBI would be distributed on a weekly, bi-weekly, or monthly basis to citizens via check or direct deposit in their bank accounts. Once they receive this money, they can spend it however they choose.

Some people worry that recipients of UBI wouldn’t spend it on the “right” things. However, virtually all data on the poor and middle class show they spend their money on basic needs.

Almost every additional dollar you give to low income individuals or families goes back into the economy through consumer spending. It’s only the rich that hoard wealth in investments and stop money from circulating.

Universal Basic Income Pros & Cons

As with all things, there are upsides and downsides to a guaranteed income. Here are some of the perceived pros and cons of UBI:

UBI Pros

  • Support unpaid care workers including stay at home mothers
  • Empower individuals to leave abusive relationships
  • Support entrepreneurs to set up their own business
  • Protects against loss of jobs due to technological advances
  • End poverty and homelessness
  • Eliminate the need for old age security benefits

UBI Cons

  • Expensive to implement
  • Billionaires will be eligible to receive it
  • People will not want to do certain jobs because they will be paid money for doing nothing

It’s clear the pros outweigh the cons. It’s also clear the pros are easier to predict, where the cons are hypotheticals that might not even turn out to be true if we did provide Universal Basic Income.

Why do we need UBI?

While it might strike you as merely a warm & fuzzy idea at first, Universal Basic Income is actually highly practical. In fact, UBI has been proven to reduce government expenditure later.

In other words, it’s cheaper to simply give people money than to deal with the fallout of poverty later.

UBI is an economic equalizer. Providing people with much needed income to care for their basic needs eliminates the stress and hardship of trying to care for those needs otherwise.

Economic equality reduces violent crime. One of the main cases for guaranteed income is it would result in a reduction in poverty, which would result in a reduction of all the bad outcomes associated with poverty, like violent crime.

Less violent crime would not only protect individuals from harm, but it would also reduce demands on law enforcement, courts, and rehabilitation services. If people aren’t fighting or using drugs to cope with the hardships of poverty, all the bandaid solutions we have to those issues would experience relief.

What it really comes down to, however, is if you believe food, shelter and clothing are basic human rights or not. If you do, and those things cost money, then giving people money in order to meet their needs is the only moral thing to do.

If you don’t believe human beings are entitled to basic human rights, well that’s a whole other issue entirely.

How much would Universal Basic Income be?

How much Universal Basic Income should be is debatable. US Democratic candidate Andrew Yang suggested a Universal Basic Income of $1,000 per month to every American. In Canada, the CERB payment during the COVID-19 pandemic was set at $2,000 per month, suggesting that was the baseline for supporting citizens.

In an ideal world, we would err on the side of a more generous guaranteed income that would allow recipients to maintain a decent standard of living. However, the nature of “basic” income is the absolute minimum, so in present-day dollars that would range from $1,500 to $2,500 per month.

How much would a Universal Basic Income cost?

It would cost approximately $3.9 trillion to implement a UBI of $1,000 per month in the USA. In Canada, a guaranteed income of $2,500 per month would cost $76 Billion per year to maintain.

How to fund Universal Basic Income

Many people believe we cannot afford to implement a Universal Basic Income. They’re wrong. We can’t afford not to have UBI.

Leaving people in poverty is actually proving to be way more expensive than simply giving them money. But that still leaves the dilemma of coming up with the billions we need to fund UBI now.

Except we’re already spending that money on multiple social programs. We just need to redirect it to the right place.

The money for UBI already exists

Implementing universal basic income could actually do away with a number of programs that already exist to support the poor.

You won’t need the same number of food banks if everyone has money to buy food. You won’t need as many homeless shelters if people have the means to pay rent. Successfully executing UBI could be as simple as taking all the money that’s currently going to supports for low- and no-income populations, and redirecting it to one place.

The other answer is increasing taxes. The easiest way to fund Universal Basic Income would be to increase taxes on wealthy and on corporations. The only way to do this is through government legislation, and the only way to do that is by voting for it.

If you believe in guaranteed income and want it to be part of our future, then elect political representatives who campaign for UBI and will fight to put it in place. Hopefully, it is something that happens in your lifetime.

You Might Also Like

About The Author

7 Comments. Leave new

  • Instead of shouting through the noise on Twitter I thought I’d leave a comment here. I really admire that you’re using your voice to advocate for UBI and many other things. Because of your position on UBI (and other political/economic positions) I think you’d enjoy the work of Stephanie Kelton. She’s one of the leading academics of Modern Monetary Theory, author of The Deficit Myth and also was Bernie Sander’s top economic advisor during his bid for the 2016 Dem. nomination.

    Long and short she’s brilliant and her book is nothing short of game changing in terms of understanding “how do we pay for” all the policies we should have to make life better for people. If you read the book I hope you enjoy it. Cheers.

  • Avatar
    Stephen Walker
    August 27, 2020 3:12 pm

    With UBI I think we should have something like the Food Stamps program in the USA. I have a friend in Wisconsin that is on Food Stamps and during Covid-19 She has been able to order from Amazon’s Pantry and have the food delivered. No need to risk going to the store for basic food.

    • Food stamps are restrictive — they can only spend it on certain things. People shouldn’t have restrictions on the money. We should assume most people know best what their needs are and how to meet them.

  • Avatar
    Gary Marcellus
    August 27, 2020 8:52 pm

    Thank you for your well-written article. The positive ramifications would do wonders for Canada to have a more “just society”! Kids coming to school not hungry would be so beneficial.

  • It’s so frustrating because it’s such an obviously good idea. You need money to make moves in life. If the majority of citizens within a system are unable to move about freely and make choices then it’s like an ant colony with immobilized ants or a computer that is really slow. So much brain potential is wasted when people are stuck, unable to afford risks or make choices.

    The longer we stay like this, the further behind we get. We need all brains within a system to function optimally and freely if we want to supercharge our progress into the future.

    Why is it taking so damn long for these old people in congress to realize this?


Leave a Reply


Fill out this field
Fill out this field
Please enter a valid email address.
You need to agree with the terms to proceed
