Blog Archive

Friday, January 6, 2012

Call for Arctic geoengineering as soon as possible -- see comment by John Nissen

Call for Arctic geoengineering as soon as possible

by Peter Aldhous, NewScientist, December 12, 2011

It's the most urgent call for geoengineering yet: begin cooling the Arctic by 2013 or face runaway global warming. But the warning – from a voice on the scientific fringe – may be premature, according to experts contacted by New Scientist.
John Nissen, a former software engineer who has become alarmed at the possibility of reaching a climate "tipping point" argued for Arctic geoengineering as soon as possible in a poster presentation at the American Geophysical Union meeting in San Francisco last week.
"We've got to pull out all the stops to prevent a runaway situation," Nissen says. He suggests using stratospheric aerosols to cool the surface and subsurface below, or increasing the reflectance of low-level clouds by pumping a fine spray of salt water into them.
Although Nissen's opinion is not in the scientific mainstream, he has the backing of a leading expert on sea ice, Peter Wadhams of the University of Cambridge, who recently suggested that the Arctic ocean may be ice-free at the end of each summer from 2015 onwards. Wadhams says that accelerating climate change in the Arctic has forced him to abandon his scepticism about geoengineering. "One has to consider doing something," he says.

Gas leak

As the Arctic loses its shield of ice in the summer months, shallow waters over the east Siberian Arctic continental shelf will warm to several degrees above freezing. This is the largest continental shelf on the planet, covering 2.1 million square kilometres, and the sea above it is just 50 metres deep on average. The seabed consists largely of methane-rich permafrost, which began to be submerged about 8,000 years ago, as the sea level rose following the last ice age. Without a protective cap of sea ice over the shallow water, the permafrost will warm rapidly and release huge amounts of methane, Nissen fears.
Nissen's alarm about catastrophic methane release stems in part from the findings of a team led by Natalia Shakhova of the International Arctic Research Center at the University of Alaska Fairbanks. Last year she reported large amounts of methane bubbling from the east Siberian Arctic shelf.

Ice-free when?

However, both the sea-ice projections and the fears about catastrophic methane releases are shrouded in uncertainty. Wieslaw Maslowski of the Naval Postgraduate School in Monterey, California, has developed a regional model that suggests an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the end of the summer from 2016 onwards. But global climate models suggest that this won't happen until 2030 at the earliest.
One contributor to the Arctic Sea Ice Blog, meanwhile, has fitted exponential curves to data on ice volume and projected forward to get a date of 2015 for the complete loss of late-summer sea ice. The problem is that other curves fit the data similarly well, but give much later dates when extrapolated forward. "If you pick one curve over another, I'd like to see a good reason for doing so," says Axel Schweiger of the University of Washington in Seattle.

Uncertainty analysis

It's also unclear how much methane, in total, is bubbling from the east Siberian Arctic shelf – and whether the methane release observed by Shakhova and her colleagues is due to present warming or is the result of the permafrost slowly melting since it was inundated beginning eight millennia ago. "There are still more questions than answers," says Igor Semiletov, a member of the team.
What's more, says Euan Nisbet of Royal Holloway, University of London, it seems that the largest current releases of methane are coming from the southern hemisphere tropics, rather than the Arctic.
Given the uncertainties, Nissen's proposal seems unlikely to take off. However, it heightens the need for governments to develop guidelines for future geoengineering that may become necessary. "There is very much an urgent need to addresses governance issues," says Tim Kruger of the University of Oxford, part of a team that has developed a "code of conduct" for geoengineering research.

Why Geoengineering So Soon

Tue Dec 13 02:41:22 GMT 2011 by John Nissen
Dear Peter Aldhous,

I need to explain the simple chain of reasoning behind the call for geoengineering by 2013, and why it is ridiculous to suggest that it is premature when, if anything, it may be too late.

As Peter Wadhams agrees, geoengineering to cool the Arctic is the only possible way to halt the sea ice retreat. Even with geoengineering it may prove impossible, but the later we leave it, the less likely we are to succeed. Once the Arctic Ocean has been practically sea ice free at the end of summer, all the ice formed over the following winter will be young ice and easily melted the following spring and summer. Therefore we have to try our hardest not to get to this point, because it could be the point of no return to a cooler Arctic. Past this point and the Arctic will be warming faster than ever from the absorption of sunlight in the open water where the ice had been. This warming is liable to thaw sub-sea permafrost holding back vast stores of methane in the continental shelf regions that Natalia Shakhova and Igor Semiletov have studied. Methane is already seen to be bubbling out from the seabed.

Now methane is a potent greenhouse gas. Release of only a small percentage of this sub-sea methane could cause sufficient warming to trigger further methane release and further warming in a runaway process, akin to what is thought to have happened in the PETM extinction event, 55 million years ago, when the global temperature rose many degrees. We simply have to do all we can to prevent such a process getting underway as it would be unstoppable. So first we have to halt the sea ice retreat.

Considering simple logistics, the earliest conceivable time to start applying geoengineering cooling technologies would be spring 2013, which is why I am urging governments to back an emergency action plan for geoengineering with that target date.

To me it seems common sense to do our utmost to prevent reaching a point of no return – a point beyond which runaway global warming could be inevitable.

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

are the rouge scientists risking the Venus syndrome?