Semitic West Eurasian Ancestry in Africa

February 6, 2014

This new study confirms everything that Afrocentrists deny about Caucasoid admixture in East (and South) Africa.

Back-to-Africa Gene Flow in Eastern Africa

A major open question concerns the initial source of the west Eurasian ancestry in eastern Africa. The estimated mean time of gene flow in eastern Africa is around 3,000 y ago, and the amount of gene flow must have been quite extensive, because the west Eurasian ancestry proportions reach 40-50% in some Ethiopian populations (Table 1 and ref. 10). Archaeological records from this region are sparse, so Pagani et al. (10) speculate that this admixture is related to the Biblical account of the Kingdom of Sheba. However, archaeological evidence is not completely absent. During this time period, architecture in the Ethiopian culture of D'mt has an "unmistakable South Arabian appearance in many details" (19), although there is some debate as to whether these patterns can be attributed to large movements of people versus elite-driven cultural practices (19, 20). Additionally, linguistic evidence suggests that this time period was when Ethiosemitic languages were introduced to Africa, presumably from southern Arabia (21). It is perhaps not a coincidence that the highest levels of west Eurasian ancestry in eastern Africa are found in the Amhara and Tygray, who speak Ethiosemitic languages and live in what was previously the territory of D'mt and the later kingdom of Aksum.

West Eurasian Ancestry in Southern Africa

A second question is, which population or populations introduced west Eurasian ancestry into southern Africa? The best genetic proxy for this ancestry that we have found is the west Eurasian ancestry in eastern Africa (Fig. 1C), and although we do not identify modern east African populations as the best source population, this is likely due to the lack of genetic drift specific to eastern Africa (SI Appendix, section 1.2.3). The most parsimonious explanation for this observation is that west Eurasian ancestry entered southern Africa indirectly via eastern Africa (the alternative scenario of direct contact with an unsampled west Eurasian population cannot formally be excluded; however, there is no archaeological, historical, or linguistic evidence of such contact). The relevant eastern African population may no longer exist. However, such a migration has been suggested based on shared Y chromosome haplotypes (12, 22) and shared alleles/haplotypes associated with lactase persistence (2, 23) between the two regions. Furthermore, based on a synthesis of archaeological, genetic, climatological, and linguistic data Güldemann (13) hypothesized that the ancestor of the Khoe-Kwadi languages in southern Africa was brought to the region by immigrating pastoralists from eastern Africa. Our observation of elevated west Eurasian ancestry in Khoe-Kwadi groups in general (Table 1) is consistent with this hypothesis.



Based on these analyses, we can propose a model for the spread of west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa as follows. First, a large-scale movement of people from west Eurasia into Ethiopia around 3,000 y ago (perhaps from southern Arabia and associated with the D'mt kingdom and the arrival of Ethiosemitic languages) resulted in the dispersal of west Eurasian ancestry throughout eastern Africa. This was then followed by a migration of an admixed population (perhaps pastoralists related to speakers of Khoe-Kwadi languages) from eastern Africa to southern Africa, with admixture occurring ~1,500 y ago. Advances in genotyping DNA from archaeological samples may allow aspects of this model to be directly tested.

Pickrell et al. "Ancient west Eurasian ancestry in southern and eastern Africa". PNAS, 2014.


Markos said...

Interesting! The so called 'myth' of our forefathers teaching of the tale of Sheba-Solomon is becoming real.

The social theory of race classification is always dominant and hence it is better that we accept our n!gro origin, what ever science says.

Markos said...


Mary said...

Politics used to direct "Science", such as the Afro-centrists do, gives me gas and a sour stomach! Good article!

Ivan Contreras said...

Does this mean that the Proto-Semitic homeland was in the Arabian peninsula?

Unknown said...

Choice of word and meaning are often the central point of confusion and clarity! Regarding the Proto-Semetic homeland of the Arabian Peninsula, the historical record will show that the tribes of the Peninsula were home to both "Arab" and "Jewish" "tribes. At some point in time, socio-religious themes began to differentiate the community and hence the break off and settlement of each. Using the tempalte of :modern" "islamic behavioural tendencies", the Jewish tribes (in the main) were kicked out of their homeland by the more numerous "Muslim" inhabitants. Whether they were Muslim or not, it is safe to say that the larger community, through violence and rape, exiled the minority to their present settlement, which is the former Palestine, now know as Israel. DNA studies will show host DNA to be reflective and shared by their corresponding communitites. We see how the Lemba community in Africa Proper, "being exiled" (extent of that diaspora is unknown) while showing both the DNA of their original origin with phenotype of their surrounding communities. The Afrocentrist is no different from the Eurocentrist but one makes up stuff pretending it is reality and can get away with it if it is said long enough. If we use the false ideology as present, we can say that Hitler was at least part Negro using the E1b..x.... dynamic. Again. it is their template, isn't it