Skip navigation

Taliban leader Mullah Mohammed Omar [1] seems to be happy giving a glimpse of the history lessons he picked up while at the Madrassa in Quetta, Pakistan, and other places of Islamic learning and scholarship throughout his illustrious career. His impressive academic credentials notwithstanding, his comments do provide an interesting insight into the bigger picture of the taquia (lies, deception) concept in Islam.

Excerpts from the Pakistani newspaper, Daily Times [2] follow.

Taliban leader Mullah Omar on Saturday told the US and NATO to study Afghanistan’s long history of war, in a reminder that foreign forces had achieved limited military success in the country.

He said the US and NATO should study the history of Alexander the Great, whose forces were defeated by Pashtun tribesmen in the 4th century.

Unfortunately for Dr. Omar, with the possible exception of the profound work done by the renounced and illustrious historians at the various Madrassas he might have graced, there is no record of any "Pashtun tribesmen" confronting the Greeks under Alexander, when they reached the Indian subcontinent. His claim is typical of the distortion of history Muslims are apt at, in order to give Islam a favorable profile. Which is, not surprisingly, consonant with the taquia (lies, deception) concept in Islam. Before Islam was spread by the sword in the Indian subcontinent, present day India, Pakistan, Afghanistan, Bangladesh, SE Asia, Eastern Iran, some parts of Central Asia, Burma were primarily Hindu, with some Buddhist, Jain and Zoroastrian population. During Alexander’s time, these regions were more or less completely Hindu, since that was before the advent of Buddhism.

When Alexander reached the Indian subcontinent, he faced ferocious resistance from the assorted republics of North West India. Bloody battles fought with the Kambojas and at Aunous, culminated in the Battle of Hydaspes (May 326 B.C.) against the Indian Hindu King Pururava (known to the Greeks as Porus), in which nearly 5000 Macedonians were killed. Alexander himself was wounded in the battle and his favorite mount Bucephalus and key soldiers slaughtered in the fighting.

The Indian king wounded, but still on his feet was restored to his throne by Alexander, impressed by the courage, determination and valor of the Indians, and by the nobility of Pururava, who refused to submit even after defeat. But the resistance of the Indians and what they told him led to a drastic change of action for the all conquering Macedonians.

The kingdom of Pururava was in fact a relatively minor power, one in the tapestry of small Hindu kingdoms and republics in North West India. Far larger and more organized states like that of Magadha lay to the east, awaiting the onset of the Greeks. It has been recorded that Hindu monks and Sadhus (saints) traversed the face of the nation to rouse the people against the invaders. The saint philosopher Chanakya was believed to be a guiding force behind the resistance. Some holy men brought before Alexander even boldly proclaimed that he would never be able to defeat the land of India and it would prove his doom. A young prince called Chandragupta was brought before the Emperor, who ordered his death. Chandragupta nevertheless managed to escape and organize the armies of Magadha against the invaders.

It has been recorded by traditional Greek historians that the army of Alexander tired and worn out by their long marches clamored that they return to their homes and hence Alexander turned back from his march into India. However a more critical analysis, now widely accepted, attest to the fear of the Greeks to march further into India. The Greeks had almost been defeated by the small armies of the Indian North West and their chances against the much larger and organized armies of interior India would have been extremely doubtful.

The difficult victory over only 22,000 Indians in the Battle of Hydaspes took the edge off the courage of the Macedonians.  They had no enthusiasm for Alexander’s proposed crossing of the Ganga (Ganges), a river said to be four miles wide and six hundred feet deep, to encounter an army on the other side consisting of 200,000 infantry, 80,000 cavalry, 8,000 chariots, and 6,000 war elephants.  Alexander was so angry at their reluctance that he shut himself up in his tent, saying that if they would not cross the Ganga, he owed them no thanks for anything they had done so far.  But finally the persuasions of his friends, and the pleas of his soldiers, got Alexander to agree to turn back. One can only imagine the mind of the young emperor, who believed himself to the son of the Gods and the victor over the once mighty Persian empire being forced to turn back in humiliation and defeat from his goal and to die a broken and sick man just shortly afterwards baffled by the determination of the Hindus of India.

Alexander was a great conqueror and an unforgettable figure in history who still evokes debate and emotion. While during his military campaigns, he did slaughter a lot of people (including civilians) and razed to the ground a lot of cities, in general, he was a very courageous person who was honorable and more-or-less gracious both in victory and defeat, as is evident by his friendship with Pururava, post war. Nevertheless, the credit for stopping his all conquering armies lay in the field and plains of India and provided only a prologue to the rise of the mighty Mauryan empire and the projection of Hindu and Indic values to the world.

