Microplastics choking the ocean


By Jessica Aldred  /  The Guardian

Sat, Dec 07, 2013 - Page 9

Microplastic particles, measuring less than 5mm in size, have been accumulating in the oceans since the 1960s and are now the most abundant form of solid-waste pollution on Earth.

Two UK-based studies published in the journal Current Biology looked at whether these near-invisible microscopic plastics that sink into mud and sand in high concentrations are causing harm to species at the base of the food chain, as these species ingest the sediment during feeding and play a key ecological role as a source of food for other animals.

Using the lugworm as an indicator species, the first study, from the University of Exeter, found that worms feeding in highly contaminated ocean sediment ate less and had lower energy levels. The second study, from Plymouth University, established for the first time that ingesting microplastics can transfer pollutants and additives to worms, reducing health and biodiversity.

Ingestion of microplastics by species at the base of the food web is a cause for concern as little has been known about its effects until now. Many other organisms that have similar feeding behavior, such as starfish, sea cucumbers and fiddler crabs, may be similarly affected.

Lugworms are common invertebrates widely found across the entire north Atlantic, living in burrows in the sand of beaches. They eat sand particles, digesting microorganisms and nutrients and passing the sand as waste through their tail, leaving a distinctive trail or “cast” on the beach. The worm can make up about 30 percent of the biomass of an average sandy beach, making it an important source of food for wading birds and flatfish.

The “earthworms of the sea,” lugworms provide another important ecosystem service by turning over large volumes of sand, replenishing organic material and oxygenating the upper layers to keep the sediment healthy for other animals and microorganisms to thrive in.

Microplastics can be made from polyethylene, polyethylene terephthalate, PVC or polystyrene. They are too small to be captured through existing wastewater treatment processes and wash directly into the ocean.

They fall into three categories: the raw material called “nurdles” that are melted down to make larger plastic items or used as exfoliating beads in cosmetic products, or larger pieces of plastic that have degraded and broken down into smaller particles over time. Microplastics are also found as fibers and have been traced back to synthetic textiles like polyester that are used to make clothes, which can release up to 1,900 tiny fibers per garment each time they are washed.

Microplastics carry a complex mix of chemicals which have the potential to harm the worms, the research showed. Many plastics contain chemical additives such as plasticizers, dyes, and antimicrobials, which can leach out into sediment and seawater. Microplastics also concentrate waterborne chemicals on their surfaces, such as pesticides and detergents.

There has been much campaigning around the impact of larger marine plastic pollution, with widely documented instances of fish and bird entanglement, ingestion and suffocation. But particles of this microscopic size affect a much broader range of marine organisms that ingest and retain the tiny plastic particles and then act as prey for larger species.

The first study, by Stephanie Wright from the University of Exeter, put worms into laboratory tanks with varying levels of plastics contamination for up to one month, measuring their growth, physiology, survival and ability to gain weight. She found that lugworms feeding in sediment highly contaminated with microplastics put on less weight than worms in clean sediment and had less energy to invest in key processes such as growth and reproduction. These effects could cause populations to decline with later effects on predators, the paper showed.



