﻿ Macro-Evolution Myth, The

Macro-Evolution Myth, The

Enlarge video

Evolutionists refer to the variety or variation within species as "micro-evolution" and to the hypothesis of the formation of new species as "macro-evolution." Evolutionists seek to give the impression that micro-evolution is a scientific fact that which everyone agrees on, and that macro-evolution is a result of micro-evolution spread out over a longer time frame. Above all, the point that needs to be emphasized is that there is no such process as micro-evolution.

As we've already seen, evolutionists try to create the impression that variation within species is an evolutionary process by giving it the name of "micro-evolution." In fact, however, that this is an attempt to validate the concept of evolution by using an expression containing the word. Variation consists of the emergence of various dominant genetic combinations as a result of geographic isolation of individuals in a given species. But even with extreme variation, no new information is added to that species' gene pool. Therefore, no such process as evolution has taken place. (See The Micro-evolution Myth.)

The second distortion is the claim that macro-evolution-in other words, development of one species into another-comes about as the accumulation of micro-evolutions over a long time. Yet when one realizes that there is no such thing as micro-evolution, the supposed basis for macro-evolution disappears. If no such process as micro-evolution ever takes place, macro-evolution must logically be eliminated too.



24. Roger Lewin, "Evolutionary Theory Under Fire," Science, Vol. 210, 21 November, 1980, p. 883.
2009-08-15 17:28:03
© 1994 Harun Yahya. www.harunyahya.com - info@harunyahya.com