Animal Cognition

, Volume 10, Issue 3, pp 305–315 | Cite as

Spider monkey ranging patterns in Mexican subtropical forest: do travel routes reflect planning?

Original Paper


Although it is well known that frugivorous spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) occupy large home ranges, travelling long distances to reach highly productive resources, little is known of how they move between feeding sites. A 11 month study of spider monkey ranging patterns was carried out at the Otochma’ax Yetel Kooh reserve, Yucatán, Mexico. We followed single individuals for as long as possible each day and recorded the routes travelled with the help of a GPS (Global Positioning System) device; the 11 independently moving individuals of a group were targeted as focal subjects. Travel paths were composed of highly linear segments, each typically ending at a place where some resource was exploited. Linearity of segments did not differ between individuals, and most of the highly linear paths that led to food resources were much longer than the estimate visibility in the woodland canopy. Monkeys do not generally continue in the same ranging direction after exploiting a resource: travel paths are likely to deviate at the site of resource exploitation rather than between such sites. However, during the harshest months of the year consecutive route segments were more likely to retain the same direction of overall movement. Together, these findings suggest that while moving between feeding sites, spider monkeys use spatial memory to guide travel, and even plan more than one resource site in advance.


Ateles Spider monkey Spatial knowledge Route planning Mental maps 


  1. Altmann J (1974) Observational study of behavior: sampling methods. Behaviour 49:227–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Batschelet E (1981) Circular statistics in biology. Academic, LondonGoogle Scholar
  3. Boinski S (1987) Habitat use by squirrel monkeys (Saimiri oerstedi) in Costa Rica. Folia Primatol 49:151–167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chapman CA, Wrangham RW, Chapman LJ (1995) Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 36:59–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cunningham E, Janson C (2007) A socioecological perspective on primate cognition, past and present. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0078-3Google Scholar
  6. Di Fiore A, Suarez SA (2007) Route-based travel and shared routes in sympatric spider and woolly monkeys: cognitive evolutionary implications. Anim Cogn. doi:s10.1007/s10071-007-0067-xGoogle Scholar
  7. Etienne AS, Berlie J, Georgakopoulos J, Maurer R (1998) Role of dead reckoning in navigation. In: Healy S (ed) Spatial representations in animals, Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 54–68Google Scholar
  8. Fedigan LM, Baxter MJ (1984) Sex differences and social organization in free-ranging spider monkeys (Ateles geoffroyi). Primates 25:279–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garber PA (2000) Evidence for the use of spatial, temporal and social information by some primate foragers. In: Boinski S, Garber P (eds) On the move. How and why animals travel in groups, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 165–203Google Scholar
  10. Gibeault S, MacDonald SE (2000) Spatial memory and foraging competition in captive western lowland gorillas (Gorilla gorilla gorilla). Primates 41:147–160CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janson CH (1998) Experimental evidence for spatial memory in foraging wild capuchin monkeys, Cebus apella. Anim Behav 55:1229–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Janson C (2000) Spatial movement strategies: theory, evidence and challenges. In: Boinski S, Garber P (eds) On the move. How and why animals travel in groups, The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp 165–203Google Scholar
  13. Janson CH, Byrne R (2007) Understanding resource cognition in wild primates—opening the black box. Anim Cogn. doi:10.1007/s10071-007-0080-9Google Scholar
  14. Janson CH, Di Bitetti MS (1997) Experimental analysis of food detection in capuchin monkeys: effects of distance, travel speed, and resource size. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 41:17–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ludvig N, Tang HM, Echenbaum H, Gohil BC (2003) Spatial memory performance of freely moving squirrel monkeys. Behav Brain Res 140:175–183PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. MacDonald SE (1994) Gorillas’ (Gorilla gorilla gorilla) spatial memory in a foraging task. J Comp Psychol 108:107–113PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacDonald SE, Agnes MM (1999) Orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii) spatial memory and behavior in a foraging task. J Comp Psychol 113:213–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. MacDonald SE, Pang JC, Gibeault S (1994) Marmoset (Callithrix jacchus jacchus) spatial memory in a foraging task: win-stay versus win-shift strategies. J Comp Psychol 108:328–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Menzel EW (1973) Chimpanzee spatial memory organization. Science 182:943–945CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Menzel CR, Savage-Rumbaugh SE, Menzel Jr EW (2002) Bonobo (Pan paniscus) spatial memory and communication in a 20-hectare forest. Int J Primatol 23:601–619CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ramos-Fernández G, Boyer D, Gómez VP (2006) A complex social structure with fission–fusion properties can emerge from a simple foraging model. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 60:536–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Symington MM (1988) Demography, ranging patterns, and activity budgets of the black spider monkeys (Ateles paniscus chamak) in the Manu National Park, Peru. Amen J Primatol 15:45–67Google Scholar
  23. van Roosmalen MGM, Klein LL (1988) The spider monkeys, Genus Ateles. In: Mittermeier RA, Rylands AB, Coimbra-Filho AF, da Fonseca GAB (eds) Ecology and behaviour of neotropical primates, vol 2. WWF-US, Washington DC, pp 455–537Google Scholar
  24. van Schaik CP, van Noordwijk MA (1986) Scramble and contest in feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis). Behaviour 105:77–98Google Scholar
  25. Tolman EC (1948) Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 55:189–208CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Valero A (2004) Spider monkey (Ateles geoffroyi yucatanensis) travel patterns in a subtropical forest of Yucatán, México. PhD dissertation, University of St Andrews, ScotlandGoogle Scholar
  27. Wallace DG, Whishaw IQ (2003) NMDA lesions of Ammon’s horn and the dentate gyrus disrupt the direct and temporally paced homing displayed by rats exploring a novel environment: evidence for a role of the hippocampus in dead reckoning. Eur J Neurosci 18:513–523PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scottish Primate Research Group and Centre for Social Learning and Cognitive EvolutionUniversity of St AndrewsSt Andrews, FifeScotland
  2. 2.School of PsychologyUniversity of St AndrewsSt Andrews, FifeScotland

Personalised recommendations