Google Wants 1 Million Driverless Miles

October 24th, 2011

Inside a driverless car

Remember when Google was just a search engine?






Google driverless carGoogle co-founder Sergey Brin announced that Google’s next goal for its driverless cars is to go 1 million miles without driver intervention. According to Brin, the company has already “driven” over 1,000 miles without any driver involvement.

We’ve reported here before on Google’s driverless cars. With some limited human input and the power of Google’s software, the cars have gone about 160,000 miles.

Google would like to reach a point where it’s legal for driverless cars to flow alongside everyday traffic. Before the technology can be marketable, though, Google says it needs to be developed to a point where human drivers can ignore the road entirely.

And that, frankly, sucks. Why would we want to ignore the road? The road is what gives us freedom and the choices to go wherever we please. Our lives are becoming so dictated by technology that we’re going to lose the great spontaneity that makes us interesting. Driverless cars will just contribute to creating a society where humans are mindless beings shuffled between locations while having conversations with the computerized woman in our iPhones. Or worse.

Maybe Google should use all the money it’s dumping into driverless cars for initiatives to get people interacting with one another. If it wants to influence the automotive realm, maybe it could contribute to racing safety.

It just seems like Google could do something great with its influence and its limitless cash. But driverless cars? They don’t make me feel lucky.

Do you think Google should develop driverless cars?


Find Used Cars in Your Area at CarGurus

Be Sociable, Share!

  1. Randy
    October 24th, 2011 at 07:46 | #1

    Having been involved in some of the first experiments in autonomous vehicles, including such technology as drive by wire, lane keeping and departure warning, active steering, radar braking, I can tell you something that google won’t: They only tell you about the success, and they don’t tell you how they generate these driverless miles. Of course they hand select the roads and the testing conditions, and don’t tell you about the problems. And are they truly driverless miles? Having someone sitting there ready to take over when the system screws up is not truly driverless. It’s an intersting technology, but given that around 35,000 Amercians die in accidents every year, not to mention the hundreds of thousands of injuries and millions of fender benders, I’d say operating a vehicle in real conditions is a pretty complex task. Since humans have some diffculty with driving, even though they possess a processing and optical system that is far more complex and capable than anything you can duplicate with a machine. There are some opportunities for some level of automated vehicle guidance, such as expressways or trunklines.

  1. No trackbacks yet.