Mullah Omar’s ancestors were most likely Hindu or Buddhists forced to convert by the barbarian Islamic invaders, who unlike Alexander were utterly dishonorable, disgusting and despicable to the bone, and who unfortunately came at a time when the pan-Indian Hindu empires were at a wane, and most smaller kingdoms were too busy fighting among themselves. His claim of Alexander being defeated by "Pashtun tribesmen" only blows the trumpet of his own stupidity and ignorance. Hardly a surprise, considering his awe inspiring academic credentials and the many degrees he has earned in the numerous madrassas in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Sadly, what is today Afghanistan and Pakistan, during Alexander’s time were Hindu lands where great Hindu kings like Pururava fought their enemies with honor. And such was their honor that even their enemies after being victorious extended a hand of friendship and camaraderie.




[3] (This Wikipedia sections contains references to peer reviewed and trustworthy material, on which primarily this post in based)




I recall the tourism ads from Malaysia, “Malaysia, Truly Asia”. The beauty of the land in the ads was truly breathtaking. But does land, mountains, or rivers make a nation? Or is a nation made by its people? A nation without people to work for its progress is like a kiln without fire. But even if it had people, does that still guarantee progress? What if the people were stuck with a mindset, with an ideology which is neither progressive nor from Asia?

What raised these questions was a news report in Times of India, on a woman being sentenced, by a sharia (Islamic law) court, to be canned for drinking beer [1].

Following are some excerpts.

A judge in Malaysia has upheld a court verdict to cane a Muslim woman for drinking beer, news reports said on Monday, re-igniting a controversy over Islamic justice in this moderate Muslim-majority country.

The Star newspaper’s website and national news agency Bernama said the chief Shariah judge of Pahang state ruled that a Shariah High Court’s verdict against Kartika Sari Dewi Shukarno, 32, was correct and should stay.


“I found that the High Court Judge had acted accordingly within his jurisdiction as provided” by relevant laws of Pahang state, Pahang Shariah Chief Judge Abdul Hamid Abdul Rahman told The Star.

“As such, the decision stays,” he was quoted as saying. He said it was now up to the Pahang Islamic Religious Department to implement the punishment.

Malaysia along with the rest of SE Asia was once Hindu-Buddhist. In fact as the name of the lady-to-be-canned reveals, (notice the “Dewi”) her ancestors were probably once Hindu or Buddhists, forced to convert under duress.

This “verdict” by the sharia court is quite consonant with Islamic jurisprudence. Even in this 21st century, Islamic countries follow such despicable laws justifying them as divine decrees. Unfortunately, forceful conversion of native populace by foreign conquerors, aided by economic (Jizya) and military (Jihad) persecution, has resulted in export of such medieval, theocratic laws from the 7th century Arabian desert. Until such an abhorrent, despicable ideology is consigned to the ashes of time, Malaysia can never be truly Asia.



Yes, that right, “Kids go to serve sex in Dubai”. That wasn’t a typo. That was the headline [1] in a metropolitan newspaper in India, Mid Day.

Following are experts.

Hundreds of minors flown out to Gulf to dance in bars, provide sex, as Ramzan month of abstinence ends

For three days now, 2,000 girls, almost all minors, have left for the Middle East, particularly Dubai, to feed the needs of a population starved of entertainment and sex post the rigours of Ramzan.

The girls have been told they are being taken to dance in bars, but it is implicit that they will double up as prostitutes for well-paying clients. Another 1,000 will leave by tomorrow.

Sources say there has been an approximate 20 per cent rise in the trafficking of minors over the last year.

Ashraf Khan, an agent, said he had been scouting for girls for the past five months. "I make around Rs 40,000 per girl if the deal goes through.

The recruitment process begins about three months before the migration to Gulf begins post Ramzan," said Khan.

In the Gulf, dance bars are shut during Ramzan and the licenses are revoked. All the girls working there are sent home. The exodus to the Gulf therefore begins post Ramzan.

