Sunday, March 23, 2008

Journal # 8:Google Earth

Learning from Classroom 2.0
Journal # 8: Google Earth
Google Earth is a virtual mapping program that maps the earth using three different tools: satellite imagery, aerial photography and GIS 3D globe. The program, which is free to download at, allows people to search for addresses, buildings and landmarks. It also allows people to see 3-D terrain and buildings and to see things in space. I downloaded the software and it is really awesome! Basically the program allows you to travel around the world, or in outer space seeing things how they really look in 3D.
The Classroom 2.0 thread that I read about discussed some of the things that you could do with the Google Earth software. The original post was from a teacher who was currently using the software in his math class to map distances and had done a few other projects with weather and geological features. The rest of the threads went on to dialogue different ways that the software could be used for a variety of subjects. Apparently, the website allows students and teachers to take virtual trips based on the locations presented in the student’s literature assignments, using Google Earth. The program also allows classrooms to make their own ‘literature trips’ and post them on the site.
The Classroom 2.0 website is a great resource for teachers to use to collaborate and learn about new things. Google Earth seems like an ideal program to learn about and incorporate into any science class. I was interested in the ideas that the teachers had about cross-curriculum projects using the software. More than anything though, this assignment reminded me just how many resources are out there for teachers to create dynamic lessons.

(Photo of my mom's house in Austin, TX)

Thursday, March 20, 2008

Journal # 7

Briggs, Linda. Technological Immersion Turns Around Texas Middle School. T.H.E. Journal, 3/20/

This article discusses the changes that happened at a middle school in Texas once both the students and the teachers were given access to technology. The school, Marvin Baker Middle School in Corpus Christi, Tx, is a Title I school where over 80 percent of the students qualify for free lunch. The school also houses the Athena Program for gifted and talented students, of which about one third of the students participate in. Three years ago the school received a grant that allowed them to secure laptop computers for every teacher and student. The grant then also allowed for staff development and workshops to enable the teachers to learn the technology and then to transfer that knowledge to the students.
The school credits staff development as the starting point for the changes seen in the school itself. So far the new technology has helped create an environment that allowed for the school to improve it’s testing scores as well as a resultant drop in school violence and disciplinary problems. The grants that allowed for the teacher training and the new laptops came from the Texas Technology Immersion Project which is a public and private partnership between the Texas Education Agency and several vendors including Apple and Dell among others. This article did bring up two questions for me that it did not address.

1. What are requirements for getting into the program, why was this school in particular picked for the grant. I actually dont have an answer for this or the following question. I wonder how invested the companies are when they donate computers and money for this project.

2. What happens when a student or teacher loses, breaks or has their computer stolen, is there any change to recover the property?Again, I dont have an answer for this question either. I would hope that there is some concession made to the students if they cannot replace the computer themselves (which seems very possible in a Title I school) but that there should also be some accountability on the part of the students who are receiving such a wonderful gift.

Monday, March 17, 2008

Journal # 6

My Experiences with Kidspiration
I had a hard time working with this software. I downloaded the InspireData and Kidspiration software. I thought that the quick tours of both programs were super and I was really excited to get started working on the programs once I downloaded the trial. I am not sure if it was just my inability to follow the tutorials, or if I just didn't spend enough time on the programs, but I found them both to be much less user friendly that I expected. Maybe that is what you get by going into things with expectations!! I thought that the InspireData program was particularly difficult to navigate, I spent some serious time trying to make graphs out of some of the databases they had already collected and found it difficult to get what I wanted. The tutorials on Atomic Learning were either to detailed (only giving you information about one small aspect) or didn't bother to go over the things I was trying to do. Eventually, after making some pretty unsatisfactory graphs, I moved on to Kidspiration, figuring that the software designed for younger children would be more appropriate for me. I thought that their activity sections were very good. I actually saw some students using the math programs in a second grade classroom the other day! I thought that the creative software was a little bit harder to use. It would have been nicer to make different kind of pictures besides just arrow graphs, and there weren't a ton of icons in the database. However, I did feel like I was more able to accomplish something with this program, and was actually proud of my picture!
I am going to keep working with the InspireData program while I still have the program on my computer, as I do think it is probably a lot more user friendly than I thought, I am chalking my inability to use it on my own technological shortcomings, not those of the program!

Monday, March 10, 2008

Journal #5

“Making Field Trips Podtastic” by Aliece Weller, John Bickar, and Paul McGuinness. Learning and Leading, March/April 2008.

This article documents a new trend in fieldtrips that uses new technological experiences to enhance the learning of children on fieldtrips. It begins by following Jay as he visits the Boston Museum of Science using a mix of podcasts, student multimedia creation, Web research and interviewing to enhance his learning experience. The article goes on to mention how these tools can help students enhance their understanding of students by making the fieldtrips more hands on. They also allow the students work together and to take the fieldtrip home with them by taking digital photos and keeping a web journal that they will have access to once they leave the museum.
Although this technology is not accessible in any other museum yet, the authors predict that this technology could be easily incorporated into other museum programs, after-school and neighborhood programs and even just for student’s personal use.


1. Does this technological experience of a museum take away from the human-ness of the experience?
– It seems that part of the interesting parts of going to a museum or another educational venue is having first hand stories told by a person. Although these could be relayed electronically, it seems possible that we may lose some of the human connection when we allow students to do most of their learning digitally.
2. What provisions will the museums or educators make for students who have less access to this technology at home and may struggle with it’s newness in a museum setting?
– It is always important to remember that students do not have the same resources at home as each other. Provisions should be made to make sure that the students are on the same level when they present the information, or at least make allowances for those who are less technologically inclined.

Tuesday, March 4, 2008

Journal #4

"Mind The Gap" by Cindy Long

As technology becomes an increasing component of education, attention needs to be paid to the differences in technological resources in varying neighborhoods. As computers become the place where learning occurs in the classroom, it is important to remember that not all students have equal access to them. These are the premises for Long’s article “Mind the Gap”, where she discusses some of the differences in student’s availability of technological resources and how that affects their education. The article profiles a number of students as they are introduced to technology or are able to increase their use of tech resources and how that affects their learning ability. According to the article there are still 30 million households that do not have computers and this number correlates to lower-income families. The article also discusses the major jumps in college bound students when technological resources are introduced into their education. In one of the profiles, district superintendent Dennis Bruno noted: “ When I first got here seven years ago, only 14% of them (students) were going to college after high school. Now 78% of graduating seniors go on to colleges and universities. The only difference is technology”. The article also discusses the prevalence of non-profit organizations that focus on adding technological resources to communities who cannot afford themselves as a way to even the gap between wealthy and poor students.
1. Why does technology account for such a large jump in college bound students?
-An increase from 14 to 78% is quite a change in college attendance for a school district. Although I have no concrete evidence to support this, it is my belief that the access to technology allows students to feel more prepared for college than they might otherwise feel. They may also do better in high school by using all of the resources that technology provides (internet, study groups, etc), which in turn may inspire students who weren’t performing as well before to suddenly find an interest in school including higher education.
2. How do you convince the government that access to technology should be a priority and afford some funding in the school districts?
-Get rid of the conservative regimes in power! Ok, and also continue to follow students who are given new access to technology as they continue their education. There needs to be more evidence that there does actually exist a technological gap between students and that it affects them throughout their lives.