Why God is Cruciform

From: George Hammond (ghammond@mediaone.net)
Date: Mon Aug 27 2001 - 16:36:42 EDT

  • Next message: bivalve: "tripods"

            ...and how it causes the "cruciform"
            shape of the Human Body and results
            in the scientific proof of God (SPOG)

    ...........As an
    example, many PhD's in Physics are familiar with General Relativity,
    but few of them can tell you why real space is Riemannian (i.e. has
    a quadratic, "square", metric), and of course, this is one of the most
    fundamental questions underlying General Relativity in the first place.
    In fact, it is the answer to "why there are no 3-legged animals".
      As an example of what you have to know in order to understand a
    simple fact such as why there are "no 3-legged animals" is the fact

                   IN NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

    Now, for the amateur, let me point out that the terms:

                    Euclidean Space
                    Cartesian Space
                    Pythagorean Space
                    Riemannian Space

    ALL MEAN THE SAME THING vis a vis one fundamental fact:

                    They all refer to spaces that
                    have a "homogeneous quadratic

    The simplest example of a "homogenous quadratic metric" is simple
    Euclidean space:

                dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean theorem)

    Note that this is the equation for a SQUARE. The Pythagorean
    Theorem is just the equation for the diagonal of a SQUARE or a CUBE.
    This is why we say space is "square"... simply because this law is
    known to hold true in real space.
      All 4 of the above spaces are referred to as "Riemannian" for
    this reason. Euclidean space is merely a special case of
    a Riemannian space that has zero curvature (flat space).
      However, there are non-Riemannian spaces. For instance if
    you define the line element to be:

                dR^3 = dX^3 + dY^3 + dZ^3

    this is a NON-RIEMANNIAN METRIC (it is not a quadratic form).

    Interestingly, HELMHOLTZ apparently was the first to show that:

                    YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
                    IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE:

    See: http://www.bun.kyoto-u.ac.jp/~suchii/R&H.html

    This was later proven rigorously by Weyl and others.
    For instance Weyl in _Space, Time & Matter_ (1920)
    discusses in the closing pages of Ch.II, Riemann's
    famous remark that:

        The metric of real space "might be a homogenous
        function of the 4th order in the differentials,
        or even a function built up in some other way,
        and that it might not even depend rationally on
        the differentials."

          (Weyl, quoting Riemann, idid ChII, pp 138-148)

    Weyl goes on to demonstrate that the "rotation group" requires that
    the metric be a QUADRATIC form, and has proven this for 3 dimensions
    (the case under discussion here).
      Finally of course, for the benefit of eager PhD's in physics lest
    they make the same amateur error Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx has recently made,
    "curvature" is not the issue here, the existence of a "quadratic
    metric" is the issue. Any space that DOES NOT HAVE a quadratic
    metric is non-Riemannian, and of interest, is the fact that:

                    YOU CANNOT ROTATE A SOLID BODY
                    IN A NON-RIEMANNIAN SPACE

    This of course, tells us WHY "Real Space" has to be Riemannian.
    Incidentally, also included in the definition of Riemannian, is
    the fact that the metric, even when there is curvature present,
    MUST reduce to a pure Euclidean quadratic for small distances.
    This is a fundamental theorem in general Relativity where it is
    known as the "Equivalence Principle".
      At any rate, getting back to the matter of "why there are no
    3-legged animals", what we see is the following. First, real
    space is Riemannian, which means that it is Euclidean to first
    order. Real (3D) space, locally obeys the Pythagorean theorem
    (and we have just finished explaining WHY):

                    dR^2 = dX^2 + dY^2 +dZ^2 (Pythagorean Theorem)
    Now, it is well known that several simple "Coordinate systems" can
    be constructed in such a space:

    Cartesian coordinates
    Polar coordinates
    Cylindrical coordinates
    Spherical coordinates

    and all of them obey the "quadratic metrical law" of REAL SPACE.
      Now here comes the interesting part. A MACHINE it turns out
    (in it's simplest form) is nothing more than a "mechanical
    coordinate system". Which means that all "simple machines" that
    we see are generally one of the above 4 mechanical structures.
    For instance we all remember being told about "simple machines"
    in grade school:

    Lever = 1-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
    Pulley = Polar coordinate machine
    Screw = Cylindrical coordinate machine
    Wheel = Polar coordinate machine

    We see that the "simple machines" are all simple mechanical
    models of the fundamental (Euclidean) "coordinate systems".
    The same holds for more complicated machines:

    Gears = Polar coordinate machine
    Jib boom = Spherical coordinate machine
    Ball bearing = Spherical coordinate machine
    Airplane = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine
    Human Body = 3-axis Cartesian coordinate machine

