Transition graph for the automaton, Theory of Computation

Lemma 1 A string w ∈ Σ* is accepted by an LTk automaton iff w is the concatenation of the symbols labeling the edges of a path through the LTk transition graph of A from h?, ∅i to an accepting node.

This is quick to verify. The path corresponding to any string w leads to a node labeled with hv, Si iff S = Fk(?  w) and that will be a node that is circled iff augmented strings with that set of k-factors (plus v?) satisfy φA. There are a few important things to note about LTk transition graphs. First of all, every LTk automata over a given alphabet shares exactly the same node set and edge set. The only distinction between them is which nodes are accepting nodes and which are not. Secondly, they are invariably inconveniently large. Every LT2 automaton over a two symbol alphabet- pretty much the minimum interesting automaton-will have a transition graph the size of the graph of Figure 1. Fortunately, other than the graph of the example we will not have any need to draw these out. We can reason about the paths through them without ever actually looking at the entire graph.

Posted Date: 3/21/2013 3:24:09 AM | Location : United States

Related Discussions:- Transition graph for the automaton, Assignment Help, Ask Question on Transition graph for the automaton, Get Answer, Expert's Help, Transition graph for the automaton Discussions

Write discussion on Transition graph for the automaton
Your posts are moderated
Related Questions

We got the class LT by taking the class SL and closing it under Boolean operations. We have observed that LT ⊆ Recog, so certainly any Boolean combination of LT languages will also

We represented SLk automata as Myhill graphs, directed graphs in which the nodes were labeled with (k-1)-factors of alphabet symbols (along with a node labeled ‘?' and one labeled

Our DFAs are required to have exactly one edge incident from each state for each input symbol so there is a unique next state for every current state and input symbol. Thus, the ne

what are composition and its function of gastric juice

While the SL 2 languages include some surprisingly complex languages, the strictly 2-local automata are, nevertheless, quite limited. In a strong sense, they are almost memoryless

Application of the general suffix substitution closure theorem is slightly more complicated than application of the specific k-local versions. In the specific versions, all we had