Server-side rendering SSR made easy with React

By Alex Lobera27 Jan 2019
Reading time: 15 mins

Server-side rendering (SSR) can significantly improve the user experience of you web app. React has built-in SSR support.

On this page:

Server-side rendering refers to the technique in which a web server returns dynamic HTML on the HTTP response. By dynamic I mean the HTML on the response varies depending on some variable on the request. Typically the variable is the URL.

The idea of a web server that returns dynamic HTML on the HTTP response is nothing new at all; web servers have done SSR since they were created in the last century. The difference between the last century and now is that before there was no alternative to SSR due to limited capabilities of web browsers at the time. In the old days, the server was the one doing most of the work. The use of JavaScript on the client was very limited.

Single-page apps

In the early 2000s a new approach started to become popular, the single-page app - also known as SPA.

The idea of a single-page app is that we try to do as much work as possible on the browser by taking full advantage of modern browser capabilities. In this approach, JavaScript becomes the main language used in building web applications.

If you use Create React App (CRA) to create React apps then you are creating SPAs.

SPA advantages

A single-page app has many advantages compared to the previous paradigm:

  • It improves the user experience by making user interactions much faster, avoiding network round-trips to the server.
  • It improves the user experience by enabling new and more sophisticated user interactions.
  • It can reduce costs and increase scalability. Think of a SPA connected directly to a Firebase DB.
  • No need to maintain two different code bases, front and back.

SPA problems

SPA brings some new issues. Have you ever seen the following screen:

Some of the problems we can experience with SPA's are:

  • What if the network is slow and it takes 5 seconds to download the initial JavaScript bundle? The user won't see anything until then.
  • Social metas. Some like the Facebook metas don't work on SPA.
  • SEO? This is not a problem anymore, as you can see in the following image Google can read SPA:

If you disable JS and navigate to the React Router site you'll see an empty blank page. Therefore Google can execute and read React SPAs.

Server-side rendering

With SSR most of our code runs both on the server and on the client. Obviously, we can't run 100% of the code on both server and client because there is code that only concerns to the server and code that only concerns to the client.

It doesn't make sense to run the following code on the server since there is no DOM:


And you can't run a server on the browser:

const server = express()
server.listen(8889, () => {
  console.log(`Running an Express server`)

Improving performance with SSR

One of the main advantages of rendering the page on the server is that we can improve the render time of the app, and hence the user experience.

1 -> HTML Request
2 <- HTML Response
3     -> JS Request
4     <- JS Response
5         - JS executed and UI rendered without data
6             -> API request
7             <- JSON response
8                 - UI rendered with data

The time it takes to # 1,2,3 and 4 to complete depends on the network and the server. It will be very fast in the case of a CDN, although in SSR only # 3 and 4 will benefit from a CDN.

The time it takes for # 5 to complete depends on the client device.

The time it takes for # 6 and 7 to complete depends on the network and the server (more unlikely than # 1 to 4 to be in a CDN)

The time it takes for # 8 to complete depends on the client device.

Long story short, looking at the previous sequence, in a SPA the user needs to complete # 5 to see the UI and to complete # 8 to see the UI populated with data. In SSR the user can see the UI populated with data at the end of # 2

🎉 New Remote GraphQL Training! 🎉

Implementing SSR in React

This is the easy part since React has built-in support for SSR (except Suspense, which is coming soon!). The only thing you need to do is to

import { renderToString } from "react-dom/server"
and invoke the renderToString function with the Root component of your app.

You can run the following code by clicking on the green "run" button to see how it works:

The previous example is quite cool, we are running the renderToString function from "react-dom/server" on your browser to render HTML dynamically in a node (server) environment via Runkit using React 🤔 🤯.

React libraries with SSR support

This is a list of libraries with great SSR support that you'll probably want to use in combination with react-dom/server:


In the previous section, we saw how easy it is to render React on the server. Modern real-world web apps are more complicated than the "Hello SSR" example we run, and we require extensive configuration to develop and build them.

Webpack is nowadays the industry standard to develop and bundle web applications. Webpack does a lot of good things to help us bundle web apps, although configuring Webpack can be a tedious and thankless task for many developers. Fortunately, there are many libraries and frameworks to help us with the set-up. Unfortunately, not all of them support SSR.

Let me give you an overview of how Webpack works to understand the different SSR alternatives.