    OBVIOUSLY, the most common of all is the "Cartesian machine"
    or SQUARE-MACHINE. Cartesian coordinates may also be called
    "cruciform coordinates", in fact we see, that the Cross of
    Christianity is nothing more than the "Cartesian coordinate
    system" itself. And, as histories number one Psychology instruction,
    a Jewish person has been traditionally nailed to it for 2,000 years
    to dramatically demonstrate the Cartesian geometry of the human body,
    brain, Psychology, and God to the ignorant and terrified Pagan
    population. Let us hope, after the establishment of the scientific
    explanation of God, this historical abomination can be removed
    from the True Cross perhaps by Vatican decree.
      For instance a t.v., typewriter, airplane, even a fish,
    are all "Cartesian machines":


    Obviously, the CARTESIAN MACHINE or SQUARE-MACHINE is the
    simplest kind of machine to mechanically construct. It is
    for this reason that the BODY PLAN of all living things, both
    plants and animals* is Cartesian (Square). Life forms, that
    is Plants and Animals are "Cartesian Machines", and this
    notably includes HUMAN BEINGS.


    Vertebrate body:
    (Note orthogonality of Medial, Transverse and Horizontal
    septums which intersect at right angles to form the 3
    Cartesian body axes of the generalized vertebrate body plan)

    (Note 3-Cartesian axes of the human body, Spinal,
    Bilateral, Dorso-ventral)

      Because of this, all of the higher Animal Phyla are BILATERAL.
    (7 out of 9 Phyla) in fact only the two lowest animal Phyla
    (jellyfish) which are after all "legless" animals to begin with,
    are not Bilateral (they are radial). Any animal with "legs" is
    Cartesian and therefore Bilateral, and the "legs" will appear in
    Bilateral pairs. Starfish actually have a bilateral larval form.
    Therefore, there "is no such thing as a 3-legged animal". The
    "Cartesian Body Plan" cannot produce such a thing, and furthermore,
    it defies the "quadratic geometry" of the space which produced the
    "Cartesian Animal' in the first place. In a bilateral or "cartesian"
    machine standing in a plane, 4 is the minimum number of legs that
    will produce stability. 3 is not possible because bilateral
    symmetry (cartesian symmetry) is imposed.
      Now, beyond all this, what we see is that the "geometric properties
    of space itself" are the CAUSAL FORCE that determines the geometrical
    shape of the human body. Because of this, it turns out that the
    "geometrical shape of the brain" is also determined and is found to
    be "3-axis Cartesian" in SHAPE (notice I said SHAPE, not volume).
    The Brain actually has 3-Axes of mechanical symmetry, just like
    the Body:

    Human Brain:

    (Note the mirror symmetric motor-sensory map of
    the body in the brain in the above two URL's)
    The structure of the brain is "3-axis Cartesian"
    because of this, and produces a 3-axis Cartesian
    structure in Psychometry eigenvector space)

      Ultimately, this leads to a 3-Axis Cartesian structure in Psychometry
    (eigenvector space), see:


    And therefore, we see that the whole mathematical
    geometry of PSYCHOLOGY is caused by the mathematical geometry of
    REAL SPACE itself.
      Finally, in one of the most stunning developments of modern
    science, Hammond (1994, 1997) has discovered that because REAL
    SPACE causes the structure of PSYCHOLOGY SPACE, that there is
    a "curvature" in psychometry space which is caused by the
    "curvature" of REAL SPACE. And to sum it all up, since this
    curvature in psychometry Space is easily and IMMEDIATELY
    identified as "God", we see that "Gravity is the cause of God".
    IOW, the scientific proof of God has been discovered.
      Now as you can see, God is not about to be readily understood by a
    layman. A layman cannot even figure out why there are no "3-legged"
    animals! If Dr. Xxxxxx Xxxxxx is any example, a run of the mill PhD
    in Physics can not even understand it.
      Finally, lest anyone get the idea that this discovery only points to
    some exotic relativistic quantity that cannot really be demonstrated
    to be "God", let me point out that Gravitational Curvature is only
    the "ultimate" explanation of God, in fact, the Secular Trend in brain
    growth turns out to be the direct-biological cause of God. In other
    words, as Sir Roger Penrose pointed out in _Shadows of the Mind_
    (1994), Gravitational Curvature on the quantum level ('brain gravity')
    mediates brain growth itself and mediates both the Secular Trend and
    the Flynn Effect. Brain growth (percentagewise) can be easily seen
    to provide a compelling and elementary explanation of the history
    of "God" and an explanation of the Bible, miracles, revelation,
    Creation, Heaven, Eternal Life, etc. etc. This understanding is well
    within the grasp of scientific layman, even if they can't understand how
    "Gravity" causes it.
      So, the message remains, for any one who is actually seriously
    interested in whether there is a God or not, that- The scientific
    proof that there is an ACTUAL REAL GOD has been discovered, found to
    be an axiomatic law of Physics, and has been experimentally confirmed.

    *This statement refers to "multicellular"
     plants and animals, not bacteria, virus' etc.

    Be sure to visit my website below, and please ask your 
    news service provider to add  alt.sci.proof-of-god 
    George Hammond, M.S. Physics 
    Email:    ghammond@mediaone.net 
    Website:  http://people.ne.mediaone.net/ghammond/index.html 

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Aug 27 2001 - 16:28:09 EDT