Consumer Acceptance of Insects as Food: Integrating Psychological and Socio-cultural Perspectives

  • Hui Shan Grace Tan
  • Jonas House


Although interest in the use of insects as food is growing in Europe and the US (the “West”), Western insect consumption remains far from widespread. Western resistance to entomophagy is often contrasted with the favourable position of edible insects in other regions, but little scholarship thus far has engaged with the question of why this difference exists. Drawing mainly on two qualitative studies, we compare the factors affecting insect consumption in contexts where it is both established (northeast Thailand) and where it is not (the Netherlands). We argue that the integration of different disciplinary perspectives elucidates the complexity of consumer acceptance, which goes beyond simple “willingness to eat” insects. Our research shows that the positioning of insects as an appreciated, regularly consumed food is the result of the intersection of a broad range of psychological, socio-cultural, practical and contextual factors. In addition to the commonly discussed psychological factors, regular insect consumption is determined by previous experience, culinary knowledge, wider cultural associations, established routines of food provisioning and eating, and the availability, price, form and taste of products. We suggest both demand-side factors (changing consumer perceptions) and supply-side factors (creating tasty, usable, distinctive and accessible products) are equally important to gaining consumer acceptance. We also emphasise that initial motivations to eat insects and repeated consumption are different things, and that there is a need to distinguish between the two in future scholarly and commercial efforts.



Jonas House’s research received funding from the Economic and Social Research Council, grant number ES/J500215/1. Hui Shan Grace Tan’s research received funding from the IP/OP Customized Nutrition programme financed by Wageningen University & Research Centre.