To develop your application using Webpack you'll need at least:

  • Webpack, obviously:

    const webpack = require('webpack');
  • A Webpack compiler based on some Webpack configuration:

    const webpackConfig = require('./webpack.config.js');
    const compiler = webpack(webpackConfig)
  • A server to serve HTML, JS, and CSS dynamically at dev time:

    const serverConfig = require('./webpackDevServer.config.js');
    const WebpackDevServer = require('webpack-dev-server');
    const devServer = new WebpackDevServer(
        compiler, serverConfigs

The most popular tool to create React apps is Create React App (CRA). Unfortunately, CRA doesn't support SSR. Let's see how we could add SSR support to CRA.

First, we should understand how Webpack is set in CRA. There are 2 parts i) configuration and ii) scripts, that we need to understand:

When we run

yarn start
the script/start.js starts a Webpack dev server on our machine. After, when we navigate to localhost:300X Webpack dev server will return static HTML and a bundle.js that contains the JS of the app. In this post, I refer to port 300X as the port CRA found available to run the WebpackDevServer.

Webpack is watching the source code of the app, so everytime you edit and save any code the

compiles the app. When that happens, Webpack dev server sends a message to the browser via websocket to say 'there is a new version of the UI' so it can be updated. This way CRA enables a good dev experience.

Production build

Before deploying your application to production you need to run the

process. The build in CRA executes the script/build.js which uses the webpack.config.js, both part of react-scripts, to package the source code of your app into something optimal that can be distributed to the Web.

Once you run the build script, locally or ideally in a CI (Continous Integration), you can deploy your web app.

Deploying a CRA is straightforward because the app is made up of static assets like HTML, JS, and CSS. We don't need a server to run the app in production because the app we send to all the browsers is the same for all of them. You can serve your static app from a CDN.


If you, like most people, use Create React App to create a React app and now you want to add SSR support to it, you'll have to make some significant changes. I see two paths to make those changes. One is to eject your app (which is a one-way, not recommended operation), and replace WebpackDevServer by a production-ready server that can handle dev and production. The other path I see is not to eject your app and instead to add another "box" to the picture that you can easily remove at any point.

I think good software is such that it's designed in a way so we can make decisions in the now and easily change our minds in the future. In other words, good software is composable software.

The server

Let's see how to compose CRA with SSR, and what I mean by adding another "box" to the picture:

First, we add another server, an Express server running on port 8888 in this case. This new server will be responsible for generating the HTML dynamically instead of always returning the same index.html.

When we navigate to localhost:8888 the new server will invoke renderToString with the root component of the React app and send that string in the HTTP response. The server should only do that if the request is not trying to access CSS or JS assets from the React app.

If the request is trying to access CSS or JS assets from the React app then the server will proxy the request to the WebpackDevServer that is running on port 300X.

What we are doing with this approach is to let the new server take care of what it's concerned about (HTML), and let CRA continue taking care of the rest. Implementing this is quite straightforward with Express by adding the following middleware:

const port = process.env.REACT_APP_WEBPACK_DEV_SERVER_PORT
  ["/static", "/sockjs-node"],
      target: `http://localhost:${port}`,
      ws: true

A few notes on that snippet:

  • The env variable
    is not part of CRA. We'll need to modify the scripts/start.js to add that variable.
  • CRA places all the static resources under localhost:300X/static so it's easy to proxy them.
  • The proxy we use is http-proxy-middleware. We only
    the proxy in dev environment.
  • Webpack HMR uses websockets to notify the browser that the app has changed. The path it uses is localhost:300X/sockjs-node.

In this approach, you will add this proxy in every CRA that you want to add SSR. Therefore you can extract it into an Express middleware that you can reuse across different apps.


CRA has an index.html template which is used to:

  • Inject some data like the title of the page at build time.
  • Inject the HTML of the React app in
    <div id="root"></div>
    at runtime.

Our server also needs an HTML template to inject the HTML from

renderToString(<App />);
. To continue composing CRA with SSR capabilities we are going to use the same template.

In this post, I'm not going to discuss the implementation details of how to use the same template. As you might see, that implementation is going to be the same in every app, so we can abstract it into some functions that we can reuse. Which I already did, feel free to use.

App specific server code

There is some concrete code that belongs to each app, and so it can't be abstracted into a generic middleware.

The following app only requires React:

const html = renderToString(<App />);

While the next app uses GraphQL, React-Router, and StyledComponents. All these libraries have SSR support and require some small set-up on the server.

const sheet = new ServerStyleSheet();
const graphqlClient = new ApolloClient({
  link: createHttpLink({
    uri: `${API_BASE_URL}/api/graphql`,
  cache: new InMemoryCache()

let html;
const App = (
  <StyleSheetManager sheet={sheet.instance}>
    <Router context={{}} location={req.url}>
      <Root graphqlClient={graphqlClient} />
await getDataFromTree(App);
html = renderToString(App);


The final two-way step towards adding SSR capabilities to CRA takes us to the start and build script:


The build script that bundles the app on the client in production is the same since we have not changed they way CRA operates.


We need to create a new build script to transform our code like JSX into some JS that can run on the server. To keep composing, the new build will be composed with the react-scripts build && react-scripts-ssr server-build. I already implemented a server-build script if you want to use it.


We need to change the way CRA start scripts works since now it also needs to start the server that renders HTML. Yes, it's implemented in the same package.

Libraries vs. frameworks

Now the often debated question, should I use a framework, or should I use a library?

Both frameworks and libraries are abstractions of some concrete solution. The difference is libraries are more specialized. Libraries do less things. A framwork is an abstraction of abstractions, in other words a framework is a super set of libraries.

What does all that mean? A framework will solve a lot of problems without you knowing much about the more concrete pieces invovled in the solution. For instance you can use Next.js for server-side rendering in React, and by doing so you'll get code spliting and pre-fetching for free.

What is the cost of using a framework? The most obvious is that it might cover use cases that you don't need. The true cost in my view is the cost of learning and the cost of change.

The cost of learning

There is a cost associated to gaining domain knowledge that belongs to a particular level of abstraction (framework), and that might not be useful in more concrete implementations (libraries).

For instance, if the framework uses a specific implementation of a router that is tightly coupled to the solutions and use cases the framework wants to address, you might learn how to make that abstraction of a router work, but you won't know how the actual rotuer works. Example, following some naming convetion or folder structure you could generate the routes of the application without understanding how the router works.

I'm not suggesting that we should not use abstractions. Abstractions are very important. They help us do robust things faster by removing the cognitive overhead of understanding all the pieces involved. You should also consider that if you are very abstract, you might move fast now, but slower in the future. It's difficult to optimize or improve concrete parts if you don't understand them.

The cost of change

Another thing we should consider when deciding how many levels of abstraction we are comfortable with is what the cost of change will be. Will it be easy to change some concrete implementation of the framework for something else in the future? Frameworks help us do robust things faster. Robust in the future could potentially become rigid, meaning not flexible.

When React Router v4 was released it brought some innovation in the routing space, but you couldn't use it in Next.js. Then someone created After.js. After.js is self described as "Next.js-like framework for server-rendered React apps built with React Router 4"

The question that remains to me is, if I use After.js, can I change in the future React Router 4 for another router if I need to? Or will I need to create another framework? Maybe the final.js?

Libraries over frameworks

I prefer to stay at the level of abstraction of the library. It gives me the opportunity to understand more concrete cases that I can use effectively and optimize. Also being at the level of abstraction of the library makes it easier to adapt to change, which I think is very important in the hectic tech industry.

There are more libraries than frameworks, and libraries don't always have consistent documentation. I think being at the level of abstraction of the library requires more dedication, and maybe not everyone has the motivation for it. Therefore, it might be a personal decision.

Another important factor to consider is your & your team's experience and knowledge. Maybe it doesn't work for you to use the right libraries for the right problem if your team doesn't have enough time to master the libraries. I'm biased, but in such cases, I'd help empower the team with a high-quality intensive training such us ours :)


  • Server-side rendering can improve performance and user experience of your web apps.
  • React has built-in support for server-side rendering.
  • Create React App doesn't support SSR but you can easily compose CRA with SSR functionality using react-scripts-ssr, which you can easily opt-out at any point.
  • You need to know in which level of abstraction you should be based on the problems you are solving and the knowledge you have now, and the knowleadge you plan to have in the future.
  • You can use frameworks like Next.js or After.js to create SSR React apps, but you should consider the cost of learning and the cost of change.

Share this on:

Comments? Shoot me a tweet @reactgqlacademy !

Help us help you learn :)

What are your main interests in a training?

Upcoming Training

Oct3 hours

GraphQL Evening with Round Table 💥 Online
London, UK
Prices & more details