Note the word “minors” above, which I have highlighted. While prostitution as a human occupation is probably as old as agriculture, if not more, why would someone want to have sexual relations with minors. Unless of course they were mentally ill. Of, if they were emulating someone who they believed lived his live as per divine injunctions. If you aren’t sure who I am talking about, its none other than Muhammad, the prophet of Islam. Muhammad’s sexual debauchery has been well documented by his contemporaries. His sexual depravity and perverted fantasies for not only 6 year olds but even toddlers is sickening to the bone [2]. And this guy is considered by Muslims as the perfect human being ever and someone worthy of emulation. No wonder after reflecting and praying to their Allah for a month they [3] feel the chronic need to follow his beloved prophet’s example.




[3] This serves as a disclaimer that vast majority of Muslims are normal people with normal sexual preferences, who either have no clue about the truth under reference no. 2 above, or conveniently turn a blind eye to it.

The US administration recently approved aid of $7.5 billion to Pakistan over the course of the next 5 years [1] [2].

I recall Obama mentioning during his campaign that Pakistan has been using US aid to shore up its military against India. Which he explicitly said is not what US civilian aid is meant for. And now, after becoming president he has gone against his own observation. That too after ex-dictator of Pakistan, General Musharraf himself has gone on record admitting that Pakistan did use US civilian aid for military purposes along its eastern border. This whole Pakistani philosophy is consonant with the taqqia concept in Islam, which condones legerdemain and deception as a means to obfuscate, when not in a position of power. Just for the purpose of buying time to reach a position of power, when of course the ultimatum would be to accept Islamic overlordship and live as dimmis (2nd class citizens) [3], convert to Islam, or be terminated. What is unfortunate is that the ancestors of these Pakistanis at some point were Hindus or Buddhists, forced to convert due to Jihad and Jizya.

And if giving aid to Pakistan wasn’t enough, the Obama administration also announced $400,000 to “charities” run by Muammer Gaddafi, the Islamic dictator of Libya [4]. In this context, it might be worthwhile to mention that Gaddafi recently led a hero’s welcome and embraced with open arms Abdel Baset Megrahi, the terrorist who bombed Pan Am Flight 103 killing 270 civilians [5] [6].

But wait! We are not done yet. Included below is an excerpt from a blog [7] which outlines where US taxpayer dollars might be going, courtesy the Obama administration. I have included a reference in the excerpt, which points to the original U.S. government press summary.


Read the summary [8] from David Obey’s office that was quietly released last week with nary a word from any media.

  • Lebanon: $74 million

Now if that wasn’t enough, keep reading.


Now, this brings us to the question, how come the Obama administration is dolling out U.S. taxpayer dollars to countries and entities which clearly have a anti-US agenda, and are bound by their Islamic ideology to dominate and destroy all but their creed. Obama is certainly a very intelligent man, and he did impress during his election campaign, where he exuded an aura of sincerity and probity. Well, here are some possible scenarios.

  1. He is a actually a Muslim, pretending to be a Christian, who is genuinely trying to help Islamic regimes in their Jihad against the Kafirs, and he himself is a true follower of taqqia.
  2. He is a Christian but has strong sympathies with Muslims and Islam owing to his ancestry and the experiences of his childhood.
  3. He is a Christian with severe leftist leanings, and is only following the call of his leftist philosophies.
  4. He is a Christian, but believes that turning a blind eye to Islamic wrongdoing, and appeasing the bad guys will at some point finally make them see reason, and turn to nice folks like himself.

Unfortunately each of the above scenarios only beget bad news for non-Islamic ideologies and societies, who will in time have to face the bitter fruits of this mindless appeasement.












TimesOfIndia recently brought out a news item [1], on the Polish government approving a law making chemical castration mandatory for pedophiles in some cases.

Included Below are excerpts.

Under the law, sponsored by Poland’s centre-right government, paedophiles convicted of raping children under the age of 15 years or a close relative would have to undergo chemical therapy on their release from prison.


Note the age of 15 years. Again, note the implication of pedophilia being an indication of mental illness.

The American Psychiatric Association defines Pedophilia as:


Now, I would like to talk about the prophet of Islam, Muhammad, and in particular his marriage with Aisha, the daughter of Abu Bakr, a man Muhammad called his brother.

In this regard, lets consider the following hadith.

Volume 7, Book 62, Number 64: Sahih Bukhari Narrated ‘Aisha: that the Prophet married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old, and then she remained with him for nine years (i.e., till his death).[3]

Please bear in mind that Muhammad was more than 50 years of age when he married Aisha. This can be confirmed from the following hadith.

“Sahih Bukhari: Volume 5, Book 59, Number 742:Narrated ‘Aisha: Allah ‘s Apostle died when he was sixty-three years of age. [4]

There are other hadiths as well which corroborate the aforementioned ones.

When Abu Bakr was hesitant to marry off his 6 year old daughter to a 50+ Muhammad, the following Hadith sheds light on what Muhammad said.

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 18: Narrated ‘Ursa: The Prophet asked Abu Bakr for ‘Aisha’s hand in marriage. Abu Bakr said "But I am your brother." The Prophet said, "You are my brother in Allah’s religion and His Book, but she (Aisha) is lawful for me to marry."[5]

Following is a hadith which mentions how Muhammad had fantasies about Aisha even before he married her.

Sahih Bukhari: Volume 7, Book 62, Number 15: Narrated ‘Aisha: Allah’s Apostle said (to me), "You have been shown to me twice in (my) dreams. A man was carrying you in a silken cloth and said to me, ‘This is your wife.’ I uncovered it; and behold, it was you. I said to myself, ‘If this dream is from Allah, He will cause it to come true.’ "[6]

Since Aisha got married to a 50+ Muhammad at the age of 6, a reasonable guess would be that he fantasized about her when she was possibly around 4-5 years of age. But wait! Lets not jump to conclusions. Following is a citation from the book of Sirat Rasul Allah by Ibn Ishak, the most authentic biographer of Muhammad. Most other biographies are based on this monumental work by Ibn Ishak/Ibn Hisham.


In the same context, following is another hadith by Musnad Ahmad.


Clearly, Muhammad’s interest in young girls extended beyond Aisha. As it can be clearly seen Muhammad, Allah’s messenger and the prophet of Islam, not only had uncontrollable urges to have sexual relations with little girls as young as 6 years old, he in fact was mentally ill enough to fantasize about  toddlers.  Why would anyone think that Muhammad’s sexual interest in babies be "the timeless expression of the Will of Allah?" How does such a prurient desire support Muhammad’s claim to be a prophet of Allah? Such a desire by an old man is contrary to nature, and is a perversion against the moral and ethical order of the universe.

It is unacceptable and abhorrent for any person, be it someone claiming to be the messenger of God or not, to lust after little girls and even babies. And therein lies the crux of the issue. Islam itself is based largely on Muhammad being the messenger of Allah and a person worthy of emulation. Who, as per Islamic traditions, lived his live in accordance with the divine injunctions of Allah. Since any attempt to reform Islam would involve admitting to some degree that Muhammad didn’t exactly live the life of a prophet, and furthermore that the divine injunctions aren’t exactly what true divinity would ordain, Muslims adamantly refuse to reform. This lack of reform is again largely consonant with the unquestionable, illogical submission that Islam demands. After all, the literal meaning of Islam in Arabic is submission. Yes, submission to Allah and the ways of his prophet, even if that prophet, if alive today, would have been castrated according to Polish laws for pedophilia.



[2] Diagnostic And Statistical Manual Of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition, American Psychiatric Association, 1994.





[7] Ibn Ishaq, The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ishaq’s Sirat Rasul Allah, translated by A. Guillaume [Oxford University Press, Karachi], p. 311

[8] Musnad Ahmad, Number 25636

Recently I came across a very interesting comment in a blog [1]:

It is important to understand the 3 columns of Islam and the MO of Islamic expansion.

The first column is the pious, peaceful, hardworking, family oriented Muslim believer. These people would be decent friends and neighbors even if they were devil worshipers. These are sincere but profoundly naive people who honestly fail to comprehend the dark side of their religion and turn a blind eye to outrages committed in its name. They are the Muslim vanguard into new territory. They are the smiling faces and extended hand of Islam surrounded by large and growing families as it expands into the west.

The second column is the Muslim organizers. These are those who are committed to the formal expansion and control of territory in host nations. These are the mosque builders, the urban community activists, the first to file lawsuits demanding specific legal accommodations reserved for Muslims. The first to invite the hate preachers into the newly established mosques. These are the ones who drive out the host culture and replace it with Islamic culture, resulting in self segregation of Muslim communities as those of other faiths feel culturally marginalized and leave. The cultural manifestations of Islam are deliberately onerous and intrusive for a reason. That reason is to ensure that Muslim communities are uncomfortable places for non-Muslims to live.

The third column is the Islamic Jihadists. The Jihadists emerge after the two previous columns of Islam have done their work and established homogeneous Muslim communities within which the Jihadists may operate outside the laws and scrutiny of the host nation/culture. The Jihadists actively attack the host society from within on every level; from petty vandalism and street thuggery to 9/11. Every outrage is justified by claiming that if only Muslims were not ‘marginalized’ then the violence would end. Of course, Muslims are by definition ‘marginalized’ until the host society accepts Muslim norms. In a word, the Jihadists work is to impose Sharia law on non-Islamic societies via violence and fear.

That is how it has been done for centuries. It works. Islam exists only to spread and control and no system has ever been devised that is as effective, brutal, efficient and patient in its conquest.

And when Muslims become the majority, they give the host society the ultimatum. Become Muslim, accept Muslims as your absolute overlords, or be killed.

That is the pattern. Read the history of Muslim conquests. It is your future because the west had degenerated into a civilization of gutless worms who think sending their young men to be blown up by roadside bombs and treating the battlefield like a courtroom where every enemy has a lawyer, is ‘war’.

This comment was made by a person called “pongadae”

While the name of the person is not really important, the comment he/she made is chillingly true for the most part. Of all the three columns of Islam, it is the second column which is the most dangerous. Because not only are they completely in cognizance of the true intolerant, bloodthirsty nature of Islam, but more dangerously, they completely subvert that and cloak it under a veneer of legerdemain, as is justified in their totalitarian, deceitful faith. They will very conveniently turn a blind eye to every Islamic act of violence, and the divine injunctions in their creed which extol believers to murder, persecute disbelievers in this life, with the promise of carnal, materialistic pleasures in the after life. While not sparing a moment to cry wolf in the name of secularism, pluralism, etc., when non-Muslims react to Muslims following such despicable, medieval decrees. They continually refuse to introspect as to why is it that 90% of the violence on this planet can be attributed to a particular dogma. And why is it that such actions are divinely ordained in their creed? Is that really a sign of true divinity? However, as I mentioned earlier, they very conveniently turn a blind eye, and adamantly refuse to look within. And when someone raises this, they will immediately start calling them racist, fascist, communal, Nazi, etc., and will use deceit and subterfuge of the worst kind to malign them and will even resort to threats of violence to try and shut them up. Under such circumstances it is easy to see why reform is nearly impossible in their creed. More than the Jihadis, these organizers need to be exposed and brought down in order to put an end to this virulent ideology.



Times of India’s recent front page article [1] on “predatory” Muslims in the state of Kerala running an organized effort to lure, seduce and convert young, gullible non-Muslim (Hindus in particular) girls only brings to the fore yet another serpentine effort by Muslims to use any and all means possible to increase their numbers, as a step towards ultimate domination of their dogma, and eventual extinction of all else.

Included below are excerpts.

Kerala police has constituted a special team to probe charges that jihadis are running an organized racket in the state’s colleges to lure gullible girls in the name of love and then convert them for subsequent use in anti-national activities

When we searched the hostel, we found provocative literature given by the boy from the rooms of the two girls,” the principal said. This was seized by the police who have now extended the probe to other campuses as well they feel this was not an isolated incident. Similar reports have been emerging for quite some time now but were mostly ignored for political reasons, police sources added

Unfortunately this is not only in India. I am sure many people will remember the brutal gang rapes by Muslim Lebanese immigrants in Australia [2]. The monsters who committed this heinous act were in fact 2nd generation Muslim Australians.

Even in Europe sexual preying by Muslims on non-Muslims have reached endemic proportions. In Norway for example, recent statistics show that “While 65 percent of those charged with rape are classed as coming from a non-western background, this segment makes up only 14.3 percent of Oslo’s population. Norwegian women were the victims in 80 percent of the cases, with 20 percent being women of foreign background[3]. In Bradford, England, Channel 4 [4] pulled a documentary about Pakistani and other Muslim men sexually abusing white English girls, some as young as 11.






I would like to start this blog with a Sanskrit sloka from the Bhagavat Gita, Book IV, Sutra 5, 7, 8:

yada yada hi dharmasya
glanir bhavati bharata
abhyutthanam adharmasya
tadatmanam srjamy aham
paritranaya sadhunam
vinasaya ca duskrtam
sambhavami yuge yuge

Translation from ‘Bhagavad Gita As It is":

A slightly different translation [1] is:

Whenever there is a withering of the law
and an uprising of lawlessness on all sides,
then I manifest Myself.

For the salvation of the righteous
and the destruction of such as do evil,
for the firm establishing of the Law,
I come to birth, age after age.

Why did I chose this particular sloka?

Watch this space…