  1. Alba JW, Hutchinson JW (1987) Dimensions of consumer expertise. J Consum Res 13:411–454CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Baker MA, Shin JT, Kim YW (2016) An exploration and investigation of edible insect consumption: the impacts of image and description on risk perceptions and purchase intent. Psychol Mark 33:94–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Banović M, Fontes MA, Barreira MM, Grunert KG (2012) Impact of product familiarity on beef quality perception. Agribusiness 28:157–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarke N, Cloke P, Barnett C, Malpass A (2008) The spaces and ethics of organic food. J Rural Stud 24:219–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. DeFoliart GR (1999) Insects as food: why the western attitude is important. Annu Rev Entomol 44:21–50CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Dick A, Chakravarti D, Biehal G (1990) Memory-based inferences during consumer choice. J Consum Res 17:82–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Distrifood (2016) Marktaandelen. In: Distrifood. Accessed 22 Nov 2016
  8. Evans J, Alemu MH, Flore R et al (2015) “Entomophagy”: an evolving term in need of review. J Insects Food Feed 1:293–305CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gmuer A, Guth JN, Hartmann C, Siegrist M (2016) Effects of the degree of processing of insect ingredients in snacks on expected emotional experiences and willingness to eat. Food Qual Prefer 54:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Halkier B, Jensen I (2011) Methodological challenges in using practice theory in consumption research. Examples from a study on handling nutritional contestations of food consumption. J Consum Cult 11:101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halloran A, Flore R, Mercier C (2015) Notes from the “Insects in a gastronomic context” workshop in Bangkok, Thailand. J Insects Food Feed 1:241–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Halloran A, Roos N, Eilenberg J, Cerutti A, Bruun S (2016a) Life cycle assessment of edible insects for food protein: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 36:57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Halloran A, Roos N, Flore R, Hanboonsong Y (2016b) The development of the edible cricket industry in Thailand. J Insects Food Feed 2:91–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanboonsong Y (2010) Edible insects and associated food habits in Thailand. In: Durst PB, Johnson DV, Leslie RN, Shono K (eds) Edible forest insects: humans bite back. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Bangkok, pp 173–182Google Scholar
  15. Hartmann C, Shi J, Giusto A, Siegrist M (2015) The psychology of eating insects: a cross-cultural comparison between Germany and China. Food Qual Prefer 44:148–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. House J (2015) Books in review: the insect cookbook: food for a sustainable planet. Gastronomica 15:85–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. House J (2016) Consumer acceptance of insect-based foods in the Netherlands: academic and commercial implications. Appetite 107:47–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. House J (forthcoming) Are insects animals? The ethical position of insects in Dutch vegetarian diets. In: Linzey A, Linzey C (eds) Ethical vegetarianism and veganism. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  19. Lensvelt EJ, Steenbekkers LPA (2014) Exploring consumer acceptance of entomophagy: a survey and experiment in Australia and the Netherlands. Ecol Food Nutr 53:543–561CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Looy H, Dunkel FV, Wood JR (2014) How then shall we eat? Insect-eating attitudes and sustainable foodways. Agric Hum Values 31:131–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lundy ME, Parrella MP (2015) Crickets are not a free lunch: protein capture from scalable organic side-streams via high-density populations of Acheta domesticus. PLoS One 10:e0118785CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Martins Y, Pliner P (2005) Human food choices: An examination of the factors underlying acceptance/rejection of novel and familiar animal and nonanimal foods. Appetite 45(3):214–224CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Nonaka K (2009) Feasting on insects. Entomol Res 39:304–312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Oonincx DG, de Boer IJ (2012) Environmental impact of the production of mealworms as a protein source for humans – a life cycle assessment. PLoS One 7:e51145CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Raffles H (2010) Insectopedia. Pantheon Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  26. Ramos-Elorduy BJ (1997) The importance of edible insects in the nutrition and economy of people of the rural areas of Mexico. Ecol Food Nutr 36:347–366CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Riggi LG, Veronesi M, Goergen G, MacFarlane C, Verspoor RL (2016) Observations of entomophagy across Benin – practices and potentials. Food Secur 8:139–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. RTV Rijnmond (2014) Eetbare insecten in schappen supermarkt R’dam. In: RTV Rijnmond. Accessed 22 Nov 2016
  29. Ruby MB, Rozin P, Chan C (2015) Determinants of willingness to eat insects in the USA and India. J Insects Food Feed 1:215–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Shelomi M (2015) Why we still don’t eat insects: assessing entomophagy promotion through a diffusion of innovations framework. Trends Food Sci Technol 45:311–318CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Sleenhoff S, Osseweijer P (2013) Consumer choice: linking consumer intentions to actual purchase of GM labeled food products. GM Crops Food 4:166–171CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Tan HSG, Fischer ARH, Tinchan P, Stieger M, Steenbekkers LPA, van Trijp HCM (2015) Insects as food: exploring cultural exposure and individual experience as determinants of acceptance. Food Qual Prefer 42:78–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Tan HSG, Fischer ARH, van Trijp HCM, Stieger M (2016a) Tasty but nasty? Exploring the role of sensory-liking and food appropriateness in the willingness to eat unusual novel foods like insects. Food Qual Prefer 48:293–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Tan HSG, van den Berg E, Stieger M (2016b) The influence of product preparation, familiarity and individual traits on the consumer acceptance of insects as food. Food Qual Prefer 52:222–231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Tan HSG, Verbaan YT, Stieger M (2017) How do better products improve the sensory-liking and willingness to buy insect-based foods? Food Res Int 92:95–105CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Tucker CA (2014) The significance of sensory appeal for reduced meat consumption. Appetite 81:168–179CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Verbeke W (2015) Profiling consumers who are ready to adopt insects as a meat substitute in a Western society. Food Qual Prefer 39:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verneau F, La Barbera F, Kolle S, Amato M, Del Giudice T, Grunert K (2016) The effect of communication and implicit associations on consuming insects: an experiment in Denmark and Italy. Appetite 106:30–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Warde A (2016) The practice of eating. Polity Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  40. Yen AL (2009) Edible insects: traditional knowledge or western phobia? Entomol Res 39:289–298CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hui Shan Grace Tan
    • 1
  • Jonas House
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Food Quality and DesignWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Sociology of Consumption and HouseholdsWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  3. 3.Department of GeographyUniversity of SheffieldSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations